« first day (2265 days earlier)      last day (2679 days later) » 

5:00 PM
whats happening!?!?!
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Yeah
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform just popped in to see if I could make sense of a conversation that had drifted into the tex.stackexchange chat:-)
 
y'all want to do this sort of unholy hacking, do it on the tex.se chatroom
 
@DavidZ There was a mention in the TeX-sx chatroom that something interesting was going on
 
@JohnRennie Not so much hacking as rendering it unusable (at least for people with ChatJax++)
 
5:00 PM
oh god Im so happy am a part of this
 
(like myself)
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform yep =D
 
Ohh right... I forgot to rejoin that room
 
@JosephWright @DavidCarlisle We are working on breaking chatjax
We want help
 
All thanks to @BernardoMeurer for introducing everyone to \newcommand
 
5:01 PM
lol
 
Congrats, you broke the world
 
@BernardoMeurer, please do try Ackermann
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform I was busy writing this answer so I didn't keep track on what's going on here and now...this, whatever this is
 
bernard is not the first guy who introduce newcommand to this chat. It is danielsank who first done that 1 years ago according to chat logs
 
@BernardoMeurer To be fair, MathJax is a fairly "crippled" version of (La)TeX. You can't break it too badly.
 
5:02 PM
@ACuriousMind who cares about Hamiltonians? were making history here
 
@DavidZ I HEAR A CHALLENGE
4
 
people will reference the mathjaxx apocalypse for centuries
 
I, for one, just deactivated MathJax for the time being :P
 
@DavidZ Look what you've done
 
@DanielSank LET'S BREAK IT
 
5:03 PM
What's going on in here?
 
$\mathbb{SO}\; \mathbf{LET}\;\mathbb{US}\; \mathbf{CONTINUE}$
2
and break chatjax
@DanielSank madness, wonderful madness
 
@ACuriousMind Er, it still works
 
@DanielSank your \newcommand result in h bar being broken, lol
 
$\renewcommand{\mathbb}{\text{\Huge BREAK IT}}$
 
Et tu, @heather?
 
5:03 PM
@BernardoMeurer Oh god
 
I'm letting this happen on the assumption that people get bored of it soon enough
 
anyone knows how to code a while-do with mathjax?
 
@DanielSank yep
 
@DavidZ so naive
 
a simple while(1) \partial should do the trick
 
5:04 PM
@SirCumference wat? I meant I just deactivated my MathJax rendering bookmarklet thingy.
 
We need to somehow make ackermann in chatjax
 
$\newcommand{\partial}{\definecolor{energy}{RGB}{114,0,172} \definecolor{freq}{RGB}{45,177,93} \definecolor{spin}{RGB}{251,0,29} \definecolor{signal}{RGB}{18,110,213} \definecolor{circle}{RGB}{217,86,16} \definecolor{average}{RGB}{203,23,206} \color{energy} X_{\color{freq} k} \color{black} = \color{average} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \color{signal}x_n \color{spin} e^{\mathrm{i} \color{circle} 2\pi \color{freq}k \color{average} \frac{n}{N}}}$
Hmm
$$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT} \tag{4}$$
 
oooooh, look at this
 
Some smart guy...
 
5:05 PM
Uh oh
 
Watching this all with chatjax off is amusing.
3
 
@SirCumference, what this time?
 
Someone destroyed \newcommand
 
@SirCumference, uh...you?
 
@SirCumference Dammit
 
5:05 PM
@heather Nope
 
Okay folks
 
what happened?
 
I will kill the fun
 
@BernardoMeurer Probably because someone did \newcommand on \newcommand
 
$\renewcommand{\newcommand}{\text{GOODBYE}}$
 
5:06 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform You suck... XD
 
@BernardoMeurer lolol
 
$
MathJax.Hub.Config({
TeX: {
Macros: {
RR: '{\\bf R}',
bold: ['{\\bf #1}', 1]
}
}
});$
oh, wait
what am I doing?
 
Sigh. $\newcommand{\text}{\text{test}}$
 
PEACE HAS BEEN RESTORED
(in part)
 
@heather ahahahaga
 
5:07 PM
@BernardoMeurer, has it?
 
@BernardoMeurer You monster
 
what has happened
 
$\newcommand{\newcommand}{\text{quit trolling}}$
LOOK
I broke it badly
OH
I KNOW HOW TO BREAK IT
 
$\renewcommand{\newcommand}{\text{no}}$
 
@BernardoMeurer DO IT!
 
5:08 PM
I need to get my laptop so I can see what thus looks like with chatjax on.
 
WE can make a newcommand/renewcommand Loop!
 
@BernardoMeurer Oh god
 
Somehow
 
@DanielSank try not to die!
 
Stop
$\newcommand{what}$
 
5:08 PM
@BernardoMeurer YES!!
$how\,should\,we\,do\,this$
 
$\renewcommand{\rho}{\definecolor{energy}{RGB}{114,0,172} \definecolor{freq}{RGB}{45,177,93} \definecolor{spin}{RGB}{251,0,29} \definecolor{signal}{RGB}{18,110,213} \definecolor{circle}{RGB}{217,86,16} \definecolor{average}{RGB}{203,23,206} \color{energy} X_{\color{freq} k} \color{black} = \color{average} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \color{signal}x_n \color{spin} e^{\mathrm{i} \color{circle} 2\pi \color{freq}k \color{average} \frac{n}{N}}}$
 
If we newcommand renewcommand to being newcommand and then newcommand is already renewcommand to renewcommand
 
$$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT} \tag{4}$$
Goddammit
 
@heather RIP my laptop
 
it should brainfuck mathjax
 
5:09 PM
$\rho$
 
@BernardoMeurer okay
$\rho$
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Someone broke it
 
you killed rho
 
$\mu$
 
5:09 PM
$\partial$
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Nah, \newcommand is broken
 
$\renewcommand{\mu}{\text{STAHP}}$
 
you broke partial, too
 
$\mu$
 
$\renewcommand{\partial}{\text{STAHP}}$
 
5:10 PM
i'm literally waiting for my computer to crash
 
$$\renewcommand{\partial}{\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT}}$$
$$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z}=-\rho G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V \rho nRT}=-G\frac{M}{z^2}\cdot\frac{m}{V nRT} \tag{4}$$
@SirCumference Uh oh
 
@DavidZ I have calculated the cross section for Heather and Bernardo to create a black hole in the Stack Exchange servers with what they're doing. In the name of science I ask that they be allowed to proceed.
 
@SirCumference Oh wow
 
@DanielSank You'll notice I haven't stopped this the whole time I've been sitting here ;-)
 
@SirCumference YOU BROKE IT
 
5:11 PM
.
.

.























































































































































































































.
SUCCESS!
 
@Secret wtf
 
@Secret Is on a whole other level
 
who made mathjax do the little gray box at lower right?
this thing is properly broken now
 
$\def\x{\x} \x$
@Secret what did you do?
 
Well, gotta go
 
5:12 PM
$\newcommand\def\x{\x} \x$
 
@heather He put a period at the end of all that
 
@Secret Did you divide by 0?
2
 
Don't forget, lovecraftian creature like to inject a lot of insanity on me
 
@SirCumference see you around
 
If only we could do loops here
 
5:13 PM
okay, wait, I've got it
read under the last two headings
 
It's broken, chatjax keeps reloading endlessly
 
$MathJax.Hub.Config({
TeX: {
MAXBUFFER: 10000*10^24
}
}
});$
$\def\x{\x aaa} \x$
ack
 
MathJax.Hub.Config(please work again);
 
@heather That's Javascript
It doesn't work in chat
 
5:15 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform lol
 
@DavidZ darn it, foiled again
 
mthjax really need a "go back to defaults" command
 
@Secret F5
 
@Secret just reload the script
And the page
 
can we just delete this chatroom and get a fresh start
?
 
5:17 PM
once the chat scroll past the newcommands, the chat will go back to normal
 
$\renewcommand{\rho}{\definecolor{energy}{RGB}{114,0,172} \definecolor{freq}{RGB}{45,177,93} \definecolor{spin}{RGB}{251,0,29} \definecolor{signal}{RGB}{18,110,213} \definecolor{circle}{RGB}{217,86,16} \definecolor{average}{RGB}{203,23,206} \color{energy} X_{\color{freq} k} \color{black} = \color{average} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \color{signal}x_n \color{spin} e^{\mathrm{i} \color{circle} 2\pi \color{freq}k \color{average} \frac{n}{N}}}$
 
o c***...
 
(entered with mathjax off)
if you'd like i can delete it
 
lol
 
God work today folks
Science has advanced
 
5:19 PM
Indeed indeed
 
indeed
so...we come back to this another day? (in the name of science, of course)
 
@BernardoMeurer publish
 
today mathjax, tomorrow quantum gravity
one step at a time
 
one quantum leap at a time, til the future
 
Here, I'll throw all y'all who like breaking TeX a bone:
57
A: What is the most bizarre thing you have seen done with TeX

Peter FlynnDavid Carlisle's Christmas 'card' at http://www.ctan.org/pkg/xii. In fact, here it is: run this through plain TeX: \let~\catcode~`76~`A13~`F1~`j00~`P2jdefA71F~`7113jdefPALLF PA''FwPA;;FPAZZFLaLPA//71F71iPAHHFLPAzzFenPASSFthP;A$$FevP A@@FfPARR717273F737271P;ADDFRgniPAWW71FPATTFvePA**FstRsamP AGG...

 
5:21 PM
@DanielSank Lol
$$\let~\catcode~`76~`A13~`F1~`j00~`P2jdefA71F~`7113jdefPALLF
PA''FwPA;;FPAZZFLaLPA//71F71iPAHHFLPAzzFenPASSFthP;A$$FevP
A@@FfPARR717273F737271P;ADDFRgniPAWW71FPATTFvePA**FstRsamP
AGGFRruoPAqq71.72.F717271PAYY7172F727171PA??Fi*LmPA&&71jfi
Fjfi71PAVVFjbigskipRPWGAUU71727374 75,76Fjpar71727375Djifx
:76jelse&U76jfiPLAKK7172F71l7271PAXX71FVLnOSeL71SLRyadR@oL
RrhC?yLRurtKFeLPFovPgaTLtReRomL;PABB71 72,73:Fjif.73.jelse
B73:jfiXF71PU71 72,73:PWs;AMM71F71diPAJJFRdriPAQQFRsreLPAI
I71Fo71dPA!!FRgiePBt'el@ lTLqdrYmu.Q.,Ke;vz vzLqpip.Q.,tz;
 
I don't suppose it works here...
$\let~\catcode~`76~`A13~`F1~`j00~`P2jdefA71F~`7113jdefPALLF
PA''FwPA;;FPAZZFLaLPA//71F71iPAHHFLPAzzFenPASSFthP;A$$FevP
A@@FfPARR717273F737271P;ADDFRgniPAWW71FPATTFvePA**FstRsamP
AGGFRruoPAqq71.72.F717271PAYY7172F727171PA??Fi*LmPA&&71jfi
Fjfi71PAVVFjbigskipRPWGAUU71727374 75,76Fjpar71727375Djifx
:76jelse&U76jfiPLAKK7172F71l7271PAXX71FVLnOSeL71SLRyadR@oL
RrhC?yLRurtKFeLPFovPgaTLtReRomL;PABB71 72,73:Fjif.73.jelse
B73:jfiXF71PU71 72,73:PWs;AMM71F71diPAJJFRdriPAQQFRsreLPAI
I71Fo71dPA!!FRgiePBt'el@ lTLqdrYmu.Q.,Ke;vz vzLqpip.Q.,tz;
@BernardoMeurer we had the same idea =P
 
Goddamit
My favorite beer tastes weird
 
$\valign{\halign#\cr!$
=(
 
@heather no it doesn't, and this is why if you really want to "break" things, you don't use MathJax
 
$\def\a{a\a}\a$
@DavidZ that sounds like a challenge.
 
5:24 PM
:(){ :|: & };:
 
@BernardoMeurer seems perfectly OK to me
 
$pi=16*arc­tan(1/5)-4*arc­tan(1/239)$
 
@DavidCarlisle The legend himself :)
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform oh my gosh get that thing out of here
 
@heather it looks so cute and harmless
 
5:26 PM
@DavidCarlisle hi, nice to see you here
 
$$\Huge{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{‌​\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{1+54464654654654645465 G^{\mu}_{\sigma}\frac{1}{0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000‌​0000000000000}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}$$
 
now math users come to contemplate us
word must have gotten around that we're the best SE
 
@DavidZ this place seems even more weird than the tex chat room, at least there you get regular updates on the cricket scores.
 
@DavidCarlisle That's probably accurate.
 
barbecue, indeed
 
5:27 PM
Of course you did drop in at one of the weirder moments
 
I have no idea what is happening
 
@Secret oh my goodness, that's fabulous
@SteamyRoot we're breaking ChatJax
 
Can't you break it with, like, nice mathematics?
 
@SteamyRoot Loser
 
@DavidCarlisle Here you will get regular updates on various food recipes for breakfast, lunch and dinner. We can even teach you cooking. :D
 
5:30 PM
and to think that it all started with an innocent "I HATE FONTS"
 
Mathematician*
 
lol, that was how it started
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Yes, it all started with me ranting at how much fonts are shit
 
This is totally why I quit physics. And maybe string theory too.
 
ok @Secret please stop spamming all chatrooms =P
 
5:31 PM
MY GOODNESS! SO MANY VISITORS ON CHAT TODAY!!!!
TODAY WAS EPIC!
 
This is what happens when I decide it's time to wreck havoc
 
@anonymous awesomeness
@BernardoMeurer you haven't even done the ackermann in chat yet
 
@BernardoMeurer Yeah. Do it more often. Unless you break things science won't be able to move fast enough ;)
 
5:34 PM
@heather It's not doable in mathjax :/
@Ramanujan That's just mindless repetition
what we're doing here is art
 
@Ramanujan That's just mindless repetition
6
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Holy shit
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform does it need to be in star board?
 
@Ramanujan Very much so
3
 
@Ramanujan Very much so
 
This message is self-referential.
 
i'm out of stars =(
3
 
@JohnRennie Man that question is amazing
Goddammit
My beer taste has changed
 

« first day (2265 days earlier)      last day (2679 days later) »