« first day (1925 days earlier)      last day (3006 days later) » 

3:02 PM
Youtube (and Twitch) chat should just not exist
Nothing productive has ever been said in either
 
Awesome, @ACuriousMind .
 
@tpg2114 How could Twitch play things without chat? :O
But you're right, my first click was to minimize the youtube chat
 
The old AOL chatrooms of the '90s were more civilized.
Here's another stream from the NSF: youtube.com/watch?v=c7293kAiPZw
Not sure if one will be better/worse than the other
 
user116211
> Stand by
 
24 minutes
 
3:12 PM
I wish I was a famous scientist
So that I could answer "IT WAS ME" on the history of science SE
 
Final 1 minute
countdown
 
The hell is a LIGO.
 
user116211
@BalarkaSen Huh??
 
Do gravity waves say anything about the discreteness/continuousness of spacetime?
 
3:20 PM
No.
Gravitational waves are purely classical
 
@user36790 That's a vague question, so don't expect answers. :)
 
LIGO was the bad guy in 'Thunderball'
 
user116211
@BalarkaSen Neither did I expect answers ;P
 
Was that a 70s movie :P @Jiminion?
 
LIGO is the sensor system that detected the waves. There are 2 (?) of them.
60's James Bond film.
 
3:22 PM
What's a wave?
 
Gravity Wave
 
user116211
@BalarkaSen WTF!
 
That side chat is ridiculous
> no sound
> Press Alt+F4 for audio
 
Something that "waves"
 
@Jiminion Gravitational wave not gravity wave!
 
3:23 PM
What's a gravitational wave?
 
We detected gravity waves a long time ago :-)
 
user116211
In physics, gravitational waves are ripples in the curvature of spacetime which propagate as waves, travelling outward from the source. Predicted in 1916 by Albert Einstein on the basis of his theory of general relativity, gravitational waves theoretically transport energy as gravitational radiation. The existence of gravitational waves is a possible consequence of the Lorentz invariance of general relativity since it brings the concept of a limiting speed of propagation of the physical interactions with it. By contrast, gravitational waves cannot exist in the Newtonian theory of gravitation, which...
 
Why is there no sound on the stream? Whaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!
 
@JohnRennie Ctrl+W for audio =P
 
3:25 PM
@JohnRennie To hear the sound, you need to set up two special microphones at right angles to each other
 
On a side note, is Crothers just being a twat here?
@John Rennie - Thanks for your comment. However, your comment makes it very clear that you are not familiar with Kirchhoff's Law of Thermal Emission (not uncommon). To know Kirchhoff's Law implies knowledge of its setting, which is not the setting you have adduced. This is a problem. Can anybody on this site state the correct setting of Kirchhoff's Law of Thermal Emission? — Stephen J. Crothers 5 mins ago
 
I read the first two lines in the wikipedia article, and it didn't make sense. I'm only vaguely aware that spacetime is a Riemannian manifold and that gravity induces curvature. But I haven't heard of this wavy business in all my life.
 
This is THE EVIDENCE for Einstein :D @Slereah
2
 
Isn't Crothers always a twat
 
user116211
3:29 PM
@JohnRennie: Did sound come?
 
We got sound :-)
 
@mle your link works!!!
They detected the waves.
2
 
user116211
HISTORY!!
 
Oh, so these wavy fellows come from two masses orbiting around each other. Fair enough.
promptly goes back to eating popcorn and thinking about homologous cochains
 
who's the lady speaking?
 
3:33 PM
Head of the NSF
 
"So uhhh.... we broke LIGO and we need more money... Don't know why this got so blown out of proportion and we needed to have this whole thing..."
 
user116211
Buffering ;(
 
lol
 
SNR=24
 
3:35 PM
"in two parallel worlds...""
 
where did u get the image on the right?
 
mle
ja, stimmt!
 
is there a seperate stream?
 
WOO! They did it. :D
 
user116211
3:37 PM
Einstein would be happy :P
 
5 sigmas is some good shit
Do we know where the waves come from?
 
^
 
Yo momma
 
Oh snap
 
Twerkin
 
3:38 PM
Dat booty's so fine it has a giant quadrupolar moment
 
The merging of two black holes.
 
is there a paper out about it yet
 
This is the FIRST direct evidence.
 
The right stream is more techincal the left is more general
 
3:41 PM
can't stream right now
At woerk
 
1Gly... In a galaxy far, far away...
 
mle
Zusammenfassung, I am in German:
LIGO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnQwFtVD5OA
VIRGO http://content.jwplatform.com/players/JK3Q6HUT-uRmjM0Xa.html
 
thx
 
3:43 PM
No preprint? I'm disappointed in that. I mean, I can log in through fermilab and get the paper, but not everyone has that kind of support.
 
1000 physicist and engineers took 50 years.
 
I think there is a pre-print
one sec
 
@FenderLesPaul Link seems to be 404.
Sorry 403. They may be taking anti-flooding measures.
 
nvm can't find a pre-print
 
prl seems to be down
 
3:44 PM
sorry
the prl link works for me
 
PRL has been slashdotted.
 
Finally, gravitational wave astronomy!
 
What a tremendous achievement.
 
That is swweeeeeeettttt.
 
3:47 PM
Eeeeeh
I dunno
The thing is
 
3 m_\sun radiated! Holy cow!
3
 
How often is it gonna happen
Are we gonna have to wait 30 years for another signal
I guess it will be good for funding, at least
It's hard to tell to the moneybags to invest when something has never been detected
 
!!!
 
62 solar masses
 
Note the range. A giga-ly. That encompasses a lot of galaxies.
 
3:49 PM
@dmckee is the PRL link working for you yet?
 
How often do black hole collisions happen in that range, tho
 
Nada.
 
Am I the only one not excited?
 
Yes
 
3:50 PM
I think it's neat
 
^
 
I'm just not terribly excited
 
@0celo7 Dude you're a GR person.
 
Well yes
But G waves were like
 
3:50 PM
Any one got an idea for the reason for the time delay between the detection at the two different sites?
 
v. expected
 
Is it me, or is the sound just perfect for a phone notification sound?
 
doesn't change much for GR theory
 
@3507 Meh, all I can think of is how many people they could have put through college with the money they spent on this.
 
@Slereah I've seen estimate but can't recall. Before advanced LIGO they would have been pretty rare. aLIGO is much more sensitive, however.
 
3:51 PM
Does anyone have the cost estimate?
 
@0celo7 science funding really isn't bleeding the US economy dry
Defense takes up much more money
 
@0celo7 That's exactly where a big chuck of the money went: funding grad students.
 
@Slereah Doesn't make it not a waste.
 
3:51 PM
When did I defend defense spending?
 
are there actually theories that predict the abscence of grav waves?
 
under 1%
 
I don't think there's any that are compatible with current observations
 
@ACuriousMind You don't give two shits about GR
 
3:53 PM
This is EVIDENCE!!!
 
For?
 
@dmckee let me know if the PRL link eventually ends up working for you
 
Something that has no economic value?
 
Guys let's ban @0celo7
 
the whole PRL is still down for me
 
3:53 PM
EINSTEIN
 
@FenderLesPaul I just upgraded from 504 gateway errors to ERR_CONNECTION_RESET chrome errors
 
@Slereah Ask David Z nicely enough and you might get your wish.
 
@dmckee Please remove that star.
 
@EmilioPisanty Yeah I can't access the paper anymore I'm getting the same ERR_CONNECTION_RESET error
 
3:54 PM
@Slereah What, again?
 
@Secret: are you using a different stream? The Youtube one seems very pop science.
 
I am actually watching both streams at the same time
with a slight emphasis on the italy one
 
URL for the tech stream?
 
@0celo7 I do care about major scientific events even if they are not in my field
 
3:56 PM
@FenderLesPaul I just got through to the abstract page
 
I'm watching the NSF youtube stream (youtube.com/watch?v=c7293kAiPZw) which is the live conference. And yeah, they've pitched it for the science press.
 
@EmilioPisanty Can you get through the image verification page?
I keep getting stuck there
 
@FenderLesPaul timeout errors there
 
@Secret Perfect, thanks :-)
 
@EmilioPisanty I got the paper
is it ok if I upload it here?
 
3:58 PM
I can't open any links anymore
 
@FenderLesPaul Yes, it's CC-BY
 
Isn't it strange that there are those two black-holes orbiting one another, and the only thing that we are able to detect is the last second before they collide?
 
@EmilioPisanty BY-SA, actually
 
The link to the paper is completely broken for me
 
3:59 PM
This is the modern Michelson-Morley experiment
 
err
how do I upload files on this?
 
heheh
 
is it just the upload button?
 
@ArtOfCode no, it's the full CC-BY
 
@skysurf3000 They speed up as they get closer, so the waves are stronger just before the merge
 
3:59 PM
It's One of Those
 
@guest It's a Michelson interferometer, but they don't do the "turn the device" thing that made the MM experiment what it was.
 
A paper with 3 pages of authors
 
@EmilioPisanty aye, but the license on this site is BY-SA.
 
user116211
0
Q: How are gravitational waves different from space time?

RohitCan anyone tell me how gravitational waves are different to space time and how they affect each other?

 
In more interesting news, I've made the first 10g of that crystal
 
4:00 PM
The instrument is not the experiment. Michelson interferomentors have several uses.
 
user116211
The influx begins....
 
Turns out 20g will be way too much
 
@ArtOfCode It's perfectly fine to republish CC-BY as CC-BY-SA (just not the other way around).
 
No invite to Stanford for you @0celo7 :P
 
@EmilioPisanty Yeah, just noting. People forget that things get licensed occasionally :)
 
4:01 PM
@FenderLesPaul You can't upload files to chat :P
 
@guest No, the guy who wants me to make it WAY underestimated how much 20g is
 
@ArtOfCode Yeah, so you look at the license and you get it right. It's pointless to argue licenses right now though.
 
@0celo7 The iron oxide crystal you mentioend previously?
 
The elements are very light
 
@ACuriousMind well that sucks
:p
 
4:02 PM
@Secret No, this is a Magnesium + Silicon crystal
 
I see
 
Don't know why he needs it, I just got the job of making it.
 
I can't continue with my own work until we get a new furnace.
 
The numbers in this experiment are amazing :O
 
4:04 PM
@ 0celo7 I guess they need silocon to make wafers?
 
@Secret No, the guy is trying to date meteors and we're making meteor-like stuff.
 
user116211
@Secret Kip Thorne!
 
i hate that the two streams are running at the same time. would actually prefer to watch both of them
 
@leongz indeed
 
you should focus on the italy one, because the youtube can be revisted later\
 
4:05 PM
^
 
@leongz Well, I'd hope they will both be available afterwards
 
@Secret Do we know for sure that they won't re-post the italy one to youtube?
 
hopefully
 
They're going to irradiate the MgSiO (don't remember the exact stoichiometry) and see how the structure degrades and compare that to meteor samples
 
That I am not sure, because the italy looks very technical, not somehting that will go on youtube readily
@0celo7 Yeah, typical of experiments of that kind they might end up making some glassy stuff of SiO in the process
how does mle secure that italy link?
 
4:07 PM
So many great accents :D
 
> The total energy is what you would get by taking "only" three Suns, and turning them into gravitational waves.
^ wooooot
 
@guest Dutch isn't a language, it's a respiratory disease :-)
 
Hah
 
A triumph of global collaboration.
 
I am watching both streams because I am an electron
 
4:09 PM
Why so negative, @Secret
 
@0celo7 Groooooooooooooooaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnn
 
I am an electorn, I hate to be confined. Any attempt to do so and you won't know how fast I move
and I end up delocalised through spaceimte
 
Bye. Have to go to class.
 
@FenderLesPaul bitbucket / pastebin / whatever?
 
Hungarian spice :)
 
4:11 PM
It seems as though the technical stuff has finished. It's all back patting now.
 
As long as you give the journal ref & DOI link you're within the license
 
Well deserved back patting of course!
 
@EmilioPisanty I can dropbox it
if that's ok
 
@FenderLesPaul Yeah, that works
 
4:12 PM
^great job
 
@FenderLesPaul grats!
 
No problem!
I already gave the journal ref above
so it should be fine
 
ah.. the benefit of having abbott as your last name
 
I'm not America, Italian. "I am a physicist"
"A black hole is no longer something written on a page."
 
4:16 PM
So, did LIGO record a single event? They just got lucky?
 
5.1 sigma lucky, I guess?
 
@Jiminion aLIGO hasn't been running that long. Unless it was just luck they got an event so soon we should get more detections this year.
 
I meant they were listening when the 20 ms wave occurred. How often do these things happen?
 
Yes. It's just one event so far. But it's not a statistical measurement so the 5 sigma standard is not applicable.
 
It's only been running a year or so, right?
 
4:18 PM
Q and A in the technical stream alert
 
It happened 1.3 billion years ago
 
@Jiminion From Wikipedia: The LIGO Laboratory started the first Observing Run 'O1' with the Advanced LIGO detectors in September 2015 at a sensitivity roughly 4 times greater than Initial LIGO for some classes of sources (e.g., neutron-star binaries), and a much greater sensitivity for larger systems with their peak radiation at lower audio frequencies.[26]
 
@FenderLesPaul Thanks :)
 
@MarkMitchison No problem!
 
So if there are lots of black hole collisions back then? (oops guy is asking similar question)
 
4:20 PM
how often are blackhole collisions anyway?
 
I think the audio files for the chirp signals can also be similarly accessed.
 
@leongz I don't think we know that, because, as they say, this is the first time we have detected one
 
Kip Thorne is way smarter than I am.....
 
So... I missed it?
 
4:21 PM
"We should see more in this coming year..."
 
@Danu Yep.
 
@ACuriousMind Fuuuuck :P
 
@ACuriousMind, is there a way to estimate collision frequency based on the number of blackholes though?
 
So was it the 29, 32 merger?
 
@Danu Yes, with 3 solar masses radiated, apparently
 
4:22 PM
So exactly as Lubos said in his blog
@JohnRennie Oi!!!
 
3 solar masses radiated in 20 ms.
@Danu A broke clock is correct twice a day..... :)
 
@Jiminion Meh, on low level stuff he's pretty trustworthy.
String theory is his big bias, but okay...
 
@Danu Sorry :-) Actually I have great affection for the Dutch. When I worked for Unilever I worked in Vlaardingen for a while and loved it.
 
The Italian president has phoned to congratulate them.
 
But Dutch is a really hard language. I don't think I ever spoke Dutch without the other person saying "Oh, you're English"!
 
4:26 PM
I love how that they estimate the masses of black holes "more or less a few solar masses"... The scale of these things...
 
user116211
BBC: Mexican Riots. CNN: Trump ; / RT: Officer fainted in discussing the ill-fated F-35 budjet.
 
user116211
WTF!!
 
50 million CPU hours of data analysis
 
user116211
WoW!! Ultimately, got one discussing LIGO . RT: It was actually Soviet Physicists who discovered LIGO.
 
user116211
4:31 PM
What???
 
vzn
(rats just missed the chat session.) anyway was telling some kids about gravity waves and comparing the detection to LHC. told them that maybe ~$1B has been spent on detectors for gravity waves. (total SWAG on my part.) does anyone have any idea how much has been spent on equipment over the years? presumably on detectors not all involved in this current discovery. anyway, another huge FTW for "big science"...
 
HELP MY STREAMS ARE FAILLING
ok it works again
 
vzn
also some have mentioned this is a "for sure" nobel prize... but who to award it to in particular...? quite a quandary...
 
user54412
@JohnRennie Though I'm not against renaming them in order to remove a couple syllables
 
"comparing GW form, and einstein equations, can tell if waves were distorted, which could support non-zero rest mass in graviton". 10-55 grams.
 
4:38 PM
So what's that in eV?
 
@ChrisWhite No don't do that. Correcting people when they use the term gravity wave is the GR equivalent of correcting people's grammar. Very annoying but hugely entertaining :-)
 
vzn
so are gravitons basically quantized gravity waves? (havent seen announcement) ... they arent talking about gravitons are they?
 
@vzn I'd say KST and the Italian woman and maybe the Russian(s) that proposed it. Are thye limited to 3?
@vzn KST just said something about them. (I guess it's in the paper -- the speculation)
 
vzn
@Jiminion higgs particle nobel only awarded to a few, dont recall details, but its a rough precedent.
 
@vzn no, though a gravitational wave is in principle a coherent superposition of gravitons.
 
4:39 PM
I missed that important QA in the technical stream (because the answerer is muffled voice) How to explain to a non physics person why today's findings on gravitational waves is so important, is it just because of astronomy?
 
@Secret The short answer is that it just verifies Einstein in a different way.
 
Italy looks like the place to be for this kind of research @ChrisWhite :P
 
@Secret The long answer is we can find out more about gravity (gravitons? maybe?) and perhaps something about the earlier universe where black holes were colliding, apparently.
 
vzn
@Secret there are many reasons (see recent nature article with "questions this could answer"), it opens up a whole new branch of experimental/ observed astronomy. will be able to tackle some of the big questions like nature of universe expansion, what holds galaxies together, birth/ death of galaxies, etc... cosmic evolution etc
 
4:41 PM
Can't wait for them to find another signal that involves intermediate mass balck holes
 
user54412
@guest uh why?
 
They have more government interest.
 
:27500693

I see, thanks
 
user54412
@guest The US has far more government spending
 
The Washington stream has ended
 
vzn
4:44 PM
24 hours ago, by John Rennie
http://www.nature.com/news/gravitational-waves-6-cosmic-questions-they-can-tackl‌​e-1.19337
 
user54412
Did anyone else catch the "These are not Hollywood animations but actual simulations" comment with Kip in the room?
 
@JohnRennie That's not the Netherlands, though ;)
 
mle
vorbei auch in Italien
 
@ChrisWhite Hehehe...didn't realize that could've been a jab at him
 
user54412
@ACuriousMind not sure it was meant to be, but the audience I was watching with all laughed
 
4:46 PM
 
i thought interstellar used actual equations
 
The Italy stream has ended
 
vzn
@ACuriousMind wasnt kip thorne involved in doing the interstellar movie cgi/ simulations as consultant? (iirc) it was some big-name physicist... (good wired article on that)
 
@vzn Yes, exactly
 
@ChrisWhite did you take any of his classes?
 
4:46 PM
@Danu It isn't? Wikipedia says it is. Or is this some obscure Dutch in joke that I'm missing? :-)
 
user54412
yes, but those simulations were (1) trivial and (2) altered for cinematic purposes
 
user54412
@guest he was retiring around then; saw him around campus plenty though
 
vzn
@ChrisWhite not exactly trivial afaik (hollywood cgi chews up a lot of manpower/ cpu cycles), but agree with the cinematic emphasis. (ie not meant to be highly realistic or accurate.)
 
user54412
well, trivial compared to merging black holes :p
 
user54412
4:48 PM
the movie was just ray-tracing in kerr spacetime, which amounts to numically intergrating a couple ODEs
 
@JohnRennie Vlaanderen = Belgium
 
Vlaardingen not Vlaanderen
 
Hahhaahha
Dat epic Dutchness fail
I'm so sorry. That is in the Netherlands.
 
user54412
@Danu More Dutch, less Murican
 
vzn
is kip thorne connected to this announcement somehow? hes at the press conference?
 
user54412
4:49 PM
@vzn yes
 
user54412
he spoke
 
@Danu You had me wondering if I'd been to one too many cafes for a while there
 
he's the co-founder of LIGO
 
user54412
he's been the theorist pushing for LIGO since the 70s or earlier
 
user54412
@ACuriousMind there was also the "Einstein was not just a theorist" ;)
 
4:51 PM
I'd love to see a simulation of black holes which includes orbiting rings of matter that are generating all sorts of radiation from infalling mass; did Interstellar have that?
 
@ChrisWhite Yeah, I heard that
 
I like to imagine that black holes would actually be pretty bright and streaky and kaleidoscopic.
 
gotta sleep guys. IT's 3:51 here in Syd and I have to wake up at 7:00
 
@JohnRennie So what sandwich spreads were you working on?
 
4:52 PM
Then again maybe all of those effects are redshifted into oblivion.
 
user54412
@CRDrost that uh... sounds like my thesis
 
@ChrisWhite: got a linky?
 
user54412
my unfinished thesis :p
 
Heh. Ph.D. or Master's?
 
user54412
PhD
 
user54412
4:54 PM
also, I don't have a team of Hollywood animators to make my movies look pretty
 
Cool. I'd like to go back and get one of those some day, kudos to you.
My problem is that my Master's thesis was not very good leading me to kind of rage-quit academia.
 
Thanks for the great link @mle :-)
 
mle
Bitte!! ;)
@guest, Bitte! ;)
 
@ChrisWhite Do we have good analytical waveforms for the detection?
Or is there a clean way to get the sound they played at the beginning?
 
vzn
@CRDrost its a huge open question whether black hole radiation is significant and/or can be detected afaik. this is a big question that hawking tried to tackle decades ago, part of his fame. he was (nearly?) 1st to propose maybe they are not invisible & radiate something.
 
@vzn: well Hawking radiation is also interesting but different, I just want to see the radiation due to infalling matter.
 
vzn
@CRDrost so do a lot of scientists...?
 
Much more classical in nature.
I mean in a simulation. :P
 

« first day (1925 days earlier)      last day (3006 days later) »