« first day (2450 days earlier)      last day (2480 days later) » 

4:00 PM
that article is way too long, man
summary pls
 
@JohnRennie I have known somebody who thought they had lived too long; but they were in a lot of pain and soon died.
 
This is a charming conversation ...
 
Well, you asked.
 
It was a rhetorical question
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Someone (Forrest Fenn) has hidden a chest full of gold and gems somewhere. and coded the location in a poem. if you crack that poem you can find that treasure (worth $2m)
 
4:03 PM
@ACuriousMind what is?
@ACuriousMind on what?
 
Someone asked this on here too. but on the wrong SE:
(deleted now)
 
@Mostafa I aint reading no poem for $2M
 
@JohnRennie Yes. Answer is 44/10 = 4.4 kg
 
@Abcd there you go! Easy :-)
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform a few people have died in the quest for that treasure
 
4:05 PM
I gave an honest answer sir, to your rhetorical question. For that I can not apologize.
 
@JohnRennie in the Atwood machine, the masses are not at equilibrium :( So how is tension same throughout the string. Brief answer would suffice.
 
@Mostafa it serves them right
who reads poems anyway
 
@Abcd ah this takes us back to yesterday's discussion.
 
yes
 
We generally consider the string to be massless in these problems.
 
4:09 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform I think if the PSE community works on it for some time with their full potential, we can finally crack it.
 
@JohnRennie Okay, T = ma, a is same therefore T is same for full string
 
dont be silly, the PSE community has no potential
3
 
Anonymous
@Mostafa Who will be given the $2M if we do manage to crack it?
 
Anonymous
:P
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Most people believe what they want to believe. Except a few people willing to change their minds by arguments and observations.
 
4:10 PM
@Abcd The string is obviously continuous, but imagine dividing it up into lots of tiny lengths so we approximate the string by a huge number of tiny beads all linked together in a line.
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform True, we're not particularly conservative
 
@JohnRennie yes
 
@Abcd When we say the tension is $T$ we mean that each of these (conceptual) beads pulls on the beads next to it with a force $T$.
 
@JohnRennie yes
 
@Blue We can ask the mods for that. espcially ACM The Just
 
4:12 PM
@Abcd So if you pick a bead somewhere in the middle it is being pulled to the left with a force $T$ and to the right with an equal and opposite force $T$. OK so far?
 
Anonymous
@Mostafa We don't even know ACM's real name. How can we trust him/her with the money ? :P
 
@JohnRennie yes
 
$\mathfrak{u(1)}$ or $\mathfrak{u}(1)$?
 
@Blue OK maybe DavidZ The Great
 
4:13 PM
@Abcd and because the tension is the same everywhere in the string the force pulling the bead one way is equal and opposite to the force pulling it the other way and the bead ends up with a net force of zero so it doesn't move.
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform the latter
 
@Blue we do know his real name :-/
 
@JohnRennie yes
 
@ACuriousMind I thought so
 
Anonymous
@AccidentalFourierTransform Wut is that? :'D
 
4:14 PM
@Blue a word or set of words by which a person, animal, place, or thing is known, addressed, or referred to.
ah, what a great movie
 
Sid
@AccidentalFourierTransform He probably meant what was the name
 
@Abcd suppose the tension wasn't the same everywhere in the string, that must mean there are beads where the force on one side is different to the force on the other side. But that means the net force on the bead is not zero so the bead will accelerate in the direction of the greater tension.
 
@JohnRennie Right, understood.
 
@Sid hmm
Apr 5 at 13:42, by ACuriousMind
@Moe We might! My real name is Björn, but I'm not often around the physics institutes these days since I'm writing my master's thesis with J. Walcher who is in the math institute
 
@Abcd And when the bead moves it stretches the string on one side of it and shrinks the string on the other side of it. That means it increases the tension on one side of the string and decreases the tension on the other side of the string.
 
4:17 PM
and we also know @Shing's real name
 
@Blue Or JR. He's arguably the most trusted person here.
 
Jun 14 at 17:18, by AccidentalFourierTransform
@Shing we'll call you Timothy from now on
 
Anonymous
@AccidentalFourierTransform Wow. Now we just need his title and his bank account details.
 
@Abcd Indeed, because the bead is massless (approximately) it accelerates infinitely fast (approximately).
 
Anonymous
@Mostafa Yeah. JR already has too much money. He won't bother about the petty $2M anyway :P We can trust him XD
 
4:18 PM
@Mostafa Trusted? Me? :: evil cackle ::
 
lol you all can trust me on that $2M. I would use that to invest. earn a bit extra fortune for myself.
 
Money is like sex - you can never have too much of either
 
And one buys the other.
 
Sid
That ^
 
yeah, sex definitely buys money
 
4:21 PM
That^
 
Can we steer the conversation away from prostitution, please?
 
In Taiwan, prostitution is legal. but having a place for prostitution is illegal.
 
Sid
@JohnRennie I don't trust you. I believe you are a wolf in sheep's skin. :P
(All in jest. No offence)
 
The oldest profession.
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform I'm confused as to why mathfrak even works on numbers
 
4:22 PM
@skullpatrol physics?
 
and all prostitution have to be done in "the place for prostitution"
 
@ACuriousMind I wish I could use \mathbb 1 though
 
@JohnRennie :(
 
@Shing y'know, I kinda meant what I said. Let's not talk about prostitution please.
 
4:22 PM
@ACuriousMind WHAT HATS
 
@0celoñe7 Operator hats
 
Sid
@0celoñe7 you are still not done with that game?
 
@ACuriousMind Aha
 
@skullpatrol I think an experiment has been conducted that once the researchers taught a group of monkeys about money, then they have that old profession.
 
@Sid what?
@Sid I think TW3 has 120 hours of content if you do everything.
I'm at work, not playing games
 
Sid
4:24 PM
I read somewhere you were complaining about something being too long.
 
monkeys with money become physicists!?!
 
@Abcd sorry, the conversation got diverted. The point I was trying to make is that if the tension weren't the same everywhere in the string then the string would immediately stretch and compress until the tension was the same everywhere.
 
Sid
Considering you were playing games before, I thought that.
@0celoñe7 Increasing the GDP?
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform the oldest profession
not physicists
 
@Sid nope
 
4:24 PM
physicist monkeys make more money than me :-(
4
 
Farming is the second oldest.
 
@JohnRennie Replace stone and me with elevator and object please please. So that I can get a good intuitive idea.
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform See monkey do
@skullpatrol We were hunters and gatherers long before we became farmers
 
@JohnRennie Understood this part. Sufficient explanation. Thanks :)
 
@ACuriousMind My QM prof stopped using hats, but then people asked him to start again
 
4:26 PM
@ACuriousMind that took a nice turn :-)
 
Define; profession
 
@0celoñe7 ugh
 
@skullpatrol manufacturers of stone tools? That's a pretty old profession ...
 
mothers.
 
@ACuriousMind There were 2 or 3 people in the class who were in the "holy fuck physics grad school was a bad idea" camp
 
4:27 PM
I win \o/
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Okay, that one actually made me laugh :P
 
ah, finally ;-)
 
stop it
 
I think its the monkey face, its funny on its own
 
4:29 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform It looks very proud
Also sorta goofy, but mostly proud
 
:38901567 delet this
 
@0celoñe7 you should perhaps tone down the language a bit
 
@ACuriousMind Why was that deleted
 
bc someone flagged it
 
Because it was flagged.
 
4:30 PM
Who?
I thought there was no language barrier as long at it is Nice.
 
Big Bother
Be humbole
 
Howdy y'all
 
@0celoñe7 Flags are a way for people to say they feel uncomfortable with the conversation if they don't feel they can speak up. Swearing is not bad per se, but if it's making someone uncomfortable you should stop
 
@ACuriousMind How am I supposed to know that it is making someone uncomfortable?
 
4:33 PM
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mechanical_Universe @0celoñe7 have you seen this?
 
You were told right now.
 
@ACuriousMind Because you're here.
If you weren't here I would get shadow banned.
 
:38901674 Calling people who use flags cowards is not acceptable. And yes, if no mod had been here you would have been banned for half an hour. As you have now for insulting the flagger.
3
 
4:34 PM
It's not the end of the world.
 
Sid
Eh.. that was a bit harsh..
 
I wanted to ask him a question
now I'll never know the answer
@skullpatrol oh, I actually have seen that
 
@skullpatrol good videos for high school. and they do have an "advanced edition" textbook for year one mechanics + heat . Probably the best text books I have ever read. Very very physics
 
Again, we're having irregular starring behavior in this room. Everybody please note that
Feb 24 at 19:38, by Mostafa
@0celo7 star != like
 
I didn't realize this room ever had regular starring behaviour.
 
4:38 PM
there is a lot of regularity
eg, when someone brings this topic up, every message gets starred
 
@ACuriousMind *behavior
 
@Mostafa *behaviour
 
for jokes, starring certainly means: I like it.
 
Well, I have also starred puns for being exceptionally terrible in the past... :P
 
4:40 PM
anyway, am I really the only one who thinks this belongs on math.SE?
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform According to the review, the only one who agrees with you is peterh.
 
WHAT!?!
is that even possible?
Well paint me green and call me a pickle
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform I thought it was relevant enough to physics that it was fine to leave it here. And I thought the answers were interesting, so I want the answers left here.
 
I dont even like the answer :-P
I really dont see how its relevant to the question
smoke and mirrors IMHO
 
4:44 PM
I don't think we should be too fanatical in migrating questions to the Math SE.
 
@skullpatrol Caltech has two "versions" for the textbook though. both are good. but the "advanced edition" is better (and probably for science schools?) :P (I think they missed writing the advanced edition on that wiki page)
 
@Shing visions, or versions?
 
por que no los dos?
 
@djsmiley2k my bad. I mean versions
 
np, visions gave me a completely different idea ;D
 
4:46 PM
sorry for my lousy English :P
 
Hey has anyone here read the book Condensed Matter Field Theory by Altland?
 
I'm sure it's better than our Chinese ;)
 
(...)
 
Have you watched that series? @BenNiehoff
 
Sid
@BenNiehoff I don't think Chinese is a language. Mandarin is the main language..
 
4:47 PM
@BenNiehoff haha thanks
 
"Chinese" is a family of languages
but yeah
 
All Chinese"s" share same "written words", but they have different sounds (and a bit difference in usages).
 
@Mostafa lol, what are you trying to do?
 
he's a time traveler
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform I have 4 Firefox windows open each with >20 tabs. My browser keeps freezing
 
4:50 PM
eww, why would you need 4 windows open?
I have one window with like 200 tabs
 
eww, why would anyone use Firefox?
 
Limited resources?
 
I use Firefox because I prefer the way it manages having 200 tabs open
 
@BenNiehoff Too much stuff to be read later
 
No time to read, must chat in h bar?
 
4:52 PM
h
 
Sid
@BenNiehoff Here's a funny thing. If you open chrome with >100 tabs, it will show you a smiley face. If you do it incognito, it will give a winking face.
 
how do you know that?
 
Sid
.. Let's not get there.. :P
 
the problem with Chrome is when you have more than about 12 tabs, it starts shrinking the size of the tabs so that you can't tell what they are
Firefox doesn't do that
also, Firefox has a drop-down list that shows all your tabs in a vertical list, with the complete page titles; it makes it really easy to find a tab you lost track of
 
but Chrome is better in any other aspect, e.g., Firefox doesn't collect user data and sends it to a multinational corporation
 
Anonymous
4:55 PM
Most of the time, opening more than 12 tabs indicates that you are lazy :D
 
Sid
... Firefox does that? :o
@Blue That is a wrong conclusion. :P
 
I mean, I've been using Gmail for years, so I'm sure Google has everything they need on me already
 
@Sid Read carefully: Firefox doesn't
 
Anonymous
@Sid No
 
Sid
Oh, right. Chrome does that. Of course it does that..
 
4:56 PM
Google knows how often you have 100+ tabs open in Incognito mode ;)
 
Oh god, it knows I secretly download postmodernist philosophy?
 
yeah, I would use Incognito mode for that, too
wouldn't want to be caught with that in your history
 
Anonymous
User data is what's makes Google the most valuable coorporation in the world. If not for the ad revenues Google would have been beaten long ago.
 
good thing Google is 18 years old, amiright
:: wink ::
 
they're a bit older than that
probably like 21 or more by now
 
4:59 PM
> Founded September 4, 1998; 18 years ago
 
Don't you just hate people who Google Google
 
interesting, so I started using Google more or less right after they started existing
 
Anonymous
Was Alphabet founded before Google?
 
Anyone remember Alta Vista?
 
the pre-Google Internet was an interesting place
 
Sid
5:00 PM
Google is older than me?
@JohnRennie Yep.
 
yes, Alta Vista, Infoseek, Ask Jeeves, etc.
 
Sid
I remember my Dad using something like that site
 
Anonymous
I have personally seen Microsoft employees using Google Search XD
 
Alta Vista was my search engine of choice in the early days, but Google rapidly out competed it.
 
Alta Vista's Babelfish was the first online translator
or was it called something else?
 
5:01 PM
@Blue that's not all of the story.
One of the tabs is a Restore Session that contains many windows, with lots of tabs in each of them, probably with other Restore Sessions in them. and this hierarchy continues to tabs from a few months ago...
 
Anonymous
This seems cool ^ :'D
 
Ha, I've just arranged a drinking session for Friday evening while reading this chat. And they say men can't multitask. We can when it suits us! :-)
 
you could also have a drinking session while in chat
much more efficient
 
its 11am somewhere, right?
 
5:05 PM
Multiple tasking is unhealthy.
 
Anonymous
It's 11pm here (almost)
 
Anonymous
So someone opposite to me should be at 11am...:D
 
Sid
@AccidentalFourierTransform That would be Honduras and Salvador
 
it's 7pm here
but dinner is not until 8:30
 
@blue and this happens because I never close Firefox myself. It crashes after a few weeks....and a new Restore Session is born
 
Sid
5:06 PM
@BenNiehoff I haven't had dinner yet and it is close to 11PM
 
I also never close FF, but I almost never have crashes (just once or twice in like 3 years)
 
Anonymous
@BenNiehoff Dinner at 8:30? That's too early relative to here
 
@Sid then lets drink a toast for them
 
what I mean is, the restaurants open at 8:30
 
Sid
@Blue That's one thing I find strange about the West. Most people have dinner quite early
 
5:07 PM
@BenNiehoff It happens when I open tabs with lots of GIFs, flash, etc.
 
@Mostafa Oh, I avoid opening more than one of those at a time
about half of my tabs are arXiv abstract pages
 
whats the best paper youve read recently?
 
recently? not sure
 
I don't often see many papers I like
 
5:09 PM
For me ^
 
the tabs are more to keep track of things I need to cite
 
optics. booooooring
 
@EmilioPisanty ^
 
@ACuriousMind Is coward not an objective description for someone who sends the authorities after someone like that without talking to the person?
 
Do you have an all time favourite textbook in physics or math? @BenNiehoff
 
5:11 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform A huge part of all the physics we know right now has come from research about the nature of light.
 
BenNiehoff AMA, apparently
 
@skullpatrol no.
 
@Mostafa as if that makes it any less boring :-P
 
@TheRaidersofLasVegas I find it hard to point out a single favorite. It's hard to compare books in different fields
@AccidentalFourierTransform what was your doubt?
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Well?
 
@TheRaidersofLasVegas For me Purcell (but damn, it doesn't have field theory at all)
 
and Feynman
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform you may
and thank you for asking before doubting
 
5:20 PM
lol
its gonna be the same question that I asked you that time
and we will both get banned for it
 
The logic and reason one?
 
no lol
nevermind
I cant
ACM is watching
 
lol all these makes me more curious
 
ACuriousMind and The Holding Company
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Go ahead.
 
5:23 PM
%%2C
what is this D:
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform I just bought amazon.com/gp/product/0486813657/…
I didn't know there was a Dover edition
basically a steal
 
again, why do you buy books?
> $8.57
ok I get it
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Huh?
 
books shan't be bought
 
Anonymous
Hardcover: $48.95 Paperback: $8.57. Why so much difference? :O
 
5:26 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform Some people collect stamps, some people collect spoons. Some like guns. I like books.
 
@0celoñe7 me too. but it is a nightmare when you move house...
 
Anonymous
I like to collect ebooks
 
hmm I just realised I dont collect anything
is that good or bad?
 
good
 
Anonymous
5:28 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform are you sure?
 
@Blue I think different publishers.
The paperback is Dover
 
I collect broken hearts
 
Anonymous
See ^ I told ya
 
5:29 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform oh! my heart!
 
You collect dirty +++- memes
 
ok you win
I do collect those
 
@Mostafa yeah, I agree, that's just silly
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform ^
 
5:31 PM
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
particularly with a paper like that, which breaks down to something like 90% quantum + 10% optics
 
I agree with @AccidentalFourierTransform
 
Light has to be the most overrated physical concept ever
It's everywhere; not that special
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform _/¯(ツ)¯_
 
5:32 PM
whats wrong w your arm?
 
damn, that Nature's paper Chiral quantum optics gets nearly 100 reference papers, do the researchers usually read all the papers?
 
@Shing yes
some factors to consider
- this is a review paper
- the authors are (to some degree) a collection of heavy-hitting PIs that have been immersed in the field, and pushing it forward at the bleeding edge, pretty much since its inception
- (in fact, they had a huge hand in creating the field to begin with)
 
@TheRaidersofLasVegas Principal Investigator
 
Principal Instigator
 
5:36 PM
- and, the papers they cite are mostly spread over the range ~2011 to 2016, and they would've read them as they came out
 
Private investigator
 
anywayz
i better get going
ciao people
 
Anonymous
@AccidentalFourierTransform Tata
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Yeah, the chat has entered its unconstructive phase
 
5:37 PM
but yeah, this is pretty damn groundbreaking
 
@EmilioPisanty I see, thanks for explaining
 
@EmilioPisanty Do you think there's any connection between this effect and photonic topological insulators?
 
@Mostafa what's a photonic topological insulator
I know what a photonic crystal is and what a topological insulator is
 
@Shing Everything that @EmilioPisanty said, plus ... I had over two hundred entries in the bibliography of my dissertation and I read every last one of them.
Mostly more than once because some of them were tough sledding for me.
 
5:40 PM
@Shing (also, final factor: the authors of the review are coauthors of a significant fraction of the papers cited, too.)
 
You get used to assimilating papers in the course of that kind of marathon.
 
@dmckee I have 340 references in my thesis and... uh... yes... I read every one of them
 
@EmilioPisanty I'm saying especially because of this science.sciencemag.org/content/348/6242/1448
(same effect in that Chiral Quantum Optics paper^)
 
@EmilioPisanty Those were the days, weren't they? Just thinking about it make me want a beer.
 
@dmckee yes
I pine for the days of unrelenting pressure and anxiety attacks
=P
 
5:44 PM
No drinking for new dads allowed :P
 
@TheRaidersofLasVegas I have these cute, tiny brandy sniffers in which 1/2–1/3 oz of whiskey doesn't look lonely. I've felt up to that much a couple of times since we came home.
 
vzn
@Mostafa very cool/ impressive paper thx for sharing! are you working somewhere in this area? "The possibility of such a propagation-direction-dependent, or chiral, light–matter interaction is not accounted for in standard quantum optics and its recent discovery brought about the research field of chiral quantum optics." o_O
@EmilioPisanty trying to follow what they mean by "forward and backward propagating light"...
 
@vzn in that diagram, forward is to the right and backward is to the left
 
vzn
5:56 PM
@EmilioPisanty is the idea the atoms are spin aligned somehow? trying to wrap my brain around this & formulate meaningful questions...
 
@vzn not necessarily
you either spin polarize the atoms to begin with
 
vzn
> ...the realization of deterministic spin–photon interfaces. ?!? o_O (Lodahl et al)
 
or you induce a splitting between the $|+\rangle$ and $|-\rangle$ levels
either way, the spontaneous emission from $|+\rangle$ goes to the right and the spontaneous emission from $|-\rangle$ goes to the left
@vzn yeah, I would take that with a grain of salt
 
vzn
dont have a nature subscription, am gonna have to follow up with arxiv papers or other material... seems like the popsci coverage has not caught up with this stuff much yet :|
 
hello everyone
 

« first day (2450 days earlier)      last day (2480 days later) »