« first day (2180 days earlier)      last day (2742 days later) » 

12:15 AM
@ACuriousMind Yep, thanks.
Well...no.
 
Hello, everyone
 
@ACuriousMind @Danu I want f(J)=[a,b]
In general you'll overshoot that target
 
@0celo7 I know, the interval I gave you should do that, no?
 
Let me reread.
@ACuriousMind proof that such a thing is possible?
Do you know you can pick these points?
 
What do you mean? if you couldn't, that would mean that somehow either $f^{-1}(a)$ or $f^{-1}(b)$ is dense in $I$. But that would mean $f$ is actually constant on $I$ with value $a$ (or $b$).
Well, not dense in $I$, but dense in each interval $[c,d]$ with $c\in f^{-1}(a)$ and $d\in f^{-1}(b)$.
 
12:23 AM
@ACuriousMind Yeah I'll think about it when I get home.
 
12:44 AM
@ACuriousMind still here?
 
@DanielSank yes!
 
@0celo7 sort of
 
1:03 AM
@Shing you subject the atom to radiation at the frequency of whatever transition you want, and for a time equal to half the time it would take for a full transition.
 
@DanielSank, hello!
I have two questions for you, from my parents:
1. What day(s) of the week would be alright, if it was to happen in the next couple of weeks?
2. Where in California is the lab?
 
user218912
@heather what was to happen?
 
@obe, it's a longer story, really
 
1:22 AM
@heather any day of week. Goleta California.
 
@DanielSank, thank you!
 
 
2 hours later…
3:16 AM
@0celo7 Say, I've been thinking about what you said regarding lower mass limits for black holes
Does that mean that for certain objects, they cannot form an event horizon no matter how much you compress them?
 
@SirCumference Maybe.
That's for an eternal Kerr black hole, nothing dynamic.
 
@0celo7 Oh, okay, so what about time variant black holes?
 
3:49 AM
Not sure
Thats CW's domain.
 
4:09 AM
@SirCumference an object with a large enough angular momentum can't collapse to a black hole unless it can get rid of the excess momentum.
 
@JohnRennie Yes, I know
I'm talking about mass though
That couldn't create a naked singularity, could it?
 
But in a real object there are ways to redistribute the angular momentum. So the core might be able to transfer angular momentum to the outer parts so the core could collapse.
You need to be a bit cautious about naked singularities. While we can construct a mthematical object that has a naked singularity that doesn't mean such an object could ever physically form.
For example there are various arguments that an extremal Kerr black hole couldn't ever form.
 
4:32 AM
@JohnRennie I'm talking about a lower mass limit though, not an upper angular momentum limit
 
There is no lower mass limit on any black hole.
 
@JohnRennie @0celo7 described the lower mass limit for a Kerr black hole as
Oct 19 at 20:52, by 0celo7
you need $e^2+a^2\le M^2$
 
That isn't a lower mass limit, that is an upper angular momentum limit.
 
user228700
Hi everyone :-) @JohnRennie: Morning!
 
@Kaumudi Morning. Doing physics on a Sunday? !!!
 
user228700
4:41 AM
:-P Everyday sir...
 
user228700
Speaking of physics (:-P), I'd asked a question about gun recoil yesterday...
 
user228700
19 hours ago, by Kaumudi
OK. When a bullet is fired from the barrel of a gun, if the bullet+gun system is considered, the net momentum must remain the same, before and after the trigger is pulled, since no external forces acts on the system. So, as the bullet moves in one direction, the gun recoils in the opposite direction, hence conserving the momentum of the system. The explosion of the gunpowder causes the bullet to propel forward. Which force causes the gun to recoil?
 
@Kaumudi OK, what do you want to know about this?
 
user228700
"Which force causes the gun to recoil?"
 
4:49 AM
> The explosion of the gunpowder causes the bullet to propel forward
Is that all the explosion does?
 
user228700
Ah, this explosion causes the gun to recoil too?
 
Correct! The explosion creates a high pressure gas. The gas exerts a force on everything that it touches, which includes both the bullet and the gun.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Ohh, I see...
 
user228700
Didn't know how it actually works inside. Now Ik at least part of the physics involved. Thanks :-)
 
user228700
Weird...usually, there are only about 8 people around at this time...today there are 14 :-o
 
user228700
4:59 AM
@JohnRennie: Another quick question? (Sorry? :-P)
 
Yes, of course.
 
user228700
My textbook says "Usually colliding forces are impulsive in nature. Since the application time is very small, hence, very little motion of the particle takes place".
 
user116211
@Kaumudi They are modelled by Dirac Delta, a generalised distribution.
 
user228700
What do they mean by the words highlighted in bold..?
 
Any coliision takes a non-zero time because the colliding objects touch, then squish each other, then bounce back into shape and finally separate again.
 
user228700
5:02 AM
@MAFIA36790 Yeah, I toootally get what u mean (:-P) Googling...
 
user116211
@Kaumudi It just means the change in momentum is non-zero no matter how infinitesimal it might be.
 
But this collision time is usually short unless the objects are very squishy.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Yes...
 
So we usually take the approximation that the collision time is zero
 
user228700
OK..?
 
5:03 AM
And that means the particles don't move during the collision.
 
user228700
Right, even tho their velocities change, yeah?
 
We assume the particles involved instantly change velocity when the collision occurs
Obviously this isn't physically realistic because it means the forces during the collision would be infinite
 
user228700
Yeah...
 
But we often aren't interested in exactly what happens during the collisin.
All we need to know is the change of momentum that happens
 
user116211
@JohnRennie And that's why they are modelled by Dirac Delta function.
 
5:05 AM
And this change of momentum has the technical name impulse
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Hm, OK...
 
In classical mechanics, impulse (symbolized by J or Imp) is the integral of a force, F, over the time interval, t, for which it acts. Since force is a vector quantity, impulse is also a vector in the same direction. Impulse applied to an object produces an equivalent vector change in its linear momentum, also in the same direction. The SI unit of impulse is the newton second (N·s), and the dimensionally equivalent unit of momentum is the kilogram meter per second (kg·m/s). The corresponding English engineering units are the pound-second (lbf·s) and the slug-foot per second (slug·ft/s). A resultant...
 
user228700
Yes, OK! :-) Thanku!
 
user116211
@JohnRennie, you can link your post on impulse; there is a pretty good explanation in it.
 
That's why the textbook is using the description impulsive
 
user228700
5:06 AM
(That was fast and omg, was it to the point :-D)
 
@MAFIA36790 I must have answered questions on impulse many times over the years :-)
 
user116211
;)
 
5:19 AM
@MAFIA36790 this one?
6
A: The elusive difference between force and impulse

John RennieIt's hard to think of a physical system involving a force that acted for zero time. However I think it's useful to consider a collision, perhaps between two billiard balls. When the balls collide they change momentum. We know that the change of momentum is just the impulse, and we know that the ...

 
user116211
yes.
 
6:41 AM
Ok I initially did not see the result coming because I implicitly and unawarely assumed that an electron with property 1 passing through detector 1 and unchanged by it means property 1 is an eigenstate of dectector 1
 
user228700
@JohnRennie: Sir, in that post, u've written:
 
user228700
"With the soft balls we get a low force for a long time, with the hard balls we get a high force for a short time, but in both cases (assuming the collision is elastic) the impulse (and change of momentum) is the same."
 
user228700
What do u mean "Impulse and change of momentum "? Aren't they the same?
 
> If you are like me, you will probably find that this explanation is still unsatisfying. We are saying that the electrons seem to communicate faster than light, but somehow relativity is saved because as a technical matter we can't tell that it happened until later. Nonetheless, satisfying or not, Bell's theorem has been experimentally tested and showed that locality must fail, and at the same time relativity has been repeatedly tested and always worked, so until someone comes up with an explanation which shows more naturally why these two results should both be true, we seem to be stuck w
 
@Kaumudi Yes they are the same. I've just used some slightly clumsy wording.
 
user228700
6:46 AM
Ah, OK...
 
user228700
Also, the O.P seems to be confused b/w the terms force and impulse...
 
user228700
S/He keeps saying:
 
Hi, everybody.
@MAFIA36790 o/
 
user228700
"If I got it right, you are saying that we must consider it impulse when t=0?, else it is force."
 
user228700
@DanielSank: Hello :-)
 
6:48 AM
@Kaumudi: this is often an area of confusion for students.
 
user228700
Hm...
 
@Kaumudi how about some good Indian pop?
 
Nonlocality and no communication... The entangled state space seemed to be spanning across miles of physical space (in a sense), yet whenever we are within a subsystem, we only ever see the "slice" of it as an averaged out version of the other subsystem...
 
I'll trade you a fantastic neotango piece...
 
And to be fair it can seem weird that we physicists are unconcerned about an infinite collision force.
 
user116211
6:49 AM
@DanielSank \o
 
user228700
I wonder if s/he was able to resolve this confusion...
 
I need to revise why we need to partial trace the density matrix when we move into subsystems...
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Yes, definitely...
 
user116211
@Kaumudi There is an accepted answer.
 
Well my answer was accepted so I guess that means the OP thought it made sense ...
 
6:50 AM
@Secret I actually never looked into that...
I think you can convince yourself that it makes sense, but off hand I don't remember why.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Oh, right, yeah :-)
 
user228700
@DanielSank: Dunno if this qualifies as "good pop" but here:
 
Oh! I've heard of that holiday when you throw colors at each other.
Apparently boys are especially supposed to target their sister in law or someething like that.
If I were to travel to India for fun, what's the best place to go?
 
user116211
@DanielSank TIFR, you must visit it.
 
6:54 AM
@MAFIA36790 The university?
 
user116211
H.Chandra Research Institute in Allahabad is also a good place to visit.
 
user116211
@DanielSank yes.
 
@MAFIA36790 I sort of know a professor there.
I wonder if I could arrange to come give a seminar.
 
user116211
I think Lubos also once visited the place.
 
Why is it so important to visit?
 
user116211
6:56 AM
@DanielSank Because of the excellent faculty especially mathematics.
 
user116211
@DanielSank They indeed do seminars but I'm not sure about that.
 
@MAFIA36790 But dude, I'm talking about travel for fun.
 
user116211
._.
 
Where are the beautiful places? The good foods?
 
user116211
@DanielSank Hyderabad!!
 
user116211
6:58 AM
The Mughal cuisine and the excellent dishes of Nizami period.
 
Thanks!
 
user116211
Then you should visit Calcutta.
 
Oh?
 
user116211
Another hub of exquisite dishes.
 
Ok, perhaps if I can arrange a time to go with my wife, you can advise me on an itinerary?
 
user228700
6:59 AM
Wait, what is happening?!
 
Anna loves to travel.
 
user116211
@DanielSank sure!!
 
What's the best time of year? Not summer, I guess...
 
user228700
Omg @DanielSank: :'-( I thought I was gonna be ur tour guide.
 
user116211
@DanielSank That depends on what part of India you want to visit.
 
6:59 AM
@Kaumudi Well why not? Can I not solicit advice from two?
@MAFIA36790 I see
 
user228700
OK, I'm in the middle of something at the moment. Will u still be here in...half an hour?
 
user228700
I could tell u loads!
 
@Kaumudi Probably, but no guarantees. It's late here.
There will be another day Kaumudi! Don't worry.
 
user228700
:-P OK...
 
user228700
I will check to see if u're around in half an hour...In the meantime, tho, I have a quick question...
 
user116211
7:01 AM
There are lots of places to watch in Calcutta @DanielSank.
 
user116211
Mostly are from Victorian period.
 
user116211
There are some famous cemeteries; old parks; library; old colleges; Memorials!!
 
user116211
You can't finish in a single tour ;)
 
When I travel, I prefer to simply "be" in the foreign city.
I do like some museums etc., but mostly I'd rather wander the street, eat local food, and try to get a feel for the normal life.
I really dislike running from one tourist location to the next.
 
user228700
My textbook says that the normal force, tension and friction may be impulsive, but that it's case dependent. However, I read somewhere on SE that these forces, esp tension absolutely cannot be impulsive. Thoughts..?
 
user116211
7:04 AM
@DanielSank yeh me too.
 
For example, if there is a park that the locals go to in the weekend, then I'll go there.
 
user116211
It's good and really thrilling to explore the city yourself without any assistance.
 
user228700
@DanielSank Oh, man, if u're still around in half an hour...
 
@Kaumudi What do they mean "impulsive"? Like... acting for a very short time?
 
user228700
@DanielSank Yes, exactly.
 
7:05 AM
@MAFIA36790 I don't mind going around with a local... India would be a little overwhelming for two obvious foreigners, I guess.
@Kaumudi Hmmm, yes I would not say tension is usually impulsive.
 
user228700
@DanielSank Oh, definitely.
 
Nor friction :\
 
user116211
@DanielSank, When I first came in Calcutta, I explored the whole city myself for two days. Went from church to local restaurants; visited old shops; it was amazing ;))
 
user228700
@DanielSank Hm...can u please elaborate?
 
@MAFIA36790 There are churches? That's odd.
 
user116211
7:06 AM
@DanielSank O.o
 
user116211
Why do you think otherwise?
 
@Kaumudi It just seems rather unlikely. If I swing a ball around on a string at constant velocity, the force of tension is constant.
@MAFIA36790 Are there many Christians?
 
user228700
Hm, yeah, I guess...
 
user116211
@DanielSank Not many; but in a substantial number.
 
@MAFIA36790 Built by the English?
 
user116211
7:07 AM
@DanielSank yes.
 
@Kaumudi suppose you have a stone on a string and you throw the stone. There is no force on the stone until the string is taut, then there is a force due to the tension in the string for a short time until the stone bounces back. That could be an impulsive force due to tension.
 
user228700
And what about friction..? That too seems like it cannot exceed a certain value, yes...
 
@JohnRennie Yes.
@Kaumudi Friction also seems unlikely to be impulsive.
@MAFIA36790 Still in use?
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Yes, yes...
 
user116211
@DanielSank Yes.
 
user228700
7:08 AM
Alright, so it is case dependent.
 
user116211
I have seen one which is not in use too.
 
@MAFIA36790 By Indians or English or both?
 
user228700
BTW, @MAFIA36790: There is so much more to India that just Calcutta!
 
i.e., are there many Indian Christians?
 
user116211
It was in a dilapidated condition.
 
7:08 AM
@Kaumudi you might be able to find an example where the force due to friction is impulsive, but I suspect this would be a bit contrived.
 
^ Yes
 
user116211
@Kaumudi I know ;)
 
@Kaumudi I've been to Pune ...
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Huh...
 
user228700
OK, then I'll wait and see if I come across any scenario in which these forces are impulsive.
 
user228700
7:09 AM
@JohnRennie Oh! When..?
 
@Kaumudi Suppose I'm driving my car slowly and I stamp on the brakes. The car will effectively stop instantly i.e. the stopping time is so short as to be negligable. That could be an impulsive force due to friction.
 
@JohnRennie That's a very interesting point.
What an interesting case to think about.
 
user116211
@DanielSank Well, I think the both.
 
There are two points of impulsive friction there. How odd.
Friction is confusing, eh?
 
@Kaumudi I can't remember exactly, but it was in the 90s. Unilever Hindustan was sponsoring research at the university in Pune and I went for a week for a conference.
 
user116211
7:11 AM
@DanielSank As I said, not many, but not few either.
 
@MAFIA36790 I see.
 
user116211
You should visit the Armenian church; one of the beautiful churches.
 
user116211
I think the state Govt. does arrange for the foreign tourists special package tour throughout the city.
 
user116211
There is so much thing in just one city; and you have in your hand the whole country!
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Huh...
 
user228700
7:14 AM
It stops immediately, yes...
 
user116211
It's going to be adventurous, @DanielSank; just pick some good time ;)
 
user228700
@DanielSank Two points?
 
@Kaumudi The brakes against the rotor and the tires against the road.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Ah, OK...
 
user228700
Did u go sight-seeing?
 
user228700
7:16 AM
@DanielSank Oh, riight...
 
@Kaumudi We went round the old fort from the Raj days. I wandered around a bit, but Pune isn't a very scenic place or at least it wasn't in those days.
 
user228700
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Oh, I see...
 
user228700
In that ^ picture, looking at the third diagram, it says that the normal force b/w the ground and the ball on the right is also impulsive.
 
user228700
I don't see how...
 
7:21 AM
Danielsank:
(Below are not asking questions, even if you see a question mark. It's outlining what I am pondering about on this issue)

Well, I found my understanding tying into knots when I looked at Bell Theorem in detail, and then tried to ask my fellow physicists about that marble analogy of entanglement yesterday and also some days ago with Acuriousmind. Because they all agree my devil's advocate that my description is still missing Bell's theorem and has a classical, hence local way of arising it (with one saying that this explanation by alluring to tensor products is essentially takin
 
user228700
@DanielSank: I'll be available to talk about touring India in like 5 mins :-P Pls be around.
 
@Secret This is a very good question. To put it simply: "How is entanglement different from classical correlated probability?"
@Kaumudi ok
 
@Kaumudi I think the point is that the frictional forces only act during the collision, so if the collision is short the frinctional forces only act for a short time.
 
The short answer, @Secret, is that each time we draw a sample from the classical correlated probability distribution, the two variables have values before we look.
With entanglement, they do not.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie They only act during the collision?
 
7:25 AM
At least, that's one way to say it.
 
@Kaumudi yes. Is that not obvious?
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Erm, actually, no...
 
user228700
Which force are u talking about?
 
user228700
(Yes, friction, but where is it acting?)
 
Consider the ball on the ground. It is stationary and no frictional forces are acting.
 
user228700
7:26 AM
Uh huh...
 
When the other ball hits it this produces a sideways force and on a frictionless surface it would make the ball on the ground move sideways.
 
@DanielSank so we cannot say the wavefunction of the entangled state contained all the outcomes in theory (i.e. they are predicted to be there, except they have not been realised), and measurements just happened to pick one of these according to the probabilities given by the wavefunction, and then realised it into an outcome observed?
 
@Secret Uh, sure, we can say that.
 
But if the friction is high enough the ball on the ground won't skid sideways, though it may rotate sideways.
 
But if we have two marbles, the marbles have colors before we look.
 
7:28 AM
So in this case we get a frictional force between the ground and the ball that only acts during the collision.
 
Let me put it this way @Secret, in classical physics, probabilities come from our lack of knowledge, but in quantum mechanics, they do not.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Hm...
 
user116211
^ Isn't this obvious @secret?
 
@Kaumudi is that Hm I disagree? :-)
 
user228700
I'm gonna go check to see if I can find a clip on YouTube or something. I'm finding it a little difficult to visualize.
 
user228700
7:29 AM
But not before @DanielSank: There is so much more to India! First question: are u a foodie?
 
@Kaumudi let me put it this way: I invented my own vegetarian dish after many iterations. I think it is very good. I served it to an Indian friend of mine. She was so impressed that she requested the recipe and served it to her husband, who liked it so much that he requested she prepare it again. The fact that an Indian requested a repeat of this dish is, to me, the final badge of victory.
Does that explain my attitude about Indian food?
 
user228700
@DanielSank Yeah, it's called Holi <3
 
user116211
@DanielSank The chili recipe? It looks awesome!
 
user228700
@DanielSank :-D Totally. OK. So food is a priority, yes?
 
@Kaumudi You have to ask?
 
user228700
7:32 AM
Just making sure :-P
 
user228700
When u say "Visit India", what does that really mean..?
 
Well because of the no communication theorem, I am always puzzled about why people said the subsystems instantly communicate, and after some studying I am wondering about treating the wavefunction as something that is not just a mathematical device, but something that is present in the system in question (which in some sense it makes sense because states (and hence probabilities) do evolve determinstically in quantum) can actually explain why saying they communicate is not necessary
(To be continuned)
 
@Kaumudi this is it. I don't know if the ingredients exist in India.
@Kaumudi It means get on an airplane in California, and eventually get off the airplane in India, then stay there for some time, and then do the process in reverse.
@Secret I'm finding this hard to follow.
 
user228700
@DanielSank OK, so u want to explore just one state or..?
 
(I will elaborate it shortly...)
 
7:35 AM
@Kaumudi I generally don't like to run around too much. I prefer to pick a few places and really enjoy them.
I like cities, but I like natural places too.
 
user228700
Hm. It would be very helpful to know what u're actually looking to do here. After reading ur conversation with MAFIA, it's clear that u don't want to do much running around...
 
user228700
One thing is for sure-u have to visit Delhi.
 
Hah, so far I have to visit Calcutta and I have to visit Delhi.
 
user228700
Food is important, yeah? Delhi.
 
user116211
cuisines of old Delhi; the old Mughal architecture....
 
user228700
7:38 AM
^Exactly.
 
@JohnRennie is there a one-syllable synonym for "because" or "due to"?
@MAFIA36790 Ok!
 
user228700
Also. Street food.
 
^ I want that.
 
user116211
Egg Roll!!
 
user228700
Delhi is so famous for its street food.
 
7:39 AM
What's that?
 
user116211
@DanielSank It's the signature of Calcutta ;))
 
Oh, it's a rolled up omelette with stuff inside.
 
user228700
All over India, u say "Street food", and someone will shout "DELHI!!!"
 
sounds delicious
 
user116211
@DanielSank yes!!
 
7:40 AM
Sounds good to me.
Hm, I'm hungry now...
dangit
Maybe I'll make some egg...
 
user116211
And nothing I can say about Delhi.
 
user228700
:-P But yeah, Delhi.
 
user116211
Everything fall short to Delhi's luscious dishes ;))
 
user228700
OK here:
 
Hey, so what's the deal... are so so many Indians vegetarian or not?
And do eggs count as vegetarian or not?
 
user116211
7:41 AM
@DanielSank I'm veggie, atleast.
 
@MAFIA36790 Aha!
 
user228700
OK, that depends.
 
On what? Religion?
Region?
 
user116211
@DanielSank No, not at all.
 
@MAFIA36790 Well, that's unexpected!
 
user116211
7:41 AM
I'm allergic to eggs. I can't tolerate the smell of fishes or meat.
 
user228700
In some places, eg: West Bengal, there are Brahmins*(who are technically supposed to be *pure vegetarians, ie. not even egg in a pastry or something) who are allowed to eat fish.
 
2 mins ago, by MAFIA36790
Egg Roll!!
50 secs ago, by MAFIA36790
I'm allergic to eggs. I can't tolerate the smell of fishes or meat.
 
user116211
There are veg variants too.
 
???
 
user116211
Veg Roll.
 
user116211
7:43 AM
Paneer Roll.
 
:D
@MAFIA36790 zomg that sounds good
 
user116211
Onion Masala Roll.
 
user228700
No, it doesn't depend on religion.
 
user116211
There are many that save the lives of vegetarians.
 
user228700
@DanielSank U're kidding me, right? Omg, in this case, u just have to go to Delhi!!
 
7:44 AM
@MAFIA36790 :O
 
user116211
@DanielSank I mentioned egg roll in a generalised intention.
 
user228700
@MAFIA36790 Exactly :-D I'm also a vegetarian lol :-P
 
Onion... masala... roll...
 
user116211
@Kaumudi Good :)
 
How to make?
I need dis.
 
user228700
7:44 AM
@DanielSank!!!
 
user116211
@DanielSank Yeh; there are many I can't even name.
 
@MAFIA36790 Certainly these can be made at home...
 
user116211
@DanielSank Surely; they are not KFC secret dishes ;P
 
user228700
@DanielSank: When did this conversation completely take a turn from tourism to food?!
 
@MAFIA36790 The recipes call for roti. I don't have roti...
 
user228700
7:46 AM
@DanielSank U have wheat?
 
@Kaumudi When I pointed out that food is a priority when travelling?
@Kaumudi I have flour.
 
user116211
@DanielSank Just an Indian-English word. You can make them easily.
 
user228700
@DanielSank U can make roti then.
 
user228700
Wheat flour+Water=Dough
 
user228700
Roll dough into small balls.
 
user116211
7:47 AM
Just need flour; oil; egg; veggies and that's it.
 
^ ?
I think I'll make this for lunch tomorrow.
 
user228700
Yep.
 
I'm excited.
 
user228700
:-P My mom has a book full of recipes for amahzing veg. dishes.
 
user228700
 
user116211
7:49 AM
There are some famous restaurants in Delhi and Calcutta.
 
Ha! gulab jamun! I made those with a friend many years ago.
Such a straightforward idea: let us fry dough and dunk it in sugar!
 
user116211
Just a few days ago, I went to Amina; a famous old restaurant specialising in Dum Biryani; you shouls taste that @DanielSank.
 
user116211
@DanielSank One of my favourites.
 
user228700
Also, natural places?
 
user228700
Google "God's own country".
 
user228700
7:51 AM
Wait, omg!!!
 
user116211
Ladakh !!
 
user228700
Noo.
 
user228700
😑
 
user228700
Kerala.
 
user228700
Not karela
 
user228700
7:51 AM
😛
 
@Kaumudi Kerala?
 
user116211
@Kaumudi No, I was not telling to you ;)
 
@Kaumudi Oh.
Wikipedia says "Kerala" for "God's own country" in India.
 
user228700
@DanielSank No, that as supposed to be a joke directed at @MAFIA36790. Karela is a type of leaf in Hindi :-P
 
user228700
But Kerala, yes, it's a state.
 
user116211
7:52 AM
You should visit North-east; they are a piece of art; exquisite tranquillity and serene panoramas and of course Himalayas @DanielSank!!
 
user228700
And omg I know the perfect place to go if u want to fall in love with Nature all over again.
 
You guys are sending me on a total tour of the subcontinent...
 
user116211
I should have mentioned Kashmir but there are recent tensions, so....
 
user228700
No, seriously, omg, that place.
 
user228700
@MAFIA36790 Kashmir? No effing way! Do u want to maybe die?
 
7:54 AM
Next you'll say I should learn Hindi and four other languages, take a degree in Indian cooking, and buy a house in Calcutta.
 
user228700
U know what? @DanielSank
 
You love your country, I can tell.
 
user116211
;)
 
user228700
:-D We do. @DanielSank! U should do something before coming.
 
MAFIA, Danielsank
Basically what I have in mind about entanglement is like this:

1. There are two marbles of no color, which we knew it will randomly become R G B or combinations thereof if you touch one of them. What color each marble become is entirely determined by this underlying probability and not some underlying thing such as the marble has some predefined color. The color each marble take when it is touched is independent on what happened to the other marble.
--> This is in analogy to the product state scenario of the two electrons
 
user228700
7:56 AM
And no, don't learn Hindi and all 😛 This is something that u can hopefully totally do...
 
user228700
@DanielSank
 
user228700
OK, I need to go have lunch, but @DanielSank: Have u heard of Ruskin Bond?
 
nope.
 
user228700
OK, just as I thought. Before coming here, read two/three of his books. They're only about 200 pgs each, so I bet u could finish them on the flight but yes, u must absolutely read his books if u want a feel for India.
 

« first day (2180 days earlier)      last day (2742 days later) »