But not the subjects. People who charge more journalists with the espionage act for revealing war crimes than all other presidents throughout history combined are not friends in my book.
I have a presidential portrait story! Our local VA clinic did a big lgbtq+ display in the lobby for pride month a few years ago. It was a first for the clinic, and it was pretty cool. They placed it in such a way that it completely blocked the Trump portrait for a month. :)
@MBraedley I don't actually think he will abdicate, because abdication has a problematic history in the UK. Back in 1936, Edward VIII abdicated so he could marry a twice-divorced woman, something that wasn't allowed for Protestants at the time, and with the King being the head of the Protestant Church in the UK, he could not stay Head of State and marry a divorced woman at the same time
You sure you got your dates exact? because when he abdicated wasn't it the moment Elizabeth took the throne? That would be 85 years ago?
Also didn't elizabeth drive jeeps in WW2 so she was not queen back then
Oh ok just looked it up, there is her dad before. Edward abdicated, the dad of elizabeth took the throne for about 20 years before she got the throne at 25 years old in 1953
@Nzall Also I just checked, and at least, I guess giving up the throne worked out. Edward and his wife lived together until he died in the 70s.
hmm, that headline isn't quite right. The linked filing is actually a request for a partial stay of the ruling, and is being made to the current court, not (yet) to the court of appeals
but its certainly being made in anticipation of an appeal:
> Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 8(a)(1), the United States respectfully moves for a partial stay pending appeal of the Court’s September 5, 2022 Order, Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 64. Specifically, the government seeks a stay to the extent the Order
> (1) enjoins the further review and use for criminal investigative purposes of records bearing classification markings that were recovered pursuant to a court-authorized search warrant and
> (2) requires the government to disclose those classified records to a special master for review. The government respectfully requests that the Court rule on this motion promptly. If the Court does not grant a stay by Thursday, September 15, the government intends to seek relief from the Eleventh Circuit.