@Wipqozn you haven't seen those "ground breaking" photo ops where the plot of dirt is like 12 feet long and pretty much everyone gets a shovel all at once?
@TimStone i mean the "live to 200" comments were bizarre and made me question what kind of doctor would spout such weird things
@GodEmperorDune Yeah but for this to possibly actually derail his nomination in light of gestures towards everything it has to be on the more egregious side
Someday there's going to be a reflection interview and they're going to play back footage from when all these people said that they were relying on some assurance Trump had given them and the interviewer will be like "So, why did you do it?" "Cocaine is a hell of a drug"
I'm sure Flynn Jr. becoming an outspoken critic of coerced testimony for people with significantly less power than someone associated with the President will be forthcoming
"oh boo whooo i can't find a girl to be with and i keep getting rejected so i'm going to blame everyone else and kill a bunch of innocent people and ruin their happy lives", yeh, the fact you come to that conclusion might be the reason why
@GodEmperorDune the first one is bad already but it's even worse because the reason of it was because of the second one
> According to the Yomiuri Shimbun, investigators discovered several DVDs that showed nude under-15-year-old girls at Watsuki's Tokyo office. Similar DVDs were also reportedly found at his house.
Yomiuri Shimbun adds that during another child pornography case, suspicions that Watsuki had purchased illicit DVDs featuring underage girls surfaced.
@GodEmperorDune yeh having at work is weird but then again age of consent in japan isn't actually clear cut. like assuming child pornography is anything with a minor who can not consent, age of consent starts at 13 but prefectures can enact local laws "which raise the de-facto age of consent to 16-18, unless they are in a "sincere romantic relationship", usually determined by parental consent."
like since the mangaka has been fined it seems it was legit child porn for that prefecture
Just In: 2 sources confirm to @nancycordes and @edokeefe Sen Vet Affairs Comm is reviewing allegations against Ronny Jackson which include a hostile work environment, excessive drinking on the job and improperly dispensing meds.
The French Presidency has this in its readout of the Trump - Macron dinner at Mount Vernon: "they spoke about the US economy, President Trump's polls and preparations for the US midterm elections." Yes, his polls.
Unlocking delivery possibilities: With Amazon Key, millions of Prime members can now have packages delivered inside their cars at no extra cost. http://www.amazon.com/keyincar https://t.co/Sxg4Fdcf6F
Look, sometimes you just talk to your casual acquaintance for legal advice about your property investing because you bought a bunch of stuff from a criminal dealer convicted of fraud
> Note that in another survey conducted by former Facebook pollster Tavis McGinn, we learned that 32 percent of Americans believe Facebook is having a negative impact on society.
@TimStone sooner or later there will be a security issue that will allow remote unlocking of all those cars, the car industry isn't exactly known for good software
So, in light of the TA strike tomorrow at Columbia (and my policy to not cross picket lines) I’ve asked the (very kind and understanding) organizers to cancel the event. https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/988609908940660736
@Ronan well it's not protected but it's not like they don't have it. like maybe i'm misreading it but it looks like here that all the things you're not allowed to do are also the things in the don't be a dick head list
@Ronan more or less, but what this guy got into trouble for was posting a video or making his girlfriends cute pug into something that isn't cute, a nazi
@TimStone Next update you won't even have to stop to get your delivery! An amazon delivery driver will chase you down while you're on the road and throw the package into your car!
Police, who essentially are dressed and armed exactly like soldiers in a war zone, are pointing loaded weapons at unarmed citizens protesting against Nazis.
This is Trump's America. This is not normal.
https://t.co/WcbEuer0n0
WOW. From the print pool: "When Jon Karl asked POTUS if he would consider a pardon for Michael Cohen, the president glared at Karl and snapped, "Stupid question."
Trump on Macron: “We have a very special relationship, in fact I’ll get that little piece of dandruff off…we have to make him perfect, he is perfect.” http://abcn.ws/2HpWmKa https://t.co/vzV2Dech86
I saw this on the BBC and thought you should see it:
Toronto van attack: How is the suspect not dead? - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43876772
> Video from the scene shows suspect Alek Minassian pointing an object at the officer and shouting: "Kill me!"
> The officer tells the man to "get down" and when the suspect says he has a gun, the officer repeats: "I don't care. Get down."
> "Research has shown that Canadian police are reluctant users of deadly force," says Rick Parent, a criminologist at Simon Fraser University in Canada's British Columbia.
> He said police in the city were "taught to use as little force as possible in any given situation".
I'm surprised at how many journos are surprised that Toronto police didn't shoot the van murder suspect. You know that police are specifically not supposed to act as judge, jury and executioner, right? We need to normalize non-violent police intervention.
Meanwhile, an American professor thinks the officer fucked up by not shooting him dead
> However, Michael Lyman, professor of Criminal Justice Administration at Columbia College of Missouri, told the BBC that the officer may have had a "duty" to kill the suspect.
Seriously, this just goes to show deadly force isn't nearly as required as American police seem to think, and that training is a huge part of it
hopefully the american legal systm takes note and tries to improve it's training
Additionally 10/10 police officer here. Makes me proud to be Canadian to be sure. hopefully we continue to see more and more incidents like this resolved without deadly force.
@Wipqozn a huge difference seems to be that in many other countries the police wait until they actually know that a suspect is armed, and even then only if they're a direct and immediate threat
I think that we as an American society encourage that mindset and training regime.
There are definitely individual bad officers and decisions, but it wouldn't happen on this scale if it wasn't systemic/societal.
So yes, I completely agree with you.
user15026
4:05 PM
@GnomeSlice @TimStone agreed - like I get it, he does a lot of very strange things very publicly, but commenting on all of them seems like an exercise in weird futility
@puzzlepiece87 Also I don't think I agree Americans, on the whole, already know know. I suspect the Average american doesn't think there's any problem at all. They probably think other countries aren't any different.
Not everyone follows issues as closely as we do
user15026
@Wipqozn I hope so. Although it sucks how many people are shocked that they didn't shoot the guy, and also how many people think they should've
@Wipqozn Agreed - sometimes we get kinda echo-chamber-y in here - America is big with lots of people in. I assume, like I see here, people assume their reality is the only reality - they might not know other countries/places act differently.
@Ash Definitely disagree this is only an echo chamber sometimes :P
And yeah, speaking as someone who used to work at a news company, the average person just reads the top stories of the day or whatever is shared to facebook. They don't do much additional diving, and a lot of folks will just read the first paragraph.
@Wipqozn I guess where I ultimately am on people not knowing is that their voices don't really count in the discussion until they start participating. That's not a judgment at all - I'm extremely fortunate to have the luxury of time and money to follow issues. It's just that these decisions will continue to be made whether people know or not.
And I think it's very unclear that even if they did know they would substantially disagree with the people who already do know.
@Wipqozn this is actually something we talked about during a happy hour; how individualizing the issue makes it way easier to dismiss, so we need to consider how to make it clear that no it's institutional
And you can use other decisions as proxies for how they would feel. For example, Americans as a whole have a long, consistent history of being in favor of increased law and order.
So it's nice of you to give people the benefit of the doubt, but when the same people you're giving the benefit of the doubt to vote for the person promising to get rid of the "scary illegals" or "scary terrorists" or "American carnage" or whatever else the buzzword of the day is, I don't think it's earned.
I think it's quite likely that they'd be like "Nope, they're criminals anyway, just shoot them"
@Unionhawk That chain seems like a very roundabout way of saying people are going to believe what they want to believe despite whatever the evidence is.
@puzzlepiece87 Except the voices of people who don't follow this stuff, are uninformed, or don't say anything at all do count. They may not matter to us, but it matters to the politicians making the decisions who are trying to get elected. If enough people don't speak up that's essentially viewed as acceptance of the status quo.
aka "My base doesn't care about this issue, so I don't care about it, if they did, they'd tell me!"
@puzzlepiece87 Never claimed otherwise.
@Unionhawk It can, but keep in mind that sometimes "it's just a few" is a response to someone arguing it's an institutional problem coming across as saying "all cops are bad people", which a completely different argument
@Wipqozn Ah got it. I thought you were giving the benefit of the doubt to them in the linked comment. I thought "if they knew, they'd want change" was implied.
What I'm saying is someone saying "it's just a few" doesn't mean they disagree with it being an institutional problem, but that sometimes folks making institutional arguments don't present their points well and it comes across as "all cops are bad people". So it looks like a person may be disagreeing, but they're not.
I hope that made sense, because I gotta get back to work
@Wipqozn For the record, this is the argument I have made in the past, or tried to make. I don't dispute that there is a major institutional policing problem in America, but I have pushed back against arguments that seem to imply that the problem is universal.
(sorry, I didn't mean it to come off confrontational, just on phone, but it sounded kinda like that so removed)
user15026
@TimStone I get what you're saying, I'm more just like headtilt at how we got to the point where we HAVE all these things to comment on because the whole thing is bananas and it's always bananas and there are so many bananas
The EPA has shut out reporters from its announcement on making science-based regulations more transparent. The audience, visible in the live feed, is a who's who of climate deniers, all of whom have worked to weaken established climate science. https://www.epa.gov/home/live
.@SenateMajLdr on VA Sec nominee Ronny Jackson: "I'm waiting to hear from both Chairman Isakson & from the Administration what they believe the way forward should be & we'll take our cues from them..I'm going to wait & see what the President recommends." https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4726113/majority-leader-mcconnell-va-sec-nominee-ronny-jackson
@TimStone not only is this solving the wrong problem, it's also forgetting the fact that a four-digit combo lock can literally be cracked by anyone and you can just cut through the plastic
@quartata It will make prescriptions marginally more costly though, I imagine
We could just not prescribe as many opiates to people who didn't need them too, but then we'd likely go too far and screw people with chronic pain over so :/
SEN. TESTER CONFIRMS: Allegations against Jackson includes improperly dispensing drugs; being drunk while traveling on the job; and hostile work environment
I only saw the hostile work environment mentioned in the early news about that report. The other stuff seems quite more likely to lead to a quick removal, if it were included in that report
Yeah, looking further the allegations were officially reported, but not part of the report, which cites another person as a participant in the hostility
Latest info from @WhiteHouse officials: Dr. Jackson NOT withdrawing as nominee to run @DeptVetAffairs.
If you know that this kind of stuff is within reach of the people questioning you, it shows exceedingly poor judgement to even accept the nomination in the first place
For 2 hrs Route 53 DNS was hijacked and nobody noticed.
The internet is the foundations for important information dissemination and supports billions of dollars of transactions.
And it's more fragile than most folks would like to admit. https://twitter.com/GossiTheDog/status/988816808563093504
There's a whole thing on whether him being an "incel martyr" or looking like a clown locked up for murdering 10 people for a long time is a more effective deterrent aside from the ethical implications but I don't know if that's been examined closely
@GnomeSlice I really don't. It sounds to me like you're saying police should be able to shot anyone they deem worthy, like it was a trial by jury. They're only supposed to use lethal force if it's required, not because a suspect "gave up his right to live".
Yeah he's a piece of shit, doesn't mean that I think we should manhunt him down and kill him. What I meant is that if the police officer had decided to shoot instead of not, i dont think it would have been a big loss to the planet earth
@GnomeSlice Then don't respond to me saying cops aren't "judge, jury and execution" by saying "he gave up his right to live". That entire conversation is why I formed an opinion, it's not me just trying to project.
Like there's more to what you say then the literal words you type.Context matters.
On the eve of arguments at #SCOTUS over the legality of Trump's third attempt at a travel ban ... https://twitter.com/markknoller/status/988909076674424832
@GnomeSlice not to bother you about this further, but I think one of the reasons you have to be careful about this is because a lot of nuts on Twitter legitimately think he should have been shot in cold blood on the spot. i get that's obviously not what you mean but you have to tread that line very very carefully