I and my girlfriend are in our 25's. We live in the same city in Indonesia.
Recently, our relationship hit a problem. Last night, we chating about our goals. I really like to her to be my wife. As a man looking for a wife, I think its normal for me to know about her better. We spoke about her p...
Around 6.15am (GMT + 1) this morning I was looking out of my window heading somewhat north and looked into the sky, when I saw something one would probably call a shooting star. the features were of a magnitude I havent by far ever seen before. From my view frame it moved from my right to my left...
me:Hi other: How are you? Instead of saying good, I just reflect on how I am feeling which can take a while, then I express it, if I don't know how I am feeling then I just say I dont know right now.
conversations don't last long enough then I reflect on how I am feeling and then It's okay
the problem is taking so long to figure out what to answer
I want to upvote this answer for the second part but I can't fully agree on your first part. If someone brings up that they feel discriminated against then I sure am entitled to receive an example of such discrimination. I do however agree with you that it's important not to dismiss any weak example as non-important since it's the combination of countless tiny things that make up the discrimination these days. — Imus26 secs ago
I agree that the open discussion is the better way to go. However, I can't help but remark that some teams/developers/companies suffer from a toxic change-resistant environment, where opening a discussion topic leads to conflict and leads to any intended change being shelved because it creates animosity. I'd suggest to tailor the approach to the environment. — Flater14 secs ago
ok, I see. I just realized that I got confused with you an another user with a similar username. If you don't mind me asking, are you on the autistic spectrum?
I'm sorry, the confusion made me tackle the issue while taking autism into account. The article may help but it's true it's very focused on the autistic conneciton
I'm autistic, indeed. But you know, even if these are traits that are commonly shared by autistic people, not all do. There's a saying "if you met one autistic person, you met one autistic person", i.e. just as neurotypical people, we're all unique. There are autistic people obsessed with order and routines and others like to live in a mess and don't like schedules.
For instance, I can't stick with using planning tools. My job requires that I use stuff like JIRA and such so I force myself to use them, but it exhausts me :p
@Rainb To be fair, that all depends pretty much on the intepretation of "change" the devil sits in the detail. I just moved 700km for a new job recently build up a complete new social circle around me and all that belongs to it and it was exciting and almost no stress at all. But small things, like a cleaning service regulary changing the alignment of stuff on my desk... that bugs the hell out of me.
Also for the tics... I didn't have them either, for reasons from my childhood. So I had recently learned how to make use of the positives of having such tics, and learning it in a socially acceptable manner, what is a great add to my life :P
@avazula The reason why I don't like jira is.... not because I don't like the mentality of such tools, but because.... JIRA feels so.... intuitive. That wouldn't mean I wouldn't like an good alternative to it. I mean the idea behind it is generally good. Do we agree on that ava?:P
I mentioned getting a state-acknowledged autism diagnosis to my partner yesterday, and they asked why it'd be important for me to get one, as I already know I'm autistic. I'm dreaming of getting special accommodation at work ...
But those are the most fun things to talk about at work here XD. Where you say things that should only be taken the non-sexual way because we're at work... and than you try to one-up the other person to make it sound even more sexual
@Rainb It is not that easy. This would generally raise the question "How so?" and be disputed. Even if you come up with autism in the reasoning, that will most likely not understood.
@dhein You can't expect people to take "autism" as the explanation. Take that as the cause of your strenghts and weaknesses and explain those and how certain changes at work can compensate for your weaknesses or reinforce your strenghts
@Imus Don't get me wrong, I am quite good at this. But still if there is ignorance/inacceptance in place, you can do what ever you want, you wont archieve anything.
@Rainb Technically you are right and thats what I did in the end. But still, you are oversimpifying it. It isn't that easy, especially if you have just a limited capability to keep up with your all day dutys.
@Rainb: Have you ever considered making an appointment with an professional therapeut? Autism or not, you mention here jsut in that short time quite a few things that bother you about your self. Maybe you should find someone who is trained in helping you with such worries? As our knowledge here is very limited.
Well thats the good thing about professional therapists: If they do their job well, you don't have to worry what to tell, cause they will ask for what they need to know ;)
But in the end, even if you annoy them, it is their job they decided to practicate. So they have their reasons why it is ok for them being annoyed, if they are at all.
Just stand it out one time and try to make new appointments with the therapist whenever you are there anyways. Thats the way how I do it with mine and I rarely have to call for rearranging appointments at all.
@Rainb I know what you mean. But keep in mind, if it si someones job listening to you, they get paid for it. So even if you indeed annoy them, they get money for it so they have to accept it ;)
> English Alternative forms allism Etymology 1 all + -ism coined by David Lewis in his 1989 paper "Noneism or Allism?"
Noun Allism (uncountable)
(metaphysics) A belief in the existence of all possible entities including past and future things or unactualised possibilities. Etymology 2 all + -ism Coined by Peter van Inwagan in 2009.
Noun Allism (uncountable)
(theology) The denial of creationism in all its forms (including intelligent design) and the assertion that evolution alone is responsible for the diversity of all living creatures.
What brings me to ask this question today is because I recently created a Stack Exchange proposal which scope may partially overlap the IPS scope. One of the proposal's followers raised that concern and I was dazzled by that answer to the question:
[...] When unsuspecting users wander into th...
That dude actually drives me mad.... he has no degree in anything, is an professional IT engineer with autism himself if trusting his website and he dares to publish such a paper... wtf....
Approach friends about getting un-invited last minute with terrible communication and rude behavior?
Yep, here we go again.
I want to know exactly, other than obvious personal and competitive issues, why this perfectly valid and complete Answer was wrongly Deleted.
Be specific, if you can. Bu...
I don't care about shoulds or shouldn'ts, I was just asking about the accuracy of it.. the problem with current machine learning is that you truly have no control of other parameters that you might want to modify, and you must treat them like a black box function. I don't think that is ideal.
I guess it depends on how you combine the NNs with the other parts of some software, I have not worked with it no, but I would like to know how much control do you have over it?
@Rainb Erm. I'm at work so it'd be difficult for me to take the time to explain it fully, especially as this is quite a broad topic. I could give you some reading references if you want to though.
Hmm I don't think I am conveying the idea. The idea is, humans can't know why complex neural networks take the decisions they do, it all reduces to fiding a local minima on their error function.
So if I say
hey AlphaZero, why did you move the bishop instead of the knight?
he won't know, it is just the collective of weights and biases that determined numerically that was the best move.
As I said, I'm at work RN and don't have the liberty of discussing this boldly but, here's the thing:
ML and DL are fields where you give some mathematical concepts a huge amount of data (both "inputs" and "outputs"). The concepts (and as it's a mountain of interconnected computing cells, let's call them networks) are processed by the networks, and then these latter will give you the relationship (aka, mathematical function) between the given inputs and outputs. If you take an example:
Say you wanna predict the price of an house based on some criteria:
You'll feed the network with a huge amount of data with paired inputs (the size, the number of bedrooms, the presence of a garage, of a pool, mould issues ...) and the outputs (the price on the market at a given time, the corresponding taxes, the finances of the renters/buyers, ...), the network will be able to find a relationship between these sets of data and therefore predict the price of a house for which you'll only give some inputs.
Now, how accurate is that result is where humans intervene: the relationship will be determined based on the network nature, and some parameters that a human will set and adjust based on the nature of the data, and their goals: if you wanna fast results, you may have to get less accurate results, for instance
Most of these parameters are comparable to thresholds, that you adjust to get a satisfying equilibrium between how fast and accurate your network will be. Depending on the nature of the data processed, they may also rely on the number of results found (say, if you're trying to detect all cats in a picture, and that once it processed all the data, it doesn't find all the cats, you may wanna lower your threshold and see whether you get more accurate results)
Here, below's an example on how networks process data when it comes to recognizing objects and features in images (which was my main field):
Basically, it's working just like our brains do
They're just not as independent that one would think. There's a lot of human fine-tuning at stake to get accurate results.
@avazula Hmm. I've watched 3Blue1Brown's video series on neural networks and I'm fairly sure I remember him showing what the nodes within each layer were actually emphasizing (for identifying handwritten numerical digits) and found that it's still pretty garbled. They just magically produce the right result when taken altogether.
I have a friend who does financial advices and arranges certain deals. Thanks to him I was able to make a deal on which I saved a good amount of money. Since we're not that good friends, we usually meet just for these occasions and a few others, I won't be able to repay him in other ways. He has ...
A little history: I was transferred to this project team a few years ago. The subteam I'm on has 4 people: the project lead (Jim), another guy, the co-worker I'm asking about (let's call her Mary), and me. We all report to the team lead (Tom), and most of the team works remotely, including Tom. J...
@scohe001 Well... y'all are an amazing community and you don't deserve being treated like that. The only point I'd make about that latest deletion: There was no comment from those that voted to delete it :)
That second part is partially on me though as the last vote. I may or may not have snuck it in during a meeting when I couldn't take the time to comment. I won't let it happen again though!
@Tinkeringbell It was on me too. I was tired when I voted to delete and leaving a comment seamed like a lot, espcialy since I knew the user and didn't though that my comment would have been useful
Please, no matter what the history of a user, try to keep commenting and treating them 'like normal'. If y'all stop doing that it makes it a lot harder for us mods to make strong cases for taking next steps :)
@Tinkeringbell I get that, but we only have so much energy to expend, and it gets tiring leaving comments for a user who repeatedly dismisses any attempts to help as the community singling them out. I care more about upholding the quality of the site than I do about trying to help one user who refuses to be helped. Should I not be flagging and voting just because I don't have the energy to do more than that?
@scohe001 Ha! Went through a job change, a move to a different city, a 2 and a half week trip to India with a 2 year old... Yeah I am just glad to finally be able to sit down and not worry.
It was. All this was jammed within a 1 month period. So it was horrible. But the trip was amazing. My parents were meeting my wife and my baby for the first time! lol
@El'endiaStarman there's no magic at stake here, really just math. Its just that the courses on machine learning are either way too broad or way too complicated. Trust me, I suffer from a very bad impostor syndrome and I still believe that once you have the right resources, machine learning is kinda easy and all the decoration is just here to try to make it a incredibly difficult topic to learn.
But again, I mainly used it for object recognition in images. May be easier than other fields.
@CrazyCucumber that's so nice! Congrats! I'm glad you enjoyed it :)
Machine learning? You might be able to help me with something @avazula. You have any resources for learning Knowledge Discovery in Databases? Reducts and discernibility functions and such?
Or is that really far away from machine learning? Sorry don't know much about that. One of the core courses in my Master's is that class and oh my god my professor is dull.
I feel like this class might have a lot to teach me, but jeez this guy needs to try harder. I am just trying to learn on my own. I need somewhere I can go to learn decision trees, rough sets, RSES, things like that.
@avazula Oh, I was just remarking on the infographic claiming that neural networks recognize certain features and then put them together bit by bit until they have the full picture of what the thing is. The video I linked shows that this didn't happen in the case of handwritten digit recognition. Also, "magical" because it just kinda happens and the logic doesn't correspond very well with our usual reasoning.
@Anon1142 You're welcome. Feel free to stick around, and ask any questions you may have about the site in here :) There's always someone around that's happy and willing to help
@CrazyCucumber oh, I'm sorry, I'm not sure I could be of great help there. I'd have loved to.
@El'endiaStarman yeah, it's true that in that infographic it seems too... Simple.
Handwriting recognition really seems more complicated, for some obscure reason. The simplest human issues seem to be the hardest to tackle with ML. We still have a lot to discover :)