« first day (9 days earlier)      last day (2539 days later) » 
00:00 - 21:0021:00 - 00:00

9:00 PM
People recognize Mos as our main chat - maybe anything else should have "General chat" in the name.
 
true, though that'd probably apply to any room with a name that was less generic than "General SFF Chat"
 
Jinx
 
and part of the point is to deliberately not have "Mos" anywhere near the name of anything anymore
 
user132126
The room description says General Discussion. Perhaps we can word that slightly different
 
I don't think "Mos" was the problem, but okay.
 
user132126
9:00 PM
"PRIMARY GENERAL CHAT FOR SFF"?
 
@CreationEdge The name doesn't.
 
no one reads descriptions so it's probably fine as is
 
TAK HEER
 
@Ixrec Who cares - anyone who's against my suggestion can come to chat and tell it to my face; I bet only 5 people will (out of ~20 or so voters).
 
TAK HEER RUME
 
user132126
9:01 PM
 
user132126
When you're selecting a room as a first time SFF visit, it's right there. Making it allcaps or Title Case could make it stand out more?
 
Please now
 
user132126
My concern would just be getting new users pointed to the right place.
 
this is probably why a meta thread would be useful: I have no idea how ordinary users discover this sort of thing
 
Hey Wad :D
 
9:03 PM
Everyone just uses a reference to their favorite franchise.
 
I thought it was the point that people don't just discover this room - one does not simply walk into Mos Restaurant.
 
evidently new people are finding this room, somehow, so we haven't confused everyone, but maybe we confused enough people to be worth not doing another name change, I just dunno
 
user132126
Yeah, I'm trying to avoid having a meta about the details followed by another meta about the actual next name rotation.
 
I suggest "Outpost #31", everyone else suggests less cool ideas, one of which wins.
@Catija Hey!
 
we need a meta about whether we're allowed to discuss the possibility of a meta thread for chatroom names in chat prior to discussing them on a meta thread, on meta of course
3
 
9:04 PM
It's Meta all the way down!
 
it kinda is
 
user132126
A quarterly post with voting closing the day before implementation? A yearly post where whichever suggestion is the highest but hasn't been done already goes? Catija suggested we do the same 4 every year, so a post open for the next quarter and the top 4 at the end are the 4 we use "permanently"?
 
user132126
Is all of this too much hope that we'll even be open next quarter?
 
same 4 every year would be lame imo
 
This is all too much responsibility, Imma go read Nausicaa in my bed. G'night!
 
user132126
9:07 PM
Quitter!
 
@CreationEdge well, there are two mods in this conversation, if neither of you guys know I sure as heck don't
 
user132126
Okay, I think I have a decent solution that'll work for me, and if no one likes it then whatever, it'll die.
 
"Super Friendly Friends Chat". It has SFF in it and it is pro-friendliness.
2
 
@Ixrec Not sure why we'd have any more insight than you, really... it's up to this community, and yes, that includes the non-SFF mods who frequent it, to keep this room reigned in. It's certainly been achieved but it's not all on the mods... the non-mod users probably have more ability to moderate the actions because they can cast flags without them being instantly binding. I really wish people wouldn't be so afraid to flag something.
 
user132126
And if a conversation is making you uncomfortable, then you can flag a message for moderator attention and only mods will see the flag (so it won't put up the not-so-subtle flag bubble on every eligible network user's avatar). It's especially useful if you can't pinpoint a specific message as offensive, but you know the whole conversation is not in a good place.
 
9:16 PM
Heck, even if it's just one statement and you want to actually explain your flag a bit, use the flag for moderator attention and use the explanation field.
 
0
Q: Does a Vulcan, in a mind-meld, feel the emotions of the entity with whom he is melding?

ab2My question is prompted by a question on English Language and Usage: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/390483/is-there-a-word-for-cold-empathy. The kernel of the question is: I am looking for a word that means "understanding BUT NOT sharing the feelings of another". I immediate...

 
So could we flag an unrelated post and explain what's really going on with the textbox?
 
well, at least try to pick a related post
 
Yeah, but we could
If, for example, someone feared some sort of retribution for flagging someone else's post, they could flag a mod's or RO's post and explain to them what happened
I've heard that one of the big problems for flags is the complaining person doesn't want to mark the perp so they don't mark at all
 
@DCOPTimDowd Why would you do that? Why flag an innocuous chat message?
The person who is the target of the flag is not notified that they were flagged. Mods need to see the actual post to be able to adequately respond.
 
9:29 PM
(by the way, does anyone actually know firsthand of people who were afraid to flag things, rather than guessing/assuming such people must exist? I've never known anyone who contemplated using the flag system at all, much less decided against using it)
 
0
Q: Why did the writer of the 2016 "Lucifer" comic series change from Holly Black to Richard Kadrey?

GallifreyanI've been following the 2016 Lucifer series, and enjoying it. While re-arranging my Calibre library, I noticed that, while all the issues up to and including 13th have been written by Holly Black, issue 14 was written by Black and Richard Kadrey, while issue after that were written by Kadrey alon...

 
From what I've heard since this last chat debacle, people have been afraid of flagging the correct person because of splashback from the community
Is this information incorrect?
 
@Ixrec Bellerophon said that in their answer, so I assume they are.
I've also seen at least two users say that they're not going to use flags and would rather people talk it out in chat... which defeats the purpose of flagging... allowing a user who feels uncomfortable to have a private way to report it.
 
@Catija I'm only looking for ways to help prevent more chat issues in the future
 
All flagging the wrong message will do is confuse the crap out of the people responding to the flags.
 
9:32 PM
@Catija isn't the purpose of flagging to be a last resort after reasonable discourse fails?
2
 
No.
Never.
 
oh
 
Who gave you that idea? That's absurd.
 
what is it for then?
 
@Catija It would get it out there at least
 
9:32 PM
every other website in the world with a flagging system, for starters
 
Flagging Shog makes things worse.
 
Flagging is for helping users get bad content removed.
 
But it's pretty funny.
 
Users can not remove their own posts after... 4 minutes... so the only way it can be removed is with a moderator's help.
 
so flagging your own content if you later realized it went too far would be considered typical usage?
 
9:34 PM
Or is it 2 minutes? the point is bad content needs to get removed and users need to have a mechanic for it.
 
some small number of minutes, I can never remember either
 
2 edit, 5 remove
 
@Ixrec Sure. :) I see people do that pretty regularly. I wouldn't go over the top with it but if you realize that a post was taken poorly and you can't delete it, feel free to flag it for moderator attention and ask for it to be removed.
 
You can delete your own messages until 3 seconds before you realize that you should probably delete one of your messages.
 
9:35 PM
I feel like I'm more afraid to flag a mod then a user.
 
@Edlothiad You should be.
 
is anyone not afraid to flag a mod?
 
Can you explain?
Wad, you're not helping.
2
 
And flagging CMs is bad.
@Catija I'm not trying to help.
:)
 
@WadCheber A mod would know I've flagged them and take offense. They would then have powers over me of which I could do nothing
 
9:36 PM
If people are honestly trying to discuss this, I'd like to help facilitate that and I think it would be appreciated if you would respect that.
 
@Catija That's what I was doing and you all called me ridiculous. :)
 
A user would be unaware and could do nothing
 
@DCOPTimDowd I apologize for that.
 
Sorry, that is my standard response to "you're not helping", because TMNT.
 
9:38 PM
@WadCheber I don't count that series, because BOO-YAH-KASHA!
 
But you can have your own message removed by 1) flagging for mod attention, or 2) asking a mod or RO to get rid of it. But RO's can only move it to the trash room, not actually delete it.
 
@Edlothiad If a moderator sees that you've flagged them for some reason, please know that it's standard recommendations for mods to not handle flags that relate to themselves. Also, if a moderator were to take it out on you somehow, that would be considered bad form and a breech of the moderator agreement.
 
@Catija It's cool. I like looking for options, especially since there was word of people saying they were too afraid to flag a post directly
 
End seriousness.
@DCOPTimDowd Possibly because the consequences can be excessive?
 
I guess the only remaining question is that if that is how flags are supposed to be used...why does getting flagged ever directly result in a suspension?
 
9:41 PM
@Catija This is all well and dandy written down, but what is there to stop them?
 
that seems like a pretty strong implication that flagging is supposed to be punitive
 
@WadCheber Socially, yes
 
You can dislike what someone is saying while still knowing that in the past, flags have led to ridiculous room freezes and suspensions which caused all kinds of nasty fallout for months afterwards.
That's why we invented "Tacos"
 
user132126
I think people flag comments on SFF quite regularly. Not always as offensive, but I imagine more proactively than they do in chat.
 
@WadCheber There's that too
 
9:42 PM
It stopped the conversation without attracting unwanted attention.
 
@Edlothiad If you're honestly concerned about it, you should consider writing up a feature request on MSE asking that moderators not be able to see chat flags on their own messages. I'm not actually certain whether they can or not. You're more than welcome to flag one of my messages "for Science" to see if I can see the flag. I'll even make a message for you to flag...
 
yeah we're definitely not talking about comment flags
 
user132126
Considering chat is glorified comment streams, I don't see flags as a last-resort
2
 
@CreationEdge We learned to treat them as such because overuse led to the apocalypse more than once.
 
admittedly, most of the userbase of this chatroom has changed since then
 
user132126
9:44 PM
I don't feel like they've ever been overused in Mos :/
 
@CreationEdge Wasn't that part of the problem?
 
The level of CM attention led to a situation where we were afraid to flag because everyone got punished for what I was one or two people were doing
 
@Ixrec Why wouldn't it? If someone says something egregiously bad and then refuses to accept that what they're saying is inappropriate for chat, why should they be welcome here? I'm not saying it should be a long suspension but a 30 minute time out or an hour or a day...
 
user132126
@DCOPTimDowd Right. Non-use, non community moderatior.
 
@Catija Or a year? That happened too.
 
9:46 PM
@CreationEdge Right
 
@Catija that kinda completely contradicts the claim that it's for cleaning up any bad content, even if the user has since been persuaded it was inappropriate
 
@Catija Well I pressed the little flag, didn't give me many options there
 
Case in point...
:)
 
wad, check your mails?
 
probably a good time to stop this topic anyway
 
user132126
9:47 PM
I'd much rather get a mod attention flag come my way, check out what's going on, and redirect chat (firmly or very firmly if needed) than have a bubble make everyone go "Whodunnit?! What, why that message?"
 
Considering the recent chat room drama, abusing flags is not the best thing to do. Just saying.
 
@Ixrec How so? You're implying that flags can't have multiple uses?
 
user132126
Because as I've seen, it's usually not a single message that causes the problem.
 
uh...with regard to a single type of flag with a single set of consequences, yeah
 
The use is a theoretical issue, the consequences are practical.
 
9:48 PM
@Edlothiad It should give you the option to flag generally for spam or abuse or "for moderator attention"... you want the latter.
 
but anyway, we should stop talking about this now
 
@Avery It's cool.
 
It isn't that cool.
 
@Catija I pressed the little flag and it said "OK!"
 
@Ixrec Are the Harry Potter movies not considered canon?
 
9:48 PM
One freeze began with a mod saying "Flag me".
 
It's not. You've just pinged every single 10k network users and mods across the network.
 
For reals.
 
You = the person who flagged this:
6 mins ago, by Catija
"For Science!" Try this one.
 
Ok flagged @Catija
 
@DCOPTimDowd I'm not familiar with Harry Potter but my understanding is that the movies changed or omitted enough stuff that they have to be considered their own separate thing
 
9:49 PM
I think we got frozen for a week because of that.
 
@Edlothiad So, yes, I can see it.
 
This is an example of why SFF is often afraid to flag.
 
@Avery We were testing something and it was done wrong.
 
@Edlothiad facepalm and that just pinged every network moderator.
 
Flag legitimately flagworthy thing, all hell breaks loose, we lose our chat room.
 
9:50 PM
@Avery I said "ask Catija" I'm safe
 
Or in this case, flag for science, all the CMs think SFF is acting up again, we lose our chat room.
2
 
at this point I'm sorry I asked any questions at all
 
@WadCheber Is SFF the only one with this particular problem?
 
When a site/room becomes known for trouble, flags - whether justified or frivolous - invite overreaction and excessive responses.
 
Here, blame me. If anything happens... I will apologize to anyone who complains and do my best to fix things. I'm honestly trying to help so I don't intend there to be negative consequences.
 
9:52 PM
@DCOPTimDowd No, but we were really good at it.
 
let's just stop talking about flags, everyone already has a stance on this stuff based on experience and talking about it isn't going to change anyone's mind
 
@Ixrec For the record, I was only asking for more info
 
The thing is, our bad days were very much behind us and everything seemed to be going well for months and months.
 
@DCOPTimDowd so was I, but I regret doing so
 
@Ixrec Not with that attitude. If people are afraid to flag for any reason that's a problem and it means that the site isn't functioning correctly.
 
9:53 PM
I haven't been around much for the last 6 months, but it seemed like we'd been problem-free for a year or so.
 
@WadCheber And then you stopped coming around and throwing tacos out when they needed to be there. :( You spent so much time worrying that you were too much of the problem that your absence could have been part of the problem. Despite what you may think of yourself and your negative history, you did a lot to keep Mos on track.
 
@Catija Either that or enough rumors and bad examples have spread to make people at least question bringing a problem forward
 
@Catija I didn't leave because I thought I sucked, I left because I had other stuff going on.
I know I became a positive presence, although my tenure as RO was not so great.
 
There was an episode of Texas Ranger on yesterday about not coming forward when there was a problem with abuse because of the fear associated with speaking up
 
@WadCheber Yeah, I know. That wasn't my intent... when we were chatting before you seemed really concerned that you wouldn't be good as a RO because you didn't have a good idea of what was OK... but I think that you are better at it than you think.
 
9:56 PM
I wish I had been around more after Richard came back, because I think I could have nudged him in the right direction.
 
note that the question of whether to speak up when something bad is happening and the question of whether to use a flag as the method of speaking up are two completely different questions
if there's any chance of this discussion not turning into another tire fire like the ones on meta let's at least not mix those up
 
(and for the record, I think the current name of what used to be Mos is wildly unhelpful, counterproductive, juvenile, and ridiculous)
5
 
@WadCheber That's fair...
 
@Ixrec Not necessarily. If someone flags a message and the offender gets suspended, they're could be a worry of them getting back at who they believe flagged them
 
@Ixrec Sure... the answer to the first part is "yes, always" and the answer to the second part is "It depends on the user".
 
9:58 PM
Leave it frozen, but don't turn it into a public stockade to shame people
 
@DCOPTimDowd that's...exactly my point? that flags aren't always the optimal mechanism?
 
@Ixrec Oh. I thought you were debating me. :)
 
No one even got flagged in the final straw that broke the Mos...
 
not that particular one
Wad's referring to older but similar incidents
 
user132126
@DCOPTimDowd If someone can't handle a 30 minute auto-suspension without flipping out or going on a witch hunt, then maybe a 30 day manual suspension is more suiting?
 
10:01 PM
@Ixrec That's the thing - flagging creates a conflict between the flagee and a faceless "opponent". People are more likely to lash out at the faceless opponent than a person who speaks up and says "this is a problematic conversation, let's talk about Wookiees"
 
@CreationEdge As long as the punishment matches the crime
 
If the person who complained is anonymous, you don't see them as another human being with feelings. You see them as an abstract tattletale.
 
user132126
I don't...
 
Then everyone might react by saying "ANONYMOUS TATTLETALE IS THE PROBLEM" and flinging poop everywhere, after which the CMs wade in with billy clubs and thump everyone.
 
@WadCheber You're only looking at it from the point of view of the flagee... If someone is honestly uncomfortable with something being discussed but worries that letting someone know publicly that they have an issue with it - perhaps they have personal things they don't want to make public here... they have the right to present their case in a private manner.
 
10:03 PM
@WadCheber And even if the person who stated they have a problem with the current conversation wasn't the one who flagged it, they'd still most likely get the flak since they put themselves out there
 
user132126
Hopefully all my "obsolete" and "not constructive" comment flags that got validated don't make me a tattletale.
 
@Catija In theory, and in a perfect world, that would be a solution.
 
user132126
All of SE is built on community moderation.
 
@WadCheber That attitude is not acceptable. That is exactly the sort of reaction that is inappropriate. The user who reacts that way should not be welcome here.
 
This is why I thought "tacos" as Ixrec defined it was so brilliant.
 
10:04 PM
*accidentally indirectly defined it
 
"Tacos" didn't necessarily mean "I'm uncomfortable", it meant "This could lead to trouble, let's change direction".
@Catija At one point, 85% of the regulars reacted that way.
 
@WadCheber Is that what the "floofs" are supposed to do now?
 
The floofs are completely unrelated to any of this.
 
@Catija Look at the saved conversations from Mos.
 
@WadCheber That doesn't put a face to the complaint either, then...
 
10:06 PM
floofs just happen to be one of the traditions that was being done by people not part of the post-Mos exodus so they remain intact
 
@WadCheber And you wonder why Mos had so many issues...
 
@Catija Yeah, it does - a person everyone knows is saying "Let's stop for the sake of the room"
When @Slytherincess put the brakes on a conversation, she wasn't doing it because she was personally offended, but because she knew we might be headed in a direction that would produce offense to others.
 
@WadCheber That still requires that someone actually uses the mechanic. Regardless of whether it's a flag or a taco... someone has to actually use it... and the other users in the room have to respect what it means.
 
there is a lot of people talking past each other in this conversation though
like, faster than I could possibly correct it even if I wasn't doing other stuff
 
user132126
Yeah, I can't keep up.
 
10:08 PM
@Catija Absolutely. And we had incidents where a "tacos" was ignored, the person who ignored it was flagged or kick/muted or whatever, and everyone saw it happen and knew it was justified.
 
@WadCheber People stopped using it, though. Within the last week or so of Mos there were at least three events that all involved users being told to cut it out and refusing to do so.
 
But we had SOOO many incidents where a minor hiccup became a total disaster because a flag produced total chaos. Often, off-site mods or CMs would storm in like riot cops and make everything much worse.
 
My only strong opinion on this matter is that discussing the history of Mos is not a good use of our time. There's just too much disagreement on what "actually happened" for such discussions to be productive.
 
@Catija Those people are probably the ones who needed a timeout, but a reasonable one.
 
@Ixrec Still found it pretty informative though
 
10:11 PM
@Ixrec I think it's relevant, especially in reference to why some people have such an aversion to flagging.
 
@WadCheber You can only give people so many timeouts before it becomes clear that they have no respect for the community and need to be removed.
 
And we were talking about that.
 
@DCOPTimDowd interesting, I would've expected this to merely confuse the heck out of anyone not already opinionated on the subject
 
user132126
@Ixrec I agree. I prefer to look forward.
 
@WadCheber It's relevant, but it's not productive. There's a difference.
 
10:12 PM
@Ixrec I'm a quick learner and a good listener
 
@WadCheber and I'm saying this despite agreeing with almost everything you're saying
 
@Ixrec Most of this discussion hasn't been about Mos, or, if it is, it's only tangential.
 
@Catija How did freezing the room and shaming users accomplish that?
 
user132126
@WadCheber That's a can o' worms best left on meta.
 
user132126
I really don't want to touch that here.
 
10:13 PM
the last several minutes has been about nothing but what flags have historically been like in Mos...
 
@WadCheber I'm with @CreationEdge ... If you haven't already, read the Meta posts... There's no benefit to discussing that here.
 
@Ixrec History is important
 
if this were any other chatroom, I would agree
 
@CreationEdge But from my perspective, knowing nothing about what happened, it seems like "[users] having no respect for the community and needing to be removed" has little to do with closing an entire room.
 
@Catija The meta posts haven't been this educational. Mostly rants and insults there.
I'm really glad I got to sit in on this
 
10:15 PM
@WadCheber At the very least read Shog's post...
 
And it illustrates what I'm saying about people perceiving - rightly or wrongly - flags as unjustifiably dangerous
@Catija I skimmed it.
 
My main concern here is that discussing flags or Mos' history or anything like that will lead us back to the same "discussions" (scare quotes very mandatory here) that were going on in those meta threads. Those threads which are the only content on the entire SE network I've ever found personally offensive. I really do not want any of that toxicity in here as well. It's just not worth it.
at least make a separate room for it
 
Thing is, we can''t change the flag system. It is what it is. So we're left with asking people to behave nicely, and using de-escalation with inappropriate users, and if that doesn't work, of course people are going to throw flags. And that's something we can't control.
 
I read it, and I don't think he makes a strong case to justify closing a room as opposed to just booting troublemakers.
@Slytherincess MISTRESS!!!!
 
@Ixrec That's fair.
 
10:18 PM
<Huggles>
 
@WadCheber - DARLING!
 
yes, more of this please
we need floofs and huggles
 
@Ixrec I think everyone here is being mature and friendly, so we're probably safe.
No one even seems to be bringing emotions into it.
 
@WadCheber I would've agreed with you before those meta threads.
 
@Ixrec Meta ain't chat.
 
10:19 PM
@Ixrec Who is your profile pic? I always thought it was Harry Potter until I zoomed in.
 
@DCOPTimDowd LOL
@DCOPTimDowd it's the Second Doctor
 
This conversation is very reasonable.
 
yeah, thank god
 
@Ixrec Oh. I still see Harry whenever I look at it.
 
@WadCheber Perhaps. I also don't think that questioning it or trying to get the old room back is a viable option.... because I honestly don't think it's going to happen. Hopefully the freezing of Mos will change some things and this room can go back to being hip deep in gifs and floofs with only the occasional taco.
 
10:22 PM
People are going to flag as they see fit, and I'm not telling them not to - I was just trying to explain why some Mos people see flags themselves as a problem rather than a solution.
 
@Ixrec The hell is he doing?
 
@DCOPTimDowd playing his flute?
everyone knows the Second Doctor has a flute
</troll>
 
There was a time when a well intended flag would almost certainly lead to a meltdown.
 
@Ixrec I didn't know there were flutes that could be played vertically
 
I don't think it's perfectly vertical, it just happens to be pointing directly at the camera
 
10:25 PM
@Ixrec Still doesn't resemble any flute I've ever seen
 
@Catija I don't even see that as an issue - a new room, whether it is called "Mos" or "Pants are lame", won't solve anything. It doesn't matter which room we're using.
 
@WadCheber And I understand your point but I hope that you recognize that it is not OK for users in any room on the network to attack known or unknown flaggers for feeling that a flag was necessary. What is important is to respond to the flag with grace regardless of whether you think it's warranted or not.
 
@Catija I think attacking is unproductive, but there are truly unnecessary flags. I got flagged once for saying "ZOMG A FLAG".
 
I think you're both failing to listen to each other
 
Flagging may make a minor situation worse, but attacking the unknown flagger will always make it worse.
 
10:27 PM
have a floof:
 
@WadCheber I didn't realize that I needed to spell out "flags cast in good faith".
 
And unless the flag is as clearly unwarranted as a flag on "ZOMG A FLAG", it is best for everyone involved to accept it and move on, and it might help if the flagee apologized and explicitly tried to change the subject to something less controversial.
I would still like to see Mos' name changed. The current name strikes me as pretty incendiary.
 
@WadCheber Yeah... the second half of what you said is what I just said...
 
@WadCheber Feel free to ask for that on meta. While I agree, fighting that rename is not the hill I want to die on. I might've made such a post if we hadn't gotten this new room.
 
@Catija I think we always agreed, I was just trying to explain (not justify or condone) the other side. There were people in Mos who had learned to see flags as an escalation of hostilities and conflicts, not a solution to them.
 
10:33 PM
@WadCheber What is it?
 
@Ixrec I'd rather ask Shog and keep it private.
 
that works too
 
@WadCheber Ah. That's fine.
 
@DCOPTimDowd "Valorum / Himarm poisoned this room; it is defunct."
 
@WadCheber Wow. That's jacked.
 
10:34 PM
It's just so provocative.
 
@WadCheber I don't think I ever disagreed with that but I also wanted to make sure that people who felt like they needed to flag due to not wanting a public outing of their feelings weren't blamed for feeling that way.
 
I think, while the mods seem (seem!) to have little faith in the users, so do the users have little faith in the mods -- how do we get around this? Rhetorical question, mostly.
 
@Catija Agreed. It might even help for those people to understand that any backlash has more to do with our history than the current situation.
@Slytherincess My impression has been that SFF trusts SFF mods and outside mods who hang out here, but some SFF people are wary of some off-site mods, and VERY wary of Shog.
And as much as I have come to like Shog, he doesn't really do much to avoid creating/encouraging that dynamic.
 
@Slytherincess I don't think that's unfair... and I think the solution is the same that it's been for any sort of social interaction... communication. I've seen so many people afraid to even talk about things related to this and I don't really understand why. If we can have productive, constructive, non-emotional discussions, we can learn from them. If that needs to happen in another space, like a gallery room about chat moderation, we can do that.
 
He's reasonable in private, but very caustic when he gets involved in an in-room issue.
 
10:39 PM
That's exactly the reason I don't want flags to be a first resort. Most of the time we can have an honest conversation with the "offender" since most people can be reasoned with.
 
@Riker Dinosaur Fish Floof
 
Well, OK... I understand that no one wants to meet the wrath of any of the CMs... but I personally don't think that's a worry.
 
@Ixrec Amen
 
@Edlothiad Why is it stuck in a fence?
 
10:40 PM
@DCOPTimDowd Because the fence holes are smaller than his body.
 
@DCOPTimDowd Some sort of weather event?
 
@Edlothiad O_O
 
@DCOPTimDowd Your man got thrown in a flood, poor dinofloof
@Mithrandir Isn't it bed time? Or do I have your timezone very wrong?
 
@Edlothiad it's 1 30 am, so you can say that
*40
 
On a school night?!
 
10:45 PM
School? I don't go to school
I'm homeschooled
I have to be up at 8 though
 
@Mithrandir Ah ok, that's interesting
was wondering how you had so much time for SE
 
Anyway, I'm tired. \o/
 
@Catija I would be more than happy to volunteer to represent Mos, should this come to pass. I think I'm a reasonable person and I'm not afraid of Shog ;)
 
Well, had to follow the trail, but I found the new chat room.
 
welcome back
 
user132126
11:00 PM
Time to eat dinner!
 
user132126
I'll finish my renaming meta after.
 
user132126
Maybe.
 
I hope this room stays the friendly place I saw when I was able to be around for chat quite a bit in the earlier days of this site.
2
 
Right now, our number one complaint is spending too much time on fluffy animal pictures (literally). So I assume we're good.
 
@Slytherincess I don't know that I have any sort of control over that... I wasn't even sure what or how it would be implemented... Though I was mostly thinking that it would relate to SFF specifically, not necessarily be a network-wide thing, though I'm sure some of what was discussed could be more broadly applied.
 
11:05 PM
@Ixrec Hmmm... I'll have to find something else.
@Ixrec: That's Tango. He's a chihuahua Jedi. He's got short hair so he's not fluffy.
 
@Tango We don't discriminate, they're all floofs
 
I don't know that there's any reason that anyone interested in discussing it couldn't set up a space for it and either make it open to everyone or control access to some extent. There's a benefit in limiting the number of people who can speak but also the issue of it seeming like only some users were given a voice.
 
one of the new running jokes is that "floof" is very, very broadly defined
so he's cool
 
Todays not so fluffy fluffy animal
 
Case in point ^
 
11:07 PM
@Edlothiad Well, here's real floof!
Weird. The floof one disappeared.
There. That's floof and fluff.
 
11:28 PM
@Edlothiad lol
@Tango is that yours?
 
@Riker Yes, both are mine. The Jedi is Tango, the other one is Mambo.
 
lol
 
@Riker They're both quite happy and love to cuddle and play.
 
@Tango mind if I edit this into the format for official daily floofs, and pin it?
 
11:36 PM
@Riker Sure. Ping me when you post it so I can see it.
 
gonna do it 24 minutes early
 
Actually, I'd rather see a floof issue in here than stuff that brings in big name mods.
 
?
 
I was reading up on why the old chat room got nuked. I was never in it when people got nasty or created problems, but I'd hear about them. Don't like dealing with crap like that.
 
@Edlothiad for the sake of floof: I've picked mambo to be tomorrow's floof
yours ended its run 24 min before the new UTC day, sorry
 
11:40 PM
@Riker: I have another good Mambo picture - not quite as floof, but I think it's cool.
And here's another SF&F based one with Tango:
@Riker: And this should give you more floof than you can handle - double dose.
 
too much floof
 
@Riker Weird. The other one won't upload.
 
huh
 
@Riker Okay, should work now. Last of my floof for a good while. Promise.
 
lol it's ok
 
11:48 PM
 
I might dig these up when I'm pressed for floofs
@Tango awww
lol, the black one (mambo?) is pushing the tan one out of the way
wait, is tango the tan one?
 
@Riker Tango is the tri-colored and short haired. Mambo is long haird and the black and white one. Tango has become alpha. (That last picture was back when they were still puppies.) At first Mambo was all over the place, but he's calmed down and loves to cuddle up. Tango is scary smart and can get bored and need things to do.
 
0
Q: Is Cut Lawquane's inhibitor chip activated?

thegreatjediLike all clones, he has an inhibitor chip implanted to ensure absolute obedience to Order 66 when the time finally comes to execute it. However, Cut Lawquane had deserted the GAR and so most probably not present when the order was given. If he ever encounters a Jedi thereafter, how will he react...

 
@Tango lol
I find it amusing that the tan one is named tan-go
 
@Riker You're the first person who has ever noticed that. Cool, isn't it?
 
11:59 PM
yep :D
 
00:00 - 21:0021:00 - 00:00

« first day (9 days earlier)      last day (2539 days later) »