The APL Orchard

brgal

00:10

@Adám Thanks for the link to the event !

Razetime

02:15

@rak1507 just replace the life function in my answer with the stencil version

jimfan

05:22

@Adám Thanks for notifying!

Feeds

06:12

0

Q: Create a binary matrix based on information given by an "Excel" table in the APL language

I have an APL challenge to solve. I received information in a table (Excel) in which the lines represent equipment and the columns represent the days of a year. In each cell I have information on the number of hours that this equipment will receive maintenance. When the table cell has a value of ...

Elias Mårtenson

06:24

At least the loading part would be easy in KAP. Just use the loadExcelFile function. :-)

Razetime

09:43

@EliasMårtenson If they export the excel file as csv, then ⎕CSV should work

Romilly Cocking

10:05

Does anyone have a url for or a pdf copy of an early paper called something like 'do thr ltrr nms run fst'? It discussed an early APL urban myth that the structure of the symbol table in APL\360 took more time to locate symbols longerr than 3 characters.

RikedyP

@RomillyCocking How early is early, years-wise?

Adám

10:20

@RomillyCocking My father claimed that.

Romilly Cocking

10:31

@RikedyP 1970s?

@Adám I think it was true for a while, but only for a beta version of APL. Or maybe the FORTRAN II version of the interpreter.

Adám

@RomillyCocking Later on, with APL*PLUS, it became reversed, where short names were stored "inline", while longer names became refs to a symbol table, and dealing with the symbols was faster than dealing with the full names!

ngn

11:18

@xpqz @rak1507 @Razetime day14

xpqz

I'm embarressed to show my solution.

Whilst I got the right answer, it took a long time to run.

ngn

@xpqz i bruteforced it too (takes ~30s on my slow computer) to get the star as early as possible, then spent a lot time thinking about a better solution

xpqz

oh, that makes me feel moderately better

Adám

@RomillyCocking There's this:

> using (and reusing) single-character variable names as much as reasonably possible.

But this speaks about memory consumption, not execution speed.

xpqz

@ngn fwiw (not attempted to golf it) - gist.github.com/xpqz/c80e65a469a01fac55e20472e80f3b5c

Takes ~30s on my considerably faster computer.

ngn

11:37

@xpqz shouldn't 65435 be 65536?

Razetime

@ngn yes, the inclusion exclusion

ngn

@xpqz correct answer and 29s here! :)

xpqz

Ok, correct is good.

Any suggestion how to deal with the sparse matrix? My eyes bleed looking at what I did.

RikedyP

@RomillyCocking Well I couldn't find it in Quote Quads of the 70s - I'll keep looking now and then and let you know if anything pops up

ngn

@xpqz maybe use a smaller type for the big matrix

the values are 64bit but there aren't that many of them, and they can be indexed

@ngn oops, i meant "memory" (vector), not "matrix"

xpqz

11:51

I have 80123 addresses ranging from 4341629681 to 68461854547

in the end state

ngn

@xpqz float could be much simpler: {⍉(⍵⍴2)⊤⍳2*⍵}

xpqz

o yeah

ngn

⍝ Address and value in decimal - nitpick: they are not in decimal, they are just numeric scalars. decimal would be 10⊥⍣¯1⊢⍵ or ⍕⍵

ngn

12:18

@xpqz interesting how you do exactly the same as what a k dict would do :) mem is the keys and val is the values. you search in mem and append to both if not found.

ideally this should be just dict[k]←v where dict is a pair of vectors internally

xpqz

I tried also doing a 1500⌶ on the keys, but that made no discernible performance difference. The problem is clearly algorithmic.

ngn

it is

xpqz

12:45

Ok, golfed it a smidge.

Only a smidge, tho.

ngn

@xpqz 0⊃.. -> ⊃.. ?

xpqz

ofc

Adám

14:24

Any feedback?

brgal

14:37

An idea ?　Add a drawing of a bookshelf with at least one book that Iverson mentioned a lot :
A History of Mathematical Notations by Cajori. Going through the book, one can appreciate even more the genius of Ken Iverson.

Razetime

14:59

@Adám on the image?

or the question?

Adám

@Razetime The image.

Razetime

hmm

don't know enough to add there really

Adám

(0,x)+(x,0) is from here and happens to be valid (and equivalent) in APL and J and K.

Razetime

cool

I should read some of his books

ngn

@Adám and in all three the pair of parens on the right is unnecessary :)

Adám

15:06

Yup.

@Razetime See here and the link there to books.

Razetime

woah

Any improvements on this one?

Adám

@Razetime ⊢1 1⍴1 → ⍪1

@Razetime {(∊⍵)[2×⍳4]} → {⊢/4 2⍴⍵}

Razetime

@Adám nice!

Adám

15:25

@Razetime I'd use , instead of ∊ when the former is enough. For clarity.

Razetime

sure, done

Romilly Cocking

@RikedyP I wonder if it was in the STSC newsletter? I'll ping some of the old guard and see if they know of it.

Adám

New version:

Razetime

looks less empty, I like it

Wezl

15:42

I wish Permanent Marker's 0 looked different from its o

ngn

@Razetime try complex

Razetime

I never use complex ⍨

ngn

you're missing a lot :)

Razetime

well I need to relearn what I did in 10th grade

Adám

White version.

ngn

15:52

@Razetime {s⍳(0j1*⍳4)+⍵⊃s←0,+\×\∊0j1*2/,\99↑1} (⎕io←0)

Razetime

6

A: Wind me a number snake!

APL (Dyalog Classic), 32 29 bytes 1+×⍨-{⊖∘⌽⍣⍵⌽{⌽⍉,⌸⍵+≢⍵}⍣2⍣⍵⍪⍬} Try it online! Uses ⎕io←1. Starts with a 0-by-1 matrix (⍪⍬). 2N times (⍣2⍣⍵) adds the height of the matrix (≢⍵) to each of its elements, puts 1 2...height on its right (,⌸), and rotates (⌽⍉). When that's finished, corrects the ...

@ngn cool, post it

ngn

@Razetime hits the limit in the last test :(

Razetime

yeah mine does too

except last 2

so dfns.tree displays function trees, how can I use it with normal trees?

like the nested tree type that dfns.tfmt works with

RikedyP

16:14

@Razetime Look at tnest and tview

Razetime

16:27

sure

xpqz

16:47

@ngn Can you explain how the mapping from 2d works in your day11 solution?

ngn

17:02

@xpqz sure, i'll try. when you flatten (,⍵) a matrix m with shape ⍴m its set of coordinates changes from ⍳⍴m to ⍳×/⍴m right? they become simply the indices of a vector. the mapping between the two can be done with k←(⍴m)⊥i j and its inverse i j←(⍴m)⊤k where i j are a pair of indices in m, and k is an index in ,m

@xpqz does this answer the question?

xpqz

Thank you. Let me do some experiments to see if I get it...

xpqz

17:22

Yes, I see now how it works.

code_report

19:29

How would you solve this problem in APL using a single reduction:
Calculate the sum of the squares of the two largest numbers?
i.e. 1 2 3 = 13
i.e. 4 4 4 = 32

rak1507

I'd probably do something like {+/2*⍨⍵[2↑⍒⍵]}

github.com/rak1507/Advent-Of-Code-2020-APL/blob/main/…

my solution to day 14 (last line is far too long)

ngn

@rak1507 wow. this is very fast.

rak1507

really?

I thought it was quite slow

ngn

@rak1507 my timings could be skewed because of the slow laptop, but i get 3.1s for yours and 7.7s for mine. and i thought mine was doing well..

rak1507

Oh cool, never thought I'd write any code that was faster than yours

Adám

19:47

@rak1507 That looks very good. Extended would have an advantage, though: +.×⍨2↑∧

rak1507

using +.× to square is smart, did not think of that

Adám

It isn't any shorter than +/×⍨

rak1507

'single reduction' to me implies O(n), and sorting is O(n log n) so maybe there's a better way

Adám

I guess you could traverse and collect the largest two.

rak1507

I know (⊃⍒) is optimised, does that mean 2(⊃⍒)array is optimised to find the second largest in o(n)?

or is it just monadic

Adám

19:49

You mean (2⊃⍒)array and no, it isn't.

rak1507

I think this is O(n) {+/×⍨⍵[m,⊃⍤⍒0@(m←⊃⍤⍒⍵)⊢⍵]}

assuming they're positive, if not replace 0 with the minimum

Might as well do that anyway, {+/×⍨⍵[m,⊃⍤⍒(⌊/⍵)@(m←⊃⍤⍒⍵)⊢⍵]}

Adám

Aha, that's a clever (ab)use of the optimisation.

rak1507

Doubt it will ever be any faster than the regular one

dzaima

comparison of some approaches (random 1000 elements)

rak1507

Actually that one is a lot faster than my original one for large arrays

dzaima

19:56

@dzaima bigger inputs

rak1507

your first one fails for duplicate maximums @dzaima

like 0 4 4

dzaima

@rak1507 right, the first one does fail, and is the reason i wrote the third one there

rak1507

The third one also fails

dzaima

@rak1507 ಠ_ಠ forgot a ⊃ after ⍸

rak1507

Oh

Right yeah

I'm biased of course but I still prefer my one

Shorter and not that much slower

Marshall

19:59

@dzaima Since most methods are slowing down with more elements, you could first run it on chunks of length 1e4 and then on the combined results. But maybe the extra copy would cost too much for that to work.

Adám

The interesting ones:

      a←?1e6⍴1e6
      ]runtime -c  "2↑{⍵[⍒⍵]}a" "{⍵[2↑⍒⍵]}a" "{m←⊃⍤⍒⍵ ⋄ ⍵[m,⊃⍤⍒(⌊/⍵)@m⊢⍵]}a"

  2↑{⍵[⍒⍵]}a                    → 7.2E¯3 |    0% ⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕
  {⍵[2↑⍒⍵]}a                    → 3.9E¯2 | +434% ⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕⎕
  {m←⊃⍤⍒⍵ ⋄ ⍵[m,⊃⍤⍒(⌊/⍵)@m⊢⍵]}a → 9.9E¯4 |  -87% ⎕

Marshall

Also you could do ⊃⍤⍒ to get the first element and ⌈/ for the second one.

Adám

Ah, true.

dzaima

@Marshall that

(makes sense that performs like rak's)

rak1507

Makes a surprisingly small difference

code_report

20:03

this is a surprisingly simple problem with a not-so simple solution

Marshall

I forgot how close ⊃⍤⍒ is to ⌈/.

Adám

@code_report Simple solution exists. Performant solution is a bit involved.

code_report

@Adám true

rak1507

well I'd say something like {+/2*⍨⍵[2↑⍒⍵]} is simple, it's only when you try and do it in o(n) time that it becomes more complex

I'd say that's true in any language as well, I can't think of any off the top of my head that have inbuilt optimisations for getting the second highest number or something like that

Marshall

Description of the index-of-min algorithm for those interested.

2

code_report

20:05

yea, i agree. in C++ people would complain about the perf. the reason I asked this question is because I showed a C++ solution to the problem in a recent talk, and a colleague wrote an article saying my "accumulate" solution wasn't STL-ish quuxplusone.github.io/blog/2020/12/14/no-raw-loops-you-say

I was hoping there was some beatiful idiomatic APL single-reduction solution so that I could say it is the best we can do with what we have. However, in APL we can do ...

but seems like it is just a tricky

Adám

@Marshall Wouldn't thunks have made the naive solutions fast?

rak1507

I mean, I see their point and realistically if you want something that can be extended to the first n, sorting is the way to go

code_report

as in a lazy sort?

Adám

2↑⍒ would be understood by the interpreter as the programmer only wanting the indices of the two largest values.

rak1507

@code_report was this replying to me?

code_report

20:08

@rak1507 no replying to @Adám

dzaima

@Adám well, you'd still need to implement the actual algorithm. Thunks just help in recognizing it

Adám

Not terrible: ⊃⍤⍒(⊃,{⌈/(⌊/⍵)@⍺⊢⍵})⊢

General solution:

2 {r⊣(⌊/{r,←⍵⌷⍨i←⊃⍤⍒⍵ ⋄ ⍺@i⊢⍵}⍣⍺⊢)⍵⊣r←⍬} a

APLcart material?

rak1507

Maybe but the simple solution is obvious and also not that much worse, I doubt people will really ever need performance for something like this

Adám

@rak1507 Isn't 2↑⍒ the obvious solution, though with terrible performance?

rak1507

Yeah

Adám

20:24

So at least the one using 2↑ on the sort idiom should be promoted, but this one still more than twice as fast on as little as a thousand integers.

rak1507

I doubt people commonly need the speed for that, but I suppose adding it can't hurt

Adám

I still think sort primitives would be good. Then 2↑∧ would be the obvious, and a pretty good, choice.

rak1507

I agree, sort primitives would be really cool

When I first came across APL and saw they had 1 character matrix inversing but not sorting I was very confused

I know what I do more that's for sure

Adám

Yeah, that does appear odd. And now that we have both unique mask and unique, we might as well have both grade and sort.

rak1507

Agreed, although I don't know what character would be ideal for it, ∧/∨ don't really 'fit' with the dyadic uses

Adám

20:27

True, but that ship has basically sailed with ≡ and ≢ and now ≠.

rak1507

Yeah true

Adám

My idea with ∧ and ∨ is that they are the symbols often used on columns to indicate sort order, plus they are simpler versions of ⍋ and ⍒. ∧ with a + gives ⍋, sort of.

dzaima/APL uses < and > which are also good, and at least related to their dyadic functions, though ≤ and ≥ would be more strictly correct.

rak1507

I think I'd prefer them over ∨ and ∧, although I'm not sure

Adám

Which ones?

rak1507

I think ∨ and ∧ are probably graphically better but ≤ and ≥ make more sense

ngn

20:33

@Adám when you're finished with this, pls explain to @rak1507 how vec⊤⍵ works

rak1507

?

Wezl

@icon-creation-committee apl385.com/favicon.ico is another apl icon

ngn

@rak1507 from your day14: 1↓⍉2⊥⍣¯1⊢(2*35),n there's a better way: ⍉(36⍴2)⊤n

rak1507

oh well yeah (36⍴2)⊤n

Adám

@ngn @rak1507 There's a thorough lesson on it.

rak1507

20:35

yeah

Just thought of that

thanks :) always do ⊥⍣¯1⊢ by default

ngn

@rak1507 a clear sign it deserves shorter syntax

rak1507

Agreed

scalar⊤stuff when

Any more obvious improvements? @ngn github.com/rak1507/Advent-Of-Code-2020-APL/blob/main/…

ngn

@rak1507 input parsing could be somewhat shorter

rak1507

I'm not too bothered about that, it does the job

Adám

@ngn Yes, and I think that is one of the very few cases where I'd risk breaking backwards compatibility. The current result of scalar⊤stuff is equivalent to the much more obvious scalar|stuff except for floats where you'd also need ⎕CT←0. With array notation, scalar(⎕CT:0).|stuff is much clearer to the reader than scalar⊤stuff.

ngn

20:41

@rak1507 line3: mems n←↓⍉↑⍎∘⍕¨'\d+'⎕S'&'¨a/⍨~m

code_report

@Adám +10 on adding a sort primitive. Makes me very sad that there isn't a single glyph to sort

rak1507

Ok fair play that is a lot simpler

Adám

@code_report Which do you prefer, ∧/∨ or </> or ≤/≥?

rak1507

I hate ⍎∘⍕¨ though

that just feels like code golf

ngn

@rak1507 i don't have particular feelings about it, could be ⍎¨⍕¨

rak1507

20:43

It's more the method of doing it

Adám

@code_report Alternatively, a sane Select function ⊇ such that (⍋⊇⊢) is sort wouldn't be too shabby either. Even more so if we had reverse-compose ("before") ⍛ so one could write ⍋⍛⌷⍨ instead.

rak1507

⍎¨¨ is the same anyway I think

ngn

@rak1507 same length, more arrayful: ↑⍎¨⍕¨.. -> ⍎⍤1⍕↑..

dzaima

@Adám I agree that ≤ and ≥ would definitely make more sense (and i'd probably pick them over < and > now), but still are kind of weird as they're scalar operations. If there were dyadic TAO comparisons, I'd definitely prefer monadic versions of those for sorting. (and i really like my monadic ∨∧⍱⍲ so i'm definitely not giving up ∧/∨ for sorting)

rak1507

I think I'll go with mems n←↓⍉↑⍎¨¨'\d+'⎕S'&'¨a/⍨~m

Adám

20:48

CMC: Spot the odd one out:

code_report

i don't know I would have to think about it. And most of the time when I try to figure out how to use ⌷ I end up failing. I agree that some mechanism that is "fork"-like would be nice enough

rak1507

APL because it's the only good language :P

Wezl

nonsense

code_report

@Adám that is the "Amecian President Lines" logo XD. it is better than the Dyalog logo IMO. an orange box with a D on it has nothing to do with APL

Adám

@code_report Yes, because ⌷ is trying to do too much, and failing at the most basic task. That's why I want a new Select ⊇ function. And yes, it has to be ⍋⍛⊇⍨ not with a ⌷.

code_report

20:51

although I stopped using that logo a while back, and started using the orange box

Adám

@code_report Sure, Dyalog's logo is for Dyalog, not for APL. Every few days, we discuss a proper APL logo here…

rak1507

And every time it gets even more convoluted

Wezl

what's the blue logo in the bottom right?

code_report

@Wezl F#

Adám

@Wezl Good point. Many of these don't exactly scream their language name…

rak1507

20:53

As far as saying the language name, D and Go have definitely won there

Wezl

how are you supposed to differentiate racket, clojure, and haskell?

code_report

I think those languages are "well known" enough that many people know

Wezl

all of them are lambdas, animals, or initialisms/names

@code_report true

Adám

Maybe something simple like

code_report

I'm not saying F# is a good logo, it just seems like when your whole company is based around a language of symbols, it is a missed opportunity on the logo front

rak1507

20:55

Looks better than most of the ones posted before I think

Adám

Round version:

code_report

or go the "American President Lines" route ... and just but APL in the logo

Wezl

how about text saying ">+/÷≢"

it shows the symbols

Adám

Yeah, I was about to say…

CMP: What are the two most ubiquitous 3-symbol APL phrases?

One is definitely +.×

Wezl

@Wezl or 'APL'≡⌈/⍵

rak1507

21:01

⊢≡⌽ and ≠⊆⊢

I would say

Adám

How is this for a logo?

Wezl

it could be rearranged for spacing

but it's nice

Adám

Just a rough draft. The dots, being operators, should probably be coloured differently from the functions.

*∘÷ is nice too, but not universally supported.

Hm, ∘.× but I don't like it.

Wezl

simple and scaleable

rak1507

21:17

maybe if you happen to be carrying around a magnifying glass...

Wezl

and monochromatic

you can type out a .xbm

it's fun to type out svgs when you're bored

Adám

Wezl

I prefer the other one because it fits on a grid.

Adám

Agreed, but +/∧\ is very famous, and easy to explain.

rak1507

I hadn't seen it before

Adám

21:33

Number of leading 1s in a boolean vector.

Bottersnike

Was just passing through and thought I'd clean up that merged A P and L logo (i.imgur.com/UHCy7Ja.png) and toss in a joke one (i.imgur.com/BvR1SWr.png) while I was at it

Adám

That last one might get us in trouble with IBM…

@Wezl How about:

Wezl

@Adám naively I thought it was a play on prettier's logo

:56431454 good, but now it doesn't fit in 13x13

Bottersnike

If you have lots going on in a logo like that it becomes entirely unreadable at small resolutions (i.imgur.com/AfZRcv9.png) such as a favicon, and there's no one central "piece" of the logo that centres it and that the eye is drawn to (esp. because the APL lettering there is hardly differentiated from the other symbols, and the huge amount of deadspace)

Adám

@Bottersnike Good points. Any ideas, then?

Bottersnike

21:41

Fresh out of those, unfortunately

Adám

Btw, this last one has infinity.

Wezl

the italics don't help it fit on the grid, either

Adám

And representatives of each "class": array, function, monadic operator, dyadic operator.

@Wezl Well, I can change font.

Wezl

APL386 is simple, which is a good thing here

Adám

How about a very simple ⍺*⎕

People have used ⍺⍴⌊ but it seems abusive.

rak1507

21:44

⍺⍴⌊ is more obvious to non APLers than ⍺*⎕

Adám

Yes, and ⍺*⎕ looks like a Unicode fail.

Wezl

it shows each class, but it loses the pleasant symmetry of before

it could have ∨.∧ at the top so there aren't two +s

some of the symmetry came from the symbols being the same size, so they could be manually tweaked

Adám

@Wezl Two +s?

@Wezl I already made ⌊ much smaller.

Wezl

@Adám sorry, I was referring to a previous version

Adám

That was a typo. +/⍬ is 0 but ⌊/⍬ is ∞

How is this for a simple 3D array logo?

I'm sure someone can pull this off better than me, but how's this?

RikedyP

22:08

@code_report Do people hate (⊂∘⍋⌷⊢)?

Adám

@RikedyP Yes. And it isn't even optimised either.

Bottersnike

As a wild thought, what about embracing the alpha and morphing it into the three letters (i.imgur.com/YtaXr33.png), then for smaller versions discarding the P and L and just making use of the alpha (i.imgur.com/otbDhO9.png)

Adám

@Bottersnike Yeah, Acre basically does that, together with my cube from above:

My problem with this is that ⍺ isn't really universal for APL implementations. Two of the three major implementations don't use that symbol.

How about using ⍟ ?

Every APL has that.

RikedyP

@Adám Aye that's pooey, I personally think it looks kind of cute though (but I'm partial to all the 3-trains in brackets). I agree that something like (⍋⊇⊢) would be better, I'm not that bothered about which of <>∧∨≤≥ would be monadic sort I think any of them is a bit of a compromise over what might have been a special-made symbol anyway

@Adám Yeah people seem to like log but my scatalogical self just sees cat butthole too often

Adám

@RikedyP Even in APL385?

RikedyP

22:15

@Adám In APL385 it looks like a wheel

Adám

Ugh.

@RikedyP So? Why re-invent it?

RikedyP

@Adám Ok I will stop abusing the images now

Wezl

@RikedyP I can't even see them

rak1507

You're missing out

Wezl

RikedyP

22:18

@rak1507 beat me to it

@Wezl Can you see the logo images from before though?

rak1507

That face one is going to give me nightmares

Wezl

but I proxy them through google docs

RikedyP

@Wezl Yeah the last two just came from google image searches

Wezl

102

Q: Imgur.com blocked, what are my options?

My organization's proxy blocks http://i.stack.imgur.com/, and they refuse to lift that block. Is there any way for me to work around that to see screenshots and images users post in questions? While most questions don't include images, the entire meaning of other questions is based on those imag...

support images

RikedyP

@rak1507 me too i kinda regretted after I posted it but not enough to delete

Adám

22:20

We could use ∘.○ with some colour. That's kinda cute.

RikedyP

@Adám I have a bit of a lean towards ⍉ as a 1-glyph attempt

(∘.○)

Adám

@RikedyP Not ⍤APL⍉ ?

RikedyP

(∘.×) (≠⊆⊢) (∘.○) (⌽=⊖)

When are kaomoji becoming valid APL? (」°ロ°)」

@Wezl I adopted that for my youtube channel youtube.com/channel/UCOx-h5m9MeV14rG4PicRB7g

@Wezl yt3.ggpht.com/…

Adám

@RikedyP (⌊○⍙○)⌊ is valid

Wezl

@RikedyP before, or just now?

RikedyP

22:26

@Wezl before - Adam pointed out that adding ⊢ makes it a valid function that gives boolean mask of items greater than the mean ⊢>+⌿÷≢

@Wezl However, I wouldn't be opposed to it being used in more places as a signifier of APL generally - it's just a bit wide for a "logo" per se

rak1507

I'm sure Aaron Hsu has that on a tshirt

RikedyP

@Adám contest - which definition of ⍙ makes the most interesting function

Adám

Also, it being tacit, isn't very universal.

RikedyP

@rak1507 Yep bonfire.com/store/arcfide

rak1507

yeah

Adám

22:29

@RikedyP Well, with ⍙←+ it makes ⌊2π⌊x⌋⌋

RikedyP

well I'm out of ideas again

Adám

@Bottersnike Cubist approach:

… but may give some people bad vibes.

RikedyP

@Adám You always seem a bit too comfortable being a few missed strokes away lol

@Adám I kinda liked where this was going - maybe a version with the dot in the middle and no APL

Adám

Heh, some use stylised prompts, like >_ or $> ― maybe we can use APL's prompt as logo? ;-)

RikedyP

:56431928

+⌿÷≢

∙

Wezl

22:38

Adám

That's cute.

Wezl

it's simpler than my previous apple

Adám

Hey, how about a plain apple?

Wezl

that's also simple

simpler meaning better

for logos

rak1507

That one is nice

Adám

22:48

Maybe with a bit of kerning.

Wezl

hehehe even better

Transcript for