« first day    last day (32 days later) » 

00:00
@Geobits 538?
538 = number of total electoral votes btw
538/2 = 269, so 270 to win
00:15
Trump has the plurality.
chat activity, please
"Better Days" / "The Goo Goo Dolls"
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC because they reported first. Nothing unexpected 270towin.com
@ConorO'Brien ?
it's a good song
@HelkaHomba huh?
I thought pop cons weren't allowed at PPCG. This is a pop-con!
Any non-usa people here?
00:24
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC raises hand
I should invite some non-usa people from TNB main.
hello, its 3:30am here and I have exam tomorrow, but I want to see if hrc or trump will win
@arda You mean if we're all doomed.
USA is one place away from being demoted to a flawed democracy.
Lowest score for any full democracy
(Economist Intelligence Unit, 2015)
@arda you wont see it for at least another 4 hours. CA polls close at 8 and it's 4 there now
IIRC
@arda Timezone?
Trump slips to 52%
00:28
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC utc+3
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC What result is this?
@HelkaHomba Popular vote. Source: associated press
Clinton at 46% for reference.
I'm using google's interface.
We need to build a moat and make the Canadians pay for it!
2-3 mil people have voted.
Reply "nay" if you think voter turnout will be higher, "yay" if you think voter turnout will be lower. Compared to 2012.
nay - such a contentious election; Donald Trump
yay - such a hard choice for many americans
@1000000000 hi
Keeping track of the votes right now is pointless; only very republican states have finished so
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC Hard choice?
00:32
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC hello
The people who are going to vote Trump were always going to vote Trump. Anyone else isn't going to even consider voting Trump. That's pretty much it
The only reason it's a "hard choice" for people is that at least in my state they put a metric fuckton of other stuff on the ballot
@1000000000 How's it going
@quartata for some, I think it's easy.
Random image of the day:
Chat activity?
this is actually fairly full
huh?
@EᴀsᴛᴇʀʟʏIʀᴋ huh?
@quartata doesn't have to
50-47, it's tightening
00:55
Check back in 3 hours then you'll have a better picture :P
4
@quartata I know....
clinton leading
01:10
44-31, but night is still young
grabs popcorn
@HelkaHomba Actually if she wins here in Florida it's pretty much over.
Hmm, I don't seem too have any popcorn, so it'll have to be Cheez-its.
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC the pop vote is unlikely to matter, watch electoral college politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president
@quartata but then it'll be Al Gore/Bush again
01:12
@ConorO'Brien Not really
didn't trump say he'll contest?
200 was actually a close election in Florida. This won't be that close.
Trump says a lot of things...
He says a lot of things
bah
Texas went blue O_o
@Doorknob Where?
01:14
@HelkaHomba According to the Google widget thingy, anyway
More correctly, San Antonio went blue. Most of the state hasn't been counted.
You can click on the state to give a county-level map.
Oh, that's pretty neat
But yeah, if Florida gets called for Clinton, it's pretty much game over, barring some exceptional upsets.
> The marijuana ballot measure in Florida passed by a landslide, legalizing medical pot for specific debilitating diseases. With 76.9 percent in favor and 29.1 percent opposed, the results lined up with the polls we looked at.
Well, it's a start.
CMC: Guess how many electoral votes Trump will get. Winner gets own cookie.
@HelkaHomba 207
01:21
I say 220
Closest answer wins if no exact winner
216
@HelkaHomba @Geobits where's the fastest of the west electoral college map?
The, uh... what?
@Geobits Fastest updating electoral college map.
NBC was faster than google
That's because google doesn't "call" states, they look for networks to call them.
They all update in real time as they get the info though. Some may make calls at different times, but there's no one "fastest" map.
@Geobits Fastest online map?
01:35
Are the Democrats really winning in Texas? o_O
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC I just said there isn't one fastest one.
@Dennis Scroll up :P
@Dennis Only a few counties have released results.
@Dennis Probably not. Only 1% reporting so far
Also, not anymore, actually.
01:36
Ah, OK.
Google changed their UI.
last year the colors were switched :P
@arda What do you think so far? Erodgan isn't in this one...
Let's talk congress.
What's with the donkey and the elephant?
@Dennis donkey = dem, elephant = repub; did you not know? :P
I guessed that, but what's the connection?
Alyson Kennedy is the Socialist Worker's party's candidate
@Dennis dunno
Well I know for dems.
They were called jackasses. They like the name. They adopted it as their avatar. True story.
Trump is winning florida! Most counties have reported!
01:41
@Dennis The democrats get their animal from Andrew Jackson, who was nicknamed the jackass.
ninja'd
Huh. TIL
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC last I saw only 60% reporting
What about the elephant?
01:43
The gerrymandering is real...
49% of the vote, most of the counties. Wow.
Well yeah. Most of the counties have low population.
You'll notice the only major city that's red is Jacksonville.
Where in Florida are you? (If you don't mind my asking)
In one of the blue areas ;)
Aren't most of yall?
Most of us what?
01:48
Floridians
I'm not sure what the exact breakdown is, but the urban areas are mostly blue, yeah.
It's interesting, this the first close election I've seen. In the only other ones I remember, Obama was pretty far ahead
interesting I remember 2012 being a lot closer than this
Bush vs Gore was pretty close, putting it mildly.
Yeah, but I was 3 when that happened. :P
01:53
You gotta remember there are kids here that weren't born then :P
And I don't remember 04
Geez, now I feel old. Thanks.
Any time
I'm not even on the young side as far as TNB goes.
All those 13-16 year olds
I'd be shocked if some of them weren't 12 tbh
02:00
CMC: Which news site has the cutest cartoon donkey/elephant.
Polls about to close in 14 states!
I don't know about donkey/elephant, but The Guardian has somewhat cute character images (and quotes, once in a while)
I got 110 rep on Politics today :D
02:20
It looks like trump is gonna win, the map is ominous...
See, that's why you should wait.
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC You must be new here
@quartata what? why? I posted the fourth message
New to elections, not the chat room.
I am new, yeah.
02:25
Republicans generally win the larger less populus states
So, election predictions.
@quartata why do you say that?
Senate is head to head; house is repub
Yeah all the shiny red things look intimidating but they aren't really the states that matter
I'm mostly just watching for the senate; I'm fairly confident that Clinton will wrap up in Florida and then it's gg
Trump can't lose a battleground state
Even if Clinton looses Florida Trump has an uphill battle
Senate looks like it's going to stay in R hands.
Just not by so big a margin as it currently is.
Bleh.
02:29
I thought most of the senate seats that aren't open for election corresponded to the jackasses.
Republicans had more to lose, but a lot of them weren't really that competitive also. So they'll lose a few seats, but retain overall control (or so it seems right now).
You obviously understand this better than I do, but by my count, Democrats currently have 78 while Republicans have 72, and 18 are still to be disputed.
Wait, no that can't be right.
Oh, Google includes all seats in their interactive thingie, disputed or not...
Right
And the ones that are left disputed are more safely republican ones.
10/10 very confusing
I'm kinda surprised 4% of the voters are wasting their votes on other candidates. With the system you have over there, that seems entirely pointless.
Kinda. If a party gets 5%, they qualify for more funding options for following races.
02:36
Still, those 4% could very well make the difference.
In a lot of states (for instance mine) the result is almost guaranteed. Voting for a third party can be a political statement and can help support your candidate in the next election.
Yeah, that too. Voting third party in somewhere like Florida, though... that's really just a big FU to both of the major candidates.
Maine has got a ranked choice voting referendum on their ballot which would make third party votes more than just a protest vote
Ooh interesting
Or at least, protest while at the same time influencing the outcome.
02:44
Well, with only four electoral votes and no other states doing it, that sounds like a sure-fire way to get politicians to ignore your state for a while.
Wow. 80% against Colorado care
@Geobits Sure but it's still interesting
Oh sure. I'm not saying it isn't. Just that it makes things harder for them to guess, so unless there's a big stake involved, it makes the state less influential than it is now imo.
If it gets some national attention though, you might see it cropping up in other states
> Looking at election map results and I think I underestimated the number of racists in America.
:|
02:51
^
@1000000000 I agree, this would be the best long-term solution. That's why I ended my first comment with "for a while".
Personally I hope we get rid of the Electoral College while we are at it
8
I think winner takes all sucks. It is why we are stuck with a two party system.
The united states is at the intersection of 3 terrible voting systems. fptp, electoral college and winner takes all
so true
02:59
I would suggest that we split up the country like divorced parents. Winner gets Wednesday - Saturday, Loser gets Sunday - Tuesday
5
Independents are underperforming.
@quartata Trump has electoral college AND florida.
Cooper and McCrory are head to head at 49%, both
Does anyone still have that poll closing time map that was in TNB before?
I don't get what people have against winner takes all
For one it gives a lot of power to swing states
@quartata It prevents small parties (such as a socialist party) from having any representation in government.
03:13
My model, based off the latest polling stats, shows trump winning by 13 votes:
not the one I was thinking of, looks even better.Thanks!
@Shog9, woah, you're here?
Bottom line: It's not going to be a landslide HRC victory
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC Florida as strongly red seems a bit dubious
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC yep. Armed with popcorn & whiskey
Especially when Pennsylvania is only slightly blue
03:17
Oh. I should get the rum and crackers then
@DrMcMoylex kinda bummed about that; didn't expect it to pass, but hoped it'd be closer.
Also not happy about the direction 71 is taking :-/
Oh, you're from colorado the best state too?
let's not quibble about where I'm from - I'm here now, so it's what I care about
chuffed to see Johnson doing as well as he is
I'm not sure I get why 71 is a big deal
It doesn't seem to matter either way
more the folks who are behind 71
the goal isn't to block amendments, it's to make them more predictable
03:21
So are you against it then?
Oh, I forgot I had this stuff. Seems perfect for the occasion:
03:43
Well that just turned around
Major update! This sake that's been sitting in my cupboard for a few years is actually really good. Never had this brand before, but it's not half bad at all.
good to hear!
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC ono ;______________;
lmao air canada stock is increasing as poll results come out
04:03
ABC news called California 32 seconds after polls closed
ono, ;_; duck is still winning
wat
wat
@Downgoat wat
(Donald) duck, I presume
wat
wat
@Sp3000 refresh pls
04:10
hey, can one of you look at idaho's vote count on the current election results?
it says its already finalized, but that only some 2,000 people voted
wat
wat
@NathanMerrill wait, wat? only 2000?
I;m seeing the same number
They called california with 0% reporting
Idaho is a historically red state so its likely they assumed it would go red
@NathanMerrill and Hawaii as well by the looks of it
04:12
and tbh it likely will
@wat donald trump = donald duck = duck
wat
wat
I know, I was making fun of my picture
@1000000000 not sure what's up with hawaii. It's also odd that they are already finalized, when they are in a different timezone
They closed polls in Hawaii already
right, its odd that they did it so early
I mean, its super convenient, but I'd hate it if I was in Hawaii
04:19
I personally don't like that they "call" states at all. It makes your vote feel worthless if your precinct hasn't reported and they already called your state. Plus states that get called while other states are still open influence the outcome of the election
2
also, take a look at my state: Utah. We've only got a 78% vote rate on the top two candidates :P
we had a really strong 3rd party candidate, changing lots of votes around here
222 to 197 for Trump? Is that correct: bbc.com/news/election/us2016/results ?
Apparently Trump has 95% chance of win ;______;
According to 538 it is 77% rn
@wat sorta appropriate
wat
wat
@mınxomaτ paying respects?
04:36
I am half "ono y dis happening", half "f*** f*** f***"
4
That escalated quickly. That last count was C/T 197/193. Now it's 197/222
wat
wat
where are you located @Downgoat
CA
Thankfully the majoraty of my state seems to be sane but apparently that doesnt hold true for the rest of the US
@Downgoat I think soon everyone of you has to fight for their sanity if all goes south.
209/228
99% of me is in denial this is even happening, and the other 1% is hoping at last moment, my fellow americans will come through and make right choice ;_;
wat
wat
04:42
still think drumpf will win
@Doorknob 99% reporting, so Florida was called as Trump winning.
LIVE STATS
@mbomb007 Yeah, Florida was called a while ago
@Downgoat polls are closed right? Just counting now. This news is too late to affect the voting.
>95% that Trump wins
04:43
@Downgoat The only choice that our fellow americans could make now that would swing the election the opposite direction would be misplacing a large number of trump ballets
@1000000000 Why? The people who care the most are the ones who participate. Literally anyone can go be a delegate in their state.
I went
wat
wat
209/232
@PhiNotPi hawaii?
Oh
@1000000000 Alaska is still open
@PhiNotPi For most states.
04:45
@WheatWizard Or, as may you know it, the ****-filled cornucopia that just keeps on giving
wat
wat
@mbomb007 I can't.\
@mbomb007 Oh yeah... that's right
@wat Not 18 yet?
(I almost can't wait for Sunday to see what happens on Last Week Tonight)
@WheatWizard Alaska may very well be not big enough to matter
04:46
People ages 13-17 can go as Junior Delegates
if your state has that, idk
wat
wat
@mbomb007 15
Well, now you know. When you're 19 in four years, go be a delegate and get involved.
You help adjust the platform, and appoint people to committees.
wat
wat
@mbomb007 ok, will consider
This is honestly the first time I've felt truly ashamed of my country.
4
And go as an alternate if the delegate positions are taken. I did, but many people don't show up and you get seated anyway.
@PhiNotPi I'm more ashamed that people chose Trump over the other Republican options.
04:48
;_; i should of become poll worker and comit voter fraud
crap wat if nsa is listening
wat
wat
@Downgoat and get convicted?
@wat no not that part
@Downgoat Maybe they'll encourage it, like the DNC
wat
wat
@Downgoat you would be discovered
just yhe through out all trump ballot part
wat
wat
04:49
What does TNB think of the Fair Tax? wikiwand.com/en/FairTax
@wat i am a goat i can just eat them and no one will notice
wat
wat
lol
Anyways, I'll be glad if Hillary loses.
Too much corruption
And most of all, it proves how biased the media is, because they've been showing Hillary as being 10-15% ahead of Trump, but that's obviously false.
@mbomb007 Not in the last days. Clinton was falling in poll averages, at least from what the BBC reported.
Dunno about american media.
@mınxomaτ Same thing here
04:54
@mbomb007 If anyone didn't already realize how biased the media are, I doubt they will now.
Three days ago the medium average was 45/45 and they've crossed streams many times
Also, 209/244. Wow.
Hey
Just woke up
Gj, murica
Thank you. Good to be appreciated
So how does the vote work in America anyway? Do you only get to pick one person, or do you number them in order of preference?
Pick one
04:59
@Sp3000 pick one
You only vote for people to vote AFAIK
That is true
@Sp3000 Maine might soon be allowing ranked voting
wat
wat
fuck the electoral college
05:00
in fact a dem representative in Washington said they wont vote for Clinton
It's not even the electoral college that's the problem, it's the "pick one" ballots.
I hope they do ranked, one seems a bit odd to me personally
@wat Trump's winning popular vote too...
wat
wat
johnson for president 2020
@betseg thanks, were really good at doing stupid
05:01
@wat maine is voting about having ranked, but doesn't currently
They are not they voted whether or not to do so in the future
I dunno, I don't think we can handle this ranked thing. Does it require numbers?
wat
wat
@PhiNotPi k
@Sp3000 A simple majority in a state selects all electors of that state, which may or may not vote for the candidate this majority voted for.
It's a pretty screwed up system if you ask me.
@Dennis Not all states are simple majority
Maine and Nebraska split their electors
05:03
Does anything happen to the losing ballots, e.g. does third place get to choose whether to give their votes to first or second place?
@Sp3000 Think more primitive.
Hmm I see
Think an 18th century country trying to figure out how democracy should work, because that's where we are still at.
3
Plus every state gets 2 extra votes regardless of its size.
If you live in a small state you essentially get more votes
05:05
But yeah re:ranked I feel like if you want to vote one, you should be able to just vote one, but you should also get the option of numbering 2, 3, 4, etc if you have a preference
wat
wat
trinton vs clump
The single transferable vote (STV) is a voting system designed to achieve proportional representation through ranked voting in multi-seat constituencies (voting districts). Under STV, an elector (voter) has a single vote that is initially allocated to their most preferred candidate and, as the count proceeds and candidates are either elected or eliminated, is transferred to other candidates according to the voter's stated preferences, in proportion to any surplus or discarded votes. The exact method of reapportioning votes can vary (see Counting methods). The system provides approximately p...
...would be nice
(does a minor fistpump for Aus)
I'm also a fan of either approval voting, or a fully-ranked Condorcet method.
But really... it doesn't matter what we switch to as long as it's not what we currently have.
How about you express your level of support for each candidate with any real-valued expression you can fit onto the ballot.
Candidate with highest sum of support wins.
05:12
@feersum the negative aspect of this is that people who "scream louder" on their ballots would have more influence: the optimal strategy is to min-max your ballot which is still moderately dishonest.
Do you dislike that people who are good at math get more votes?
wat
wat
I found a picture of @Downgoat if trump wins
@feersum the goal should be that an honest ballot is an optimal ballot
My goal was that the ballot with the most math is optimal.
oh, I think I misunderstood... (aka took your joke as a literal endorsement of range voting)
05:16
Anyway, approval voting doesn't necessarily make honesty optimal either.
@PhiNotPi hahaha somebody suggested that as a "serious" proposal?
Let's go live to the Canadian border: https://t.co/xkvIU37npQ
(click for image)
05:31
Hmm, I just realized my (-∞, ∞) range voting idea isn't so good, since equality of real numbers is undecidable. We could have an uncomputable election result (even assuming votes were required to be computable).
wat
wat
@feersum 0-10 each candidate
@wat Still uncomputable.
???
wat
wat
fuck
05:48
What the... I leave the chat room for a couple hours and this is what you guys let happen?
Don't worry its not over. You can still fix it for us
Downvote all the things?
wat
wat
@Geobits Consider becoming a Trump supporter for a day
No thanks
wat
wat
...wtf did i just write
05:52
Again, no thanks.
How many times are you going to edit-ping me?
wat
wat
@Geobits sorry :(

« first day    last day (32 days later) »