But yeah, if Florida gets called for Clinton, it's pretty much game over, barring some exceptional upsets.
> The marijuana ballot measure in Florida passed by a landslide, legalizing medical pot for specific debilitating diseases. With 76.9 percent in favor and 29.1 percent opposed, the results lined up with the polls we looked at.
Republicans had more to lose, but a lot of them weren't really that competitive also. So they'll lose a few seats, but retain overall control (or so it seems right now).
You obviously understand this better than I do, but by my count, Democrats currently have 78 while Republicans have 72, and 18 are still to be disputed.
Wait, no that can't be right.
Oh, Google includes all seats in their interactive thingie, disputed or not...
In a lot of states (for instance mine) the result is almost guaranteed. Voting for a third party can be a political statement and can help support your candidate in the next election.
Well, with only four electoral votes and no other states doing it, that sounds like a sure-fire way to get politicians to ignore your state for a while.
Oh sure. I'm not saying it isn't. Just that it makes things harder for them to guess, so unless there's a big stake involved, it makes the state less influential than it is now imo.
Major update! This sake that's been sitting in my cupboard for a few years is actually really good. Never had this brand before, but it's not half bad at all.
I personally don't like that they "call" states at all. It makes your vote feel worthless if your precinct hasn't reported and they already called your state. Plus states that get called while other states are still open influence the outcome of the election
99% of me is in denial this is even happening, and the other 1% is hoping at last moment, my fellow americans will come through and make right choice ;_;
@Downgoat The only choice that our fellow americans could make now that would swing the election the opposite direction would be misplacing a large number of trump ballets
But yeah re:ranked I feel like if you want to vote one, you should be able to just vote one, but you should also get the option of numbering 2, 3, 4, etc if you have a preference
The single transferable vote (STV) is a voting system designed to achieve proportional representation through ranked voting in multi-seat constituencies (voting districts). Under STV, an elector (voter) has a single vote that is initially allocated to their most preferred candidate and, as the count proceeds and candidates are either elected or eliminated, is transferred to other candidates according to the voter's stated preferences, in proportion to any surplus or discarded votes. The exact method of reapportioning votes can vary (see Counting methods).
The system provides approximately p...
@feersum the negative aspect of this is that people who "scream louder" on their ballots would have more influence: the optimal strategy is to min-max your ballot which is still moderately dishonest.
Hmm, I just realized my (-∞, ∞) range voting idea isn't so good, since equality of real numbers is undecidable. We could have an uncomputable election result (even assuming votes were required to be computable).