« first day (663 days earlier)      last day (4071 days later) » 
03:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

3:41 AM
@DoubleAA Shouldn't be a surprise. A contract is a contract. Good, though.
 
@IsaacMoses You never know till you know. Especially with legal stuff.
 
@DoubleAA You're right. I speak in terms of "should."
 
@IsaacMoses The usual rule in U.S. contract law is that if a contract is ambiguous then it's construed in favor of the party that didn't draw it up. (There are exceptions.) Who draws prenups up?
 
@msh210 I think these are designed to be unambiguous. The template is written by the RCA and signed and notarized by the couple mutually.
 
1
Q: Can we see our personal stats?

Seth JIs it possible to view our personal stats on the site (number of x until level y or badge z)? If so, how? If not, is there any feature being worked on for this?

 
3:50 AM
Salutations, @goldPseudo
 
@IsaacMoses If all the wording is formula then I don't know whether the construed-against-the-drafter rule applies. But I don't know -- do you? -- whether all the wording is formulaic in these prenups: there may be sections where the drafter chooses what to put in.
(Anyway, IANAL.)
 
@IsaacMoses Salaam and/or Shalom, as the case may be.
 
@goldPseudo =
@goldPseudo I mean, and to you, the same.
@msh210 I think it's pretty formulaic. We didn't happen to do one, but we were intending to do a "post-nup" on principle and just never got around to it, and I looked at the forms at the time. Seemed pretty straightforward. Just sign on the dotted lines.
 
@IsaacMoses All right then.
@IsaacMoses Re "designed to be unambiguous": Doubtless every major corporation with numerous lawyers on staff or contracted intends its contracts to be unambiguous also, but courts frequently rule otherwise anyway.
@goldPseudo Pax.
 
@msh210 OK, well, B"H.
 
3:59 AM
@IsaacMoses Yep.
 
@hodofhod Is that your wording or borrowed?
Or if you happen to be in California, you can read this version theprenup.org/pdf/Prenup_California.pdf
 
@DoubleAA Yeah, Isaac linked to it, above. Thanks.
 
@msh210 ahh missed that.
 
5:00 AM
@doubleaa, assuming you're talking about the tag wiki, I started with the first line of wikipedias article, then rewrote it. I agonized over "(through negligence)"
 
5:25 AM
@DoubleAA I happen not to be at the moment, actually.
 
 
9 hours later…
2:21 PM
After watching this, and parallel discussions on Christianity SE, and a run-in I had myself on Islam SE, the question uppermost in my mind is Why is Islamic proselytism so inept?
 
2:53 PM
@TRiG 1) I don't know about the other interactions you mention, but I'd not necessarily generalize based on one person's actions here. 2) Are other faiths' proselytisms more ept (especially on SE)? 3) If so, one contributing factor may be shared cultural and linguistic heritage. A church (not to mention an individual preacher) steeped in American English (e.g.) is naturally going to have an easier time getting others who grew up in that culture/language to relate.
 
3:11 PM
@IsaacMoses I've noticed a tendency (not just from Ali), to jump straight in, without any attempt to learn where the audience is coming from. As in, "Oh, you're an atheist? You must immediately drop everything you're doing and watch this hour-long lecture on YouTube." (Then again, such unthinking arrogance is hardy unique to Muslims.)
 
@TRiG Shall we band together and teach a seminar on effective interfaith proselytizing? Or at least a comedy sketch? "No, no, no. You're doing it all wrong. Give me that microphone."
 
14
A: Why aren't Yemenites an ed echad on locusts?

ari greenspanAri Zivotofsky and I have worked hard to collect tens of testimonies from Yemenites and North Africans on the ID and traditions of which chagav (locust-like insect) is kosher. There is no question, as there are still many people alive who can remember them from their countries of origin. Birds a...

 
3:26 PM
@msh210 Right. I was about to go search that up :)
 
3:52 PM
@Ali You. Are. In. The. Wrong. Room.
 
@Ali, what @SethJ said. If you have a question about Christianity, ask there.
@Ali since you're here I"ll say this now (also for @DhoweedYaAgov and others): do not bring the Islam-versus-Judaism discussion back here. We created a special room just for that. Once I figure out how I intend to move the extensive discussion from Friday/Saturday to there. V'dibarta Bam is not the right place for this. Last night I said this as my own personal opinion; I am now speaking as a moderator.
6
 
@SethJ Don't knock it till you've tried it.
 
@IsaacMoses Heh. I didn't notice the link. I saw the Yemenite link immediately below it and scratched my head about where it came from. Then someone posted the above on Facebook.
@IsaacMoses Who says I haven't tried it?
 
4:26 PM
@SethJ Sorry. Have you?
 
@IsaacMoses Remind me to tell you next time I see you.
 
@AlUmmatمجاهد Thanks!
 
@AlUmmatمجاهد thank you!
 
no problem
I didn't do it last night for I was working
 
4:39 PM
@AlUmmatمجاهد & thanks again. :-)
 
@msh210 no problem :)
 
4:54 PM
Ugh. @msh210 @MonicaCellio @DoubleAA can't you guys do something about this?
 
@SethJ "this"=?
 
@msh210 The continued participation of a particular "truth" seeker engaging in tiresome circles of reasoning and questioning.
 
@SethJ What we really need IMO is more 20k users.
 
@msh210 How will that help?
 
yydl and @IsaacMoses are a little close. Lemme go see if there are some particularly good answers I can give bounties to.
@SethJ Mods are loath to vote to delete because their decisions are effective. 20k users can vote to delete.
More 3k users (who can vote to close) will help also.
 
5:08 PM
@msh210 I'm 4.4K away. You should instead encourage me to post more valuable content on Mi Yodeya
2
 
@IsaacMoses I hereby do so.
@msh210 Hm, no, We have a good number of 3k users. They just don't vote to close, I guess.
 
14
Q: Bli Neder Loophole

NaftaliWho came up with the Bli Neder loophole of: Bli neder I will help you do X Or Bli neder I will etc... And the list can go on and on. Who came up with addingBli Neder which basically means "Without a promise" to things that seem like promises?! Does that remove one from the obligatio...

 
@IsaacMoses Wait, did you mean I should encourage you to post more content that is valuable, or that I should encourage you to improve the value of your posts?
:-)
 
@msh210 The former, mainly. I've posted almost as many answers on Mi Yodeya Meta as I have on Mi Yodeya, and also almost as many questions if you leave out .
 
@IsaacMoses @msh210, if you don't leave out , you might be able to bump him up a bit more.
 
5:22 PM
@SethJ Pardon?
 
@msh210 Unless you always upvote those questions, you can probably bump @IsaacMoses up a few points by upvoting the questions in the series.
@msh210 It would be artificial inflation, but it would achieve a desirable outcome.
 
@SethJ Ah, I see. I usually do upvote the m-y-series Qs. (In fact, my votes on IM's Qs have been cancelled twice that I noticed by the automatic vote cancellation script thingamabob.)
 
@SethJ What @msh210 said. Systematically upvoting someone's stuff is likely to get canceled (and rightly so, actually). Just vote your conscience on each post on its own merits. A bunch of us will B"H make it to 20,000 within the next year, probably.
 
@IsaacMoses indeed. Don't vote on people; vote on content. Reviewing existing material to see if there's soemthing bounty-worthy is one thing; systematically voting on things that you wouldn't vote on otherwise is another.
 
@MonicaCellio I agree completely. And my usual upvote on the m-y-series question du jour (or du quinzaine, or du mois) is because I like the series, not because I like the asker (though I do).
 
5:33 PM
@msh210 right, I assumed as much.
 
@MonicaCellio Or call for new mod elections.
 
@SethJ Are you expressing insufficient confidence in the current team?
 
@SethJ and all: the following is an old question (almost 2 years) that is more of a survey, which is now discouraged on the network. I asked Seth to edit it to fit current norms and he rightly pointed out that doing so would invalidate existing answers. Thoughts on the best way to proceed?
1
Q: Is Selling חמץ Legitimate?

Seth JDo you sell your חמץ before פסח? Why or why not? This is meant, in part, as a form of a survey, but also as a collection for arguments both for and against. Please cite your sources.

 
Ali
hi now i am unblocked
 
@MonicaCellio Historical value lock
 
5:35 PM
@IsaacMoses sorry, didn't mean to stomp into a current disucssion.
@IsaacMoses that's what I was thinking. @SethJ?
 
Darn.
 
@MonicaCellio The best time to quell a revolution movement is just as it's about to get started.
 
@IsaacMoses Not at all. @msh210 was expressing that there is an insufficient amount of (wo)man-power to effectively police the site sometimes.
@MonicaCellio Whatever you guys deem appropriate is fine with me.
@MonicaCellio BUT...
Can I reserve the right to re-ask the valuable part of the question without it being "dupe"d?
 
@SethJ if by the valuable part of the question you mean what are the sources/reasons on either side, I agree. That's what I wanted this question to be instead of what it is, except for the answers being there. :-)
 
@IsaacMoses Whaaaaaaa?
 
5:49 PM
@HodofHod What, you only eat things with endoskeletons?
 
@IsaacMoses No, I have an issue with eating things that are still recognizable as animals. Always had an issue with fish heads. One of my Rabbis likes to roast a whole lamb's head for RH; that sort of thing.
 
@HodofHod I'll bet you also don't shecht your own chickens at home.
 
@IsaacMoses @HodofHod ...or eat tongue that you saw before it was sliced.
 
@IsaacMoses Not at home, no. Other people's homes. I do kisui hadam every year, if that's what you're wondering.
 
@HodofHod So, you don't mind looking the bird in the eye, shechting it, and then cooking and eating it? You just don't want to still be able to look it in the eye when it's on your plate?
 
5:57 PM
@msh210 No tongue at all. But that's not because of the way it looks.
@IsaacMoses Pretty much. But then again, I'm not the shochet.
 
@IsaacMoses You remind me of the restaurant at the end of the universe.
 
I never claimed it made sense, did I?
 
@HodofHod Why? if I may ask.
 
@msh210 It's been a long time since I read that. Was there a guy expertly making sandwiches?
 
@msh210 I don't enjoy it. Not sure. Might be a texture thing.
Hey, did you know they call that mouthfeel these days? Just found out.
 
5:59 PM
@IsaacMoses There was a cow that came up to your table and spoke, describing her past diet and offering various parts of herself as particularly delectable.
...IIRC.
 
So, if this isn't a comment....
1
A: Yosef "stretched his height" to conceal Rachel?

yehudaIt occurs to me that Esau would have wanted to know where Rachel was had he not seen her at all, since the rumor at the time was Yaacov was the intended of Rachel he knew she existed. Secondly, why did Rachel bow at all if she was hidden from site. Based on that perhaps he only hid her main fi...

 
@msh210 yes, that's correct. (Well, some animal resembling a cow, anyway; I don't remember if Adams specifically named the species.)
 
Who wants to edit it to actually be an answer? Any takers?
 
@HodofHod, you'd probably really not like the experience Pulitzer-Prize-winningly described here: laweekly.com/1998-10-15/eat-drink/man-bites-prawn/full (Caution: disgustingly describes probable violation of 'eiver min hachai prohibition)
 
@IsaacMoses No. Just....no.
:D
 
6:03 PM
@IsaacMoses That installment of that column, specifically, won a Pulitzer? Or the column generally? Or the paper's reporting on food even more generally? Or...?
 
@SethJ I'm not sure we can (there's missing info). I just left a comment.
 
@msh210 The author, for a body of work including that column. I think that column was one of the ones hilighted as his best work.
 
@IsaacMoses Interesting.
 
@IsaacMoses See the last section of this piece wrt 'Ever Min HaHai and fish.
 
@SethJ @MonicaCellio I think it is one. The question assumes Rachel was hidden, the answer proposes that she was incompletely hidden, which even a six-year-old-can do. It's not a good answer, in that it doesn't explain how he covered enough of her to matter, but I think it's an answer.
 
6:07 PM
@MonicaCellio I just don't like the fact that he's asking a question in his answer. Something about that completely removes the "Shem" Answer for me and necessarily relegates it to Comment status.
 
@SethJ Huh! I was choshed be-[relatively]-kasher! May he find his way to even greater levels of kashrut, and enjoy no less success in the process.
 
@IsaacMoses That installment is good.
 
@msh210 Certainly well-written.
 
@SethJ The question is included as evidence of his answer.
@IsaacMoses Yeah. I didn't mean "tasty". :-)
 
@msh210 That's why I suggested a re-write. I'm just not up for it right now. I don't feel focused enough.
 
6:13 PM
@msh210 :) ... or "consistent with Halacha," I presume
 
@IsaacMoses er... right. That neither.
Nine people nominally here. (But three (I guess) of us don't count toward a minyan.)
 
@msh210 If you're trying to start an argument about personal status, we have another room for that :)
... and then their were seven. TTYL
 
@msh210 Minyan for what?
 
@DoubleAA Anything (pretty much) that requires a minyan.
 
@msh210 Like Kiddush haShem beRabim? Megillah?
 
6:25 PM
@DoubleAA Like those, yeah. Like I said, pretty much. :-)
 
@DoubleAA We have another room for such arguments! ;^P OK bye for real.
 
7
Q: When can you count ladies towards a Minyan?

Gershon GoldI've heard that there are situations in which one can count the ladies towards a Minyan. Is that true? Which situations?

 
@msh210 I do in mine, but I don't expect you to agree. :-)
 
@IsaacMoses I can start a "Discussion about Judaism's view of personal statuses and assorted extended discussions. Note that this room is not being heavily monitored by the Mi Yodeya moderators." room
 
@MonicaCellio :-) We can take this outside if necessary, @IsaacMoses.
 
6:27 PM
It seems they're actually still arguing in there.
I'm so very glad they have their own room.
 
@DoubleAA Ja.
 
@msh210 it's ok. I'm not feeling the need for an argument. :-)
 
@MonicaCellio I edited in the link
I'm applying a historical lock to this question. The OP (or anybody else) is welcome to ask the "what are the reasons/arguments for/against?" question separately from this survey. Such a question should not be closed as a duplicate of this one, though some answers here may also apply there. EDIT: The better version has now been asked here: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/26797/759Monica Cellio 45 mins ago
I can't add a comment because it's already locked
 
@msh210 Actually, two of them are discussing that right now over there.
 
If I ask the following, can we merge all the recent mishebeirach questions into it?
> God knows our intentions. How important is it -- in prayers such as Mishebeirach..., getting called up to the Torah, or other synagogue uses -- to be precise in naming the target of the prayer? Is it sufficient that no one standing there is confused as to the intent, or must we follow a specific pattern for the prayer to work?
 
6:42 PM
Hey, mods, while you're all here, can we ban this cat? What's keeping us from purging him from MY?
@DoubleAA I vote no, but I may be biased.
 
what do you guys think of this chart?
 
@DoubleAA great, thanks!
 
@SethJ ???
@DhoweedYaAgov I'd say it seems to contradict a pasuk mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0129.htm#35
 
@DhoweedYaAgov site is blocked for me at work, sorry.
 
why is contradicting?
@DoubleAA it says praise
 
6:48 PM
@DhoweedYaAgov "Hod" means praise?
 
אוֹדֶה
erm :/
 
(ping our resident expert on all things 'hod': @HodofHod)
 
@DoubleAA lol
:D
 
@DoubleAA hodu lashem ki tov?
hodu is praise not?
or thanking
same thing
 
@DhoweedYaAgov The shoresh of that is ידה
 
6:52 PM
Yeah, sort of both of those together, like in the pasuk you quoted and like the hoda'ah, the third-from-end b'racha of the t'filah.
 
@DhoweedYaAgov I don't think so. What conjugation of י.ד.ה. gives you הוד?
 
וַתַּהַר עוֹד וַתֵּלֶד בֵּן, וַתֹּאמֶר הַפַּעַם אוֹדֶה אֶת-יְהוָה--עַל-כֵּן קָרְאָה שְׁמוֹ, יְהוּדָה; וַתַּעֲמֹד, מִלֶּדֶת.
pa3m odah ath hashem
so odah is from yodah?
 
@DhoweedYaAgov Ok...אודה is a conjugation of ידה because the radical yod becomes a wow. Those two letters can switch.
like how יום הולדת comes from shoresh ילד
 
@DhoweedYaAgov yes. Sometimes yud as part of the shoresh drops out.
 
6:54 PM
so when does hod come into play? :P
 
@DoubleAA explained it better. Listen to him.
 
what bout yahudith?
 
@DhoweedYaAgov הוד is like grandeur like ברכי נפשי את יקוק יקוק אלהי גדלת מאד הוד והדר לבשת:
@DhoweedYaAgov יהדות seems to come from יהודה the name. I don't know what the first use of that construct is. It might be modern Hebrew.
 
so many we should fix the chart
i thnk we can still work it out
 
@DoubleAA I think you know who I mean.
 
6:58 PM
so the person who made the chart probably used the wrong word. instead of hod he shouldve used odah
still same message, no?
 
Nah I take it back. It shows up in Rashi. So it's not modern Hebrew.
@DhoweedYaAgov I don't know why Yehuda needs to be a perfect combination of two separate mutually intelligible parts. Maybe it's more of a portmanteau or just a mixing of related sounds, like a pun.
Though @msh210 might be better at this sort of thing than I.
 
yahudith is not a new word which means a female yahudoh
there was a yahudith in tanach
i think
 
@DoubleAA @DhoweedYaAgov Don't want to get too kabbalistic on you guys, but the sefirah of "hod" is certainly linked to both "splendor" and "praise". See for example Rabbi Ginsburg's page: "Hence the word hod connotes both "acknowledgment" (hoda'ah) and "splendor,""
 
im pretty sure splendor and praise are attributes which are closely related
without any kabboloh
 
@DhoweedYaAgov There is. Divrei Hayamim I chapter 2 of 3 or so
 
7:05 PM
right
so am i wrong in suggesting on fixing up that chart to say odah instead of hod? it has the right message just the word hod is not the right word
The Book of Judith is a deuterocanonical book, included in the Septuagint and the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Christian Old Testament of the Bible, but excluded by Jews and Protestants. The book contains numerous historical , which is why many scholars now accept it as non-historical; it has been considered a parable or perhaps the first historical novel. The name Judith () is the feminine form of Judah. Historical context The Book of Judith has a tragic setting that appealed to Jewish patriots and it warned of the urgency of adhering to Mosaic law, generally speaking, but what acc...
i was not talking bout her, im pretty sure there was anotehr yahudith somewhere in tanach
oh yeah channukah, but channukah took place after the establishment of judea
 
@HodofHod I wonder now about the etymology of the two words. I bet R Hircsh (@IsaacMoses) or someone who writes about that kind of thing discusses it.
 
@doubleAA are you sure hod and yodah are not similar?
 
@DhoweedYaAgov They look like different Shorashim to me. They might still be related etymologically or just similar in meaning. I'm not the official final word on this of course, though.
 
imma look into it when im back later.
 
@DhoweedYaAgov Hmm. Why did the Septuagint contain books which aren't included in Jewish canon?
 
7:17 PM
@TRiG because the rabbonim took out book from the canon which were controversial in their eyes if they were read by am ho'orasSim
therefore leaving only book which dont arise any doubt.
the books were kosher, but not kosher for everyone
 
@TRiG Good question! Probably better for BH.SE but I'd guess the books were circulating/popular so the Septuagint chose not to 'discriminate', ie take everything available.
 
@DoubleAA that too
 
@DoubleAA Woot! I have a question for BH.SE! I've been trying for ages to think of something I could ask there.
Thanks.
 
everything which was "holy" and popular was accepted
 
@TRiG :) No problem. Link me back here when you do.
 
7:22 PM
@DoubleAA that is why ben sira was banned
Jesus ben Sirach, commonly known simply as ben Sirach or Sirach and also rendered Joshua ben Sirach, Jesus son of Sirach or Jesus Siracides, was the author of the deuterocanonical Wisdom of Sirach and possibly the rabbinical Alphabet of Sirach. Ben Sirach, a Jew who had been living in Jerusalem, may have authored the work in Alexandria, Egypt c. 180–175 BCE, where he is thought to have established a school. According to the Jewish tradition his name was Shim'on ben Yeshu'a ben Eli'ezer ben Sira (Hebrew: שמעון בן ישוע בן אליעזר בן סירא) and he was a contemporary of Simon the Just. His...
 
@DhoweedYaAgov Yet the gemara darshins it a number of times.
 
rabbi agiva says whoever reads it will lose his olom habo
yet rabbeinu saAdyo jaon quotes it all the time and i think he wrote a peirush on it
and many others wrote peirushim on it, of the top of my head i know someone mentinoed in milhHomoth hashem by rabbeinu avarohom ban harambam names someone who wrote a peirush on it him time, with an intent to undermine his fathers morah navuchim
how can this be if holochoh says its forbidden? rambam says its forbidden. rambam says learning aristotle is forbidden too. why did he do it?
one can forbid for the mass but not for the minority
 
0
Q: Why does the Septuagint contain non-Tanakh books?

TRiGThe deuterocanonical books, treated as part of the Bible by the Orthodox and Catholic churches, are accepted because they appear in the Septuagint. However, they are excluded from the Jewish Bible, the Tanakh (and are therefore also excluded by most (all?) Protestant Christians). Given that the S...

> The deuterocanonical books, treated as part of the Bible by the Orthodox and Catholic churches, are accepted because they appear in the Septuagint. However, they are excluded from the Jewish Bible, the Tanakh (and are therefore also excluded by most (all?) Protestant Christians). Given that the Septuagint was a Jewish publication, why does it contain books which are not part of the Tanakh?
 
i remember a site which had all the books out of the canon in english i think. i remember seeing a prayer from esther as a seperate book
 
@MadaraUchiha, someone noticed one flag?
 
@SethJ It's not like flags in chat are extremely common (not rare either, they just don't "flood" the system)
 
@DhoweedYaAgov I recall a "Prayer of Manassah", as part of the Apocrypha. I've never actually read any of the Apocrypha.
 
some books there are works of minim and such
 
Ah, well, I just want to thank the mods for addressing part of the problem (@MonicaCellio in particular, thank you for freezing the other room).
 
I noticed the discussion over it in my chat, skimmed back a little and joined.
 
7:30 PM
so i recommend taking discretion before reading anything
 
@MonicaCellio Yeyasher kocheich. My suggestion: burninate the room. It's served its purpose - to divert unwanted arguing from this room. The records thereof are probably of more negative value than positive. Just get rid of it.
 
Here's another semi-related question. The branches of Christianity which accept those books call them "deuterocanonical" (second canon). The branches which don't call them "apocrypha" (hidden things, I think). Do the Jews have any word for them at all, or do you simply ignore them?
 
See, that's what I mean about terrible romanization
 
@IsaacMoses I don't know about that. I think there might be some value to be gleaned from it.
 
@IsaacMoses Nah. I'd like to read it one day.
(And it does no harm frozen, does it?)
 
7:32 PM
@TRiG Well, some of the best material has probably been deleted. Depending on what you're most interested in.
 
In Hebrew we write ישר כוחך, which I would romanize as Yasher Kokheh or something.
 
@TRiG as far as I know, no
 
@TRiG One day?
Get 10k reputation on this site, and on that day, you'll be able to read it :)
 
@MadaraUchiha Most people vocalize it at Yasher Ko-ach.
 
@MadaraUchiha Fairy nuff. ;)
 
7:33 PM
@TRiG It does a lot less harm frozen. It still exists as a net-negative contribution to the content of the Internet.
 
Or on any Stack Exchange site really
@SethJ Yeah well, it depends on how you mean it.
 
i thought it was yashar kacha
 
@MadaraUchiha Getting 10K on any SE site is a lot more likely than getting it on Mi Yodeya.
 
ישר כוח is similar, but not 100% the same as ישר כוחך
@DhoweedYaAgov Kacha = ככה = because
 
@DhoweedYaAgov I thought it was shkoiyach. All of these are contractions of the original "יישר כוחך" (starting with two yods) @SethJ @MadaraUchiha
 
7:35 PM
@IsaacMoses I'm with ya. I'm not stating what's correct, just what's generally done. And I know your style.
 
I don't mind the style
But I don't like spending over 5 seconds reading one word :P
 
(misfired my @)
 
you dont like my teimoni hebrew?!
sheeeeeeeeeeeeee
 
@DhoweedYaAgov I thought you were Muslim. (Shoot, pleasedon'tbanmepleasedon'tbanmepleasedon'tbanme)
 
@MadaraUchiha the only thing wrong with how I wrote it there, IMO, is that I accidentally was inconsistent on transliteration of tzeireh, using "e" in one place and "ei" in the other.
 
7:37 PM
in arabic everyone is muslim who submits to a higher being
but i am a yahudi muslim
 
@IsaacMoses And again, took me a little while to understand WTF is tzeireh.
 
@DhoweedYaAgov Too soon
3
 
@MadaraUchiha How would you transliterate that?
 
@IsaacMoses indeed.
 
7:38 PM
@IsaacMoses Tzere
Or Tsere
 
sSere
 
Nah, most likely Tzere
 
@MadaraUchiha An English speaker would likely read that like "tseer"
 
Hmmm, you have a point.
I guess I'm too used to playing online games with other Israelis where you can't type hebrew
 
7:39 PM
@IsaacMoses Lawrence was deliberately inconsistent in his transliteration of Arabic.
 
We used to speak like that the entire time
Gam ani yodea ledaber besafa muzara.
 
@SethJ you're welcome. I have not been following that room at all closely (as noted in the description I added on Friday, speaking for all the mods), but I skimmed today and...wow.
 
@MadaraUchiha Doing entire discourses like that seems like it would be quite annoying
 
@TRiG Really? Why?
 
@IsaacMoses We had to :)
 
7:41 PM
@MadaraUchiha In that world, it would make sense to use a convention that's closest to the original Hebrew spelling rather than to pronunciation by an English-speaking reader
 
Hebrew was not supported by the game's chat.
@IsaacMoses ata mitkaven chcha?
Meh, we preferred it so it's easier to read.
 
@SethJ He said that it was impossible to transliterate Arabic into the Latin alphabet in a way that would be understood by English speakers with any degree of accuracy. And being deliberately inconsistent (to the point of spelling the same placename differently every time he mentioned it) underscored that point. But then, he was going for a literary effect, not a work of scholarship.
(I'm talking about Seven Pillars of Wisdom, in case you're wondering.)
 
@TRiG iterary effect...in a game chat?
 
@MonicaCellio I don't see why not.
 
@MadaraUchiha Whatever works. In any case, it's a different context than the occasional transliterated word in otherwise-English text.
 
7:43 PM
@TRiG Ok. I don't play real-time games myself, but I marvel that anyone has the time to be literary in that context instead of just slamming messages out.
 
I sometimes make the effort to carefully phrase things for a euphonious use of language in ephemeral written communication.
2
 
Guess so
 
@TRiG Interesting. Sounds dumb, but hey, he's a world famous archaeologist/Arabist, while I am not.
 
(I mean, I hear some of my husband's weekly Diablo game, and they went to voice for the increaased bandwidth, which is why there's anything to hear.)
 
I as a native Hebrew speaker find it quite annoying, but I guess it's a matter of getting used to
 
7:45 PM
@SethJ Yeah. I've not actually read his book, but I have read his introduction to it.
@MonicaCellio I've never done computer gaming, but I get the impression that some of the MMO games would give people time to phrase things with a certain degree of care if they wished to.
 
@MadaraUchiha would you be made if i wrote in teimoni hebrew?
 
@DhoweedYaAgov I actually have no idea what Teimoni Hebrew is.
 
instead of kaddish ill say gaddeesh
and for the actually text for kaddish ill say yithjadal wiyithgadash shmeh rabo
instead of yitgadal vyitkadash shmeh raba
 
@MadaraUchiha Right, just be happy I transliterate in something akin to modern Hebrew pronunciation and not Teimani or some form of Ashkenazis
 
Ali
So why was the room deleted?
 
7:49 PM
:O
instead of meshuganah ill say meshujanah :PPPP
 
Ali
did it contain any "prosyletization"?
 
@Ali It wasn't, it was frozen.
 
Ali
I cant see the room now
 
@Ali Mi Yodeya -> chat -> view frozen rooms
 
Ah, it was deleted, my bad;
Deleted indeed.
 
Ali
7:51 PM
so why not undelete?
 
ok imma go now. ill bbl. kol tuv
 
@MadaraUchiha Nah. Just frozen. Here it is.
 
@Ali the room was frozen, not deleted (yet, anyway), because the discussion has become non-constructive. I quoted you the message that I say is proselytizing; you claim it's not but I disagree. There may have been others; I haven't read the entire transcript.
 
Right, (weird the way it displays as if it's deleted, first time I notice that)
 
Ali
@TRiG NO i CANT SEE
 
7:52 PM
@Ali because we are not going to give you a platform for continuing to argue. Did you not see the message I posted before freezing?
 

 Discussion about Islam's view of Juda

Note that this room is not being heavily monitored by the Mi Y...
 
in Discussion about Islam's view of Judaism and assorted extended discussions, 27 mins ago, by Monica Cellio
Everybody needs to chill for a while. I am going to freeze this room for a while. I will discuss the fate of this room with the other mods. Meanwhile, do not bring this argument/discussion/whatever-you-want-to-call it back to V'dibarta Bam. I will not hesitate to kick people out of chat.
 
@Ali I can see it. And I'm not a mod. So I don't know why you can't. Could be a mod action. Could be something do with your rep levels. Could be a bug. shrug
 
Ali
freezing!=deleted
 
@TRiG Maybe because you have 17k reputation on another site on the network.
 
Ali
7:55 PM
@MonicaCellio It can be frozen but should not be deleted
 
@Ali It is not deleted. Repeating it will not make it true.
 
@Ali It's not deleted...
 
Ali
OK maybe only i cant see it
 
3 mins ago, by Madara Uchiha

 Discussion about Islam's view of Juda

Note that this room is not being heavily monitored by the Mi Y...
 
Ali
ok
 
7:57 PM
Well, I opened another browser to see whether I could see it when logged out. But I actually cannot log out in IE. Which is weird.
 
@TRiG You're using IE?
I could kick you out of chat right now.
2
 
@MadaraUchiha I'm in FF here. I opened a separate browser, to view as a logged-out user. But I'm also logged in in IE, and am unable to log out.
Probably because of the weird way SE uses local storage to record login state.
 
@TRiG Peculiar. Try erasing cookies
 
@TRiG huh, weird. Is IE keeping a cookie for you? (You've logged in in the past, perhaps?)
 
@TRiG You could try private browsing mode in FF
 
03:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (663 days earlier)      last day (4071 days later) »