« first day (2636 days earlier)      last day (2291 days later) » 

yo'
12:39 AM
@HaraldHanche-Olsen Especially funny to find such a question, where, moreover, you don't remember asking it. Happens most often to @egreg and @DavidCarlisle :-)
 
12:58 AM
@yo' Yes, I remember none of my questions.
4
 
 
7 hours later…
7:29 AM
@yo' I have asked all of my questions at least three times, and never had a good answer to any of them
 
8:23 AM
@DavidCarlisle: did you see Nintendo Labo?
 
8:54 AM
@PauloCereda no, who is she?
 
@DavidCarlisle ooh :)
@DavidCarlisle labo.nintendo.com
 
@PauloCereda oh, robotic cardboard boxes:-)
 
9:10 AM
@DavidCarlisle :)
 
 
2 hours later…
10:56 AM
Warm-up for LuaTeX 1.07.0 (well... almost all done, really). Already landed in TeXLive 2018 svn. 1) tl2018 has luatex (lua52) as tex engine and luatex53 (lua53) as *program*, i.e. not tex engine, useful to check lua53 scripts.
@JosephWright ^^
 
11:23 AM
@PauloCereda New features, new fun!
 
11:35 AM
@egreg :)
 
11:53 AM
@PauloCereda oh I was just going to comment to @JosephWright about same thing (not the tweet, Luigi just mailed us with the same warning:-) I guess we'd better get the l3build testing running of luatex experimental releases again.....
 
@DavidCarlisle ooh can I create a LaTeX3 account in Twitter?
Then we can add a GitHub hook and annoy people
 
12:14 PM
Don’t use google translate.
@DavidCarlisle ^^
Also
Best. Business card. Ever.
2
 
 
2 hours later…
1:52 PM
@DavidCarlisle I see there are W32TeX builds: I'll try one tonight
 
2:05 PM
 
2:56 PM
@JosephWright Luigi told it compiles in the Linux subsystem too.
 
3:42 PM
@JosephWright Can you add the second answer to the duplicate link on this tex.stackexchange.com/q/410863/2693 (although technically the OP was asking a more basic question, so it's not a duplicate strictly speaking.)
 
4:00 PM
@samcarter Imho it should be better closed as "unclear". Without a log-file that shows the pathes and versions one can't say anything specific but only make wild guesses.
 
@JosephWright Luigi's narrowed down the issue on cygwin (poppler using non standard gnu c++ stuff so needing extra flags passed to the compiler as far as I understand, there was/is an issue in the poppler bugzilla) So hopefully I'll be bale to build again soon as well.
@PauloCereda that was an option I thought of if I couldn't get cygwin to work
 
@DavidCarlisle ah
 
4:27 PM
@PauloCereda by default cygwin build fails, Luigi can reproduce and identified it as this bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97915 so it'll probably get fixed
 
@DavidCarlisle Meanwhile, version 4.0 of arara has Cygwin support specially for you. :)
 
@PauloCereda I'll probably dump it and use the linux subsystem :-)
 
@DavidCarlisle Cygwin or arara? o.O
 
4:41 PM
@PauloCereda both!
 
2 days ago, by Paulo Cereda
@AlanMunn Nah, I will soon get distracted and this trauma will surely... OOH A COOKIE
 
5:12 PM
@AlanMunn ooh :)
 
@AlanMunn Done
@DavidCarlisle Cool
 
This is LuaTeX, Version 1.07.0 (TeX Live 2018/dev)
@JosephWright ^^
 
@DavidCarlisle Cool
 
@DavidCarlisle This is LuaTeX, Version 2.01.0a (TeX Live 2010/dev)
 
5:34 PM
@DavidCarlisle This is LuaTeX, Version 1.07.0 (TeX Live 2017/W32TeX) . Does someone know why w32tex.org has not only a dev version but also luatex-exp-w32.tar.xz?
 
@UlrikeFischer I was wondering that
 
5:55 PM
@marmot Don't make too many friends, Mr Marmot nytimes.com/2018/01/17/science/…
2
 
> Marmots were studied under annual permits issued by the Colorado Division of Wildlife (TR-917). All procedures were approved under research protocol ARC 2001-191-01 by the University of California Los Angeles Animal Care Committee on 13 May 2002, and renewed annually.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B
@AlanMunn wow
 
6:24 PM
@AlanMunn Are you saying that I will live longer if I vote all your answers down? ;-)
 
@PauloCereda: You'll like this site: duckietown.org
2
 
@Aditya oooh
 
6:49 PM
@UlrikeFischer Hello Ulrike. I sent you an email (fischer@troubleshooting-tex.de) yesterday about my problem. It would be very cool if you could indicate whether you are interested or if I should look for another solution. It's about using a ttf font in Beamer.
 
@Dr.ManuelKuehner I did reply yesterday. Didn't you got it?
 
No. I'll check my spam folder
@UlrikeFischer No, I'll check my spam folder
 
@AlanMunn See http://marmots.org/about-marmots/animal-profile/, where it is written that ``...marmots live in family groups called colonies and hibernate below ground from mid-September until late
April or early May. Hibernation permits the marmots to survive the long alpine winters when food is not available. Radio-telemetry suggests that marmots hibernate as family groups...'' So we spend much more than 50% of the year very close to each other anyway, so is it too surprising that we seek some privacy for some time in summer?
 
@UlrikeFischer Indeed. It is in the spam folder :). Thanks for replying. I'll try to solve is myself. If I get stuck at the "trivial" problem (as you call it in the mail) then I will come back to you and I will be happy to pay.
 
 
1 hour later…
8:09 PM
@UlrikeFischer The exp version uses Lua 5.3
 
@marmot: consider this a tribute: github.com/cereda/marmot
2
:)
 
@DavidCarlisle I'm starting on a full set of tests
@DavidCarlisle I'll check v1.07/Lua 5.2 first, then move on to Lua 5.3
 
@JosephWright My new hypothetical tool can help somehow. :)
 
@PauloCereda I remember some very full repository which doesn't even have a nice picture: github.com/cereda/artexmis...
 
@TeXnician ooh I need one for that as well!
 
8:16 PM
@PauloCereda Well, it's good that at least the artwork will be finished soon ;)
 
@TeXnician so true. :D
 
@PauloCereda LOVE IT! Quack!
 
@marmot Consider it as my new project after the release of arara 4.0 later on this year, together with ArTeXmis. :)
 
@PauloCereda And the holy ghost of the ducks will fill the repository with commits one day (when he's finished his thesis)...
 
@TeXnician one day. :)
 
8:20 PM
@PauloCereda Here is a way to mock up a latex document: \def\def{\empty} ;-)
 
@DavidCarlisle They've changed the discretionary logging again
 
8:47 PM
Holla !
Is there any changelog for l3build?
 
@Maïeul The Git history ...
 
I would like to know when ` \RenewExpandableDocumentCommand` was added for test minimum version required by reledmac
 
@Maïeul Huh? That's xparse
 
not l3build, xparse
I made a typo :-)
I was so focused previous time on l3build :P
 
@Maïeul Commit 70d2cb0d9388131c17ed44d0a295cc39d913c988, dated 2017-02-16
 
8:49 PM
@JosephWright thanks a lot
 
@Maïeul Not a problem
 
9:46 PM
@egreg -- i'm not sure the answer in the question marked as a duplicate will work for this question: tex.stackexchange.com/q/411046 . unfortunately, i don't have a (la)tex system available, and can't test. if it does work, i'd like to know. would you be willing to try it out and let me know, please?
 
10:15 PM
@PauloCereda How about Most Amazing Recreation Material Of TeX ?
 
@marmot MARMOTeX?
 
@PauloCereda Or just MARMOT? MARMOTeX may be misinterpreted as something analogous to the German Unkraut-Ex....
 
@marmot In Italian MARMOTeX=MARBLETeX
 
@marmot Unkraut-Ex is that herbicide thing used for making explosives?
 
@PhelypeOleinik You may abuse it like this. But it is really meant to exterminate weeds. Hence MARMOTeX sounds a bit like something to exterminate marmots.... not good....
@CarLaTeX Also not to good for @PauloCereda nice web site... what do you think?
 
10:24 PM
@marmot Well, that was what I could understand from the Wikipedia page :P
@marmot But in this case you have to agree with me that MARMOTeX has much more impact!
I'm going to hell for this :)
 
@marmot but it could sound strong
 
@PhelypeOleinik NOW I start understanding why it is healthier for marmots not too become too social ;-) @AlanMunn seems to be right...
 
@marmot LOL XD
 
@CarLaTeX but "Most Amazing Recreational Material Of TeX" sounds like a lot of fun... I guess, it will be full of ducks (and marmots, of course)... what do you think?
 
@marmot Very funny! :):):)
 
10:35 PM
@CarLaTeX What is the correct translation of feep into duck language? Quack?
 
10:51 PM
@JosephWright yep saw your mail:-) I've just kicked off a test run now (after updating l3build and latex2e) I'll see what I get....
 
@barbarabeeton Indeed, it's not a duplicate.
 
@egreg -- thanks. can werner reopen it directly? if not, i'll post a reopen request.
 
@barbarabeeton Already reopened.
 
@egreg -- thanks!
 
@barbarabeeton I had a doubt about compatibility with cleveref, but I tested and there was no problem.
 
10:58 PM
@UlrikeFischer (@JosephWright) I guess it's built off the head of the experimental branch rather than trunk (which are currently the same)
 
@egreg -- is the suggestion i made in a comment the right one? (except that i didn't mention that the first align* shouldn't be starred.) if it's appropriate, i'll post an answer. (i know that this is what's recommended in the amsthm documentation.)
 
@barbarabeeton In the edit to the question, align has become equation.
 
@egreg -- that's good. should i post an answer?
 
@barbarabeeton I think so. Maybe I'll add something for cleveref.
 
can anyone translate this into english, I'm having trouble parsing it
@David Carlisle: So is there a way around that? Longtable is a bit of a strange beast. — CGRemakes 1 min ago
2
 
11:23 PM
@JosephWright VVVVV
  Check failed with difference files
  - ../build/test/tlb-callbacks-001.luatex.diff
  - ../build/test/tlb-extraprimitives-001.luatex.diff
  - ../build/test/tlb-ltluatex-001.luatex.diff
  - ../build/test/tlb0010.luatex.diff
  - ../build/test/tlb0056.luatex.diff
  - ../build/test/tlb0073.luatex.diff
  - ../build/test/tlb0077.luatex.diff
  - ../build/test/tlb0320.luatex.diff
  - ../build/test/tlb0380.luatex.diff
  - ../build/test/tlb0881.luatex.diff
  - ../build/test/tlb0942.luatex.diff
  - ../build/test/tlb1451.luatex.diff
@JosephWright the above is with a build from experimental branch luatex 5.3 flavoured luatex (i suppose we are going to have to decide if tl2018 should have lualatex and luatex53 by default (and the test suite engine options....)
 
11:46 PM
@barbarabeeton Added the example
 
@egreg -- good edit. thanks much.
 

« first day (2636 days earlier)      last day (2291 days later) »