« first day (2520 days earlier)      last day (2710 days later) » 

Paulo Cereda
Paulo Cereda
09:40
Quack!
Joseph Wright
Joseph Wright
@PauloCereda Quack!
Paulo Cereda
Paulo Cereda
@JosephWright ooh a fellow duck
Paulo Cereda
Paulo Cereda
10:06
> Adobe's Product Security Team Accidentally Posted Its Private PGP Encryption Key to Its Blog
Oopsie. :)
 
4 hours later…
egreg
egreg
14:10
@DavidCarlisle I see you're learning lessons. ;-)
David Carlisle
David Carlisle
@egreg I reference a master
egreg
egreg
@PauloCereda Look! ^^^^^
Paulo Cereda
Paulo Cereda
14:23
@DavidCarlisle oooooh
@egreg incredible!
egreg
egreg
@PauloCereda /me looking around in astonishment
Paulo Cereda
Paulo Cereda
@egreg :D
 
1 hour later…
David Carlisle
David Carlisle
15:48
I love you (I will delete this comment soon) — Skeleton Bow 25 secs ago
2
saved for posterity ^^^^
Paulo Cereda
Paulo Cereda
@DavidCarlisle LOL
Christian Hupfer
Christian Hupfer
A few minutes left in Voting for the general elections here in Germany... I am scared about the result :-(
Paulo Cereda
Paulo Cereda
@ChristianHupfer Merkel?
Christian Hupfer
Christian Hupfer
@PauloCereda Oh my, yes, another four years with here as chancellor ...
Paulo Cereda
Paulo Cereda
@ChristianHupfer oh
Christian Hupfer
Christian Hupfer
16:00
@PauloCereda Polls will come in in a few moments, they are quite reliable
Paulo Cereda
Paulo Cereda
@ChristianHupfer ah I see
Christian Hupfer
Christian Hupfer
:40179432 We have our own Nigel Farages here ...
Paulo Cereda
Paulo Cereda
:40179432 Or that guy who looks like Bam-bam from the Flintstones
CarLaTeX
CarLaTeX
@ChristianHupfer Germany is the only country where they are reliable
Christian Hupfer
Christian Hupfer
@CarLaTeX The Populists from the Right got 13,5% apparently... oh my ...
CarLaTeX
CarLaTeX
16:10
@ChristianHupfer They are growing in Italy, too...
TeXnician
TeXnician
16:22
@ChristianHupfer Jamaika or not Jamaika, that's the question ;)
@ChristianHupfer Maybe one should say that the scary thing is that they are the third-most voted party...
Christian Hupfer
Christian Hupfer
@TeXnician Yes, that's the aspect that really bothers me
Ulrike Fischer
Ulrike Fischer
@TeXnician @ChristianHupfer well the SPD is already one the way out -- like in NRW it looks as if they quite happy to avoid the responsability.
TeXnician
TeXnician
@UlrikeFischer But let's wait whether they are able to resist another term with the CDU...
David Carlisle
David Carlisle
16:42
@egreg again:-)
 
4 hours later…
yo'
yo'
21:06
@UlrikeFischer sponserberleries?
user image
egreg
egreg
21:59
@DavidCarlisle And the tick goes to…
David Carlisle
David Carlisle
22:12
@egreg the undeserving?
egreg
egreg
@DavidCarlisle The best answer, of course
David Carlisle
David Carlisle
@egreg I'd have done an expandable inline map if I'd done an l3 version
 
1 hour later…
bertieb
bertieb
23:41
Hey again all. I've another 'I don't quite grok *TeX yet' question- trying to cite a page a specific page number in a book when I have two citations in one: \supercite{citeA,citeB}. Is there a way to go about this?
XeLaTeX, better BiBTeX, \bibliographystyle{vancouver} as things ago
The biblatex docs have a section on citing page/pages
> \cite[25]{key}
> \cite[vii]{key}
> \cite[XIV]{key}
> \cite[34--38]{key}
(etc) but I'm not sure how that would translate to the \supercite{} call; partly as I'm not sure of how the macros (?) are structured.

« first day (2520 days earlier)      last day (2710 days later) »