@StefanKottwitz I'm prepared to restart my work, but sadly I'm sick at the moment and have a conference to organize, so my plans are suspended for a while. In a couple of days, I'll have good news. :)
@JosephWright Ah! Very sorry I didn't see this in time; I was 850 miles away from my computer looking for housing in Wisconsin :( It's been a very, very busy few weeks.
@ChristianHupfer No, i am not. I am just confused by the term template. We (the LaTeX community) need a clear statement on what a template is/ what a template is supposed to do.
@Johannes_B: Yes, that's true... no <10k rep user applied (so far)
@Johannes_B: I believe, that many users are not aware of Meta.TeX.SX and ignored Joseph's question/call for nomination, even if listed at the right sidebar
@Johannes_B: It's a personal decision: I have a DANTE membership so far, considered to get TUG to (joint), but I would not have put my name on that list if @PauloCereda hadn't fired sugar on me :-P
I am using the xepersian and lstlisting packages and I am having some trouble with the captions.
Here is the code:
\documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article}
\usepackage{listings}
\usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{color}
\usepackage{xepersian}
\settextfont{Nazli}
%\setlatintextfont{Courier}
\Default...
@ChristianHupfer Are you a TUG member right now? Have you read the review by @nicola? The paper is akzeptiert by TUG :-( I posted my concern earlier today, i am just to lazy to search for it right now.
@ChristianHupfer But doesn't that rather defeat the point? That is, if everyone does that, it will all turn on coin tosses. If only some people do that, it will all depend on the others' opinions. That is, don't your votes cancel each other out?
@Jubobs @ChristianHupfer says you are our listings expert. If so, could you look at
I am using the xepersian and lstlisting packages and I am having some trouble with the captions.
Here is the code:
\documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article}
\usepackage{listings}
\usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{color}
\usepackage{xepersian}
\settextfont{Nazli}
%\setlatintextfont{Courier}
\Default...
@cfr: I am sure that there are other ones (non-nominees too) that did not vote for every candidate... It's quite unlikely that there is a draw at all...
@StrongBad people won't write down the url anyways during the lecture, and it's clickable in the PDF they download afterwards even if it's too small to be read ;)
@StrongBad well, depending on what do you have it there for, it may make sense even if they can't read it, for instance below a figure as a reminder: I'm not the author of this figure
Other than that: the rule I use is: three steps down at most, i.e., \small, \footnotesize, \scriptsize. With \scriptsize the distraction it brings to the listeners is already quite significant
@cfr well, I don't see why would it be necessary to vote only for 8 people. You can simply have "acceptable/non-acceptable" distinction, and then the 8 people that are acceptable to the most get selected
@StrongBad as I say, 3 sizes down (4 sizes altogether) is the most I use. However, you're fine with 3 sizes altogether for most things. For the web addresses with pictures, I prefer to put the name of the website/author there rather than the http. If you publish it later on your or the seminar's website, you can change this.
@StrongBad I need to tell you, Sir (well, I hope this title is correct, your profile page doesn't specify it), that your ability to catch our local humour is extraordinary :D
I am using the xepersian and lstlisting packages and I am having some trouble with the captions.
Here is the code:
\documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article}
\usepackage{listings}
\usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{color}
\usepackage{xepersian}
\settextfont{Nazli}
%\setlatintextfont{Courier}
\Default...
