« first day (3562 days earlier)      last day (1064 days later) » 

 
4 hours later…
07:53
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty not sure about that
@Natty I can't understand anything from this one
08:22
networking is all Greek to me
08:33
Hahahaha
Don't use the wide one.
cryptic quote of the day
 
1 hour later…
10:30
@Zanna Hahaha! I guess it is a reference to the other answer which suggests the use of a "wide dhcpv6 server", but I'm not sure what that means exactly and if there is something actually useful in Brett T's answer.
ahh... apt search isc dhcp provides some hint as to what the other paragraph might refer to
@Zanna Right! I added a comment.
great, thanks
No problem!
Hadn't noticed that this was the answerer's blog!
was just going to bring that up
I feel like that answer should just be deleted
10:43
Me too
I think there is a bug where you can't unfollow a post that has been deleted
but maybe it has been fixed
dupe The duplicate question is linked to in the last comment.
@karel Closed!
I guess this should be closed as unclear since the OP hasn't clarified what she wants.
11:00
@Zanna Please add the duplicate question linked to in the last comment as a second duplicate question for this question which was closed a minute ago as a duplicate.
@karel thanks, done :)
@BeastOfCaerbannog I would give Mona Jalal the benefit of the doubt on this question since she rarely bothers to give us all the information about her questions but it seems to me that she always knows it herself.
@Zanna The above question that you just added a link also has an answer part. Should something be done about it?
@karel Hmmm... But she hasn't even marked an answer as the solution. If she had done that then we could know what her target was, so we could clarify the question ourselves.
Another thing that I know about Mona is that she likes to wait for a long time before accepting an answer.
@BeastOfCaerbannog if the answer in the question is unique and valuable, we could ask the OP whether they'd be interested to write it up as an answer. As it is, I think most visitors will never see the question as they'll be redirected to the target. Logged in users will see the question. It does not bother me that they might find the answer in it. It could take quite a bit of effort to get the answer put into an answer one way or another. Is it worthwhile?
(quite a bit of effort with all the opening and waiting and tracking and reclosing that would need to be done)
11:13
@Zanna OK! I'm fine with that.
well I'm asking you what you think haha
Hahaha! Somehow I didn't see the question at the end! No, I don't think that this worth the effort!
okay :)
I agree with karel about Mona Jalal's question. I have also answered some of her questions in the past!
also, the number of possibilities is quite limited
one could quite easily write a speculative answer that covers each of the threeish possible interpretations
it seems like the existing answers do that between them
11:28
@Zanna Oh! And she doesn't clarify her questions?
she thinks that she has clarified it
I don't think she will clarify further
but I think she will accept an answer
Ok, then, I'm retracting my CV
okay :)
12:21
@BeastOfCaerbannog I misread that to think you had applied for a job and now had second thoughts 🤐
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer, potentially bad asn for hostname in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (64): What is stock price prediction of Apple?‭ by C Singh‭ on askubuntu.com
 
2 hours later…
14:13
@matigo Hahaha!
@BeastOfCaerbannog "Work on Fedora? But they use Flatpak! Why ... I never!" {retracts CV with extreme prejudice} ... 🤪
 
1 hour later…
15:24
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted user (71): How can I troll AskUbuntu?‭ by fuzzylowhand633‭ on askubuntu.com
 
1 hour later…
17:16
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): im-launch in Ubuntu startup‭ by learn2farm‭ on askubuntu.com
 
2 hours later…
20:08
@matigo I can't say I understood that... 🙃

« first day (3562 days earlier)      last day (1064 days later) »