I've recently decided to start rep farming trying to earn the archaeologist badge cleaning up posts in Ask Ubuntu where I am a low-repper.
Because each of my suggested edits require multi-user approval and final approval takes too long, I can only submit one or two edits per day.
I am not a "prob...
I agree with mickmackusa's suggestion, but as Glorfindel said, the lack of reviewers would throttle any change. It is an interesting suggestion though that should be reconsidered in the future if the interest in reviewing gets increased.
@RandomPerson I think that this could also be shared in AUGR.
@karel Yeah, but since at least two votes are required for approval, this wouldn't make such a big difference, unless you (anyone) improve posts instead of approving.
Hmmm. I don't think so. You have about 6000 reviews, while I have about 2000. If the number of edits was inversely related to the number of reviews, I should be getting more than you. I'll keep note of the audits I come across in the next days.
@Zanna I rejected and improved (I think) the edit.
I don't think the frequency of audits being served to a reviewer is related to their total number of reviews, but I think it is related to 1) how quickly they review (the faster you review, the more audits, I suspect) and 2) how different their decisions are from those of other reviewers (the more unconventional your review decisions are, the more audits you get)
I mean these stats:
BeastOfCaerbannog has approved 785 edit suggestions and rejected 597 edit suggestions and improved 833 edit suggestions
Zanna has approved 2359 edit suggestions and rejected 1585 edit suggestions and improved 2653 edit suggestions