I think it can be undeleted with or without an edit.
It would be helped by a edit to link somewhere that documents bluetoothctl commands and to say how to find the hardware address of the device to pair. But it's not like the deletion was at all correct. The undeletion and the edit could be done in either order.
Perhaps it will be declined on the grounds that I didn't make improvements myself--though the flag does not request improvements. (There wasn't room in the flag to fully explain why I didn't, which is as I don't have a machine available right now to test Bluetooth, and also I am not very knowledgeable about this subject.) Note that this is not a request that you handle the flag hastily: the deletion may itself have been the result of overly hasty flag handling, which needn't be repeated.
(I'm not saying it would be wrong for the post to be undeleted at any time. Obviously I don't think that's wrong, or I wouldn't have flagged to request undeletion. But I definitely don't think it should be undeleted on account of me!)
So, should askubuntu.com/tags/lts/info be edited further so it doesn't support the misconception that upgrading is only supported between successive releases and successive LTS releases?
I answered this question about do-release-upgrade not allowing an upgrade of 14.10 to 15.04 only to 15.10, I assumed it was due to 15.04 being end of life.
A user (@xangua ) posted that it was not possible to skip a release with do-release-upgrade, so I looked in to this information by running t...
I wonder if this tag wiki edit suggestion should get an Improve Edit review rather than Reject. It's kind of better than most tag wiki edits, because it offers usage guidance.
Actually never mind. The existing guidance, to not use the tag at all, is better.
@Kulfy I'm not sure if that's off-topic or not. I'm not insisting it isn't, but I wouldn't vote to close it. The issue is that it was posted considerably before EOL releases became off-topic, and about four months before there was evidence that community opinion had shifted toward wanting them off-topic. This is different from questions about releases that are non-EOL when the question is posted, which is unambiguously on-topic. But it seems like a case where we have no clear policy.