« first day (6 days earlier)      last day (16 days later) » 

12:08 AM
I am not confused. To me what is being said is the same in one place as it is in another. You are confused because you only see words and not the clear sense of the words. Paul says, "God is not the author of confusion", and I stand with him. You are telling me that one thing means different things in different places, but I'm not seeing it like you. If you get too much into the minutia of anything, then you are going to experience chaos.
You allow only as much of the minutia as it takes to make sense of what you are looking at. The more time you spend in the minutia trying to work things out, the more you should be convinced that your aim was amiss from the start.
 
 
1 hour later…
1:32 AM
Elika, can you articulate what you currently think of as the Jewish notion of a day? If you can, does it make sense of Exodus 12, Numbers 13, etc? If not, then what option do you have but to approach it from another point of view? Surely, you don't want to remain in a state of confusion.
 
@enegue Enegue: (@BrianWeigand) - I will try - but I have to be honest - I really, really, do have a "disability" of sorts that makes it hard for me. B.) So, I try to rely on facts - than explain, (which causes more confusion);
@enegue @enegue - A.) In linguistics, an "Idiom" is a construction that has a meaning that: is not deducible from those of the individual words; C.) Saying that a Sabbath must be observed "From the Evening, at the end of the day on the 9th until the evening, at the end of the 10th - is non-idiomatic - because the plain meaning is crystal clear;
@enegue D.) But, for you then to say:** "For the Passover Sabbath, Evening of the 14th means the evening at the end of the 13th - is not consistent - and implies some sort of idiomatic use*;
@enegue And so the answer to: What do I think the current notion of the Jewish day is?" *E.) In Rabbinic thought - it is expressed in two different ways: - E.1) the plain meaning, (called the Peshat meaning); E.2) And the *Halakhaic meaning;
@enegue This means - that one reckoning is from the plain meaning - is as you say, from the end of the 9th, until the end of the 10th;
@enegue The other meaning - is also as you say - that regardless of the calendar day - to protect the Sabbath - the authorities ruled that Sabbath would begin at evening - to make sure.
@enegue Regarding the Day of Atonement - GOD Himself is pictured as safeguarding that Sabbath - by explicitly mentioning the evening before -- this is claimed to be unique in Scripture;
@enegue Regarding all of the other Sabbaths - God say "YOU safeguard the Sabbaths" - meaning - it was up to them;
@enegue H.) Again, your question was - what is my current notion of the "Jewish Day": I.) That explanation, I just gave, is a horrific paraphrase of a mountain of Rabbinic Literature;
@enegue If you would like references - I highly recommend you start with the Rashbam link - in that post.
@enegue - but ultimately - In Hermeneutics: It is an "Error of Reasoning" to inject Rashbam, Ibn Ezra, Saadia Gaon, and Rashi's commentary into the text; Because - We know, with absolute certainty - there was a schism in Judaism between the Sadducees and Pharisees regarding Babylonian customs and magic into Judaism; ***The Pharisees, (and Rabbinic Judaism tried to purge these positions from Judaism, (like killing those who rejected the Oral Law - without Trial);
@enegue Because we know that Jewish traditions were manipulated - we cannot know for sure; Perhaps your argument is right; Perhaps the Pharisees were right; But - because of the way the "Tradition has been received" - it is now no longer possible to know; - this is why - even though your conclusion may be right - the burden of proof is greater - because the evidence must necessarily be neutral - apart from Rabbinic Judaism;
 
2:25 AM
@elikakohen - I'm dropping in here to try and answer some of the things you said in your last comment on my answer here: hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/22029/…
 
@BrianWeigand Surprised you aren't ignoring me. Thanks for your patience. I have millions of questions.
@BrianWeigand I would love to collaborate with you on that answer.
@BrianWeigand I am afraid that if I personally wrote it - you all would think I was crazy - I can't believe what I discovered. :D
 
@elikakohen - You said: "A.) But - Jesus said "for because of THIS it has been written""...where are you getting the word "because"?
@elikakohen - You link to an interlinear (biblehub.com/interlinear/luke/22-37.htm) but it doesn't have "because"
 
@BrianWeigand Luke 22:37, Greek Interlinear: γὰρ ... ὅτι τοῦτο τὸ ... click the links for the two words <-- I just put in bold.
@BrianWeigand There are Three links for each greek word: A.) The strongs definition, (a number), B.) the english transliteration, (which you give you some of the occurences where that word appears in the Bible; C.) And below, the part of speach, (conjugation, in these cases - for those two words);
 
@elikakohen - but that's what I don't understand, there are multiple words that are given but you chose the word "because"...I mean it's almost like you picked that word since it helps you, ever so slightly, to affirm your theory that Jesus saying Isaiah 53:12 was fulfilled right then instead of when He died on the cross.
 
2:42 AM
@BrianWeigand Absolutely. I did choose "because" - but the reasons are these:
@BrianWeigand Both terms, γάρ and ὅτι - both imply causality - a logical syllogism. Because of A, then B & C.
@BrianWeigand So, even if one didn't mean it - the sentence begins with: λέγω γὰρ
@BrianWeigand ... Jesus is giving a reason for what he is saying.
He is saying ... "Something" - .... because of a prophecy.
there is no other reason for the prophetic reference to even be there.
Second, the construction "τοῦτο τὸ"
τοῦτο, from οὗτος Perseus Link, Section VIII
 
@elikakohen - if you read verse 35, then you will see that Jesus is referring to the time He sent out His disciples without money, knapsack, or sandals...basically no preparations. Now He tells them to take a money bag, knapsack, and even a sword, for He will soon be numbered as a transgressor, and as His followers, they will be considered transgressors by default, so they need to be ready and prepared with money, knapsack, and perhaps even a sword (for protection).
 
@BrianWeigand "For Protection" - is this something you have inferred? Or something the text explicitly states? Does the text support this inference? Did Jesus ever tell them NOT to be concerned how to protect themselves?
So, γὰρ, ὅτι, and τοῦτο, can all indicate that an explanation is being given.
So, that is ONE piece of evidence that I have used to render it as, "because".
 
@elikakohen - yes, 'for protection' is an inference of mine...the only reason to have a sword is to protect yourself.
 
Mark 14:27 V-RIM/P-3S
GRK: ταύτη ὅτι γέγραπται Πατάξω τὸν
NAS: because it is written, I WILL STRIKE
Luke 4:10 V-RIM/P-3S
GRK: γέγραπται γὰρ ὅτι
NAS: for it is written, HE WILL COMMAND
Luke 24:46 V-RIM/P-3S
GRK: ὅτι οὕτως γέγραπται παθεῖν τὸν
NAS: to them, Thus it is written, that the Christ
And ... that's just luke.
@BrianWeigand And so - I usually always abstain from inference - deferring to the syntax, or the context - when possible..
 
3:00 AM
@elikakohen - you go on to say, "Jesus said: the swords would be sufficient to fulfill the prophecy, right, (v.38)?" And this is where I think you keep going wrong...you quote the first half of v37 ("But - Jesus said "for because of THIS it has been written"") and then skip to v38 to try to make your point.
 
@BrianWeigand Okay, so vs. 37 - in the interlinear ... says, γὰρ τὸ
 
@elikakohen - Jesus is not saying the swords would fulfill the prophecy, because if that were true then the money bags and knapsacks would also have to play a role in fulfilling the prophecy.
 
@BrianWeigand EXACTLY!!!!!
@BrianWeigand THAT is what I just figured out.
@BrianWeigand You can't know how excited this has got me. :D
@BrianWeigand I have been posting these Passover Questions - and everyone keeps jumping to conclusions about 3 days, 3 nights ... etc, etc.
@BrianWeigand BUT I DON"T CARE.
 
@elikakohen - but like I already said, Jesus is saying that He is about to be numbered with the transgressors, so the disciples will need to start being prepared for things, such as now carrying around money bags and knapsacks and swords.
 
@BrianWeigand MY PROBLEM - with the Passover ... Is that it is a SABBATH.
And I kept trying to figure out ... "No, this can't be right ... because that would break the Sabbath ... and if the Sabbath was on that day ... then it would break that sabbath restriction.
@BrianWeigand The three Day / 3 Night - objection - is ridiculous - its ultimately meaningless
@BrianWeigand But - IF JESUS, "the SPOTLESS LAMB" - was breaking the Sabbath - not just any Sabbath - but THE PASSOVER SABBATH - then the entire theology crumbles.
 
3:05 AM
@elikakohen - only the first day of the Passover (14th of Nisan) and the last day of the Passover feast (21st of Nisan) were "sabbaths". They were to be kept like the weekly 7th-day Sabbath. Jesus kept the 7th-day Sabbath by resting in the grave and not rising until Sunday morning.
 
@BrianWeigand And you cannot travel, (Cloak), nor purchase, (money), nor fight, (swords).
Jesus was CONSTANTLY telling people that he was "The Lord of the Sabbath" - and constantly telling people to violate it.
@BrianWeigand - So the thing is - if the Last Supper was the First Day of Passover - a Sabbath - then Jesus was intentionally telling them to violate the Sabbath - for no reason.
And they were accounted lawless.
 
@elikakohen - what did Jesus tell anyone to do that violated any Sabbath?
 
But - if the day Jesus was crucified was the Sabbath - then even if it wasn't the Sabbath WHEN Jesus told them that - they were certainly violating the Sabbath later, in the Garden - and taken to the priests.
Like picking up and carrying someone's bed.
picking grain - etc.
He was always explaining away those commands - in order to show mercy, compassion, love.
But a sword? money? ... completely different.
So, we got two thieves on the cross - who said two very different things, and two instances where Jesus was "counted among the transgressors"
 
@elikakohen - picking up and carrying your bed or picking grain was not violating the Sabbath. Furthermore, carrying a money bag, knapsack, or even a sword were not violations of the Sabbath. Where is the command not to do any of those things?
 
So - even though Jesus may not have been carrying the money - his disciples were - and swords.
 
3:12 AM
@elikakohen - again, carrying money or a sword were not violations of the Sabbath.
 
@BrianWeigand So first - Jesus said, you are experts at setting aside the commandments of God - for the traditions of men; You make the commandment of God to no effect;.
Example Sabbath Prohibitions: Wikipedia Link
That's an awful list - but just starting out
 
@elikakohen - I'm sorry, but I do not accept any authority except the Bible. So that excludes all other Jewish rabbis/talmuds/targums/mishnahs/wikis/etc.
 
@BrianWeigand And that's the point of the passage: "And we was CONSIDERED to be among the lawless"
The Pharisees and the Jews were CONSTANTLY in disagreement about the law.
So, regardless if they were actually violating the Sabbath - they would have been "counted / considered / reckoned" as transgressors of the Sabbath.
Here is a Reference to the Prohibition to Travel: Acts 1:12 Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a Sabbath day’s journey away.
 
@elikakohen - because they went against the command of Moses and added to the law: "2 You shall not add to the word which I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you. -Deut 4:2 (NKJV)
 
A Sabbath's journey was the maximum a person could travel on a Sabbath.
So - regardless if they actually were transgressors - they were considered so.
 
3:22 AM
@elikakohen - Acts 1:12 is not saying you are sinning if you "travel" farther than that...you are trying to read too much into the text. It's just saying Olivet was very close to Jerusalem, close enough to walk to leisurely without exertion...a distance the vast majority of Jews would walk on a Sabbath day.
 
@BrianWeigand correct. there are passages in the Torah that restrict travelling .. and so a limit had to be defined.
 
@elikakohen - again, I will have to remind you that I do not accept Rabinic prohibitions...and please specific where travel restrictions are mentioned in the Torah.
 
@BrianWeigand And they began building "Eruv" - that allowed Jews to carry on Shabbat: What is an Eruv
@BrianWeigand I understand your Point on Rabbinicism, (and agree): But they "Sat in Moses' Seat" - they were the rulers, (the Pharisees) - THEY decided ..
@BrianWeigand And so - under THEIR rulings, THEIR judgments ... Jesus would have been "counted among the transgressors"
 
@elikakohen - once again, I must remind you that I only accept Biblical authority. Also, I am going to leave because it is getting late and I have to work tomorrow. I hope you have a good evening.
 
@BrianWeigand If PILATE considered Jesus to have broken a law - then Jesus would have broken a Roman Law; If the Sanhedrin found that someone violated their "Law" then they would have been transgressors.
@BrianWeigand I am NOT sayying that they were transgressors under the Biblical Law.
@BrianWeigand I hope you have a great night too! And thanks!
 
3:51 AM
@BrianWeigand Right, Jesus simply loved to spit on the Rabbinic laws. And I literally mean spit. It was against their rules to spit on the ground on Sabbath. So Jesus spat on the ground and healed a man :D Jesus was a badass rebel...just sayin
 
@JoshuaBigbee Hah. I have been putting together a list of Biblical Sabbath prohibitions that the Disciples broke.
@JoshuaBigbee But I agree - It is anti-thetical to appeal to Rabbinic Tradition - to prove anything about Jesus.
 
But it's little things like that that I don't think people who think Mark isn't familiar with the Jews don't get. The gospels are SO familiar, too familiar, that most of it goes over our gentile 1980 years later heads
 
@JoshuaBigbee It went over my head - and I though I "got it" - I just now understand about the two thieves on the cross.
 
@elikakohen Anyway, back to this afternoon's exchange (we can go back to your topic in a sec) I just wanted to say how I see the 3 days working out
 
@JoshuaBigbee :D
 
3:57 AM
Jesus crucified on the 14th when the lamb is, that it one Day period, 15th is Passover Sabbath Friday, thats 1 Night, 2 Day periods. Saturday Sabbath afterward (double Sabbath, plural SabbathS) 2 Nights, 3 Day periods. Sunday night comes 3rd night period, Christ rises before dawn. 3 days, 3 nights.
 
@JoshuaBigbee Okay - back up: Is the day when the Passover lamb is sacrificed a Sabbath?
 
On the calendar it is the Third Day AFTER (as all OT examples show you DON'T actually count the current day) so Sunday is 3 days after Thursday, it is the "third day" and it is 3 days and 3 nights. It's the only time that fills all three desciptions of the timing
@elikakohen Yes, traditional 3pm
 
okay, then why is the 15th also a Sabbath?
@JoshuaBigbee Rephrasing: It looks like you have THREE Sabbath days: Thurs-DAY, during the Sacrifice; B.) Fri-DAY, (not sure why); C.) And Satur-Day - the Seventh Day Sabbath ... ?
 
@elikakohen 15th is always the Sabbath. 14th is the Day of preparation, It is not the sabbath, it is the First day of unleavened bread NOT the First day of the FEAST. The Feast is 15-21, it is 8 days.
 
@JoshuaBigbee Why is the 15th always a Sabbath?
 
4:03 AM
@elikakohen A Sabbath, not The Sabbath. It is a Sabbath in its character and how it is to be treated. Not in what day of the week it is. The 7th day is defined as the Sabbath. The sabbath is not defined as the 7th day
 
@JoshuaBigbee Okay - but why are you saying the 15th is a Sabbath - and not the 14th?
 
Ex 12:18 "In the first month, from the fourteenth day of the month at evening, you shall eat unleavened bread until the twenty-first day of the month at evening."
 
Reading that we go wait, that doesn't make sense, so we look back and we see TWO "First" days
 
The Second "Evening" is actually "Night" ... not evening.
 
4:05 AM
12:15 "Seven days you shall eat unleavened bread. On the first day you shall remove leaven out of your houses,..." 12:16 "On the first day you shall hold a holy assembly, and on the seventh day a holy assembly. No work shall be done on those days. "
 
okay, so the first day, and the seventh day. From the 14->21st.
 
Right so it is describing 8 days, after that we are told seven days.
 
14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 = 7 Days
 
Count those numbers you just put up...
 
14th UNTIL the 31st.
Sorry.
 
4:07 AM
"On the first day shall be a holy convocation; you shall not do any ordinary work." "For seven days you shall present food offerings to the LORD. On the eighth day you shall hold a holy convocation and present a food offering to the LORD. It is a solemn assembly;"
 
Exodus 12:18, Interlinear Hebrew:
Okay - So, forget the 21st, for now... why isn't the 14th - the first day?
 
Sound familiar? That's the feast of booths, exactly 6 months later. The feasts are Parallels, pairs. Lev 23:32 “Speak to the people of Israel, saying, On the fifteenth day of this seventh month and for seven days is the Feast of Boothsfn to the LORD.
 
And it pairs with Lev. 23:32 that also says, "until the evening of the 10th.
 
Lev 23:7 clarifies Exodus "And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the Feast of Unleavened Bread to the LORD; for seven days you shall eat unleavened bread." v7 "On the first day you shall have a holy convocation; you shall not do any ordinary work."
 
looking this up, one sec.
 
4:10 AM
no the Day of Atonement (with two lambs and a sacrifice) is the 10th and lines up with the day you choose the Passover Lamb
 
Correct, the 15th of of Nisan - isn't the Passover anymore - its the remaining days of unleavened bread.
So - on the NIGHT of the 14th - you eat unleavened bread WITH the lamb - right?
Day 1 of Unleavened Bread?
 
Leviticus is pretty clear, the 15th is the first day for the holy convocation. Exodus is just a bit confusing.
 
@JoshuaBigbee Okay - Let's concede this for now, because I will end up saying something dumb like - no, it doesn't say on the 15th in the Hebrew - then you will call me dumb ... and so on.
SO -
Let's say the DAY of the 15th is a Sabbath.
Is the DAY of the 14th a Sabbath too?
 
Not as I understand it now, but hey maybe your Hebrew knowledge will fix me? :)
 
It won't.
Because I think in appsotives.
that one clause modifies something before it.
leap frog style... poetry.
 
4:13 AM
That's why ALL 4 Gospels say when Christ is dead and they are hurrying to bury him "it was the day of Preparation"
 
Okay... but back up ... 14th and 15th are Sabbath - no matter which day? Is that what you are saying?
 
hey are you guys here
 
Not me
 
quick opinion if you dont mind
 
@elikakohen No only the 15th. Hi Frank
 
4:14 AM
Okay.
 
for my girlfriends ROTH IRA is it a terrible idea to tell her to use vanguard , while i use scwabb that way we can see what we like about each one and in a few years maybe switch to the one we like more?
we are both under 27
 
You are totally in the wrong chatroom
 
whoops
 
Numbers 33:3
They journeyed from Rameses in the first month, on the fifteenth day of the first month; on the next day after the Passover the sons of Israel started out boldly in the sight of all the Egyptians,
 
@elikakohen I'm thinking more in themes. So Christ dies when the lamb dies, does his redemptive work on the night of Passover just like when the angel "passed over" their doors because they had the blood of the lamb, and then he rests on the 7th day having completed his work. The Father then raises him from the dead, the firstfruits of creation, the first light of creation (Gen 1:2)
 
4:20 AM
(The actual passover happened about midnight)
I am with you - Paul said the same thing you just did in 1 Cor. 5
I understand the argument.
 
@elikakohen RIght but it was midnight the 15th, the first night Christ was dead
 
It says, "The day after the Passover".
OOH. Try it this way. :D
P14 - Evening, (Sacrifice)
 
It ALSO says they journyed from Rameses on the 15th....
 
Passover-14, Sacrifice.
not quite.
There are two different hebrew words there.
They both are /very/ vaugue... but one means "to lead out" ... (passive) ... and the other is , (to leave).
so yes - Pharaoh woke up in the middle of the night - and told them to get out
And so God started leading them out.
SOMETIME - on the 15th ... they left Rameses.
 
Also, I think you understood this, but this is using the sunset-sunset day. Just clarifying.
 
4:26 AM
Exodus 12:51. Interlinear Hebrew: ON THE SAME DAY, (as the passover) God הוֹצִ֨יא, (brought out / led out) Israel ...
I think in Sabbath DAYS.
The whole point is to CEASE FROM WORKING -
Everyone is obsessed with the night for some reason.
And I have ZERO problem agreeing that the text shows people starting to observe the Sabbath from the evening before - to safeguard the Sabbath.
 
Which, again, I think is actually right because (thematically) it fits Jewish and Biblical thought. Creation and the day start in darkness and then the light comes. I just don' think all narratives really care about it when describing chain of events, but as soon as it comes to technical things like feasts and the Sabbath, they know what they mean
Right, though I don't think the FIRST Passover was a Sabbath, them traveling wasn't a problem.
 
So. back to my question is - Why is the 15th a Sabbath - and not the 14th? Numbers 33:3 They journeyed from Rameses in the first month, on the fifteenth day of the first month; on the [c]next day after the Passover the sons of Israel started out [d]boldly in the sight of all the Egyptians,
Well 0 it is argued the 14th IS the Sabbath -- BECAUSE they traveled on the 15th.
 
Ok, but then we need to sacrifice the lamb on the 13th....
 
but it says day of 14th.
that, (to my knowledge), was never contested historically.
 
Well we have a problem then. Unless you're going for solar sunrise-sunrise system, which actually works much better in Exodus/Numbers. So you can go with that if you like. Doesn't bother me.
But there is no way to kill the lamb before sunset on the 14th and then eat it after sunset and not have 2 days. Not in Sunset-sunset system
 
4:34 AM
Kind of my point.
it is a catastrophic contradiction.
 
But there is also no way to have it be sunrise-sunrise day so afternoon 14: kill lamb, evening/night 14: eat lamb and midnight its suddenly the 15th and passover....
 
meaning - there is zero ways to reconcile it.
well - the text of exodus is very, veyry, ambiguous about that ...
 
Unless the Romans are just using God's calendar and the Jews had it all wrong :D
 
so - I think it is understood that when a day actually started - was ambiguous
Well - OH.
I didn't give you the link.
One moment please.
 
I think official days are sunset-sunset....but again, in narrative accounts they are going next, next, next, not talking about calendar days but sequence of events. So it WAS the "next day" in the sense of being daylight.
 
4:38 AM
@JoshuaBigbee Babylonian Calendar: Sunset to Sunset, Book Link:
So - what I have been trying to explain - that when Israel was exiled in Babylon - the Pharasaic movement started - They competed for authority - with the Sadducees, (Priests / Scribes).
The Pharisees asserted an "Oral Law" - which the Sadducees rejected outright. As a result, the Pharisees, (and Rabbinic Jews), decided to go kill the Jews that rejected the Oral Law - without Trial: Mishneh Torah, Sefer Shoftim, Mamrim, Chapter 3
So - Therefore, it is very plausible that the "Sunset / Sunset" reckoning was injected AFTER Moses.
Because - A.) WE KNOW that the Babylonians had this calendar; B.) And according to the Rabbinic Jews, (Rashbam) - the Plain Meaning is contrary to the Babylonian Reckoning; C.) And we know the Pharasaic Jews adopted Babylonian customs - in direct opposition to the traditions of the Sadducees; D.) And we KNOW that Jesus was OPPOSED to Pharasaic Judaism;
E.) SO THEREFORE IN CONCLUSION, (NO APPLAUSE, JUST THROW MONEY): - We have very little certainty what the JEWISH CHRISTIANS were relying on - when they read the gospels;
F.) My hypothesis is: That when the Early Christians read the gospels - they were well-informed of the contention between the Sadducees and the Pharisees - and just read over it - understanding what was being said, without being said. :)
G.) AND Because they understood the theme: They understood Jesus to have died on the Day of the Passover.
H.) And could probably care less about the Evening/Evening contention between the Pharisees and Sadducees.
 
@elikakohen F) That's what I've been saying :P John was later and had to make it clearer for us ignorants.
 
@JoshuaBigbee But as I was trying to tell @enegue - it doesn't really matter if I have a great hypothesis - I need evidence - Just because I say its true - doesn't make it true;
 
E) Except one thing: They agreed when the 7th day Sabbath started and ended. Which seems significant.
 
So - I am hoping for an early Christian writing, or even Jewish - that reflects the mindset - of that time.
 
4:53 AM
I'm liking this article. it doesn't look like much but its actually quite in depth: nowoezone.com/NTC02.htm
 
@JoshuaBigbee Can you help me on a related question?
 
@elikakohen I can try, though I am going to bed imminently
 
Why were there two thieves on the cross?
Have you seen it?
 
@elikakohen I've seen the question and thought about it a bit. The question is too tied up in presuppositions. I could come up with about 3-4 themes but more would require assumptions about the last supper, etc
 
@JoshuaBigbee That is what I had thought - and you are right - the way its framed is pretty bad - but.
@JoshuaBigbee I have been writing all of these Passover questions - and you all have been going all kinds of crazy over the three day / three night thing... or evening/evening.
@JoshuaBigbee But my issue has NEVER been: Who cares about the three night / three day contradiction? At worst it can be chalked up to textual preservation - at best given over to "idiomatic language".
@JoshuaBigbee The real issue is - !!! That's the Sabbath! They can't do that - God said they would die!!!
 
5:05 AM
You've got two witness, two groomsmen, two lambs of atonement, the Isaiah 53 counted among trespassers, etc
@elikakohen Ehh...read my comment to Brian's answer, the killing is NOT actually the problem. Its the burial.
 
No - I mean what the DISCIPLES did.
What Jesus had the Disciples DO.
If the Last Supper was a Passover Feast - then it was a Sabbath.
Or, if Not - then it was by the time of the garden.
EITHER WAY
Jesus told them: Grab some money, Grab some swords, Grab a Cloak. ... let's go on a journey.
And to Judas - he told him to go do the thing - with the money - to betray innocent blood - on the Sabbath .
No matter how you slice and dice this - that's crazy objectionable.
Then I read that question - and I am like, "Maybe symbolism ... bah.
But the text says - "and he was accounted among the lawless/transgressors
Jesus said - explicitly - it was for that purpose.
So, when the Priests and Rulers came up to them ... according to their laws, (and the Bible) - they were all transgressors of the Sabbath, (though Jesus himself may not have been).
Two guys on a cross .... saying two very different things.
Two times Jesus says "counted with the lawless".
So now ... I am starting to think ... uh, not a coincidence.
 
right...so to finish my theory and go to sleep: 14th not Sabbath, night of 14th was preceding evening, it wasn't the Passover meal it was the Essene meal on the Day of Preparation. Its the only way he is Passover lamb for the 15th but eats a Passover the night before. Also, its fine for the priests to be out, they are worried about staying clean AND they can bury people before 15th starts. Its the convergence of evidence in my mind.
 
For the record - the Sadducees liked the 14th as a Sabbath.
I get it.
I just need you to find that written down some place.
:D
 
Its that or we have to resort to the idea of the day in between crucifixion and 7th day which means we're at 4+ days and....eh they could have waited to bury him
 
Not at all.
 
5:13 AM
Ok open your Bible....
And go to John :P
 
The sun set early on Jesus' crucifixion day.
I am in JOHN.
ezra
You reconcile it easy if the 14th was a Sabbath.
 
I'm just saying John wrote it for US, ignorant gentiles and that is how he portrays it. Whatever doesn't make sense in the synoptics about the Last Supper is our problem, not theirs. Again. ALL FOUR AGREE: Day of Preparation. The Passover IS NOT a day of preparation
 
but, the passover has a day of preparation, (actually several)
and the Sabbath has a preparation day.
so, you have to rule out: Preparation Day + Sabbath + Preparation Day + Sabbath
 
right, and they are the SAME DAY if the Passover lands on the 6th or 7th day
 
why the OR
Oh - Thursday the Preparation Day for both.
I understand.
 
5:17 AM
@elikakohen rIGHT
 
Not really sure if you are doing it intentionally - but you are referring to a whole lot of Rabbinic writings.
But, the Passover Sabbath has very relaxed restrictions.
 
P = day of Prep, S = any Sabbath, R= Resurrection. ^ = Cross. P^SPSR doesn't work. P^SR Doesn't work, P^SSR works.
 
Its more or less a "day not to work, so you can work, hard, to prepare for the Passover.
 
oh bad choice of symbols lol
 
You forget one option.
:D
There were two nights, on one day
 
5:20 AM
Eh I've looked into that. Its pretty shaky
 
Actually, its a quote from Justin Martyr.
 
Ouch you just J Martyr'd me
 
Regardless if it is shaky or not - him saying that with Tarphon ... is major.
that was 80 CE?
Have to look it back up
 
Tarphon?
 
Very, very, famous. (Like Gamliel
 
5:22 AM
Oh oh ok, a Rabbi
 
Rabbi Tarfon or Tarphon (Hebrew: רבי טרפון‎, from the Greek Τρύφων Tryphon), a Kohen, was a member of the third generation of the Mishnah sages, who lived in the period between the destruction of the Second Temple (70 CE) and the fall of Betar (135 CE). == Biography == === Origins and character === He is said to have lived in Yavneh, although it is evident that he lived also in Lod (Lydda). He was of priestly lineage, and he once went with his uncle on his mother's side to participate in the priestly prayer in the Temple in Jerusalem. As a priest, he would demand the heave-offering even after the...
Not just any rabbi
In other words - if Justin Martyr's arguments didn't have merit - Tarphon would have eaten him alive.
 
Are you going with the idea that Trypho = Tarphon?
 
Yep. Of course. Reading the Talmud - and seeing the same quotes ... its hard not to make the connection.
(Well, the Tannaim, Unredacted Mishneh, etc0
But - it doesn't matter - At that time - it was impossible for Justin to have published anything with "Trypho" on it - and not have been called out if he was lying.
They were contemporaries.
 
I don't doubt Justin maybe was thinking of Tarphon or quoted or referenced things, but doubt there was an actual dialogue.
 
So - Tarphon absolutely knew about the work.
Maybe. But again - the fact is that Tarphon let it stand.
 
5:26 AM
They'd only overlap for maybe 10 years. But its not the same name, its close but not.
 
depending on the text.
Either way - again, the arguments that Justin makes are incredibly Judaic.
 
It would be like me writing an Apologetics book called Dialogue with Richard Dockins. Justin was trained in Greek Philosophy. The "fake dialogue" is well known.
 
Even if he wasn't in dialogue with "THE Tarphon" - the arguments are incredibly solid.
Absolutely.
And if you DID - Richard Dawkins would publish a letter.
To say that you are full of it.
 
Tau
@All Where's Xystus?
 
And I would say all similarities to real life people or characters is purely, blah blah blah :P
 
5:29 AM
Hahaha
 
@Tau Don't know? Just us here for a while.
 
Tau
@JoshuaBigbee That's where Justin and Trypho had their discourse-it was outside Israel-if we believe the account.
 
Look, even if I admitted it was referencing Dawkins, legally I'd still be fine btw.
 
Ohhhh
 
5:31 AM
What?
 
Could have been a Xystus anywhere. Like me saying "we met at the Boardwalk" it could be a boardwalk anywhere
 
Tau
@elikakohen Thank you! Gotta go.
 
The Priests erected structures to blow the trumpets, etc - (to announce the Sabbath and what not)
It is almost impossible to know how it was actually made, or what it looked like ... but its supposedly a ceremonial structure.
 
@elikakohen But its a Roman term...anyway...I must sleep
 
One of those "meh - I will never know"
Yeah, so was the Pastaphoria... but I think they were analagous to Babylonian / Jewish Temple practices.
Maybe a translated word.
No idea
 
5:34 AM
night
 
@JoshuaBigbee Night. :)
 
 
9 hours later…
2:58 PM
@JoshuaBigbee @elikakohen - I only wanted to address one thing: in relation to the 14th to the 21st, Joshua said, "Right so it is describing 8 days, after that we are told seven days." 14(1), 15(2), 16(3), 17(4), 18(5), 19(6), 20(7), 21(8) <-- while yes, those are 8 numbers, you are actually counting it wrong in accordance to them being "days."
@JoshuaBigbee @elikakohen - 14th-to-15th(day 1) --> 15th-16th(day 2) --> 16th-17th(day 3) --> 17th-to-18th(day 4) --> 18th-to-19th(day 5) --> 19th-to-20th(day 6) --> 20th-to-21st(day 7, end of Feast)
 
3:27 PM
There's an inconsistency in what is being regarded as evening or night then. Later in our discussion we showed how the evening of the 14th is being regarded as just before the 15th starts, but then you want to say the evening of the 21 is the start of evening and don't count the 21st. But that's equivocating
You just changed evening from being the end of the day before the next starts to the beginning of the day. So evening of 21st must mean the ending of the 21st OR change or understanding to say the lamb is slaughtered as 13th s ending/14th starting and then eating it the evening of the fourteenth, but at the beginning of it, so no longer is it representative of the first Passover which was clearly the 15th... See the problem? So I include the entire 21st. 14-21 is right days
Granted it's a partial day of 14th, its not part of the "feast". Review how the feast of booths works, its parallel
See how Lev. 23:32 treats the day of atonement. It says it's the tenth day earlier but then says it starts evening if the 9th.
You could go with the beginning of 14th too, or say there were only 6 days but they counted the partial as the 7th, but can't really make that the high Sabbath then. But I only see those three options working in the Babylonian model. Change the model and it changes everything everything again.
@BrianWeigand odd thought I replied in the first one. Tag you're it
 
4:19 PM
Also Numbers 28 summarizes well "16“On the fourteenth day of the first month is the LORD’s Passover,
17and on the fifteenth day of this month is a feast. Seven days shall unleavened bread be eaten.
18On the first day there shall be a holy convocation. You shall not do any ordinary work," feast and the seven days starts on 15th. @elikakohen this is the one I was looking for last night hah see the Sabbath is on first day of...? The Passover? Or the feast?
 
4:50 PM
@JoshuaBigbee - the Feast of Unleavened Bread ends at twilight on the 21st. The seventh day of the Feast completes at twilight, thus the 21st ends and now the 22nd begins (at twilight). This is what is confusing everyone. The Day of Atonement in Lev 23 starts in the evening of the 9th day (at twilight <-- yes I added this myself), when the 10th day starts, which is why God says the 10th day of the 7th month is when the Day of Atonement is.
@JoshuaBigbee - it can be "evening" without being twilight yet. Here in the mid-west USA, after about 5pm, people stop saying "Have a good afternoon!" and start saying "Have a good evening," because after 5pm it is generally considered "evening" even though the sun has not set and there is still plenty of light. <-- This is what God is saying with the Day of Atonement. It starts in the evening of the 9th at twilight when the 10th day begins.
 
5:07 PM
@JoshuaBigbee - ok, after re-reading your last few posts a few times I think I finally get what you are saying (FINALLY! lol). On the 14th day twilight would begin the 15th day. That's what you are saying, right? So my chart is wrong and should be: 15th-to-16th(day 1) -> 16th-to-17th(day 2) -> 17th-18th(day 3) -> 18th-19th(day 4) -> 19th-to-20th(day 5) -> 20th-21st(day 6) -> 21st-to-sunset(day 7) {at sunset begins 22nd day}.
 
@BrianWeigand you got it :) I was going to say those first couple replies, you were saying exactly what I was about the 21st LOL Twilight slash evening is always part of that day, at the end, before dark
 
 
1 hour later…
6:19 PM
@BrianWeigand and @JoshuaBigbee - It looks like you are still leaving out Deut. 6, so here is Mekhilta d'Rabbi Yishmael Perek 12 : Pasuk 15 - which handles it a different way.
@JoshuaBigbee I mention this specific commentator - specifically, be it is one of the oldest of the bunch.
@BrianWeigand - @JoshuaBigbee - Sorry, that commentary was on Deuteronomy 16:7-8‌​ - 7 You shall cook and eat it in the place which the Lord your God chooses. In the morning you are to return to your tents. 8 Six days you shall eat unleavened bread, and on the seventh day there shall be a solemn assembly to the Lord your God; you shall do no work on it.
 
6:40 PM
@BrianWeigand @JoshuaBigbee - Here is another "factor" - you may want to consider - The construction, "Until then" can be translated into: As Far As - In english, "until" denotes a stopping point - you do this - until but .... in Hebrew, its a little a little different: Deuteronomy 16:4 - Do not leave any of its flesh לַבֹּֽקֶר / UNTIL morning - the prefix לַ*** - בֹּֽקֶר*** indicates "For" ... or "Until"
In Exodus 12:6 - a Different expression is used - you will safeguard the lamb - as far as the 14th - עד ארבעה עשר
 
6:55 PM
You can see some of the instances of *עַ֤ד In Hebrew, in their contexts, List of Instances Here - In otherwords, "Until then" is interpreted as either "up to then" or "up to and including then".
 
 
2 hours later…
8:55 PM
Elika, "don't leave anything for morning and until morning mean the same thing. I can't do a graph here but I'll do my best with text.
Night ----------> | Morning ---------->
"don't leave any until morning" means it all should be eaten before you get to the bar, "don't leave any for morning" means none should eaten beyond the bar.
 

« first day (6 days earlier)      last day (16 days later) »