« first day (2532 days earlier)      last day (2507 days later) » 

11:00 PM
I have some solutions already
 
Then why are you asking, Lucas?!!
 
They are not mine, lol
And I didn't read them. I was asking if my method was right
 
Well, my solution isn't yours, either :P
Oh.
You had a method?
That limit with product thing? Nah, I don't see any way to fix that.
Take logs and use what I just said.
 
Do you guys want to see one of the solutions? I just read it
 
I'm fine with mine, thanks :)
 
11:04 PM
Ted isn't that only for $x$ near $-1$?
 
Why is $$\sum^n_{j=1}\cos\left(\left(j-\frac{1}{2}\right)x\right)=\frac{\sin\left(nx\ri‌​ght)}{2\sin\left(\frac{1}{2}x\right)}$$?
 
Lacks rigorosity, tho
 
No, @GFauxPas, it's for $x$ near $0$.
Oh, you can make mine totally rigorous.
That's what Taylor's Theorem is for (error estimates in Taylor polynomials).
 
@TedShifrin how?
 
in that case, we have $\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^N \ln \left({1 + \frac i {N^2}}\right) \sim \sum_{i=1}^N \frac i {N^2}$?
 
11:06 PM
Right. And then you need to look at an error estimate.
 
Im not used to having both bounds of summation in the summand
 
Pull the $N^2$ in the denominator out, @GFauxPas.
 
oooh
triangular number
 
Right.
 
$\frac 1 2 N^{-2} \cdot N \cdot (N+1)$
$= \dfrac 1 2 \dfrac {N+1}{N}$
$\to \frac 1 2$
 
11:08 PM
yes
 
so $\ln y = 1/2$, that is, $y = e^{1/2}$
okay, so let's talk error
 
Right. Now show that the error is insignificant (i.e., limits to 0).
 
If you guys are interested, I do also have another question
But I think this one is... a lot harder
(Without gamma function)
Prove that $\sqrt{2} = \frac{2 \cdot 2}{1\cdot 3}\cdot\frac{6 \cdot 6}{5\cdot 7} \cdot \frac{10 \cdot 10}{9\cdot 11}\dotsb$
 
So when you approximate $\log(1+x)$ by $x$, what's the maximum error (when $|x|<1$)?
 
$E_n = \frac 1 {(n+1)!} (x-1)^{n+1}D^{n+1}\ln \eta$
 
11:11 PM
No, that's not right, @GFauxPas.
 
@LucasHenrique this one is hell...
 
for some $\eta$ in $[0..1]$
is that right now?
 
And sorry @AkivaWeinberger, but I really can't understand why I was wrong
 
Not $(x-1)$, since I'm doing the function $f(x)=\log(1+x)$.
And we're doing $n=1$.
I would rather write $f^{(n+1)}(\eta)$ as opposed to your way.
 
I thought we need to consider all $n > 1$
okay sure
 
11:13 PM
No, I'm just doing linear Taylor approximation here. Right?
 
oh right
 
That $a_1 \to a_2 \to \dots \to 1 \implies a_1 \cdot a_2 \cdots = 1^n = 1$
 
agreed
 
That's wrong, @Lucas. Look at $\lim (1+1/n)^n$.
 
so $f^{(2)}(\eta) = \dfrac {-1}{\eta^2}$?
 
11:14 PM
@TedShifrin I can't see why they relate
 
You can only do stuff like that for a fixed finite product.
 
oh, at $x = 1$
 
@GFauxPas, maybe $-1/(1+\eta)^2$?
 
right
 
But take absolute value and the biggest that can be is $1$.
 
11:15 PM
because $0 \le \eta \le 1$
 
@Lucas: Each $(1+1/n)$ goes to $1$, but what does the product $(1+1/n)^n$ go to?
Strict inequality, actually, @GFauxPas.
 
Damn, I'm dumb
 
because strictly monotonic?
 
thank you @TedShifrin, @AkivaWeinberger and @GFauxPas
 
No, because of what Taylor's theorem says. Plus things don't converge at $x=1$.
Well, they do, but ... never mind.
 
11:17 PM
oh, was misreading the theorem
 
@Lucas: You have to be very careful with things like that. You can only do what you wanted if the number of terms in the product is fixed.
 
Yes, I understood y'all point now
 
so we need $\dfrac{(x-1)^2}{2!}$ to go to $0$
as $x \to 1$
 
No, no: you have to use the error for each term of the sum, @GFauxPas.
 
which it does
 
11:18 PM
No, no, no.
There's no $(x-1)^2$. It's $x^2$.
 
:( it's been so long since I did this lol
 
We're approximating $\log(1+k/n^2)$.
Then adding 'em up.
 
why $x^2$ and not $(x+1)^2$?
 
Because my $f(x)=\log(1+x)$.
 
which is centered at $x = 0$
 
11:20 PM
Right.
You have to be consistent throughout.
 
$\dfrac {x^2}{2!}$
 
Right: That's an upper bound on our error. So what do we get for the sum?
 
geometric series
 
Huh?
 
oh, it's a function of $x$
 
11:22 PM
We're looking at $\sum_{k=1}^n \log(1+k/n^2)$.
@Alessandro!!!
 
Parked on top of any shops yet? :)
 
No, but I have another lesson tomorrow so there's a nonzero chance of that happening soon :P
 
Glad to hear it.
 
$\dfrac 1 2 \dfrac {k^2}{n^4}$?
 
11:23 PM
@GFauxPas, summed from $1$ to $n$, yes.
Guess you're way more interested than @Lucas is ...
 
I guess so
 
Hahahahah
 
$n^{-4} \to 0$ as $n \to +\infty$ then
 
I know nothing about error
 
No, @GFauxPas. Pay attention.
 
11:25 PM
I was just checking the chat before going to sleep, have a nice day everyone, I'm already going
 
sorry, as I said, havent done this in years
 
Night, @Alessandro.
You have to sum $k^2$, don't you? @GFauxPas
 
Either way, how do you show this?
 
isn't it constant?
we're working on it Lucas
 
19 mins ago, by GFauxPas
in that case, we have $\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^N \ln \left({1 + \frac i {N^2}}\right) \sim \sum_{i=1}^N \frac i {N^2}$?
 
11:25 PM
Think back to how you did the first part, @GFauxPas.
@Lucas: Do you know any calculus?
 
What's the slope of the tangent line of $y=\ln(1+x)$ at $x=0$?
 
oh dur
it's another triangular number
?
 
well, y' = 1/(1+x) so y'(0) = 1?
 
No. You're looking at $\sum\limits_{k=1}^n k^2$ now.
 
11:27 PM
oh, theres a formula for that
 
Right, @Lucas. So $\ln(1+x)\approx x$ for $x$ near $0$.
 
let me look it up
 
@TedShifrin that's right.
 
$\dfrac {n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}$
 
isn't this much more of a "numerical" solution
rather than an "analytical" solution?
 
11:28 PM
All you need, @GFauxPas, is that it is roughly a constant times $n^3$ ... And you have $n^4$ in the denominator. So, as $n\to\infty$ ...
 
Lucas that's why we're analyzing the error
 
No, @Lucas. It's a totally analytic solution if you do it correctly.
 
nice Ted, thanks for being patient with me
 
Oh, I got it
 
Lucas, when you have a Taylor polynomial, Taylor's theorem also gives you a bound on the error between the series and the function
 
11:30 PM
no, polynomial, not infinite series.
 
oops, right
we're showing that the error goes to $0$ as the index of summation goes to infinity
 
And indeed we're done.
Now write it all up :P
 
that's Lucas's job
:P
 
well, you have to help him.
 
Ok, good night guys
xD
 
11:31 PM
LOL
 
sure
 
just kidding.
 
Where are you, anyhow, Lucas?
 
Brazil.
 
Ah, cool.
 
11:32 PM
8:31pm here
 
proofwiki.org/wiki/Taylor%27s_Theorem Here's the formation I'm using, Lucas
 
BTW, my linear algebra book was published in Portuguese :P
 
@GFauxPas I'm familiar with Taylor's Theorem
 
and the error term?
 
@TedShifrin Ooooh!
@GFauxPas You mean, "complexity"?
 
11:32 PM
What is Taylor's theorem?
 
Of course, he's completely unaware of the numerous mistranslations
 
what does it say
 
sends DogAteMy to his Spanish lesson for 5 weeks
 
@GFauxPas A way to write infinitely differentiable functions as an polynomial series
 
@Ted Oh that's interesting
 
11:35 PM
Huh? Demonark
 
a way to approximate infinitely diff functions
 
Book published in Portuguese
 
@GFauxPas, well, at infinity it's true, isn't? :P
 
Oh.
 
not always
 
11:36 PM
Yeah, I guess W.H. Freeman had enough interest that they had it translated.
So I assume some schools in Portugal/Brazil are using it.
BTW, Demonark, you got my email?
 
and we were only using a linear approximation
so we need to know how good that approximation is, and Taylor's theorem tells us about the error
 
Yeah @Ted, I messaged you on there for reference
 
oh.
 
@TedShifrin you're a famous mathematician and I didn't even know it
Oh my God...
UGA math department?
 
11:38 PM
Formerly.
 
Oh my God. You're incredible, man
 
rolls several eyes
ok, Demonark, we should be all set ... except you still have to prepare your lecture.
 
loans Ted his eyes so he has more to roll
 
I actually rolled 9 the other day.
 
This is true
I'm TeXing up some lecture notes right now
 
11:42 PM
BTW, @Lucas, @EricSilva is also Brazilian (/American).
 
Well, @EricSilva, hi! Or should I say "olá"? :P
Boy, I'm so anxious
 
anxious?
 
My school managed to send me to IMPA: "Institute of Pure and Applied Mathematics"
 
oh cool ... I've known lots of people from there over the years.
 
Just in time when we'll have IMO here in Brazil
 
11:47 PM
my mathematical brother (and very well known geometer) Manfredo do Carmo was at IMPA. When I was a grad student, there were lots of dynamical systems people from IMPA who visited (and vice versa).
 
@TedShifrin nice. AFAIK IMPA is "relevant" in the international mathematics
 
ayyy um outro brasileiro
 
Very, yes.
 
Neves told me to do everything i can to retire to impa
 
I think it's a little early to be thinking about retiring, ERic.
 
11:48 PM
lol im just repeating his advice
 
But at the rate the US is going, maybe you want to get to Brazil in the next few months.
 
@EricSilva My academic plan is UFRJ -> IMPA -> Berkeley
 
Ah, @Lucas ... I was at Berkeley.
 
cool cool
 
But I have ENEM first so it's a pain in the ass.
@TedShifrin What did you think of it?
 
11:49 PM
You'd better understand the proof I just did if you have such aspirations.
 
I liked it, but it's not a good department for people who are shy.
 
@TedShifrin I'm trying Princeton, then. :P
 
Um, it's difficult in different ways.
 
scary
 
11:50 PM
@TedShifrin b-but I'm just a highschooler
 
princetons colors give me a headache
 
And we do not have calculus here in Brazil
 
There goes Eric with his school colors obsession.
 
@EricSilva how old are you?
 
What year of high school, Lucas?
 
11:51 PM
@Ted I have synesthesia and certain colors combined with certain letters give me a headache! so i have a reason!
@Lucas 20
 
rolls a few eyes at Eric
 
it's true! it's neurological man
 
You overdo it.
 
@TedShifrin US-Brazil school systems are different. I'd say I have this and next year to pass all my exams to got to uni
 
What color is a P
 
11:52 PM
maybe a bit
@Akiva pinkish
 
What about R
 
like between pink and purple
 
LOL
 
red
 
Enjoy your intensive Spanish, DogAteMy!
 
11:53 PM
So drawing that little extra line changes its color, cool :P
 
OK, I'm outta here. Have to have dinner and go play bridge for the evening.
Happy learning, @Lucas.
 
@EricSilva are you at university?
 
You ever have one of those moments where you cannot remember something important?
 
(Not sarcastic, I bet it actually is cool, though the headaches are less so)
 
It's called old age, Typhon.
 
11:53 PM
and it drives you nuts?
 
@Lucas I go to university of chicago
 
@TedShifrin does it mean I should (or I must) learn it "quickly"?
 
@TedShifrin 21 is not old age.
 
No, just learn, Lucas.
 
@Akiva it's cool, i think it helps me remember things, the headaches suck but i get a LOT of those anyway
 
11:54 PM
remains confused about Typhon's age
 
@AkivaWeinberger just ignore it. uses Jedi mind trick
 
didn't Typhon say he was in high school
 
@EricSilva how was the SAT and the application process for you?
 
Bye, all.
 
im a bit older
 
11:55 PM
Bye @Ted
 
dont overthink it
i said i didnt do well
 
@TedShifrin I will, professor, I will. :)
Bye @TedShifrin!
 
@Lucas Well for the SAT i didnt study, but that was a bad thing. The application process was annoying because I waited until the last minute bc I didn't know if i could go to college until after the application process was open
 
hi chat
 
all in all i was lucky and am not someone to look to as an example or anything
 
11:56 PM
hi semi
 
hello!
 
any advice i would give is to start earlier than me and actually study for things
 
@Semiclassical I remember that you helped me before
 
heh, glad i was memorable.
 
Semi were you there for the $e^{1/2}$ product-series shenanigans?
Ted finally figured it out lol
 
11:57 PM
actually, I don't frequent this chat because the stuff here is hard and smart people are scary. heheh
 
you should hang out here anyway
:)
 
nah, I wasn't.
 

« first day (2532 days earlier)      last day (2507 days later) »