« first day (2529 days earlier)      last day (2499 days later) » 

5:00 AM
or rather a = \bar a
 
@Typhon $x$ can be complex, it's $a$ that we know is real
 
i know. Said it wrong
 
Subtracting $x\bar x=a\bar a$ and subtracting $1$, we get $x+\bar x=a+\bar a$
 
4
Q: Proving that if $a^n$ and $(a+1)^n$ are both elements of a polynomial field, then $a$ is also an element of that polynomial field?

TyphonIn the main MSE chat @AkivaWeinberger proposed the following conjecture they found from an old question. If $a$ is a real number and $a^n$ and $(a+1)^n$ are both rational, then $a$ is a rational number. I have tried several times to prove it and I just wish to know how to prove it. Since I...

 
and dividing by $2$, we get ${\rm Re}(x)={\rm Re}(a)$
er, uh, $=a$
 
5:01 AM
@LasVegasRaiders see this meme please
XD
 
I'm having trouble remembering how to finish
 
True dat
 
We have $|x|^2={\rm Re}(x)^2+{\rm Im}(x)^2$, I guess
 
Hi!
 
5:03 AM
or $a^2=a^2+{\rm Im}(x)^2$, so $x$ is real
 
How hard is it to get into University of VA if im in state
 
Virginia?
 
yes
 
What's your gpa?
 
So $x$ is either $a$ or $-a$. Only one of those also satisfies $|x+1|=|a+1|$, though.
 
5:05 AM
@AkivaWeinberger slow clap
 
cumulative?
 
about a 4.4
 
So, $x=a$, QED. And that was probably more messy than it had to be
 
weighted
 
5:06 AM
but whatever
Also, note that we had to use that $a$ was real
As noted earlier, there are counterexamples otherwise. For example, the cube root of unity with $n=6$.
 
hmmm
actually there is an easier one
 
The circles $|x|=|a|$ and $|x+1|=|a+1|$ are only tangent when $a$ is real, essentially.
 
i^2 and (i+1)^2 are both real methinks
wait wait wait nope
 
No, $(i+1)^2$ is $2i$
 
no
i^2 + 2i +1
oh nevermind
but i + 1 has a length of...
\sqrt{2}!
 
5:09 AM
…$\sqrt2$
Yup
Note, by the way, that the two circles can only intersect at at most 2 places (when $a$ is allowed to be complex). This means that, when $a$ is any complex counterexample, it can have at most one (Galois) conjugate.
This means that the only complex counterexamples are quadratic irrationals.
 
@AkivaWeinberger hmmm
so solutions to the polynomial x^2 + ax + b like earlier?
 
Thus the examples of the cube root of unity (which is $-\frac12+\frac{\sqrt{-3}}2$) and the example of $-.5+.5i$ (which is $-.5+.5\sqrt{-1}$)
 
heh
golden ratio
x^2 - x - 1 = 0
 
@AkivaWeinberger for $n=2$, $2a+1$ is rational, so $a$ is rational...
 
$-.5+.5i$ that's the golden ratio, right?
 
5:12 AM
No @Typhon
 
wait no
 
It's $\frac{1+\sqrt5}2$, which is like 1.618 I think
 
i was thinking of $\frac{1}{2} + \frac {\sqrt{5}}{2}$
 
I see, sure
 
stop. sniping. MEEEEEEE
 
5:12 AM
That is not a complex counterexample.
 
thank you
 
Nor is it complex.
Oh, speaking of
 
thanks, sherlock
yaw?
oh welll...
 
They are listed as extremely competitive @chrismc
 
@LeakyNun It's important that $a$ is real. There are counterexamples if it's allpwed to be complex
 
5:13 AM
they arent tangent for all complex numbers
 
@LeakyNun Is it?
 
i understood
we're speaking colloquially
@AkivaWeinberger who?
 
wait, you're right @AkivaWeinberger
 
If $a^n$ and $(a+1)^n$ are both elements of a field $Q[x]$ where $x$ is the solution to a second order polynomial with integer coefficients and a leading coefficient of $1$, then $a$ is an element of $Q[x]$.
im trying to think of the correct way to make this one work
i dont want to just say "real"
that might not work and it might limit the possible ways to look at it since elements of Q[x] need not be real always
 
Is $x$ specifically real there?
 
5:17 AM
@AkivaWeinberger no
it can be ANY solution
 
$n$ needn't be $2$?
 
@AkivaWeinberger I've been having too many brain farts
 
i was wondering there
 
Leaky, take a nap
 
@AkivaWeinberger n can be any positive power
 
5:19 AM
or eat
or go to the bathroom, or something
 
it is the quadratic ring equivalent of your statement
only problem is that the integers are a quadratic ring
 
@Typhon I was talking to Leaky there
 
and a need not be real here
oh
hahaha
 
I'm half-regretting using the letter $a$ for this, it's looking to much like the actual word
What $a$ confusing variable
5
 
im trying to build a legit conjecture out of the one you posted
 
5:21 AM
Hm, do there exist complex counterexamples if $x$ is a complex thingy?
 
and I think that the restriction need not be that a is "real" but rather something more "exotic"
@AkivaWeinberger dont know
try?
append i
 
OK, I appended $i$
It made a 'pop' sound
 
look for a counter example
-_-1
omg
looks like a cell phone
 
$\Bbb Q[i]$ 'pop'
 
-_-1 <== im on the phone, see
XD
best... typo... evah
@AkivaWeinberger that's alpha-braic number theory? eh? eh? gettit?
 
5:25 AM
I'm kinda confused how my last comment got three stars, since there's only three of us here and I can't star my own thing…
Is there someone else here?
Hello? 'echo-y reverb'
 
@LasVegasRaiders quit lurking
 
That's my specialty.
 
Aah! jumpscare'd
 
no, your specialty is being annoying in minecraft
 
5:26 AM
@AkivaWeinberger see the meme
 
I should take all this as an indication of how I need to sleep
@Typhon ?
 
@LasVegasRaiders raiders are the most annoying of players in that game
pillaging is one thing
but when they steal my fucking math theorems
 
…Isn't that rainbow backwards?
 
they're dead to me
 
Unless it's the second of a double rainbow
 
5:29 AM
idk
@AkivaWeinberger you know how you can have written books in minecraft? Well anyways, I had a written book full of proofs and someone stole it and I was like:
 
…Probably hard to typeset that, I imagine
 
they were geometry stuff
no need to typeset too much
 
Ah OK
Fun fact, De Moivre correctly calculated the day he was gonna die
Apparently he got chronically lethargic when he got older
He noticed he needed 15 more minutes of sleep each night
so he calculated when that would accumulate to 24 hours of sleeping time
and, as it turned out, he was correct—he did die that day
 
huh
creepy
how did he die?
 
I think they put something like "lethargy" as his cause of death
 
5:34 AM
heh
 
Let me look it up, though
 
how old was he?
 
Was he accurate to within 15 minutes of his time of death?
 
87, apparently @Typhon
 
sounds to me like his prediction actually caused him to die out of him believing it
@AkivaWeinberger oh well then ok.
 
5:35 AM
Wikipedia has more words
 
so... 4*16 is 64 days
 
wow
2 months to live
geez
aah
1667
i was thinking this was a modern man
heh
 
Hm, apparently it's probably apocryphal
> "The story isn't completely false. It is true that De Moivre was, towards the end of his life, in an increasingly frail state. He required in excess of 20 hours per day of sleep, and his condition only worsened. However, the story about predicting his own death has no reliable source, and can reasonably be assumed to be at least partly apocryphal."
Hm
 
heh
 
5:39 AM
Seems he did die in his sleep, at least
 
13
Q: Did Abraham De Moivre really predict his own death?

UserX At the last point of his life, he noted that he slept 15 minutes extra every night then he calculated that he would die on the day that the extra 15 minutes a night accumulated to 24 hours. That day was November 27, 1754, the actual day of his death. He died in London and was buried at St. Mar...

 
well anyways'
@AkivaWeinberger can you find a counter example?
im afraid to star that yet i want to
 
Don't they'll ban me.
2
 
xD
no they wont
D:
 
We're not ready allowed to talk about that
 
5:48 AM
...
dude, we are
lighten up
relax
 
It's not "nice."
 
yes it is
it is fine in context
and pretty funny
 
We should talk about rainbows and unicorns
Some might flag it.
and then taken out of context
BAM!!!
 
I've been there pal
 
5:51 AM
George Dantzig mistakes open problems for homework, solves them
 
Possible, but highly unlikely...
 
Snopes has a quote from the man himself @LasVegasRaiders
And the second link says what the problems were
 
...yup, saw that.
 
6:09 AM
NB: I screwed up. Will fix this later
\begin{align}
C_{\alpha} & : \{\gamma,\delta,\eta\}\mapsto \{\gamma+\delta,\gamma\delta,\gamma^\delta, I(\gamma,\delta),C(\eta),\psi_\gamma(\eta)|\eta < \alpha\}\\
C(\alpha)_0 & =\{0,1\}\\
C(\alpha)_{n+1} & =C_{\alpha}C(\alpha)_n\\
C(\alpha) & =\sup (C(\alpha)_n|n\in\Bbb{N})\\
\psi_\beta(\alpha) & =\sup\{\max\{\gamma_n|\gamma_n\in C(\alpha)\land \gamma_n<I(0,\beta)\} |n\in\mathbb N\}
\end{align}

----
All cross terms after $C(\alpha)_1,\alpha > 0$ were omitted from print. $n,m \in \Bbb{N}$

NB Nonstandard notation for subscript towers:
Jul 2 at 21:13, by Simply Beautiful Art
Let $I(0,\alpha)$ be the $\alpha$th ordinal that is either admissible or a limit or admissibles.

An ordinal $\alpha$ is said to be $\beta$-inaccessible if it is $\gamma$-inaccessible and $\alpha=\sup\{I(\gamma,\delta):\delta<\alpha\}\forall\gamma<\beta$.

Let $I(\beta,\alpha)$ be the $\alpha$th ordinal that is either $\beta$-inaccessible or a limit of $\beta$-inaccessibles.
$$C(\alpha)_0=\{0,1\}\\ C(\alpha)_{n+1}=C(\alpha)_n\cup\{ \gamma+\delta,\gamma\delta,\gamma^\delta, I(\gamma,\delta),\psi_\gamma(\eta)| \gamma,\delta,\eta\in C(\alpha)_n\land \eta<\alpha\}\\ \psi_\beta(\alpha)=\sup\{\ma
 
@LasVegas finally figured out the Bassel problem
Well, that one was easier, the one we /just/ figured out was proving that $\sum \frac{1}{n^4} = \frac{\pi^4}{90}$
 
6:39 AM
How did you do it? With a lucky fourier series?
 
@AkivaWeinberger if I were to prove some conjecture in Z/1 and show that it being true in Z/n implied it were true in Z/{n+1} could I then conclude it is true for the integers?
 
6:51 AM
Nope, the idea is to use $\frac{\sin(x)}{x} = \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} (1-\frac{x^2}{\pi^2 n^2})$
I mean, that's what the problem said to use
You compute the coefficient of $x^2$, which becomes $\frac{1}{\pi^2}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2}$
But the coefficient of $x^2$ in the Taylor series of $\frac{\sin(x)}{x}$ is $\frac{1}{6}$
For the other case, the coefficient of $x^4$ is $$\frac{1}{\pi^4}\sum_{n,m = 1, n < m}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2 m^2} = \frac{1}{120}$$
But then $$\sum_{1 \le n < m}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2m^2} = \frac{1}{2}((\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2})^2 - \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^4})$$
The reason why you know this is because you can express the first term on the right to be the sum over all possible $\frac{1}{n^2}\frac{1}{m^2}$
But then, in the left, $n < m$
The way you make this true is by eliminating $n=m$, thereby knocking off the sum of quartic reciprocals, and then you divide by 2 since the $m < n$ and $n< m$ cases are symmetric. Then you have it, and use the last result to get what we're looking for
@Alessandro
 
7:06 AM
Interesting
 
Of course, the question you'd likely have is how we know the product for $\sin(x)/x$
To my understanding, the basic idea is somehow, it's sorta like factoring a polynomial by roots
 
I'm trying to obtain it from the other infinite product for $\frac{\sin x}{x}$ that I know (the one I posted yesterday or the day before) with no success
 
$x = n\pi$ are precisely the roots of both the product and $\sin(x)$, so by some analogy (and maybe actually so) this sorta gives you what you want up to a constant. And then well, you let $x = 0$, the left side tends to $1$, and the right side equals $1$
I don't know for sure if analytic functions are determined by zeroes or not, but this is at least a reasonable heuristic
 
Hm, makes sense
 
7:27 AM
Actually it's not occurring to me yet for some reason whether or not analytic functions are determined by their zeroes up to a constant
Do you know?
 
@Daminark e^z has no roots.
As does e^(e^z)
 
Rip
 
There's a sort of characterization of entire functions like this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weierstrass_factorization_theorem
and there's other things you can do on other domains
 
I see
 
7:50 AM
hi
can any one help me with finding out how the venn diagram of two independent events is like?
 
8:46 AM
If a continuous function $f$ is subharmonic (i.e. smaller than its average on spheres around any point) then $\frac 1f$ is superharmonic? (meaning same with opposite signs.)
I can prove this in the smooth case, because there it is equivalent to checking the sign of the laplacian.
I also assume the function is negative.
(My aim is tackling this question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2348511/…)
 
9:06 AM
im trying to calculate $\int \int \int_D 6x +8 $ where $D=\{(x,y,z) : x,y \ge 0 , z = 4 - x \ ^ 2 - y \ ^ 2 $. i use cylindrical coordinates to get $x = r cos(\theta) , y = r sin(\theta) z =z $
now im trying to find the boundaries of $r , \theta$: $\theta \in [0,2\pi]$
how can i find the boundaries of $r$ ?
we have $z = 4 - r \ ^ 2 $
huh, $r \in [0,2]$ , right?
 
@SohamChowdhury Hey soham, did you get IISER Pune?
 
9:28 AM
What is the etymology of the word homology?
> One should realize that the homology groups describe what man does in his home; in French, l’homme au logis. The cohomology groups describe what co-man does in his home; in French, le co-homme au logis, that is, la femme au logis. Obviously this is not politically correct, so cohomology should be renamed. The big question is: what is a better name for cohomology?
I think this is not a correct etymology^^
 
@s.harp nah this has gotta be correct
I mean, this sounds Greek
homo-logos?
 
yes, the study of sameness
 
Hmm, that does a better job at explaining what the word entails to a biologist
 
Hi, $$\forall n \in \mathbb{N^*},\forall a \in \mathbb{N^*}, a^n(a^{n!}-1) \mod n!=0\text{ ?}$$
 
10:21 AM
@LeakyNun I have not read these in detail yet, but these are your best bet for somehting very different from ZFC. I stumbled upon them today when trying to make sense of admissible ordinals
Generically, an alternative set theory is an alternative mathematical approach to the concept of set. It is a proposed alternative to the standard set theory. Some of the alternative set theories are: the theory of semisets the set theory New Foundations Positive set theory Internal set theory Specifically, Alternative Set Theory (or AST) refers to a particular set theory developed in the 1970s and 1980s by Petr Vopěnka and his students. It builds on some ideas of the theory of semisets, but also introduces more radical changes: for example, all sets are "formally" finite, which means that sets...
In mathematics, fuzzy sets are sets whose elements have degrees of membership. Fuzzy sets were introduced by Lotfi A. Zadeh and Dieter Klaua in 1965 as an extension of the classical notion of set. At the same time, Salii (1965) defined a more general kind of structure called an L-relation, which he studied in an abstract algebraic context. Fuzzy relations, which are used now in different areas, such as linguistics (De Cock, Bodenhofer & Kerre 2000) decision-making (Kuzmin 1982) and clustering (Bezdek 1978), are special cases of L-relations when L is the unit interval [0, 1]. In classical set theory...
 
10:43 AM
Hello!!! We have $2^n$ possible n-tuples in $\{0,1\}^n$. How can we find the number of n-tuples in $\{0,1\}^n$ for which two coordinates are 1 and the rest 0?
 
you have $n$ choose $2$ options to pick the coordinates that are $1$ , and the rest is zero. @Evinda
 
I see, thank you :) @Liad
 
No problem :)@Evinda
 
11:22 AM
Hi
I want to learn multivariable integration, do you know any sources that can explain me how to?
 
11:49 AM
@Steamy I think I made it!! And also: I'm FREE NOW!!!!!! After an entire year of suffering (and amazement), I am finally free! I think I'm going to revise on all the subjects I didn't have enough time for this summer! And I can do that without any time pressure!! And it won't be difficult, because I've already read everything, so it's really placing the dots on the i's :P It feels so good!!!! The year is over!
 
Haha, congratulations :)
 
Congratulations. Just don't follow my footsteps in the past of procrastinating e.g. in facebook while what I really want to do on that holiday before PhD is to devour Munkres, and i am sure your maths background will be massively beefed up without any pressure
 
@Secret yes I'm afraid of that.. I can be extremely lazy if I don't feel any time pressure :(
I wish someone could just force me to do it this summer :P but then it wouldn't be a holiday anymore, but just school at a lower pace I guess
 
I love academic related learning, but my issue is laziness. It is one of those few things that can override my passion on something. For me it took a 30 mins warmup period in order to achieve flow and not distracted anymore. Perhaps you and other mathers might be better than me at concentration
 
user84215
DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS APOSTOL
 
11:58 AM
For PhD students, summer is that time when you can finally concentrate on research ;)
 
Indeed, and supervisors like to take sabbaticals during this period
 
o.O
 
Oh I have that too, I need a warm-up period. But I also like to work on stuff obsessively or just not at all, so my warm-up period is often 1-2 days, and then I can do it for maybe an entire week obsessively, and then it's over all of a sudden. But getting yourself to start is the most difficult part :( especially without time pressure. Ugh! I'll have to figure something out to really force myself.
Maybe I could make small youtube videos on the bits I want to revise, and then I have something to work towards
 
Sabbatical is at least half a year at my university
 

« first day (2529 days earlier)      last day (2499 days later) »