The problem ls how to end sentences wlth a polnt when a polnt ls lnflnltely small wlthout people not seeing the perlod After all, how are we to use punctuatlon based upon polnts? Plus "l" looks like "l" because the letter "eye" has a polnt above lt, and you cannot see a polnt
@Dodsy "The problem ls how to end sentences wlth a polnt when a polnt ls lnflnltely small wlthout people not seeing the perlod After all, how are we to use punctuatlon based upon polnts? Plus "l" looks like "l" because the letter "eye" has a polnt above lt, and you cannot see a polnt"
i mean i like greek stuff so ive read it very thoroughly, idt it's hard from a mathematical perspective but from a historical perspective it's pretty annoying
@Dodsy negate the parallel postulate. See what happens. I can think of at least 3 surfaces for which that all works. I can state with 90% confidence that you stand on one of them.
@EricSilva nah. Euclid set down a pretty solid foundation. One just have to think deeply about what they meant. It's like bad MSE posts. You just have to read between the lines and mentally revise it as you read. If you can do that, you learn quite a bit.
@AkivaWeinberger take a folded piece of paper. Shift an angle on one side so that the vertex is on the fold. You just obtained an angle less than 90 degrees.
And the power set of that in turn would be found by taking all those numbers, using each of them to label a binary digit, and asking how many numbers can be represented using that set
@Semiclassical I'm starting to see now that the issue is the sheer bookkeeping. I need to determine more efficient ways to update the 3D model produced during runtime as things change...
It's nice when there's a proof of some theorem that works in a specific setting, where the theorem can be extended to more generalized settings (even if the proof can't)
What's the usual meaning of a notation like "g(t − 2∆t) ", where ∆t is the sample period, i.e. in my case the interval between recording one sample (of $g \in \mathbb{R}^3$) and its successive? t is of course the time at which g is recorded. For example, g(t) means a 3D vector recorded at time t.
@AkivaWeinberger Another question. Do you think I should drop the first term of the numerator for the approximation of the derivatives of the first and second angular velocities, or maybe I should avoid using the first and last two angular velocities so that I can find an approximation of the derivatives?
@Semiclassical I think the problem is that you don't understand the gameplay completely. I suppose it's the sort of thing you have to play with to really understand. :p