« first day (2662 days earlier)      last day (2361 days later) » 

11:08 PM
Quick question for algebraic geometers: when talking about "a local ring whose completion is normal" (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytically_normal_ring) is it always assumed that the completion is with respect to the maximal ideal?
 
@Damin Demonark, yes, you're completely correct. However, the converse fails, as you know, too.
@rschwieb: I'm not an algebraic sort of algebraic geometer, but it seems to me that's the only thing it can mean, yes. :)
 
It seems like the wiki articles on "completions" never state this explicitly, but it seems like the most likely meaning.
@TedShifrin thanks for pitching in your two cents...
 
Eisenbud and such texts are a lot more reliable than Wiki, but I no longer have mine to confirm for you.
 
I love your avatar @rschwieb is it a guy panicking?
 
@rschwieb: Lang says "By a complete local ring, one always means a local ring which is complete in the $\mathfrak m$-adic topology." ($\mathfrak m$ being its unique maximal ideal)
 
11:14 PM
hi
 
Heya Meow.
 
why checking if loops are equivalent if the shrink to the same point ?
the7*
they*
 
That's too vague a question.
BTW, within a few minutes, you can edit your post and correct typos.
 
Hi,were anyone here taking probability course can help me on this one? math.stackexchange.com/questions/2525418/…
 
@Victor: You should be able to do that yourself. You need to know the definition of expectation or expected value.
 
11:20 PM
Say there are 2 loops of the same point. I wanna check if they are equivalent.Our professor used as an argument they shrink to that point so all the possible classes is just one
without rigor
 
to be equivallent must there be a homotopy between them
 
ted this problem is stumping me
 
so a deformation to one each other
 
What do you mean by equivalent, @Manolis? Homotopic?
 
11:22 PM
yeap
 
If the space is simply connected (which is what allows you to shrink any curve to a point), then every closed curve is homotopic to a point, yes.
@Meow: That's a bit vague.
hi, @Alessandro
@Manolis: What is your space?
 
what does shrinking mean
homotopy is deformation of a path to another
why shrink them?
 
It's intuitive ... shrinking usually means you use the straight-line homotopy to your point.
 
ohh so there is a homotopy from a path to a point?
 
a point is a constant path
 
11:24 PM
ok thats what i wanted
 
i just odnt know where to start
all my solutions prove futile
 
@ManolisLyviakis Haven't you done $\pi_1(\Bbb S^1)$, $\pi_1(\Bbb S^2)$ for intuition
 
not yet
 
i can write out the coefficients of the sum out of the coefficients of $f$ but that proves futile
 
only basic definitions
of homoty and fundamental groups
next lecture is calculating some funtamental groups
Im an undergraduate i think for a basic undergraduate topology class he has gone abit far
hell go as far to jordans theorem proof
 
11:28 PM
@ManolisLyviakis Well, you can think of a rubber band on a sphere, and since there are no obstructions, it will 'contract to a point'. But if the rubber band is stuck around a circle (think of a string tied around a pole, that has infinite length if you wish) and the rubber band can not be taken away.
 
@Meow: Have you told us your question?
 
it was the second one you said in your email
 
Ohhhh ... I was supposed to know that?!!
 
if polynomial $f \ge 0$ for all $x$ then $f + f'' + f'' + f''' + \dots \geq 0$
 
Yes, I remember.
So what do you know about the degree of $f$?
 
11:30 PM
@user104729 you are saying that any loop on sphere that doesnt go around the sphere can be taken away but if it does a whole round it cant?
 
@ManolisLyviakis Just think of a rubber band on a sphere in the real world. I am just saying, that you can shrink the rubber band to a point.
 
@Manolis: It's going to turn out that any closed loop on a sphere is homotopic to a constant loop (point). But it's not totally obvious how to prove it.
 
The rubber band is a loop on the surface on the sphere.
 
@Meow: Are you answering me?
 
sorry i was doing something
ok so
the degree of $f$ is even
and it has a positive leading coefficient
 
11:33 PM
Let $g=f+f'+f''+\dots$ ... What can you say about $g$?
 
it also has an even degree?
 
OK. Now what have you proved in previous chapters about odd- and even-degree polynomials?
(I already gave you that hint a few days ago, but you probably ignored me, as usual.)
 
@TedShifrin Savage :P.
 
shrug
@user104729: You see now why I'm being "savage." Did he pay attention? Is he looking? I have no clue. @Meow
 
@TedShifrin Haha, I don't think it was rude. I just thought it was amusing. I feel like Meow Mix is thinking about it, and pretending not to, so his delay doesn't make you think he is stupid.
I've been there for sure.
 
11:40 PM
Usually, it's good to get a one-word response like "Aha" or "Thinking" :P
 
I agree :).
@BalarkaSen Hahaha, this comment is gold.
 
Balarka is capable of being rude/blunt, too :P
 
sorry i was on a skype call
okay so what did we prove
 
@ted a small but cute observation re: my surface from earlier (the unshifted version)
 
he learned from me, i think
rip
 
11:48 PM
LOL, Mike.
@Meow: That's for you to figure out.
 
poll: what's your favourite visualization of $\Bbb S^3$?
1. as $\widehat{\Bbb R^3}$
2. as $\Bbb D^3$ with the boundary identified to one point
3. as $\Bbb D^3 \cup \Bbb D^3$ with the boundaries glued to each other
4. as two solid tori with boundaries glued to each other in the wrong way
5. others
 
Remember I told you that I went back and taught Chapters 7 and 8 before doing chapter 11. :) @Meow
 
As noted earlier, it contains (1,1,1) as the vertex of what is locally a cone. Nothing new there.
 
alright im just gonna leave this cal for now
 
$S^3$ looks the same as $S^2$
It's just a bit bigger
 
11:50 PM
yeah right
 
Definitely 4
 
@MeowMix wut?
 
I like 4 too, but 4 and 1 are kind of connected
 
All of the above, Leaky, depending on what's going on.
 
@MeowMix Isn't it freshest on your mind?
 
11:50 PM
huh?
 
@user104729 Not calculation, but rather call as in Skype call
 
@Leaky: I often prefer the unit sphere in $\Bbb C^2$.
 
Oh hahahaha
Right @MikeMiller.
 
like for 1 I would further decompose it into a base circle, continuumly many tori, and then a pole in the middle
 
I went through the same thought process ;)
 
11:51 PM
@TedShifrin your mind must be able to visualize 4D space :D
 
@Leaky: I already told you that complex geometers think in real pictures, understanding what they're doing.
 
actually what I just said for 1 is essentially the Hopf map video
 
unit quaternions, as this gives a group structure
 
Yup, Mathei.
I won't even argue this time :)
 
But at the level of the equation it’s symmetric under the reflection (x,y,z) -> (-x,-y,z) and is symmetric under any permutation of the coordinates
 
11:52 PM
Although I usually would say $SU(2)$. :P
 
One should try to give optimally irritating definitions
$\Omega \Bbb{HP}^\infty$?
2
 
HP @_@
 
@Semiclassic, I agree on permutation, but I don't agree on the two minuses.
 
Which I think leads to it having the same symmetry group as a regular tetrahedron
 
harry potter and the group structure on a loop space
4
 
11:53 PM
Up to rotation of coordinates, we already said it was $z^2 = 2(x^2+y^2)$. :P
 
if $\Bbb S^3 / \Bbb S^1 \cong \Bbb {CP}$, then does $\Bbb S^7 / \Bbb S^3 \cong \Bbb {HP}$?
 
Yes, Leaky.
 
stick some 1s in the exponents but yues
 
You're missing $^1$s.
 
is it true that $x^1 = x$? :P
 
11:54 PM
Yes, after shifting coordinates to be centered st (1.1,1)
 
@Semiclassic: A cone has a lot more symmetries than a tetrahedron. There's a whole continuous group.
There's an obvious $O(2)$.
 
what is the symmetry of the whole space? SO(3)?
 
$E(3)$?
 
In mathematics, the Euclidean group E(n), also known as ISO(n) or similar, is the symmetry group of n-dimensional Euclidean space. Its elements are the isometries associated with the Euclidean distance, and are called Euclidean isometries, Euclidean transformations or Rigid transformations. Euclidean isometries are classified into direct isometries and indirect isometries, an indirect isometry being an isometry that transforms any object into its mirror image. The direct Euclidean isometries form a group, the special Euclidean group, whose elements are called Euclidean motions, displacements or...
 
But the original unshifted (and unapproximatef) version was x^2+z^2+z^2=1+2xyz
 
11:55 PM
O(n) = E(n)/T(n)
fair enough
 
@Semiclassic: I'm not following you.
Are you referring to that version?
I see.
So with the cubic in there you're saying it has those symmetries. I missed that.
But you're talking about symmetries relative to the origin, not relative to the cone point.
Why can't you use any pair of coordinates. You used just $x,y$?
 
A true mathematician watches this five times a day.
 
BTW, @Semiclassic, that is not a reflection. It's a 180º rotation about the $z$-axis.
Similar rotations about each of the axes, in fact.
Definitely not the tetrahedral group.
 

« first day (2662 days earlier)      last day (2361 days later) »