@Wipqozn That's fine. I'll be playing Nioh when I get to OrigamiRobot's this week, and will continue to chip away at Bloodborne in the meantime and after.
The current damage models is very forgiving and allows crashing at extreme speeds. Is it possible to disable damage altogether or use a more realistic model, for example?
You're suppose to pick jobs through the portal, but to do that you rank preferences through 5 select dropdown menus, each of them only stating the job title and ID
Oh, and did I mention that the resume and introduction area you can fill up does zero filtering? It literally tells you that HTML is allowed, and so the first thing I did was turn the page background orange using a <style> tag. The system accept it with no complaints.
I entered a SQL injection string into the address field. It got accepted, but didn't show up again when I tried to edit it because the quotation marks were not escaped, which broke the HTML input element
@djsmiley2k RFC822 has been long since surpassed. And it's technically possible to write a regex, just crazy and stupid and almost guaranteed to be wrong.
@djsmiley2k Yes, I've seen that page before :p Did not remeber this specific line though:
> The regular expression does not cope with comments in email addresses. The RFC allows comments to be arbitrarily nested. A single regular expression cannot cope with this.
@Nzall You have to find a host that will allow it though. It's not because you can have comments in your eamil according to the RFC that gmail will allow you to do so (I don't know if they do or not)
Is it possible to write a regular expression that matches a nested pattern that occurs an unknown number of times. For example, can a regular expression match an opening and closing brace when there are an unknown number of open closing braces nested within the outer braces.
For example:
public...
So you could define a grammar that says you can put parenthesis in parenthesis, as long as you have them properly balanced and close them inside the level you start
Wait that's to simplistic that'd always work, you need to types of token sets that match (i.e. () and <>, you need to use the matching one. So you can say ( <> ) but not ( <) >
You cannot validated that to an arbitrary level with regex
> I still maintain that if protesters want to really make an impact, they should attend any public event he's [Trump] meant to be at en masse, and as soon as he makes an appearance, quickly and quietly leave. > That's the most British protest I've ever heard of and I love it.
@Unionhawk This was a comment on a news post that Trump is rescheduling his UK visit to take place during a Parliament recess so he'll avoid "embarrassment".
Note that if Parliament is in recess while he's visiting, he can't address Parliament.
Which makes sense, I guess, we don't want Theresa May to show him up again.
@Unionhawk Well, the "argument" is that it was an intelligence gathering mission. To which my question is "why are you sending in an assault team to gather intelligence?".
Proposed Q&A site for a site about all crowdfunding platforms. The best place for asking advice for making your own crowdfunding campaign, or to avoid wasting money on impossible campaigns.
And note the five sponsors that Avery requires? If she costs the Canadian government any money (i.e. welfare), they come after the sponsors for reimbursement.
The current damage models is very forgiving and allows crashing at extreme speeds. Is it possible to disable damage altogether or use a more realistic model, for example?
