« first day (1635 days earlier)      last day (3406 days later) » 

8:01 PM
 
Sounds like a good Lifehack.SE question
 
@OrigamiRobot This only works if your cat is good at catting
Our cats are morons and are not good at anything.
 
0
Q: How do I log in as another commander

Aoc J JonesI would love to be able to login to Elite : Dangerous as another Commander. Is there a menu option I'm missing or is it as simple as registering another account on the website?

 
MY CATS ARE GOOD AT CATTING
ALICE IS A LITTLE TOO GOOD IF YOU ASK ME
HER MISSION SEEMS TO BE TO FIND ALL THE BOTTLE CAPS IN THE WORLD AND MAKE AS MUCH NOISE AT 4AM AS POSSIBLE
 
hm. elite dangerous is by frontier? that's unexpected (finally looking into it. I'm slow)
is it like EVE online but less spreadsheet sim?
 
8:16 PM
ALL I KNOW IS FLYING IN SPACE AND SHOOTING AT THINGS IS FUN
AND I DON'T HAVE TO PAY MONTHLY TO DO SO
 
you do that in star fox, but i don't see the masses making a big deal about that
 
NEVER PLAYED STAR FOX SO I CAN'T MAKE A BIG DEAL ABOUT THAT
 
The color scheme on the Elite: Dangerous forums makes me eyes bleed.
@Rapitor To be fair, I'm not sure it's "the masses"
 
@Sterno REALLY? SEEMS FINE TO ME
 
Just because a few of us are playing it doesn't mean it's wildly successful
 
8:18 PM
UNLESS YOU MEAN THE MOBILE SITE
 
@Sterno i've seen it outside of the bridge pretty often
 
@Rapitor Those all sound like good things? what's the problem
 
@GnomeSlice those all sound good alone, not together.
 
why not?
 
8:27 PM
live action ghost in the shell is a questionable idea in itself. Dreamworks doesn't do live action as far as I am aware. and Scarlet is great and all, and probably the only good decision about the whole thing
 
the hell
oh whoops
 
WHEW, YOU SAVED IT
CLOSE ONE
 
Now there's no purple beam, you're just flipping off air :(
 
yeh I grabbed the gun
then zombies
 
@TimStone That beam owed him $15
 
8:29 PM
DISAPPOINT
 
@GnomeSlice Sorry, can't pay attention to screenshot. No middle finger.
 
these clowns
 
SO DID @TimStone START PLAYING ELITE YET?
 
this game does not like being alt tabbed
 
8:29 PM
Of course I replied to the wrong one
 
@OrigamiRobot How deep is the combat in that? It's expensive and I could just play Galaxy on Fire 2
 
@OrigamiRobot Well I got that fine I paid before you came halfway across the galaxy to bounty-collect on me.
 
@GnomeSlice I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT QUESTIONS MEANS
 
@OrigamiRobot how deep is the combat in elite dangerous
like is there a lot to it
or is it just point and blast
 
I mostly just keep cruising around from station to station trying to decide what I want to do.
 
8:31 PM
THERE IS A LOT TO THE POINTING PART IF YOU'RE @Wipqozn
 
@GnomeSlice I also have this question
 
what is this indiana jones
 
IF I SEE ONE MORE PICTURE FROM @GnomeSlice OF A MIDDLE FINGER, I'M IGNORING HIM :/
 
Also I keep getting interdiction attempts that I keep thwarting.
 
@TimStone COWARD!
 
8:32 PM
I WAS JUST MINDING MY OWN BUSINESS
 
what the fuck is this
 
@GnomeSlice clever
 
I LOVE BEING INTERDICTED
 
@GnomeSlice CENSORSHIP. AAH RUN AWAY FROM THE CENSORSHIP
 
WAIT, IS THIS JUST A GAME WHERE YOU'RE WALKING AROUND LIKE THAT?
 
8:33 PM
this game is amazing holy shit
@OrigamiRobot No I'm taking screenshots after shooting all the zombies
it's far cry 3: blood dragon
 
@OrigamiRobot I've got but a wee unmodified ship
 
blood dragon is a game everyone should play
it's a masterpiece
 
@TimStone GET A BETTER WEE SHIP
 
pew pew pew pew pew
 
8:35 PM
@OrigamiRobot I have to make the monies first! Which means deciding what I should do.
 
if i do decide to get elite dangerous. how viable is it to just wander around the cosmos? Will other players decide to shoot me because they are jerks? or is pvp disabled
 
Do missions until you can afford an eagle
 
0
Q: Minecraft is not working (No mods )

NightMareMineCraft is not working with me this is the log Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: C:\Users\Dell\AppData\Roaming.minecraft\versions\1.6.4\1.6.4-natives-111511491628551\lwjgl.dll: Can't load IA 32-bit .dll on a AMD 64-bit platform at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrar...

 
@Rapitor There is a solo mode if you want
 
Can you be a merchant and hire other players to escort you places like mercenaries
 
8:38 PM
@GnomeSlice blood dragon? or elite
 
oh there's boobies in this game
I guess it has pretty much everything else
 
@GnomeSlice Yes, but it would kinda be a pain.
 
Although the 'gore' is pretty tame.
@OrigamiRobot Just because of like payment limitations?
or is everybody just an ass
 
@Rapitor I haven't been shot at yet, at least.
But I've only been playing since yesterday-ish
I did see someone get blown up by a station, that was funny.
 
No, because if they get interdicted (forced out of FTL), there isn't a good way for the escort to follow them into normal space.
At least, not that I know of
 
8:40 PM
@OrigamiRobot OH YTOU
 
oh
so it's just not really supported
lame
 
I haven't really looked into that
 
@Unionhawk I actually switched to a different video. The video just stops at about 10 minutes in.
 
@TimStone that brings next question. when you inevitably die, do you lose your ship and have to buy/build a new one?
whats death penalty
 
8:41 PM
@GnomeSlice Normally you can follow people's FTL wakes to enter the same instance as them. I'm just not sure if interdiction leaves a wake
 
I'm gonna play blood dragon again I think
 
There's a rebuy fee for your ship, I guess?
 
@OrigamiRobot Oh.
 
(I haven't died, so)
Let's ask @Sterno, since he crashed into a sun.
 
lol I added $5 to my steam wallet so I could get the foil badge
what the fuck
 
8:42 PM
@Rapitor You pay 5% of the value of your ship to rebuy it. If you can't afford that, you can always get a free Sidewinder
My rebuy cost is currently ~100k
 
that sounds like a reasonable punishment..
 
oh yeah well I have a cool ship too
 
pointy
 
ur pointy
 
The cooperative player-to-player part of the game needs a lot of work, TBH
 
8:45 PM
also that's not even from that game
 
Plenty of PvP opportunities, but trying to directly work together is hard.
 
Hmm nice, I think this is the first time I've backed up my phone since I got it years ago
 
Wow I have 281 steam screenshots of GoF2
 
The risk of 3rd party credit selling means there is no direct credit transfer method.
I say who cares about that, but w/e
 
make that 279
 
8:48 PM
speaking of backing up phones. im pissed i didnt. i lost all of my kairosoft game saves when i got new phone. why they don't just use cloud saving like everyone else idk.
if any of you know how to get the data off the SD card, please. do tell.
 
0
Q: Is the world really balanced for multiple players

PhaDaPhunkWhen I play don't starve together, I always feel like the generated world was made for a single player game. I usually play with 2 friends but we usually end up starving pretty soon (20ish days) since we all try to supply on the same sources. Don't get me wrong, we all work together so triple w...

 
@TimStone I didn't die. I just got cooked a bit.
But if you're in the starter ship, there's no fee for dying
 
Oh, excellent.
 
Otherwise I think it's 5% or something
Oh, @OrigamiRobot answered this already. WELL THEN
 
@Sterno I didn't even get any rep
 
8:58 PM
1. That's a finger, you pervert
 
lol wut
 
2. Lifehack material!
 
Is that a picture of @Wipqozn blowing up?
 
@OrigamiRobot No. It's a picture of Bad Rats with @Sterno commenting with my evil Laugh gif.
 
9:02 PM
 
I'm so happy @el
@GnomeSlice OH MY SNAP GNOMESLICE IS BACK
HE'S NOT ELFSLICE OF DWARFSLICE ANYMORE
THIS IS THE BEST DAY OF MY LIFE
 
I changed it a while ago
10 hours ago, by Wipqozn
@GnomeSlice My word! How rude.
 
@GnomeSlice I only just noticed now though./
 
Obama authorized North Korea sanctions over cyber hacking. Solution there, it seems to me, is to create unhackable systems.
 
@GnomeSlice He's a turtle, off course he's slow.
 
9:03 PM
Remind me why everyone thinks he's smart.
Unless that is sarcasm.
 
@Sterno Probably sarcasm.
Also probably a fake account.
 
@Yuuki Nope, it's verified.
 
NO. IF IT IS ON THE INTERNET IT MUST BE TRUE
2
 
@Wipqozn BRB modding his name to @ElfSliceOfDwarfSlice
 
nothing is unhackable
 
9:05 PM
@StrixVaria I nominate @StrixVaria for worst mod.
 
@Rapitor Tell that to this stupid ad that keeps saying "you can't hack what you can't see".
 
@Rapitor Define "hack"
 
@Wipqozn cc @badp
 
@OrigamiRobot number 2
 
9:06 PM
anybody want to play skydrift?
3
 
I am @badp and I approve of @StrixVaria
 
@Sterno That's totally impossible. I hope he's not a tech guy at all.
 
@Sterno If that is not sarcasm: I need to contact that guy to offer him an unhackable system for a forward payment of 1000 times the US debt.
 
void main() {} //hack this
 
@Frank not necessarily. You can actually harden a system
expensive != impossible
 
9:07 PM
(actually it's probably very likely that you can hack it)
 
@Rapitor This piece of paper on my desk is pretty unhackable :P
 
@murgatroid99 Harden, yes. Make completely unhackable? Not a chance.
 
@Frank No, no he's not.
 
I'll deliver a pc that has all network abilities physically removed. Plus all possible ways to read data from it removed.
 
@Frank It's difficult, but it's not impossible
 
9:07 PM
@OrigamiRobot The one that contains the Javascript to turn everything lowercase? We already know what's on that paper.
 
All you can do is make the effort required to access your data greater than it's worth.
 
Smart != good with computers.
 
@JasonBerkan No, the other one
 
@Frank This.
 
@murgatroid99 How, exactly, would you make a system unhackable?
I'm honestly unsure of how you could do that.
 
9:08 PM
@Frank It is possible to have a system that doesn't have vulnerabilities
 
@murgatroid99 Every system has vulnerabilities.
 
inf
Probably just the work filter though
 
Take computer. Remove internet capabilities. Put on bottom of ocean. Breed laser sharks. Kill everyone named "Austin Powers".
 
9:09 PM
I can create an unhackable system so long as you don't ever want it up and running.
 
Congratulations, you have an unhackable computer!
 
I'll just hide the power cord
 
@Frank Computers aren't magic boxes. It is possible to have a program that only does what it is supposed to do
 
I bet you guys can't hack into my TI-89!
 
@murgatroid99 Wait, does this mean I can't call myself a wizard after getting my CS degree?
 
9:10 PM
@murgatroid99 Let me know once you design a system that does exactly as planned, and never has bugs.
 
@murgatroid99 LIES! Computers are very much magical.
 
Well, screw college now, it's all pointless.
 
@Frank I didn't say I could do it. But that's not the same as "impossible"
 
Otherwise I am far less cooler than I thought.
 
My home PC is currently off unhackable
 
9:11 PM
@murgatroid99 The effort required to build such a system would require so many man hours so as to put it into the realm of impossibility.
 
0
Q: What determines the exchange rate for global trade items?

lemontwistWhat determines the price of items selling on the global exchange on Sim City Buildit? For example, I see from two different towns a dozer exhaust selling for §799 in one case and §750 in the other. Security cameras range from §490, §505, §559, §650. Does this also set the price of the goods tha...

 
4 mins ago, by murgatroid99
expensive != impossible
 
@Powerlord Tell that to the lunatic who just invaded your home and is now hacking away at it with an axe.
 
@murgatroid99 90% reliability = easily possible. 95% = requires three times the effort. And it just goes up exponentially from there. I do not believe 100% reliability is possible.
 
0
Q: Should tags really be created for each specific version instead of having a general one for each platforms

PhaDaPhunkI tagged a game and used the PC tag to let the users know I am specifically talking about the PC version. I then read the tag properly to realize that the PC isn't used at all to tag a version of a game. After a bit of research, I noticed that in order to specify a version, you need to create a ...

 
9:13 PM
(100% reliability and any functionality =p)
 
Disregarding the "classified information" the FBI refuses to share, the Sony hack seemed to have been carried out with such ease that the spirit of the tweet is still entirely true.
 
@Frank Here's a program that prints the numbers 1 to 100: for(int i=0; i<100; i++)printf("%d\n", i);
 
Yay, just rebooted my computer, once because it being slow, the second because I updated TortoiseSVN, and now its back to being slow again.
 
That's a working program that does something specific and does absolutely nothing it is not programmed to do
The difficulty goes up as functionality increases, but that's still not the same as "impossible"
 
@SepiaLazers Nonono. No. Just no.
 
9:15 PM
Oh, oh, the eMichigan all-staff meeting is coming up in two weeks. I wonder if suggesting we get rid of Symantec Endpoint Protection and use something better would go over well.
 
Impractical is not the same as impossible.
 
@Frank You're thinking of things from a feasibility perspective, where @murgatroid99 is thinking of things from a theoretical limit perspective.
 
Red is not the same as purple.
 
@OrigamiRobot exactly
 
@StrixVaria This is the heart of the argument, it seems.
Theoretically, it's possible. Pragmatically, not even maybe.
 
9:16 PM
@Frank It depends on the application
They write hardened programs for aircraft and spacecraft
 
@murgatroid99 Any application that has any utility is complex enough to never be perfect.
9 mins ago, by Frank
@murgatroid99 Harden, yes. Make completely unhackable? Not a chance.
 
One time they said man would never fly.
 
But the argument's going in circles at this point, so I'm done.
 
@Frank I don't even understand why there's an argument then. Are you trying to say that theoretical limits aren't a useful measure? Then say that. It doesn't change what the theoretical limit is.
 
Or travel at high speeds.
 
9:17 PM
@Frank I still say that's bullshit. Unless your definition of "utility" extends beyond stuff like simple unix programs
I bet that I could implement a simple text transformation program like those people actually use on Linux systems with exactly 0 bugs
 
If you wanted to, you could just play No True Scotsman with the definition of "utility" until you win.
 
@murgatroid99 It depends on the bugs in the architecture you choose, too.
You'd have to design an entire computer architecture from the ground up or find one that has zero bugs.
 
@StrixVaria If you can write pieces without bugs, you can write the whole thing without bugs in something like O(n^2) time
 
0
Q: Can I revenge someone in my clan in clash of clans?

user20037Let's say someone attacked me and then he joined my clan would I still be able to revenge him? Thank you.

 
The shuttle architecture and code had very few bugs.
Kind of required it.
 
9:20 PM
@JasonBerkan They also have a team of dozens of programmers, with incredibly strict and robust code policies.
And it still breaks on occasion.
 
@Frank the fact that it didn't work perfectly for them doesn't mean that it can't
 
I'm not sure how much of the Sony hack was even an exploit of existing programs versus just terrible, terrible infosec.
 
@murgatroid99 We won't agree on this, as I don't believe a theoretical limit is a useful point of measure for anything but something to strive for, but can never attain.
 
4 mins ago, by murgatroid99
I bet that I could implement a simple text transformation program like those people actually use on Linux systems with exactly 0 bugs
I'm making more than just a theoretical argument
 
@TimStone Apparently, server data was hardcoded into the virus so probably the latter.
 
9:23 PM
@murgatroid99 Okay. Write it. And then show me how useful it is.
 
5 mins ago, by Origami Robot
If you wanted to, you could just play No True Scotsman with the definition of "utility" until you win.
 
I can bet you dollars to donuts that a program that does the same thing, but has more functionality, and has bugs, is going to be more useful.
 
@Frank You aren't making sense. The theoretical limit is useful to discuss, even if it isn't feasible to reach it in large-scale projects at the moment. The theoretical limit is a bug-free piece of code, period. You are not participating in the same conversation that the rest of us are having.
 
@Frank OK, then can you give a lower bound of "utility" above which bug-free code is impossible?
 
You know, just speaking from a philosophical standpoint, I'd rather think "this is very, very unlikely but possible" rather than think "this is never going to happen, f--k ever even thinking about it."
 
9:25 PM
@OrigamiRobot I think it's easiest to just blame the Scottish and move on.
 
Man, I really hope a gauntlet gets thrown down here.
 
@Sterno must be so happy right now.
 
Oh look it's time for me to go sit on a train for way too long.
 
@StrixVaria That's the point I'm making; any project worth its salt is going to be complex enough that having zero bugs is a practical impossibility. No project is ever going to get funded to the point where the code is 100% bug free.
Striving for bug free code is a fantastic ideal that I think all coders should shoot for, yes.
 
@Frank But no one else cares about feasibility right now. You're the only one talking about that. Everyone else is talking about possibility.
 
9:26 PM
2 mins ago, by murgatroid99
@Frank OK, then can you give a lower bound of "utility" above which bug-free code is impossible?
 
Anyway now I'm actually going AFK.
 
Bug free code is possible until I start writing it. It all goes downhill from there.
 
@murgatroid99 I honestly wouldn't know. I don't think there is a specific line that would count.
It depends too much on what it's supposed to do, and the inputs and outputs.
 
@Frank Then your argument is so vague that it is no longer worth engaging
3
 
@murgatroid99 You want a pragmatic measurement at which code is impossible to write bug free.
 
9:28 PM
Chat just reloaded, did something happen?
 
@Frank You are the one who seems to be saying that there is a line. I'm just asking you where it is
 
How do you measure code? Number of lines? Time saved?
 
You're the one saying things like "worth its salt"
 
@Frank You're the one saying there should be a test of utility ("any project worth its salt"), does it not then fall to you define the benchmarks?
 
You're the one Wait, I took my turn already
 
9:33 PM
It's like my teacher telling me I should both get an A and write the exams.
 
@Yuuki I'm arguing against code of one-liners. Yeah, you can write a one-liner that has no bugs, but it also has dick all for usefulness.
 
Yeah sure, but I doubt you'll accept the grade I gave myself, so what the point of trying?
 
Bug free code is easy; just define the bug context as one line.
 
@Frank How about two-liners? Three?
 
What about two lines?
 
9:34 PM
That's why I'm saying useful code. Something someone would actually use.
 
Read CodeGolf.se. They can fit a lot of bugs in one line. Or a lot of functionality
 
Tell you what: Write a program that's fit for purpose for something a business wants done.
 
@Frank I use the Linux command head. Do you think it's impossible to write that program without bugs?
 
@murgatroid99 I'm not familiar with Linux. I don't know what that does.
 
@Frank It outputs the first K lines of a file, or STDIN if no filename is provided
 
9:37 PM
@murgatroid99 So it has one of two inputs, and one single output?
 
@Frank actually, you can pass more than one filename. So a bit more than that
 
0
Q: Is it possible to get more than one mystery box in one run?

nicaelEvery time I play, I can't get more than one mystery box in one run (top score 611k). Is it even possible?

0
Q: How to do enchanting correctly? (Skyrim)

GeekyGamerI'm very confused with the process of getting/making enchantments for armor and weapons. Will someone please give me the full guide to enchanting or give me a descriptive enchanting link?

 
It has a couple of other options, but that's the basic idea
 
@murgatroid99 That sounds simple, but reasonably complex. Are you saying that it's 100% bug free?
 
@Frank I would be willing to bet that the implementation distributed with Linux has no bugs
 
9:41 PM
If you have a Pi, I can highly, highly recommend the wireless starter kit
 
Of course, this is the point where we get stuck, because if you could determine with 100% accuracy whether a program has bugs, you would have also solved the halting problem and you probably wouldn't need your job in the first place
 
It's crazy easy to do awesome stuff
 
@murgatroid99 After thinking about it, I don't think it's possible to ever prove code is 100% bug free.
Perhaps a more reasonable metric would be, "No bugs reported in X time"?
 
@Frank If your program is supposed to complete for all valid inputs (or a well-defined subset thereof), then the halting problem is a subproblem of bug finding
 
@Frank If your code has users interacting with it, you can never account for all possible cases. Users are dumb
 
9:45 PM
@Batophobia Well, yes. Users will always do something stupid. You can limit the damage they can do, though.
@murgatroid99 And requires complete knowledge of the codebase as well.
I dislike dealing with 100% guarantees of any nature, as there are always variables you can't account for.
 
@Batophobia Unless it's something like:
 
Unless you have perfect control of all layers of the architecture, and you shoot any user that strays outside of the required parameters.
 
public void SomeProgram(userInput)
{
   discard userInput
   do whatever
}
 
@Yuuki They will find a way to ruin it
 
@Batophobia Buffer overflow.
Wrong input type.
 
9:48 PM
I am constantly surprised by how crazy stupid people are
 
And that's why there are QA departments.
 
public void SomeProgramMk2(userInput)
{
    Shoot users
}
 
@Yuuki I approve of this program.
 
Computer Science is dumb. All programs halt - you just have to kill the power to the computer.
 
@Yuuki This is a bad Rube Goldberg machine
 
9:50 PM
public void SomeProgramMk3(userInput)
{
     try
     {
           do operation
     }
     catch
     {
          shoot user
     }
     finally
     {
          shoot user
     }

     return 1;
}
 
@Frank Replace do operation with shoot user and we're good.
 
@Yuuki Check the finally statement.
 
And after the finally clause, a double tap just to be safe would be an A+.
 
Problem is, you eventually run out of users. Thereby your program is no longer useful.
 
@Frank This is the best-case scenario.
 
9:52 PM
@Yuuki Program has served its purpose. Terminate self.
 
@Frank Is a program only useful if it is useful eternally?
 
@murgatroid99 Well, it can't be, because no program is eternally useful.
 
Is hardware malfunction considered a bug?
 
@OrigamiRobot Does it cause the program to malfunction? Then yes.
 
I could write a mean vending machine program. Vending machines are useful.
 
9:54 PM
@OrigamiRobot no
 
@OrigamiRobot Why would you write a mean vending machine program? Vending machines are jerks enough as it is.
 
@OrigamiRobot Even they have bugs; sometimes they eat your coins.
 
@Yuuki Every program I write would be mean. It's just my nature.
@Frank Hardware malfunction.
 
@Frank According to @OrigamiRobot, this would be by design.
 

« first day (1635 days earlier)      last day (3406 days later) »