« first day (2126 days earlier)      last day (2560 days later) » 

20:07
@Zhe but there are some reactions whose mechanism we don't know for sure...Like oxymercuration?
@Tanuj sort of, if it follows Meerwein addition
@Rick hmm okay
guys , in case of carbocation which one is more stable...attachment of carbon with nitrogen or attachment of carbon with oxygen ?
@Tanuj oxygen is more electronegative
so I think that the double bond formed due to resonance (conjugation) in case of oxygen would be stronger
@Abcd i know that , but according to me Carbon with nitrogen should be more stable , as it donates electrons more easily than oxygen
Zhe
Zhe
@Rick I'm not sure what your point is?
@Zhe nothing really, just a random thought I got.. :D
Zhe
Zhe
20:17
@Rick ok :)
3
Q: Confused about carbocation stability

JavaNewbie_M107For which element 'X' is the carbocation $\ce{CH3-X-CH2+}$ the most stable? A. X = S B. X = N C. X = O I thought since oxygen is the most electronegative among the options, it would create the greatest electron deficiency, which would in turn facilitate a lone pair donation from the O atom (...

@Zhe that there are some reactions whose mechanism we don't know for sure
Just a hunch
Zhe
Zhe
@M.A.R. You are such a troll
I love it
You are right @Tanuj, refer to the answer above.
Zhe
Zhe
@Tanuj Draw the resonance structure? It should be pretty obvious
20:19
@Zhe no kidding. Sunlight is bad for me
@Zhe No idea how drawing resonating structures would help.
@Abcd @Zhe Got it , thanks :)
Zhe
Zhe
@Abcd $\ce{R2-N-CH2+}$ is an imminium ion
@Zhe so?
Zhe
Zhe
So, you draw out the series
20:21
which series?
Zhe
Zhe
The series with various kinds of X?
The question you posted
And Rick
@Abcd what are you studying these days ?
in maths
20:52
hi all
Hi all
new avatar :)
Yup. Was about time
I used to change avatars as fast as I did diapers as a baby
lol
I never change avatars
21:27
Yeah, @Mart, sorry about you giving me owner status on PT and then basically disappearing. :-/
@hBy2Py wut, Mart never disappeared
Hey Brian, long time no see
Brain
21:44
who is Brian?
@JavaScriptCoder an old timing cool guy
22:05
@M.A.R. Oh, whoops...no I basically disappeared.
@JavaScriptCoder Once upon a time I went by my real name on SE
@hBy2Py no worries . . . Me and Mart can hold the front lines for as long as we breathe
22:21
@M.A.R. by saying Brian's name whenever he shows up? That counts?
What? I didn't catch what you said
you said that you could hold the front lines for @hBy2Py (not revealing his name). Or am I getting this wrong?
@M.A.R. Sir. SIR.
@M.A.R. I have a doubt, please help
@pentavalentcarbon you are disingenuous
But not an Indian
So is not working, haha
@M.A.R. No, I am a pentavalent carbon
22:31
@JavaScriptCoder hByPy is Brain
Also you don't know that, have you found my picture?
Or Brian. Whichever.
@pentavalentcarbon is it on Exorcist movie's poster?
not sure how you came up with that, but no
I am not so bloody and twisted yet
Oh, the gentleman killer?
I don't know, never seen it
9
Q: What chemical can cause such a fire?

user59309A friend of mine who thinks that she is under influence of black magic met an astrologer. The astrologer asked her to wear a t-shirt for three nights and then bring that to him. The astrologer then cut some lemons and rubbed them throughout the t-shirt. Then he poured some water on her hands and ...

> A friend of mine who thinks that she is under influence of black magic met an astrologer.
oh dear
22:45
Haha
Shame that I thought the OP was on sciencez side
oh that question
I saw it
that was... unusual to say the least
not touching it with a 10 foot pole
mentions alchemy => not legit
It ended up a surprisingly decent question, save for falling afoul of the "is there a chemical that..." too-broad VTC rationale.
we should totally make an alchemy stackexchange
uses scientific method -> not on topic
22:53
"too broad" is quite abused
I support "help me expose a charlatan" efforts. Difficult to keep them around at Chem.SE, tho.
@pentavalentcarbon Oh...has that usage of too-broad been rolled back some?
nope, everything that's not HW gets sent up for too broad
2
Q: Reaction rate constants for methane combustion

LarryI can't find a rate constant or activation energy for the methane combustion reaction given by: $$\ce{ CH4 + 2O2 -> CO2 + 2H2O}$$ Do all reactions have a rate constant? The NIST web site lists several rate constants for reactions of methane that yield other products, but none for the reaction a...

nice question
you would think that would be easy to find
in my experience non-beginner information can often be very difficult to find
23:39
@pentavalentcarbon We really have turned into a bunch of grumps, haven't we.
NO SPECULATION ALLOWED, DAMMIT!
GERROFF MY LAWN!!
@pentavalentcarbon you're right for once
Maybe you were right before too
But only scarcely

« first day (2126 days earlier)      last day (2560 days later) »