« first day (1498 days earlier)      last day (1577 days later) » 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

12:17 AM
English has three animate pronouns: masculine (he), feminine (she), and non-specific (they). But the non-specific "they" covers all uses. If a person says they are (insert gender here), then they are to be believed, but I fear that exclusive use of "they" (as a superclass of all other possible pronouns) may be punished here. I strongly believe that it is not misgendering to refer to someone (e.g. someone who uses "xe") by a more general pronoun. Is that view fundamentally wrong somehow? — Fox 2 mins ago
#335955 Fox (141 rep) | A: A Pronominal Proposal (score: 22) | posted 35 days ago by Jose Antonio Reinstate Monica (1803 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | Comment on inactive post | tps/fps: 0/0
@BSMP It isn't really spam when it's under a question relating to the subject of the GoFundMe, is it? And there are quite a few such questions around. — Inactive - Objecting Extremism 1 min ago
#338357 Inactive - Objecting Extremism (319 rep) | Q: Repercussions for posting links to certain legal fund campaigns? (score: 43) | posted 7 days ago by Inactive - Objecting Extremism (319 rep) | edited 7 days ago by Inactive - Objecting Extremism (319 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Dom - Yesterday when I received my 7-day suspension on Music Fans I got extremely furious and had scheduled my account for deletion until August - but today I was like "wait a min... it's only a week" so I had cancelled my deletion and decided to wait my suspension out. (So I had to post my experience here...) — Maika_Sakuran0miya 1 min ago
#337399 Maika_Sakuran0miya (1020 rep) | A: How do moderators decide how long to suspend users for? (score: 30) | posted 20 days ago by Journeyman Geek (71740 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
12:56 AM
I find SE's behavior to be shameful and a continuation of their disrespect towards the community. I completely disagree with their decision to conduct these link removals. They are essentially trying to bury what they did to Monica. The world will not forget. Your censorship of the issue will only strengthen our cause — ag415 1 min ago
#338270 ag415 (248 rep) | Q: Why is SE removing links and community ads about legal issues? (score: 162) | posted 8 days ago by JNat (9765 rep) | edited 7 days ago by thebjorn (1234 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
I would like to add my voice to the massive list of voices that are protesting this and other recent actions taken by SE's staff. I find SE staff's handling of this matter disrespectful to the community. — ag415 41 secs ago
#338271 ag415 (248 rep) | A: Why is SE removing links and community ads about legal issues? (score: -354) | posted 8 days ago by Juan M (3399 rep) | edited 8 days ago by Juan M (3399 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
1:13 AM
@eyeballfrog but who determines which are acceptable? Almost every made up thing can be said to be genderneutral, but many people won't like it when referred to something they don't know or may be offensive in some languages / cultures. — JJ for Transparency and Monica 35 secs ago
#338638 JJ for Transparency and Monica (2687 rep) | A: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 2) | posted 4 days ago by eyeballfrog (501 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
1:26 AM
Wow, fastest downvote. Oh well. I'm leaving anyway. — Mari-Lou A 1 min ago
#338907 Mari-Lou A (14406 rep) | Q: Should we learn to accept the demise of "community"? (score: 0) | posted 2 minutes ago by Mari-Lou A (14406 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
1:39 AM
@weakdnasaysreinstatemonica Are 'I', 'you' 'it' and 'we' neopronouns? — Inactive - Objecting Extremism 2 mins ago
#336847 Inactive - Objecting Extremism (319 rep) | Q: What does ɴᴏᴛ count as a “neopronoun”? (score: 26) | posted 26 days ago by Rounin says Je suis Monica (1024 rep) | edited 1 minutes ago by tchrist (9934 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Possible duplicate of Share menu hangs iOS appLaurel 23 secs ago
#338904 Laurel (21056 rep) | Q: When clicking on own comment the share card freezes (score: 3) | posted 1 hours ago by markb (131 rep) | edited 1 hours ago by tchrist (9934 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@JJforTransparencyandMonica I'm still having trouble envisioning the problem you're suggesting. Offensive language is already disallowed. — eyeballfrog 2 mins ago
#338638 eyeballfrog (501 rep) | A: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 2) | posted 4 days ago by eyeballfrog (501 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@eyeballfrog the problem is who determines what is offensive. Some even find singular they offensive because they adhere to a strict view of male and female genders. The problem is that what is offensive and what acceptable is subjective. By focusing on this issue by putting it on their website so prominently, there's been a large surge in trolls already. People have a tendency to see where the line is and many people did and continue to do. For example by having all kinds of weird words as their pronouns in their profiles, I've seen kings, queens and emperors on this site recently. — JJ for Transparency and Monica 2 mins ago
#338638 JJ for Transparency and Monica (2687 rep) | A: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 2) | posted 4 days ago by eyeballfrog (501 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@JJforTransparencyandMonica If it's so much of a problem, then singular they can be required as the gender neutral pronoun, but I don't think it will be. Honestly, this proposed policy still works with a vague "be reasonable" standard, because the default of singular they always exists to be used. That is what separates this from the current policy. In the current policy, you must call someone fae if that is faer pronoun. — eyeballfrog 9 secs ago
#338638 eyeballfrog (501 rep) | A: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 2) | posted 4 days ago by eyeballfrog (501 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@eyeballfrog you might as well just have be reasonable policy and nothing more. It's worked for me so far. ;p — JJ for Transparency and Monica 22 secs ago
#338638 JJ for Transparency and Monica (2687 rep) | A: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 2) | posted 4 days ago by eyeballfrog (501 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@tchrist In this particular incident, the relevant user has explicitly requested not to be referred to by "they". — bit.ly slash 373WUTm 53 secs ago
#338453 bit.ly slash 373WUTm (1149 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 86) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | edited 6 minutes ago by tchrist (9934 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@bit.lyslash373WUTm You're right that de facto doesn’t strictly need a hyphen, but this is the existing use of epicene they, which is simply how English grammar works. It isn't something that can one person can tell another they can or cannot use. You can't brute-force somebody else's grammar. You can only change your own grammar. — tchrist 1 min ago
#338453 tchrist (9934 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 86) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | edited 16 minutes ago by tchrist (9934 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Please do not interpret my effort as "purposely trying to get points" , Please show me , where have i tried to get points on porpose (without helping others?) — forkdbloke 1 min ago
#338867 forkdbloke (65 rep) | A: Yesterday, i think i have lost 36 points, feeling very sad (score: 3) | posted 16 hours ago by user56reinstatemonica8 (6393 rep) | edited 16 hours ago by user56reinstatemonica8 (6393 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
2:21 AM
@tchrist Personally I think it's all right, I'm just saying that what you used might be interpreted by a moderator / Stack Exchange staff member as a violation of the new CoC. — bit.ly slash 373WUTm 45 secs ago
#338453 bit.ly slash 373WUTm (1159 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 86) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | edited 29 minutes ago by tchrist (9934 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Wrong site pal. Try stackoverflow.com. — Renan 17 secs ago
#338910 Renan (1175 rep) | Q: Basic Javascript question about object misunderstanding (score: -4) | posted 14 minutes ago by UberCheetah (1 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@CptEric Repeating the noun is not the same thing as using a pronoun, because a noun is by definition never a pronoun. Using pronouns is fundamental to English grammar; they cannot be forever avoided or the writing is no longer English. — tchrist 1 min ago
#338455 tchrist (9934 rep) | A: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 52) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | edited 58 hours ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Inactive-ObjectingExtremism No, those are not neopronouns because they developed organically. Nobody ever invented them. — tchrist 29 secs ago
#336847 tchrist (9934 rep) | Q: What does ɴᴏᴛ count as a “neopronoun”? (score: 26) | posted 26 days ago by Rounin says Je suis Monica (1024 rep) | edited 59 minutes ago by tchrist (9934 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Laurel yes it is. sorry, i didn’t find it in any of my searches on the app — markb 2 mins ago
#338904 markb (141 rep) | Q: When clicking on own comment the share card freezes (score: 4) | posted 2 hours ago by markb (141 rep) | edited 2 hours ago by tchrist (9934 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
3:26 AM
I really fail to see how this is an appropriate response to the OP — linuxandria 2 mins ago
#338905 linuxandria (1395 rep) | A: Give moderators the power to add tag warnings (score: -3) | posted 2 hours ago by wmyfloyd (1 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
3:50 AM
Please don't police my phrasing. If you want to correct my grammar or change my cadence, please suggest them first. — Xirema 47 secs ago
#338691 Xirema (1175 rep) | A: Does the Fram's ban on Wikipedia seem similar to recent events? What can Stack Exchange learn from it? (score: 44) | posted 3 days ago by Xirema (1175 rep) | edited 9 minutes ago by Xirema (1175 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@tchrist please do not edit this question in a manner that changes the fundamental assumptions (e.g., by stating that the pronouns indicated by the user in question are not pronouns). — De Novo supports GoFundMonica 2 mins ago
#338453 De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 86) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | edited 8 minutes ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@DeNovosupportsGoFundMonica Names are always nouns by definition. Names are never pronouns. This is not a matter of personal opinion. It’s how it works linguistically. A pro-form stands in for a non-pro form. Repeating the non-pro form never makes it a pro-form. We should not use misuse established grammatical terms like these that have precise and formal meanings in ways that are linguistically unsound and unsupportable. Do you not agree? If not, perhaps you could please post a question on Linguistics where it belongs. — tchrist 2 mins ago
#338453 tchrist (9934 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 86) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | edited 12 minutes ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@tchrist this is meta, not linguistics. I'm referring to a username and a pronoun as described in the code of conduct and the faq. As discussed here if you believe the pronouns someone has declared to be their pronouns are not in good faith you may flag for moderator attention. Alternatively, since this is the topic of discussion, it seems reasonable to post an answer. But please don't edit this post to change the fundamental assumptions. — De Novo supports GoFundMonica 31 secs ago
#338453 De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 86) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | edited 19 minutes ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@JJforTransparencyandMonica Well I don't disagree with that. But as long as we're going to have a policy about pronouns (and it seems that is foregone at this point), it seems like we should have one that's clear and enforceable. — eyeballfrog 1 min ago
#338638 eyeballfrog (501 rep) | A: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 2) | posted 4 days ago by eyeballfrog (501 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
4:46 AM
@tchrist thank you for reviewing the post and providing copyediting. I considered and incorporated many of your suggestions. I did not incorporate edits that violate the CoC, rejected some suggestions that altered the meaning (see above comments), and, i prefer nonnormative and de facto without hyphens. I appreciate your expertise re the technical term pronoun. I hope you can appreciate the usage of pronoun that refers to a manner of expressing nonnormative gender identity — De Novo supports GoFundMonica 2 mins ago
#338453 De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 86) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | edited 9 minutes ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3279 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
5:34 AM
Perhaps they misinterpreted her questions as rhetorical questions? — Peter Mortensen 2 mins ago
#336117 Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | A: How to disentangle the CoC discussion from the Monica issue? (score: 102) | posted 32 days ago by Script47 (7466 rep) | edited 2 hours ago by tchrist (9934 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
This is "not a real question", as they used to say. — Stormblessed 11 secs ago
#338907 Stormblessed (6913 rep) | Q: Should we learn to accept the demise of "community"? (score: 10) | posted 4 hours ago by Mari-Lou A (14580 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Re "...never did I feel so called unwelcoming": Don't you mean "...never did I feel so called unwelcomed"? — Peter Mortensen 1 min ago
#335299 Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Q: Is there even an attempt by SE to make existing users more welcomed? (score: 109) | posted 41 days ago by Karan Desai (1234 rep) | edited 2 minutes ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Re "...for making new users welcoming": Don't you mean "...for making new users welcomed"? — Peter Mortensen 2 mins ago
#335299 Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Q: Is there even an attempt by SE to make existing users more welcomed? (score: 109) | posted 41 days ago by Karan Desai (1234 rep) | edited 6 minutes ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
6:11 AM
The problem is that even the "helpdesk" approach requires knowledgeable subject-matter experts to stick around. We've all experienced real-world helpdesks where people who have no idea are reading from a script. Imagine a helpdesk solely manned by such people, with nobody to escalate to. Failure to realise this is what will ultimately kill the SE platform if it keeps to that trajectory. — Maximus Minimus 29 secs ago
#338911 Maximus Minimus (2065 rep) | A: Should we learn to accept the demise of "community"? (score: 2) | posted 3 hours ago by Ward - Reinstate Monica (10712 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Re "dump fire": Do you mean "dumpster fire"? — Peter Mortensen 1 min ago
#335310 Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | A: Is there even an attempt by SE to make existing users more welcomed? (score: -12) | posted 41 days ago by BelovedFool (7273 rep) | edited 41 days ago by Philipp (99 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | Comment on inactive post | tps/fps: 0/0
 
6:31 AM
There is REPREX AKA MCVE AKA MWE and SSCCE (but not on this meta site). The TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange site has an awesome one. — Peter Mortensen 1 min ago
#338897 Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Q: Are questions that talk about "today", "recently", etc. considered harmful? (score: 5) | posted 8 hours ago by Roger (191 rep) | edited 8 minutes ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
What is wrong about respecting a person‘s identity as a whole, not just the gender identity? In many languages there is a formal and a casual second person. In some situation, it‘s a form of disrespect to use the wrong one. — Philippos 24 secs ago
#336971 Philippos (99 rep) | A: How does the new CoC apply to second-person pronouns? (score: 3) | posted 25 days ago by Tanner Swett (428 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@tchrist you're assuming it's a name, just because it also happens to be a username? What about zir? — House- 'Reinstate Monica' -man 21 secs ago
#338453 House- 'Reinstate Monica' -man (4425 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 87) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3289 rep) | edited 2 hours ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3289 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Yes, it wouldn't hurt if the tag wiki got much more attention and visibility. — Peter Mortensen just now
#338908 Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Q: Do we have any searchable public resources pages? (score: 2) | posted 5 hours ago by DukeZhou (767 rep) | edited 4 hours ago by DukeZhou (767 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@House-'ReinstateMonica'-man I don't have to "assume" it is a name. It is the username itself. Names are not pronouns. Please read about pro-forms so that you understand what these are, including pronouns. They are never names because they have to stand in for something else. — tchrist 45 secs ago
#338453 tchrist (9934 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 87) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3289 rep) | edited 2 hours ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3289 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Curious to know why people don't agree So leave a comment if possible. — Edenia 2 mins ago
#338915 Edenia (97 rep) | Q: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: -2) | posted 46 minutes ago by Edenia (97 rep) | edited 15 minutes ago by Edenia (97 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
"because of the presence of ANY sort of answers" - that's not quite right. The question can be deleted by the author as long as there are no more than one answer, and that answer doesn't have a positive score. — Mat 1 min ago
#338915 Mat (18747 rep) | Q: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: -2) | posted 56 minutes ago by Edenia (97 rep) | edited 25 minutes ago by Edenia (97 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Yeah, just not too sure about that answer count restriction. Also the reason warning that appears when you try to delete undeletable question is inaccurate, because the real reason would be that even though the question is bad, the answers have value. Nothing to do with investing time and efforts. — Edenia 15 secs ago
#338915 Edenia (97 rep) | Q: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: -2) | posted 1 hours ago by Edenia (97 rep) | edited 35 minutes ago by Edenia (97 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@tchrist I just linked you to the user named "zir". Is "zir" a name or a pronoun, or both? If zir wants to be referred to as "zir", in place of "he", will you say "no, that's not a pronoun, because it's your username, and usernames aren't pronouns?" — House- 'Reinstate Monica' -man 2 mins ago
#338453 House- 'Reinstate Monica' -man (4425 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 87) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3289 rep) | edited 2 hours ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3289 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
The question author being unable to delete its own question, just because someone received 1 score or just because two people answered does not seem optimal to me. — Edenia 2 mins ago
#338915 Edenia (95 rep) | Q: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: -3) | posted 1 hours ago by Edenia (95 rep) | edited 49 minutes ago by Edenia (95 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@House-'ReinstateMonica'-man Choosing a pronoun for a username merely makes that pronoun a name, not a pronoun. This happens all the time, like asking how many shes are around: as you see, that is now a noun not a pronoun because it has been inflected into the plural. But you cannot make a name into a pronoun that stands in for that name because it is the same thing. It is not a pro-form. I again request that you please read up on this technical matter of pro-forms. Pretending a name is a pronoun does nothing to make it one. That is not how the grammar of pro-forms works. — tchrist 37 secs ago
#338453 tchrist (9932 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 87) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3289 rep) | edited 2 hours ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3289 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Aza Personally, I am angry at those trans people who expect everyone in the world to fall over themselves to avoid causing them pain through a behavior that to other people would only cause them to shrug. We can expect other people not to be outright abusive, but beyond that we have to be tolerant of people behaving differently than we do. The trans community expects everyone else to respect their lifestyle. In the same way everyone else expects trans people to respect their lifestyles (including the way they speak). Respect doesn't mean that one submits to another person's choices. — I am not the way you speak 2 mins ago
#335310 I am not the way you speak (1684 rep) | A: Is there even an attempt by SE to make existing users more welcomed? (score: -13) | posted 41 days ago by BelovedFool (7270 rep) | edited 43 minutes ago by BelovedFool (7270 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
You said what I tried to say so much better - I'm going to delete my answer :) — Modus Tollens 9 secs ago
#338921 Modus Tollens (412 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 0) | posted 2 minutes ago by Journeyman Geek (71778 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@PeterMortensen please respect an author's style and "voice". Fixing spelling, punctuation and grammar mistakes is useful and helpful, but writing out "Stack Exchange" in full, every single time is unnecessary. The post begins to sound unnatural, stiff, and stuffy. Abbreviations are acceptable in English, native speakers use it all the time, in their speech and in their writing, and especially on SE because the logo "Stack Exchange" takes time to type and users want to save time. Once the meaning is established, there's no need to repeat its full form every time. — Mari-Lou A 26 secs ago
#335299 Mari-Lou A (14578 rep) | Q: Is there even an attempt by SE to make existing users more welcomed? (score: 112) | posted 41 days ago by Karan Desai (1264 rep) | edited 1 hours ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Thanks to the user who helped many people that way, he gets rewarded with account suspension. — Edenia 1 min ago
#338920 Edenia (93 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 4 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
So the user does not get the chance to fix his mistake in cases he posts the wrong question? Earning from that mistake would be impossible too, because he may get suspended. — Edenia 5 secs ago
#338921 Edenia (93 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 1) | posted 3 minutes ago by Journeyman Geek (71788 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
.... Don't. Yours was a minute faster and I don't see why we can't have both ._. — Journeyman Geek ♦ 25 secs ago
#338921 Journeyman Geek (71788 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 1) | posted 3 minutes ago by Journeyman Geek (71788 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Well - it takes a pattern of bad questions to get question banned. And "Wrong" question is an 'interesting' way to put it. Low quality can be improved. Low value is relative. You can sometimes actually find value in seemingly trivial things too. Fundamentally its about how best we can serve the commons — Journeyman Geek ♦ 55 secs ago
#338921 Journeyman Geek (71788 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 1) | posted 7 minutes ago by Journeyman Geek (71788 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia The user can improve their question by editing it. Deleting downvoted questions is not a good solution - it can lead to a question ban. — Modus Tollens 1 min ago
#338921 Modus Tollens (392 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 1) | posted 7 minutes ago by Journeyman Geek (71788 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia It is worse to delete a lot of downvoted questions. Their score still counts when it comes to suspensions. — Modus Tollens 40 secs ago
#338920 Modus Tollens (412 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 10 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
I'd also add great questions are difficult. I'm trying to work out how to ask one on my own site because it feels broad and trivial, yet its something I'd like to know about. That said, if I'm happy with it, it will be epicJourneyman Geek ♦ 45 secs ago
#338921 Journeyman Geek (71798 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 1) | posted 8 minutes ago by Journeyman Geek (71798 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Aza i don't think accusing others indirectly is helpful. Just because he expressed his personal view doesn't mean he has a secret aim. — Fermi paradox 2 mins ago
#335299 Fermi paradox (1908 rep) | Q: Is there even an attempt by SE to make existing users more welcomed? (score: 114) | posted 41 days ago by Karan Desai (1284 rep) | edited 2 hours ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@PeterMortensen please respect an author's style and "voice". Fixing spelling, punctuation and grammar mistakes is very useful and helpful, but writing out "Stack Exchange" in full, every single time is unnecessary (e.g. Pascal's answer). The post begins to sound unnatural, stiff, and stuffy. Abbreviations are acceptable in English, native speakers use it all the time, in their speech and in their writing, and especially on SE because the logo "Stack Exchange" takes time to type and users want to save time. Once the meaning is established, there's no need to repeat the full form every time. — Mari-Lou A 19 secs ago
#335299 Mari-Lou A (14574 rep) | Q: Is there even an attempt by SE to make existing users more welcomed? (score: 114) | posted 41 days ago by Karan Desai (1284 rep) | edited 2 hours ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Stormblessed yes, I know... but it's really meant as a departing "thank you" message. I wanted to mention the MSE users and answers that were special to me. — Mari-Lou A 40 secs ago
#338907 Mari-Lou A (14574 rep) | Q: Are we witnessing the demise of "community"? (score: 7) | posted 6 hours ago by Mari-Lou A (14574 rep) | edited 5 minutes ago by Mari-Lou A (14574 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
I cannot upvote this with the misquotes. Sorry. — Mari-Lou A 58 secs ago
#335929 Mari-Lou A (14575 rep) | A: How do I better protect myself on Stack Exchange? (score: 5) | posted 35 days ago by Mister Positive (605 rep) | edited 4 days ago by tchrist (9932 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
8:25 AM
Curious to know why people don't agree Suggesting that answers are disposable and should be sacrificed because the author of a question wants to delete a poorly received post (i.e LQ question), is "unappealing" to most users. Answers on VLQQs are somewhat rare, but if the content of answer is good and helps the OP, why should it be thrown out? — Mari-Lou A 13 secs ago
#338915 Mari-Lou A (14573 rep) | Q: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: -7) | posted 2 hours ago by Edenia (87 rep) | edited 1 hours ago by Edenia (87 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
My upvote became a downvote. Of course, there's toxicity in the mod community. In fact, your answer is pretty toxic in its own way... This is unavoidable when... people have things to complain about. People will complain given enough incentive. The downvote is because you have forgotten where that continuing incentive originated. — Sklivvz 23 secs ago
#333968 Sklivvz (32163 rep) | A: Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community? (score: 655) | posted 54 days ago by (deleted user) | edited 4 days ago by (deleted user) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
can not be edited to be improved, because it is the "wrong" question. Means that editing it will most likely change the subject and invalidate other answers. And in the real world some people just don't have the capacity to do it. If it really is a community then every opinion matters. Every user is important. You can't just always put others on the first line. — Edenia 2 mins ago
#338921 Edenia (87 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 49 minutes ago by Journeyman Geek (71828 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Did not say behavior like this should be tolerated. it will exist in either case, but not if the users have the chance to delete their question easily and fairly. — Edenia 1 min ago
#338920 Edenia (87 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 55 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 36 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia Is this about a specific question? Maybe we can help with that. How was the question "wrong"? Asked on the wrong site? — Modus Tollens 35 secs ago
#338920 Modus Tollens (412 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 56 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 37 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia If you see that practice, please rollback or flag. Behaviour like that is not acceptable. — Modus Tollens 54 secs ago
#338920 Modus Tollens (412 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 44 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Ah, no. I guess I am just a liberal person that sees a problem and tries to purpose a solution. This is a problem affecting the mindest of users. Editing the question rendering it completely irrelevant in order to try to force answerers to delete their question is a common practice. — Edenia 1 min ago
#338920 Edenia (85 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 44 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
If one does care for the entire community as a whole he shouldn't neglect the user's decision to delete his question in a few other circumstances at least. — Edenia 52 secs ago
#338920 Edenia (85 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 45 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia Users can delete their questions if the conditions to do so are met. But as soon as a question has several upvoted answers the decision to delete does not only affect the original poster, but others and the community as well. That's why the original poster can't decide to delete on their own. It would be different if Stack Exchange sites would be personal help desks, but they aren't. — Modus Tollens 2 mins ago
#338920 Modus Tollens (412 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 49 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Yes, flag it, but what will the moderator do exactly? Restore the original question and lock it? — Edenia 2 mins ago
#338920 Edenia (85 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 49 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia Yes, if the behaviour continents, they would. The original question can (and should) even be restored by non-moderator users. — Modus Tollens 47 secs ago
#338920 Modus Tollens (412 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 50 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Damn right it affects others too. If this changes, then those who wish to post answer can step aside and think twice. — Edenia 56 secs ago
#338920 Edenia (85 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 50 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
People will know their answers can get deleted with the question. They will just not answer such a question and save a lot of trouble or accept the risk. — Edenia 45 secs ago
#338920 Edenia (85 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 51 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Yes, okay. I guess I will just have to admit that Stack Exchange have this Windows tendency. To deprive users of choice. At least you can earn it by the reputation-privilege system. So not that windows. — Edenia just now
#338920 Edenia (85 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 55 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Stack Exchange has a very strong and very weak side. It is well-moderated, well-designed, useful, but too many people struggle with the criteria to make good questions, too many people rage quit, rage downvote and so on. — Edenia 1 min ago
#338920 Edenia (85 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 55 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia Please don't make this a problem of the answering users. As I said before, this is not only affecting bad questions. Even good questions get deleted when answered because users don't want to get caught by tutors or where asking during a competition or a test. — Modus Tollens 2 mins ago
#338920 Modus Tollens (412 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 55 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia Yes, that's bad. But it often happens because they have wrong expectations and get disappointed when participating. SE's model might not be the right choice for every question. Maybe they can ask on different sites. — Modus Tollens 9 secs ago
#338920 Modus Tollens (412 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 56 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia Even for some LQ, low reseached questions there may be good answers, that may be helpful for future research. It doesn't help the OP anyways if they could easier delete their not so well received questions. As already stated these would still count for a possible quesiton ban. — πάντα ῥεῖ 41 secs ago
#338920 πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 56 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Then mods should not be able to delete answered with voted answers question as well. — Edenia 2 mins ago
#338920 Edenia (85 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easily deletable (score: 2) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | edited 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (412 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
We aren't. But most users ask only for themselves. Unless they become serious SE users. — Edenia 1 min ago
#338925 Edenia (85 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 1) | posted 20 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Oh well then. We can expect all that rage imminently. — Edenia just now
#338925 Edenia (85 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 1) | posted 24 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | edited 3 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia "But most users ask only for themselves." We don't care. At least even LQ questions can serve as good examples what not to do. — πάντα ῥεῖ 1 min ago
#338925 πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 1) | posted 24 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | edited 3 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
BT dubs I love greek music. I can trust you just from that you are greek haha. Smart people. .. but I still hold on my opinion :) — Edenia 2 mins ago
#338925 Edenia (85 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 1) | posted 24 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | edited 3 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Oups. Awkwaaaaard — Edenia 12 secs ago
#338925 Edenia (85 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 1) | posted 25 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | edited 4 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia You'll be surprised that I am not from greece if you take a closer look at my profile :-D — πάντα ῥεῖ 45 secs ago
#338925 πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 1) | posted 25 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | edited 4 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6583 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Her Thank you Dalija for backing up again. — πάντα ῥεῖ 35 secs ago
#338925 πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 2) | posted 29 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | edited 8 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia "But most users ask only for themselves" We don't want such users. We don't care and should not care if someone posted bad question and wants to get rid of it. It is their problem, they should think twice before posting a question. — Her Majesty Queen of ARC 1 min ago
#338925 Her Majesty Queen of ARC (5745 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 2) | posted 29 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | edited 8 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia Well, at least I liked Aphrodite's child a lot when I was young ;-) — πάντα ῥεῖ 1 min ago
#338925 πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 2) | posted 29 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | edited 8 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@πάνταῥεῖ I would probably add explanation why mods and high reputation users can delete questions even if there are upvoted answers. — Her Majesty Queen of ARC 29 secs ago
#338925 Her Majesty Queen of ARC (5745 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 2) | posted 39 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | edited 7 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia There's quite well a difference, if a mod or high-rep community members decide to delete a question or the OP does so. — πάντα ῥεῖ 2 mins ago
#338920 πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 3) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (422 rep) | edited 8 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (422 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
#338927 adiga (580 rep) | Q: How does "Unsung Hero" encourage positive behavior? (score: 1) | posted 8 minutes ago by wimi (111 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia Take a look at this, it is possible to disassociate a question from your account: meta.stackexchange.com/q/26844/204841Modus Tollens 2 mins ago
#338920 Modus Tollens (422 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 3) | posted 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (422 rep) | edited 12 minutes ago by Modus Tollens (422 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
The original feature request explains the ideas behind: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3294/…Marvin 1 min ago
#338927 Marvin (247 rep) | Q: How does "Unsung Hero" encourage positive behavior? (score: 1) | posted 9 minutes ago by wimi (111 rep) | edited 45 seconds ago by Glorfindel (100808 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Her I tried a bit. — πάντα ῥεῖ 5 secs ago
#338925 πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 2) | posted 48 minutes ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | edited 32 seconds ago by πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Hi Saravanan M, welcome to Meta! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an answer from users that have the expertise about the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — Glorfindel 1 min ago
#338929 Glorfindel (100828 rep) | Q: Background concurrent copying GC freed 1349570(42MB) AllocSpace objects (score: -2) | posted 3 minutes ago by Saravanan M (1 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@ScottSeidman it takes some time, but it's doable (see my answer below). It's even possible to determine which sites got another #1 user because of the change. — Glorfindel 21 secs ago
#338131 Glorfindel (100828 rep) | Q: Will I know how much reputation I gained from the change in question rep? (score: 16) | posted 9 days ago by Skooba (1794 rep) | edited 8 days ago by Skooba (1794 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Are you asking about the stack overflow android app (now discontinued) or something else? — dbc 33 secs ago
#338929 dbc (1530 rep) | Q: Background concurrent copying GC freed 1349570(42MB) AllocSpace objects (score: -3) | posted 8 minutes ago by Saravanan M (1 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@dbc I highly doubt so. — πάντα ῥεῖ just now
#338929 πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | Q: Background concurrent copying GC freed 1349570(42MB) AllocSpace objects (score: -3) | posted 9 minutes ago by Saravanan M (1 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@πάνταῥεῖ - well so do I but it's polite to ask. — dbc 24 secs ago
#338929 dbc (1530 rep) | Q: Background concurrent copying GC freed 1349570(42MB) AllocSpace objects (score: -3) | posted 10 minutes ago by Saravanan M (1 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
10:14 AM
I am not so clear about what you actually want to have implemented. Can you elaborate a bit more about the process you want please? — πάντα ῥεῖ 30 secs ago
#338924 πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -1) | posted 1 hours ago by JohnDoea (63 rep) | edited 1 hours ago by JohnDoea (63 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
10:27 AM
Homework cheats deleting their question as soon as they get an answer is a big problem on several sites, not just Stack Overflow. It's probably worse on Mathematics.SE than it is on SO. It rarely happens on Physics.SE due to its very strict policy on homework-like questions. — PM 2Ring 2 mins ago
#338920 PM 2Ring (179 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 5) | posted 2 hours ago by Modus Tollens (442 rep) | edited 1 hours ago by Modus Tollens (442 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Hello, please check changes in question per my last edit. Thank you, — JohnDoea 2 mins ago
#338924 JohnDoea (61 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -2) | posted 1 hours ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | edited 3 minutes ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia No, every opinion does not matter. The goal of SE sites is to build & maintain a repository of knowledge. We can't expect every asker to become an ideal member of the community, but we can expect them to put in some effort to writing a useful question with long-term value. On SE sites you "pay" for good answers by writing good questions. If the OP needs help doing that, we can assist them to improve their question. But if they are simply too lazy or too selfish to write a good question we do not want their questions or their opinions. — PM 2Ring 1 min ago
#338921 PM 2Ring (179 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 3) | posted 3 hours ago by Journeyman Geek (71848 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@PM2Ring Then it is isn't a QA community it is a knowledge repository. Btw I lived long enough to know that the initial idea was not like this. — Edenia 1 min ago
#338921 Edenia (81 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 3) | posted 3 hours ago by Journeyman Geek (71848 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@πάνταῥεῖ It's 'review queue for questions (not new user edits) that have too many edits by OP (both initially, or over a ~week)' type of feature request. Prevents: bumping, submissions from people whom can't formulate their thoughts, and "question drifting" - that's my guess. — Rob 58 secs ago
#338924 Rob (6115 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -2) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | edited 15 minutes ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Rob Sorry, I still have no clue. — πάντα ῥεῖ 1 min ago
#338924 πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -2) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | edited 2 minutes ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@JohnDoea So you mean that any OP should have the right to deny or approve edits of their posts? Is that your question? — πάντα ῥεῖ 40 secs ago
#338924 πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -2) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | edited 3 minutes ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
We don't care about people's opinions, people's problems, people in general, but the pop-up message that appears when you try to delete answered questions is about respecting people's time and effort. Nothing about actual value. And there is nobody to estimate if the answers actually do provide any value. Any placeholder question with 1 upvote can disable users to delete their LQ question or so I heard. — Edenia 45 secs ago
#338921 Edenia (81 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 3) | posted 3 hours ago by Journeyman Geek (71848 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@MiFreidgeim Yes, there's a post that gives an overall summary of the events: Summing up the main issues (The Story So Far) It's Q35 in PART ONE. — Mari-Lou A 1 min ago
#337143 Mari-Lou A (14599 rep) | A: Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community? (score: 75) | posted 24 days ago by Mari-Lou A (14599 rep) | edited 2 hours ago by Mari-Lou A (14599 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@JohnDoea Then you still leave me clueless :-P ... — πάντα ῥεῖ 1 min ago
#338924 πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -2) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | edited 16 seconds ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@GeorgeStocker - When can we expect to hear something? What about all those new podcasts? — J.R. means 'Just Reinstate' 2 mins ago
#336177 J.R. means 'Just Reinstate' (4060 rep) | Q: Feedback post: Moderator review and reinstatement processes (score: -640) | posted 32 days ago by Catija (56321 rep) | edited 16 hours ago by Glorfindel (100883 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@πάνταῥεῖ this is not... — JohnDoea 2 mins ago
#338924 JohnDoea (61 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -2) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | edited 23 seconds ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Physics.SE has 167 Tenacious and 48 Unsung, sometimes they're for unclear or unpopular (borderline OT) questions that remain open long enough to get (usually one) answers but they're quickly pushed off the front-page and not upvoted; the answerer continues attacking these kind of questions. Whether it's good or bad is a bit opinion based. Stats would be great, (cough) which @Glorfindel might SEDE for us (cough Thanks!). — Rob 52 secs ago
#338927 Rob (6115 rep) | Q: How does "Unsung Hero" encourage positive behavior? (score: 1) | posted 1 hours ago by wimi (113 rep) | edited 1 hours ago by Glorfindel (100883 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Troyen My idea is that talking about it is almost always better than not talking about it, at least in the long run. The sympathy for the company is at a low currently and not without reason. Jeff Atwood, kind of idol for many users especially older ones, coined the statement that listen to the community is important as long the community doesn't decide. And just because always someone will complain listening and explaining seems to me to be instrinsically better than what they are doing now. — Trilarion 2 mins ago
#338808 Trilarion (3715 rep) | A: What new things can be done to increase participation in MSE? (score: 7) | posted 42 hours ago by Trilarion (3715 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@JohnDoea I did already. — πάντα ῥεῖ 2 mins ago
#338924 πάντα ῥεῖ (6593 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -2) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | edited 4 minutes ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Edenia I didn't say that we don't care about people's opinions. I said we don't care about every opinion. There's a big difference. — PM 2Ring 2 mins ago
#338921 PM 2Ring (179 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 3) | posted 3 hours ago by Journeyman Geek (71848 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@πάνταῥεῖ please review last version diff. — JohnDoea 3 mins ago
#338924 JohnDoea (61 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -2) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | edited 4 minutes ago by JohnDoea (61 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Troyen I don't know so well for other exchanges, but SO is going down, the number of answers (not to speak of the quality) is down from it's peak to the level of 2012 and no end to the trend is in sight. The company does almost nothing to encourage more and better answers, if anything it seems focused on questions and some side things. The changes they made in the last years are rather cosmetic in nature. To me it looks like they seriously think that pronouns usage is the most important issue at the moment. — Trilarion 2 mins ago
#338808 Trilarion (3715 rep) | A: What new things can be done to increase participation in MSE? (score: 7) | posted 42 hours ago by Trilarion (3715 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Related Fastest gun in the west... people often post a quick answer and then ameliorate it (sometimes frequently) as time passes — Greenonline 13 secs ago
#338924 Greenonline (2993 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 15 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
I wonder if you are using a phone (tablet etc?) Because on the full site (aka computer) you can always review in real time... — Rusi 1 min ago
#338924 Rusi (99 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 15 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Troyen There is something to be said about the bunker mentality and it's true for the stack exchanges as well as for the company. The million dollar question is how to leave that behind and basically invent yourself new regularly without breaking all that's good or heading in the totally wrong direction? I admit that the company tries to introuce change, but so far it's much more announcements than real action and what real action there is, is mostly shallow or not very thought through in my opinion. Listening might help finding better solutions. — Trilarion 1 min ago
#338808 Trilarion (3715 rep) | A: What new things can be done to increase participation in MSE? (score: 7) | posted 42 hours ago by Trilarion (3715 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@πάνταῥεῖ Like first post review except "too many edits by OP" (especially one every 5-10 minutes for the first hour, during the first day - you few know whom you are). — Rob 2 mins ago
#338924 Rob (6115 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 15 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Rob I misunderstood your last comment. — JohnDoea 1 min ago
#338924 JohnDoea (57 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 16 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Rusi I edit from PC and but I think edit review in some cases, is good to prevent possible cognitive biases and for accessibility. — JohnDoea 59 secs ago
#338924 JohnDoea (57 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 18 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
I know. Others have said it though. — Edenia 2 mins ago
#338921 Edenia (81 rep) | A: Low-quality questions should be easier deletable by their OP (score: 3) | posted 3 hours ago by Journeyman Geek (71848 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
If a post is rolled back, that counts as an edit and you can change/retract which was previously locked in. — Glorfindel 50 secs ago
#338930 Glorfindel (100883 rep) | Q: Edits refused through rollback and votes resulting from those edits (score: 0) | posted 33 minutes ago by LPH (109 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
A queue checking for this would either quickly fill up with all of the sequential edits, or would only the latest edit be in the queue? I guess te latter. Meanwhile, what would happen to the previously (now overwritten) partially reviewed edits? Would people have approved an edit that has probably been changed after their review - as is currently the case with the suggested edit queue? That is assuming two reviewers are required per edit. I think having people review your own edits to your own post is not a productive use of people's time, tbh — Greenonline 2 mins ago
#338924 Greenonline (2993 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 25 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Hmm, I'm a bit lost now. Maybe a block diagram or process flow chart would help illustrate your point? — Greenonline 38 secs ago
#338924 Greenonline (2993 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 29 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Greenonline I think I wasn't understood --- I don't mean that any queue will be created --- just people review edit they themselves publish before publishing it --- asking them to review it. — JohnDoea 2 mins ago
#338924 JohnDoea (57 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 30 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
I have pretty much totally revised my question above. I invite you all to re read it. I am sorry, I think it just reinforcing my point. — JohnDoea 31 secs ago
#338924 JohnDoea (57 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 1 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Greenonline and πάνταῥεῖ, they're saying that they've made a half dozen edits to a 2 hour old question, more may be coming, and after many edits and comments we might have a question. Based on the newest comment it's "no" and unsalvageable. — Rob 2 mins ago
#338924 Rob (6114 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 1 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Rob I personally don't recognize Rusi's comment as an "answer"... — JohnDoea 1 min ago
#338924 JohnDoea (57 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 2 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
John, answered in Rusi's comment. — Rob 2 mins ago
#338924 Rob (6114 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 2 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 2 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Glorfindel I did try to do what you explain but I was stopped by a notification (You last voted on this answer 14 hours ago. Your vote is now locked in unless this answer is edited.). This happened on the FSE (french.stackexchange.com/a/40394/17649); for the retraction I clicked both arrows and each time I had the same notification. — LPH 1 min ago
#338930 LPH (109 rep) | Q: Edits refused through rollback and votes resulting from those edits (score: 0) | posted 55 minutes ago by LPH (109 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
11:55 AM
Have you got a link to this new 2019 feature that you refer to? I'm not sure what this new change is. — Greenonline 1 min ago
#338924 Greenonline (2989 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 3 hours ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | edited 19 minutes ago by JohnDoea (57 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
That's because you voted (14 hours ago) after the rollback. You can check the Votes tab on your profile to see exactly when you voted. — Glorfindel 1 min ago
#338930 Glorfindel (100903 rep) | Q: Edits refused through rollback and votes resulting from those edits (score: 0) | posted 1 hours ago by LPH (109 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Glorfindel Then my question holds since it specifies that retracting votes after a rollback is the point. — LPH 1 min ago
#338930 LPH (109 rep) | Q: Edits refused through rollback and votes resulting from those edits (score: 0) | posted 1 hours ago by LPH (109 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Sorry, but I simply don't believe that the SE (company) would want any positive. They don't want anything. Their new CEO wants probably higher stats, and the internal employee in the NY office want to preserve their seats. Except these, the only what I can see on the company, is the total unpredictable chaos, and the evil, evil, EVIL in all aspects. — peterh says reinstate Monica 2 mins ago
#335941 peterh says reinstate Monica (4278 rep) | A: What is Stack Exchange going to do to prevent further weaponization of the Code of Conduct? (score: 29) | posted 35 days ago by divibisan (1979 rep) | edited 35 days ago by divibisan (1979 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | Comment on inactive post | tps
Do you really believe that this whole crap was for the 0.00001% openly transgender visitors? And not some infight, to kill Monica (probably someone simply disliked her) and to show everywhere, how liberal is the company? — peterh says reinstate Monica 59 secs ago
#335940 peterh says reinstate Monica (4278 rep) | A: What is Stack Exchange going to do to prevent further weaponization of the Code of Conduct? (score: 10) | posted 35 days ago by Rubiksmoose (3373 rep) | edited 35 days ago by Rubiksmoose (3373 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | Comment on inactive post |
"Wait until localization is implemented" isn't working. — Foo Bar 2 mins ago
#82156 Foo Bar (101 rep) | Q: Allow users to set custom date formats (score: 14) | posted 3181 days ago by Jeroen Wiert Pluimers (1105 rep) | edited 3181 days ago by Jon Seigel (39818 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | Comment on inactive post | tps/fps: 0/0
@Glorfindel No, I didn't vote after the rollback but after the edit as I thought then that the post was readable; the rollback was made after the vote. — LPH 1 min ago
#338930 LPH (109 rep) | Q: Edits refused through rollback and votes resulting from those edits (score: 0) | posted 1 hours ago by LPH (109 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
I have Unsung Hero on Stack Overflow. I got Tenacious without trying to get it, but then I realized there is also a gold version :) In retrospective, I did answered some questions I probably should not have. Yes, I solved someone's problem but today I would probably just comment instead. I am atill not sure if those badges are good or bad. — Her Majesty Queen of ARC just now
#338928 Her Majesty Queen of ARC (5745 rep) | A: How does "Unsung Hero" encourage positive behavior? (score: 7) | posted 3 hours ago by Glorfindel (100923 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
12:36 PM
There are also requests for quantikz and qpic along with QCircuit / XYJax / Xy-Pic on QC.SE. Other sites, such as Music.SE, have specialized rendering too. So whatever is implemented needs to work with what we have, and what might be forthcoming. — Rob 27 secs ago
#338933 Rob (6114 rep) | Q: Next math renderer MathJax v3 versus KaTeX? (score: 3) | posted 47 minutes ago by Sil (131 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
12:58 PM
I think this is annoying as well, especially if you just want to use the search function. — Philipp Ludwig 1 min ago
#154961 Philipp Ludwig (100 rep) | A: I see "Welcome back! If you found this question useful..." message very frequently (score: 66) | posted 2571 days ago by Leopd (1229 rep) | edited 2571 days ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | Comment on inactive post | tps/fps: 0/0
 
1:11 PM
Hi Naveen, welcome to Meta! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an answer from users that have the expertise about the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — πάντα ῥεῖ 12 secs ago
#338935 πάντα ῥεῖ (6602 rep) | Q: Production/support relation with developement server in PLSQL database (score: -1) | posted 55 seconds ago by Naveen (1 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Well, i do have to say that i'm present in other communities, and everybody is complaining about SE doing nothing and not helping their mods to solve the massive amount of problems that they have — riki481 2 mins ago
#333965 riki481 (100 rep) | Q: Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community? (score: 1942) | posted 54 days ago by amon (8078 rep) | edited 27 minutes ago by Community (1 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
#333968 Mari-Lou A (14603 rep) | A: Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community? (score: 654) | posted 54 days ago by (deleted user) | edited 4 days ago by (deleted user) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Your edit was rolled back at 20:37:21 (UTC). Your up-vote was registered about six minutes later, at 20:43:37. — anon 2 mins ago
#338930 anon (311 rep) | Q: Edits refused through rollback and votes resulting from those edits (score: -1) | posted 2 hours ago by LPH (107 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
1:46 PM
Almost 2200 negative votes, just so you guys can see how bad this whole place is getting because of your bad decisions — riki481 1 min ago
#334248 riki481 (100 rep) | Q: An Update to our Community and an Apology (score: -2198) | posted 50 days ago by Sara Chipps (1 rep) | edited 12 days ago by ColleenV (4271 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Sorry, I am not really clear what exactly your question is. Who is "you", who are you talking to, and what do you expect to happen for your question here? — GhostCat says Reinstate Monica 2 mins ago
#338936 GhostCat says Reinstate Monica (11707 rep) | Q: Problems and problems about other communities, is there any solution? (score: 0) | posted 16 minutes ago by riki481 (100 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
when i say "you" i say the SE high level moderators, CEOs, etc — riki481 30 secs ago
#338936 riki481 (100 rep) | Q: Problems and problems about other communities, is there any solution? (score: 0) | posted 17 minutes ago by riki481 (100 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Greenonline my only link as an "ask question" button: When I publish a question in stackoverflow I get the "suggestion" to review that question; I did notice it's not available in all sites. — JohnDoea 58 secs ago
#338924 JohnDoea (65 rep) | Q: "Review edit" feature at least in some circumstances (score: -4) | posted 5 hours ago by JohnDoea (65 rep) | edited 1 hours ago by JohnDoea (65 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Probably now is more understandable — riki481 says Reinstate Monica 1 min ago
#338936 riki481 says Reinstate Monica (100 rep) | Q: Problems and problems about other communities, is there any solution? (score: 0) | posted 21 minutes ago by riki481 says Reinstate Monica (100 rep) | edited 1 minutes ago by riki481 says Reinstate Monica (100 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps:
 
2:04 PM
By posting that, you guys are digging your own grave — riki481 says Reinstate Monica 27 secs ago
#334551 riki481 says Reinstate Monica (99 rep) | Q: An apology to our community, and next steps (score: -322) | posted 47 days ago by David Fullerton (36076 rep) | edited 10 days ago by Monica Cellio (145959 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
#338938 Aleksey Timoshchenko (111 rep) | Q: How to write special symbols in Stackoverflow question? (score: 1) | posted 13 minutes ago by Aleksey Timoshchenko (111 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
2:17 PM
Ok, but the question is how to know how to write correctly these symbols. Let's say I need to write this symbol "U", how should I assume that it should be written like this \cup? — Aleksey Timoshchenko 53 secs ago
#338939 Aleksey Timoshchenko (111 rep) | A: How to write special symbols in Stackoverflow question? (score: 0) | posted 5 minutes ago by Laurel (21066 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
When you say the translated posts are getting downvoted, what site is that on? — Laurel 2 mins ago
#338936 Laurel (21066 rep) | Q: Problems and problems about other communities, is there any solution? (score: 0) | posted 46 minutes ago by riki481 says Reinstate Monica (99 rep) | edited 27 minutes ago by riki481 says Reinstate Monica (99 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@AlekseyTimoshchenko As I said, you can write it in MathJax and use a draft on a MathJax enabled site to translate that into plain text, as I attempt to show in the screenshot. Does that make sense? — Laurel 1 min ago
#338939 Laurel (21066 rep) | A: How to write special symbols in Stackoverflow question? (score: 0) | posted 9 minutes ago by Laurel (21066 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@tchrist your argument was made 39 comments above and dealt with 38. We understand what you're saying and it is not particularly relevant. — De Novo supports GoFundMonica 23 secs ago
#338453 De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3319 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 89) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3319 rep) | edited 9 hours ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3319 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Rob I can help writing a query, sure, but what do you want to know? How many of these questions (with zero-score accepted answer) have negative votes? It seems strange that an answer attacking a question gets accepted, I'd love to see a concrete example. — Glorfindel 34 secs ago
#338927 Glorfindel (100948 rep) | Q: How does "Unsung Hero" encourage positive behavior? (score: 2) | posted 5 hours ago by wimi (131 rep) | edited 5 hours ago by Glorfindel (100948 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
So basically the original new feedback mechanism was a cluster f... and required extensive rework. I am looking forward to the announcement. — Alex 1 min ago
#338864 Alex (846 rep) | A: What about that new feedback mechanism? (score: 28) | posted 31 hours ago by Catija (56321 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
3:11 PM
#338927 bobobobo (12886 rep) | Q: How does "Unsung Hero" encourage positive behavior? (score: 4) | posted 5 hours ago by wimi (151 rep) | edited 5 hours ago by Glorfindel (100958 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Glorfindel I'm not sure how the query could decide"positive behavior", I guess that it could show age vs. award (staleness, but that relies on the OP too much) or it could try to plot the range (true zero, vs. -10/+10) (mediocreness vs. controversy) - but how that applies to "positive behavior" of the 3rd party (whom has no vote) is quite unclear. Stats are great, interpreting and applying them more difficult. --- 2nd question: let's replace the word (but not the meaning) "attacking" with "tackling" (apply oneself, take a shot at, attack). — Rob 2 mins ago
#338927 Rob (6114 rep) | Q: How does "Unsung Hero" encourage positive behavior? (score: 4) | posted 5 hours ago by wimi (151 rep) | edited 5 hours ago by Glorfindel (100958 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Don't get your hopes up. The official SE feedback mechanism has been > /dev/null for a while. — Eric Duminil 1 min ago
#338860 Eric Duminil (1914 rep) | Q: What about that new feedback mechanism? (score: 30) | posted 35 hours ago by GhostCat says Reinstate Monica (11737 rep) | edited 59 minutes ago by GhostCat says Reinstate Monica (11737 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Rob ah, I see what you mean by attacking. I've still no idea about how to produce a meaningful SEDE query, but here's another one which lists the # of these badges awarded on each site (note: you can sort by each column - that query was originally written for something else). — Glorfindel 2 mins ago
#338927 Glorfindel (100958 rep) | Q: How does "Unsung Hero" encourage positive behavior? (score: 4) | posted 6 hours ago by wimi (151 rep) | edited 5 hours ago by Glorfindel (100958 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
I really don't see any good reason not to have a simple "message" option ... if someone abuses it etc can always have a block option or whatever.. — Machupicchu 1 min ago
#57538 Machupicchu (101 rep) | A: How do I contact other users? (score: 116) | posted 3415 days ago by Arjan (27025 rep) | edited 291 days ago by Sonic the Reinstate Monica-hog (34101 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | Comment on inactive post | tps/fps: 0/0
 
3:44 PM
@tchrist "Choosing a pronoun for a username merely makes that pronoun a name, not a pronoun". Exactly. Just like having the username "zir" is "choosing a pronoun for a username", you can't say that "peilonrayz" is any different. Therefore, one can be named "zir" and have the pronoun "zir". It's settled then, right? — House- 'Reinstate Monica' -man 19 secs ago
#338453 House- 'Reinstate Monica' -man (4425 rep) | Q: Policing gender expressions and pronouns (score: 89) | posted 7 days ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3319 rep) | edited 11 hours ago by De Novo supports GoFundMonica (3319 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Can we have an update please? — JL2210 32 secs ago
#230639 JL2210 (248 rep) | A: Open sourcing Stack Exchange Android App (score: 10) | posted 2034 days ago by Kasra Rahjerdi (23944 rep) | edited 1717 days ago by Kasra Rahjerdi (23944 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | Comment on inactive post | tps/fps: 0/0
 
4:18 PM
@riki481saysReinstateMonica "Probably now is more understandable" Not really. — πάντα ῥεῖ 24 secs ago
#338936 πάντα ῥεῖ (6602 rep) | Q: Problems and problems about other communities, is there any solution? (score: 0) | posted 2 hours ago by riki481 says Reinstate Monica (115 rep) | edited 2 hours ago by riki481 says Reinstate Monica (115 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps
It could be for many reasons, but we can't answer without any data about the voters. One interesting point is that one post is locked it can't be voted upon any more. If someone can share the vote-history of No Opposition Allowed... uh.. i mean Post for clarifications on the updated pronouns FAQ, that would be great. — Fermi paradox 55 secs ago
#336795 Fermi paradox (1904 rep) | Q: Why is it that the new pronouns FAQ was relatively well received with a positive score, but the post for clarifications about it has a negative score? (score: 10) | posted 28 days ago by Oleg (846 rep) | edited 49 minutes ago by sourcejedi (376 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/
@Glorfindel that's quite good, as much as can be hoped for. Indeed the awards are SO heavy, and unawarded at many sites. — Rob 6 secs ago
#338927 Rob (6114 rep) | Q: How does "Unsung Hero" encourage positive behavior? (score: 4) | posted 7 hours ago by wimi (151 rep) | edited 7 hours ago by Glorfindel (100958 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Another interesting point is that the FAQ#2 post disallows any criticism. Imagine if people would read strong counter arguments to the pronoun CoC. Downvotes would skyrocket like they did the now deleted FAQ#1. — Fermi paradox just now
#336795 Fermi paradox (1904 rep) | Q: Why is it that the new pronouns FAQ was relatively well received with a positive score, but the post for clarifications about it has a negative score? (score: 10) | posted 28 days ago by Oleg (846 rep) | edited 51 minutes ago by sourcejedi (376 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/
This question belongs to SE Math's meta site, rather than here. — πάντα ῥεῖ 1 min ago
#338942 πάντα ῥεῖ (6602 rep) | Q: Formatting Combination Questions on Stack Exchange Math (score: -1) | posted 4 minutes ago by Cece (1 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
How could the plaintext possibly be rendered correctly on stackoverflow, even with copy & paste. Does it use the math symbols from the higher numbered Unicode planes? — James Reinstate Monica Polk 1 min ago
#338939 James Reinstate Monica Polk (858 rep) | A: How to write special symbols in Stackoverflow question? (score: 1) | posted 2 hours ago by Laurel (21076 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Glorfindel: I'd like to suggest that this question is not quite a duplicate of the question you linked too. When I saw the question I assumed it was not necessarily about LaTeX. Sure enough, user Laurel below has an excellent answer that I can use as well as the OP. — James Reinstate Monica Polk 2 mins ago
#338938 James Reinstate Monica Polk (858 rep) | Q: How to write special symbols in Stackoverflow question? (score: 1) | posted 2 hours ago by Aleksey Timoshchenko (111 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Ooops. Got it. Thanks for letting me know. — Cece 2 mins ago
#338942 Cece (1 rep) | Q: Formatting Combination Questions on Stack Exchange Math (score: -1) | posted 18 minutes ago by Cece (1 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
The answer is here, but a more complete tutorial is available; but not for that particular question, see the first link. — Rob 1 min ago
#338942 Rob (6114 rep) | Q: Formatting Combination Questions on Stack Exchange Math (score: 0) | posted 22 minutes ago by Cece (11 rep) | edited 28 seconds ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
That same site has the absolutely awesome MathJax basic tutorial and quick reference" — Peter Mortensen 18 secs ago
#338942 Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Q: Formatting Combination Questions on Stack Exchange Math (score: 0) | posted 23 minutes ago by Cece (11 rep) | edited 1 minutes ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@ PM 2Ring, will do. Thanks for letting me know. — Cece just now
#338942 Cece (11 rep) | Q: Formatting Combination Questions on Stack Exchange Math (score: 0) | posted 27 minutes ago by Cece (11 rep) | edited 5 minutes ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Peter Mortense, thanks for posting this for me. — Cece 39 secs ago
#338942 Cece (11 rep) | Q: Formatting Combination Questions on Stack Exchange Math (score: 0) | posted 27 minutes ago by Cece (11 rep) | edited 5 minutes ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
@Rob thank you. — Cece 1 min ago
#338942 Cece (11 rep) | Q: Formatting Combination Questions on Stack Exchange Math (score: 0) | posted 28 minutes ago by Cece (11 rep) | edited 5 minutes ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
Also, $\binom{n}{k}$ But you should probably delete this question. — PM 2Ring 2 mins ago
#338942 PM 2Ring (179 rep) | Q: Formatting Combination Questions on Stack Exchange Math (score: 0) | posted 28 minutes ago by Cece (11 rep) | edited 5 minutes ago by Peter Mortensen (6315 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
When will Stack Exchange ... show they care about rebuilding trust. If by that you mean when will SE try to make Monica whole again, the answer is never as long as the clique that fired her is still around. — James Reinstate Monica Polk 1 min ago
#338907 James Reinstate Monica Polk (858 rep) | Q: Are we witnessing the demise of "community"? (score: 14) | posted 15 hours ago by Mari-Lou A (14603 rep) | edited 9 hours ago by Mari-Lou A (14603 rep) | Toxicity 0.0 | tps/fps: 0/0
 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

« first day (1498 days earlier)      last day (1577 days later) »