« first day (8 days earlier)      last day (3525 days later) » 
04:00 - 15:0015:00 - 23:00

04:51
This is taken from here
It claims the following sentence is incorrect -
> On the day of the match, everyone hoped for fine weather.
It says that preposition for and about is incorrect. And the correct was of. My answer was for, and I think of/about are impossible.
At least in this particular sentence.
 
2 hours later…
06:56
o/ @Dam!
How's your day?
I'm thinking about a question for ELL.
Hi! Good. Thanks! -- What is it?
Let me see and Google and see if it's even logical.
@Man_From_India I think hope of/about sounds really wrong.
Nah. It doesn't make a good one.
@Man_From_India Are they FLAWLESS too?
Hope of may work if hope is a noun.
07:01
@Man_From_India However, with a for, I'm expecting an a before fine.
Hmm...
Let's check (both hope the verb with of/about, and a fine weather)...
[hope].[v*] [ii*] (corpus.byu.edu/coca/?c=coca&q=40240660): 1532 results, 11 are hope about, none for [hope] of.
Wait, why is there no [hope] for?
[hope].[v*] for|to|of|about (corpus.byu.edu/coca/?c=coca&q=40240671): 28384 results, 21 hope of (all but few are false positives), 14 hope about
The false positives are like We hope of course.
Among those few hope of are:
> It was akin to first confronting my mortality because I learned that I could not depend on my body to do all that I expected and hoped of it.
> And so while we're sending out block grants, while we're dismantling programs that have not completely satisfied everything we hoped of them, we have to concern ourselves about those who may be cut loose, and we have to be prepared to help them.
> It was so dark and shadowed we couldn't even hope of finding a gas can among those mystery metal shapes and barrels, and the smell of farm animals and the sound of their shifting in stalls in the deep back blackness of the barn.
> We'll be right back with Ambassador Ghazi Al-Gosaibi, the Ambassador to Bahrain from Saudi Arabia, and more of your phone calls - we hope of the normal variety.
> I think that the position of the administration - and I would hope of the other Western nations - would be to say to Gorbachev,' You now have the full support of Yeltsin. ...'
@Dam BTW my question was whether if any of these were "more correct":
> My point exactly.
> Exactly my point.
Now, I see they aren't that different.
I've heard My point exactly more often.
Right.
07:16
I think I think too much.
These hope of above sounds a bit like expect of, which is possible when we mean expect (something) of someone. I'm not sure if it's really work with hope, but maybe it does.
In any case, weather is not a person.
That is weird.
@Dam have you seen the latest meta question?
replied in the Cabin.
About hope for/of (a) fine weather...
You can check out the results of this https://www.google.com/search?q="hope+*+fine+weather"
(Only 6 pages)
@DamkerngT. What does that asterisk do?
Any (number of any) words.
So, it's a bit unfortunate that that site conflates hope the verb with hope the noun.
07:34
That's Google. It's never helpful when it should be.
@M.A.Ramezani I meant the site Man_From_India linked to.
Dunno @Dam, maybe pazzo flared up on the site because of the meta.SE post.
Oh!
Let's talk about that in another room, either the main room or the Cabin is fine with me.
08:08
@M.A.Ramezani Right :)
@DamkerngT. I also think so.
Who dares summon me?
Oh hullo @Man!
@DamkerngT. I think I have found examples of "hope of someone" in COCA
@M.A.Ramezani Hi...how is everything going?
Dang this printer.
@DamkerngT. Now see how these so called educational sites are! :'( They should not be such careless :(
 
3 hours later…
11:34
This could be fun (and funny too, maybe) to read:
(Look at those red marks (incorrectly) marking the bashed passive voices.)
@DamkerngT. tl;dr.
Try the second link. Should be more obvious.
Holy s*it!
From the first link (Language Log):
> I have seen a paper marked by a teaching assistant who was wrong concerning 70 percent of the passives that he red-circled in a student paper, but this is more extreme.
Quite likely, the assistant is a native speaker.
Or, from a language that hates passives.
11:40
But we can't know for sure.
nods
> Why play grammarian when you don't have a clue about the grammatical structure of your native language, rather than do something you might be good at, like writing political analysis in your native language? To pick up prestige? Grammarians are high-prestige role models? I don't think so.
11:55
@DamkerngT. Poor guy though, their idiotic mistakes went viral.
Viral?
Internetal. Something!
I didn't know that his corrections are well-known.
But they're sure in the public now.
('in public' would be better)
12:49
1
A: easy-going vs easy going

J.R.Hyphens often disappear over time as compound adjectives become more established phrases, so it's no surprise that the hyphen in easy going is disappearing in some places. The Ngram for this is pretty nifty; as the two-word phrase rose in popularity, authors began to dispense with the hyphen, e...

Another language change. (Nice graph, BTW)
@DamkerngT. They changed English because I use very easygoing rather than the other options.
Hehe! :D
413
Q: Can Stack Overflow and Meta's logos be changed temporarily to the "#LoveOverflows" logo?

TimStack Exchange just tweeted this image following the Supreme Court of the United States ruling in favor of gay marriage: #LoveWins #LoveOverflows Please can this be made the logo for a couple of days? I'm thinking Stack Overflow. LoveOverflow chat room for the more... off topic discussions...

WHAT A DRAMA!
I'd had no idea that it can be spelled easygoing until I saw that graph.
@DamkerngT. I had no idea about the hyphenated form.
12:52
Some time back noticed pazzo's "nuke my profile" post. Why is he leaving? Any idea?
Oh! The hyphenated one is my default spelling.
@Man_From_India I have no idea. Haven't been on the main site much lately.
btw
BTW
btw
My rep is 5333.
Is it a prime number or something?
@DamkerngT. Nor do I :( but why on earth he is up to deleting his profile completely? :O
Oh I just won 400 bounty from Pazzo :D
Usually, when this kind of thing happens, it's a result of what happened within previous 24 hours.
12:55
@DamkerngT. No. It's an interesting number. a five and three threes.
@Man_From_India Yay! Congrats!
@DamkerngT. Thanks :-) but it's basically due to ur help :) u showed me PEU entry first. So thank u.
It was my pleasure!
It's very unfortunate that he is leaving :'(
You added your own analysis, which is very fine, imo, too. :-)
Yes. It's a little sad.
12:57
:-)
Where's snailboat?
That's another sad thing...
An employee has to review your request. Please give it a little time. Employees can go through a special process that preserves your votes by transferring them to Community before the account is removed. (Moderators can delete accounts themselves but generally don't when they're high rep accounts—that's left for employees to deal with.) — snailboat 2 hours ago
But I saw her on the meta the last hour.
nods
@DamkerngT. Especially becse he was a contributing member. Nice answers from him.
12:58
Indeed!
@M.A.Ramezani Same thing I was thinking :)
Anonymous
@Man_From_India I'm here!
Anonymous
I snuck into the room without an invitation.
Oh, hello! @snailboat!
Everyone misses you!
Anonymous
Sometimes I need to take a break from chat :-)
12:59
@snailboat Fireworks!
@snailboat It sounded like Rocky Balboa in Rocky III :D
@snailboat SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HAPPY YOU'RE HERE! AND YES, I'M YELLING!
Welcome back @snailboat
Anonymous
Ahh! Caps lock!
It's fun, not as fun as LaTeX$\ldots$.
Anonymous
13:01
I logged back in to ELL today. A user asked a question on Japanese.SE about how to translate some English sentences, but the English sentences didn't quite work. So I suggested they head over here :-)
@snailboat Ahh
Anonymous
1
Q: Is this use of "define" correct?

user10467I'm asking this because my question on Japanese.SE will be answered with different meaning and nuance (possibly ambiguous question) I have these sentences "How X is defined as being Y?" "How X is defined to be Y?" "How to define X as Y?" (assume X is a noun word and Y is an adjec...

And while you're at it, I went on a rampage in The Periodic Table.
I haven't noticed a translation question... --- Oh!
Anonymous
13:02
A rampage, eh?
Everyone's abusing $\LaTeX$ now.
in The Periodic Table, 27 mins ago, by M.A.Ramezani
Screw that. $\fbox{Here's a button}$
See for yourself.
Anonymous
I don't have ChatJax turned on.
You can make a bookmark of the code in Martin's answer.
It also has mhchem enabled, since that package is REALLY necessary in an English Language chatroom.
Time to play, see you guys later :)
@Man_From_India Have some fun!
13:05
@Man_From_India Play volleyball?
Cya anyways.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. But be careful―if you say "Semantic satiation strikes again!" enough, it loses all meaning!
Hehe! You read the log! :D
Anonymous
I went to the beginning of the chat to find out what this room was about.
BTW @snailboat while you were absent, all the dramatic news happened here: Ramadan started, Iran reached the crucial moments of volleyball world league matches, and that's about it.
I can tell you my idea my idea about the three rooms very briefly.
English Language Leaners: quick corrections + main site stuff/management
13:09
Basically, only the pieces of news about me are the exciting news.
ELL's cabin: long-term learning + hang out.
@DamkerngT. And jibber-jabbers.
@M.A.Ramezani That, too.
Language Overflow: Random thoughts about language, language learning, learners, and their language
:P
Anonymous
@M.A.Ramezani News is singular.
Originally, its name was Damkerng's Language Overflow. :P
13:10
Yes.
I somehow ended up pluralizing that.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Ah, I see!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I don't think people typically pronounce it that way...? But those vowels are pretty close, I suppose.
Like a loose /e/ sound, perhaps?
> Exactly what we need for the purpose at hand: Competence is what you expect; performance is what you get.
:-)
Thanks for an interesting post!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Well, vowels vary a bit each time, right? No two pronunciations of a vowel are ever exactly alike. And if the [ɛ] is pronounced just a little bit more open than usual, it might sound more like [æ].
Anonymous
13:16
Alternatively, because they're so close to begin with, it's easy to imagine that the OP misheard the pronunciation.
Anonymous
I don't know. There's a lot of variation in vowel realization in English across accents, and I don't know a lot about it.
nods -- I thought the OP's listening must've been involved.
Anonymous
That was my first guess.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. That's the definition I'm going to use from now on!
Hah! :-)
Anonymous
13:19
1
Q: Active/passive voice

Amit SoniIt would be a great help to me,if someone avoid my doubt in the following two sentences, considering each separately. 1) It is being cautious.(typical sentence for an animal), 2) It is being organized.(it refers to some event) Are both of these sentences in present continuous tense (in...

It's a very tricky thing, imho.
Anonymous
I think the second example is ambiguous with respect to category. Is organized an adjective or a past participial verb form?
@snailboat My first thoughts too.
Pazzo posted an interesting answer to another related question:
1
A: "I am surprised": passive voice or adjective?

pazzoThis is an answer in progress. Expect a lot of downvotes. I accept that this is an answer in progress. Yet I have placed a 500-point bounty over at the ELU question that allegedly has a canonical answer to your question: How can I reliably and accurately identify the passive voice in writing or s...

13:21
> This is an answer in progress. Expect a lot of downvotes.
I think I know what's going on.
@Pazzo wasn't enjoying this anymore.
He was being cynical about the community back there.
I blame ELU unicorns.
Anonymous
What if we kept that sort of discussion in the other room?
Yes, OK OK.
But if you wanna only have languagic discussions here, I suggest throwing me out.
I always go off-topic.
I said this a couple few days ago:
Jun 22 at 17:42, by Damkerng T.
I try to aim at 80% meat, and 20% casual; but I'm not a super-strict person.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. They don't like deep center embedding.
Anonymous
13:25
In general, higher levels of nesting are more easily tolerated at the periphery
Anonymous
That is to say, nesting works better towards the left or right edge of the sentence. Especially the right.
@snailboat Is deep center embedding a linguistic term?
looking...
Anonymous
Your example is an example of center embedding.
Anonymous
That is, embedding in the center.
Anonymous
In linguistics, center embedding refers to the process of embedding a phrase in the middle of another phrase of the same type. This often leads to difficulty with parsing which would be difficult to explain on grammatical grounds alone. The most frequently used example involves embedding a relative clause inside another one as in: A man that a woman loves A man that a woman that a child knows loves A man that a woman that a child that a bird saw knows loves A man that a woman that a child that a bird that I heard saw knows loves In theories of natural language parsing, the difficulty with multiple...
13:26
A-ha!
@DamkerngT. Of course it is. How could you doubt @snail?
Anonymous
When you do it more than once, you have multiple center embedding.
@M.A.Ramezani True!
Anonymous
When something is deeply embedded, that means it's embedded multiple times.
@DamkerngT. Seems you've forgotten the conventions here.
Anonymous
13:27
But my emphasis was on the "center" part.
@snail talks, we star.
I can't think of periphery embedding clearly.
I could use some examples, I think.
> The ancient manuscript that the grad student who the new card catalog had confused a great deal was studying in the library was missing a page.
Somehow it seems to be more tolerable than 3-level center embedding sentences.
(Still not sure about the criteria for center embedding.)
Anonymous
They're embedded in the center.
Anonymous
Sent[ Sent[ Sentence 3 ]ence 2 ]ence 1
Anonymous
Like that.
Anonymous
Except pretend I wrote clause instead of sentence.
13:34
Thank you very much for introducing me to a great subject!
Anonymous
Now imagine a sentence with a bunch of relative clauses at the end. Or even just a couple.
Anonymous
If you want examples of stacked relatives, you can look up "stacked relatives".
Anonymous
Or maybe you could look up unbounded dependency constructions. Those are probably a better example.
Anonymous
I guess stacked relatives are stacked and not really embedded in one another :-)
13:39
This is very interesting!
Anonymous
Hmm, where to find a good example of multiple embedding at the right periphery...?
Anonymous
I think there might be an example in Aspects.
Anonymous
I'm too lazy to check. :-)
I vote for internet.
@snailboat How about: Here is the ancient manuscript that had confused the grad student who was studying in the library a great deal.
:D
Anonymous
13:40
@DamkerngT. Oh! That works! :-)
Very interesting. You guys are making me make my writing even more incomprehensible.
Lots of good search keywords up there.
@M.A.Ramezani LOL
Anonymous
@M.A.Ramezani The internet is good. Right now I'm too lazy to grab any book that isn't within arm's reach of my computer.
@snailboat Me too.
Anonymous
Which is actually a decent number, since my floor is covered in books.
Anonymous
13:44
Not like covered covered. I'm just resorting to a little hyperbole :-)
Anonymous
My floor is actually covered by carpet.
@snailboat You may confuse your books with your tiles. :P
Anonymous
But I do have lots of stacks of books around.
Anonymous
I wish I picked better books for my piles, though. A lot of these books, I'm never going to read or refer to again.
Anonymous
I just read The Martian by Andy Weir. It was really good.
Anonymous
13:46
So that's my most recent book. The trade paperback :-)
Oh, it's the one the movie is based on!
Anonymous
Oh! Right, yeah, they're making a movie!
Anonymous
I recommend reading the book!
Anonymous
It's short. I read it in one sitting.
@snailboat You do that too?
Anonymous
13:47
It's hard not to. It's a real page-turner! And funny :-)
Anonymous
@M.A.Ramezani Sometimes.
Anonymous
1
Q: Is this use of "define" correct?

user10467I have these sentences "How is X defined as being Y?" "How is X defined to be Y?" "How to define X as Y?" (assume X is a noun word and Y is an adjective word) Take "How is volcano defined as being active?" for example. Are those grammatically correct? Are those giving differe...

If I get down to reading a story book, I read it until it finishes. And nothing will stop me, certainly not a bunch of brain explosions, apocalypses, @Dam's pinging me etc.
Anonymous
This question is going to get closed, it looks like
@snailboat Just bought it!
13:49
Oh no, I'm 3 reps away from close votes!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Yay!
I think it's a duplicate. (At least about the part How is ...? vs. How to ...?)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. That seems strange.
Anonymous
In certain circles, these forms are described like this:
Anonymous
> take + -ed = took
> take + -en = taken
> walk + -ed = walked
> walk + -en = walked
Anonymous
13:52
Which might also seem a little weird.
nods -- I think it's because most of verbs in their past participle forms have the -ed ending.
Hmm$\ldots$
Anonymous
Yeah. In regular verbs, there's no past tense - past participle contrast
So, maybe PEU made a good call. (Calling the past participle form the -ed form, and avoiding saying anything about the past form entirely.)
Anonymous
The problem is that "-ed form" often refers to the past tense (or preterite) form, so people might get confused.
13:55
nods
Anonymous
I think I called past participle forms -ed forms before.
Anonymous
But I do all sorts of crazy things. It's 'cause I get confused easily.
I'm not even sure what I used to use the -ed form for.
To ed'ing?
Anonymous
My favorite is "-ing form."
14:01
It's my favorite too!
Anonymous
Gerund-participial form is not only mouthful but an eyeful and a brainful as well
Anonymous
And -ing attaches more or less without exception to every non-defective verb in English
Sometimes it's really difficult to judge whether it's a gerund or a participle.
@snailboat That's why I put it there.
Oh, that define question is cross-posted on ELU, too!
Anonymous
14:04
Yeah, it looks like it kinda is.
Anonymous
0
Q: What "How is X defined as being Y" is actually asking?

user10467Take "How is volcano defined as being active?" for example. Is it answered with one of these answers: Make forth the meaning of "active volcano" Features of a volcano that make a volcano can be defined as being "active volcano" or features of a volcano make it such that we would classify it as...

Anonymous
1
Q: How to say "How is X defined as being Y?"

user10467"How is X defined as being Y?" is similar with "How is X defined to be Y?", and "How to define X as Y?". Assume X is noun word and Y is adjective word. However, I'm not sure if those are similar in Japanese. From my understanding, I can form the Japanese sentence with these words: 何【ど】の様【よう】...

Oh! It's from JLSE!
Anonymous
Uh-huh. I suggested they head over to ELL!
Anonymous
"How X is defined as being Y?", "How X is defined to be Y?", and "How defines X as Y?" are all ungrammatical. (The first two have marginal uses as echo questions, but that doesn't appear to be what you intended.) I suggest visiting ELL.SE. — snailboat ♦ 2 hours ago
14:07
I think "Volcano is defined as being active" is a weird sentence in English.
Anonymous
It is.
But This volcano is said to be active is fine.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Yeah! I do. It is very colloquial, though. "I like to post pictures of snails. Because snails."
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Yeah :-)
@snailboat Seeing that diamond makes my body shiver. Vvvvv.
Anonymous
14:10
@M.A.Ramezani ♦
Anonymous
Enjoy your frisson!
Enjoying . . . Please wait
Anonymous
Please waiting!
Anonymous
Please waiting complete.
That is the most charming phrasal compound verb thingy we made so far.
14:16
@snailboat A-ha! I remember you used it. Not sure if it was about snails. But now we can be sure that you've said it at least once about snails. :D
enjoyed a browser crash for a few minutes...
Anonymous
Oh no!
Anonymous
One of my snails crashed a few minutes ago.
Oh no!
Anonymous
They were sleeping on the wall, and another snail snailed up to them and pushed them off!
How can that possibly happen!?
Ouch!
Anonymous
14:17
They woke up upside down!
Jealousy.
Hullo!
Hello!
How are we?
@snailboat I can't believe what I see in the first sentence of the novel!
We are okay!
14:29
@snailboat And then the robots invaded!
@DamkerngT. What can you see?
Two novels in a row that have f*ck(ed) in the opening sentence.
Maybe it's trending.
Anonymous
14:41
Well, it gets the reader's attention. :-)
It does!
@M.A.Ramezani No, today I did just jogging and mostly played with my neighbour's little kid :-)
:-)
3
Q: Verb "contribute to" + "doing something"

roka114 I would like to contribute to arresting that man. Is this grammatically correct? I mean to have an influence on / bring about arresting him.

Do you think that usage is ungrammatical? I found lots of hit in COCA and BNC.
Anonymous
14:58
@Man_From_India Perfectly grammatical. Maybe a tad strange, but grammatical :-)
Strange? :O okay...might be...but there are lots of example in corpus.
@Man_From_India How often will you hear that?
Anonymous
Examples of what, exactly?
Rather than hearing
04:00 - 15:0015:00 - 23:00

« first day (8 days earlier)      last day (3525 days later) »