« first day (206 days earlier)      last day (3036 days later) » 

Anonymous
5:00 PM
Dysarthria (from Ancient Greek δυσ- dys, "hard, difficult, bad" and ἄρθρωσις arthrosis, "articulation") is a motor speech disorder resulting from neurological injury of the motor component of the motor-speech system and is characterized by poor articulation of phonemes (cf. aphasia: a disorder of the content of language). In other words, it is a condition in which problems effectively occur with the muscles that help produce speech, often making it very difficult to pronounce words. It is unrelated to any problem with understanding cognitive language. Any of the speech subsystems (respiration,...
 
Maybe he can't move his tongue well and makes a more pronounced glottal stop, or puts more effort into making a glottal stop, or .. well, something.
O.O
It's interesting, but I notice that I don't desire to develop an expertise in pronunciation to that level.
 
Anonymous
Which is totally fine.
 
Anonymous
I find that studying phonetics and phonology helps me pronounce the languages of the world more easily :-)
 
Which sort of takes me up to your earlier comments about feeling disappointed with community member's lack of expertise or willingness to guess on ELL here, and to upvote whimsically.
Sure it would!
 
Anonymous
@JimReynolds I think a lot of questions on ELL can be answered without a great deal of expertise.
 
5:04 PM
Agreed. But some feel a need to go beyond the answer.
Most?
Me?
ha.
I think answering is a way of learning.
 
Anonymous
Sure. I think that's okay.
 
Anonymous
I think all of us are learning as we contribute.
 
Anonymous
None of us know everything there is to know about English, even if it is our native language.
 
@Dam Ok. Taiwan is . . . trisected (?) by the Tropic of Cancer, so it's southern third is tropical. Up here in the north, we are not too far from the tropics!
 
Oh! What a location!
 
5:08 PM
Offhand, I'd say that lows in the winter rarely go below around maybe sort of . . . 8C?
 
I thought snow is common up there because many (mostly period) dramas have snow settings.
 
I wonder if it's ever snowed in Taipei? I'd guess never or almost never.
Really? !
You could knock me over with a snowman.
 
The settings are perhaps about what happened on the main land, though.
Haha!
 
That sounds more righter.
But ... Movie: Snowfall in Taipei; Chinese: 台北飄雪
 
Anonymous
@JimReynolds Seems like an unwieldy tool.
 
5:11 PM
But a fairly safe thing to get knocked with!
 
Unless the corncob pipe gets you in the eye.
I wonder how frustrated the average person who spends substantial time editing Wikipedia feels.
 
Like, a lot?
 
I remember once deciding that I could design a much better grammar wiki last year.
Now, I don't recall what I was really thinking.
Experts having more control.
 
I don't think information on Wikipedia is geared toward learners much.
It's useful, still.
I link to it times and again.
 
5:14 PM
True. I'm fairly sure I'm a good English teacher, though not an expert on English linguistically.
 
Anonymous
Wikipedia is supposed to be a faithful synthesis of published source materials, accurate but not really pedagogical.
 
Why my I didn't get capitalized, huh, iPad?
 
Anonymous
More of a reference than a tutorial.
 
Anonymous
I wrote a little bit about this in another chat room:
 
Did your iPad also re-invert your subject and verb to make an unfelicitous question form?
:D
 
5:16 PM
Oh, that's me. :P
 
I was fighting too much with my input thingy on my iPad. :-)
 
Sometimes it seems as if the higher the level of expertise in a subject, the more questionable a person's teaching skills.
Or is that just me?
 
Anonymous

snailboat-wikipedia

Dec 8 '15 at 23:52, 4 minutes total – 17 messages, 3 users, 0 stars

Bookmarked 8 secs ago by snailboat

 
Anonymous
5:18 PM
I wrote something else about Wikipedia, too.
 
@JimReynolds I think they're independent. But it's true that it's rare to find both in the same person.
 
Anonymous
Just wait, this one is going to be even more exciting!
 
Ah, well-said about Wikipedia and grammar.
Oh noooo !
 
excited!
 
Here it comes.
 
Anonymous
5:19 PM

snailboat-wikipedia-2

Dec 9 '15 at 0:05, 10 minutes total – 25 messages, 4 users, 0 stars

Bookmarked 5 secs ago by snailboat

 
I'm hoping for a confrontation!
in English Language & Usage, Dec 9 '15 at 0:07, by snailboat
I occasionally make an account, but then I usually forget what I named it :-)
Hahahaha!
 
Anonymous
I would've put them all in one message, but they went across midnight UTC, which is a magical boundary across which you cannot bookmark a single conversation from the transcript view.
 
0
Q: Is 'went down well' correct conjugation of 'go down well'?

DTTI'm trying to construct a sentence where I would like to use the 'go down' phrasal verb. The sentence I am working with is follows this pattern: They decided to play Mozart; it usually went down well with most clientele. Is this the correct use of 'go down'?

 
I think they are required to do that by international law, snailboat.
You know, clicking across the international dateline can slow the rotation of the earth.
OMG
There will be a lot of fun had with that one
 
Anonymous
Fun having not allowed!
 
Anonymous
5:23 PM
ELL is about not having fun.
 
@Nihilist_Frost I replied to something that isn't there anymore.
 
Anonymous
hot-dog's;
 
Fun is a sin.
in English Language & Usage, Dec 9 '15 at 0:14, by Cerberus
Oh, well, such is life...
 
But to be fair, most OPs don't ask their questions in the titles, or not only in the titles.
 
I'm inclined to agree with that, most of the time. But then it's usually people who insist on something better that make great things happen.
Or am I just talking? @snailboat, what do you think?
Has anything great ever happened?
 
Anonymous
5:25 PM
Dunno. Probably.
 
@snailboat I didn't know that!
 
Aside from the development of @Dam's model.
You didn't know about ... bookmarking?
 
About no fun having. :P
 
Anonymous
No one expects no fun having!
 
No fun having? What's wrong with you people?
 
5:27 PM
Two sides of the same bitcoin.
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.: The older people are talking. Shush!
(In Mar's culture, he has to respect my age.)
 
@JimReynolds On the internet, no one knows you're a dog human @Jim.
 
Anonymous
I've become older people!
 
lol
It will happen over time.
Will that be all? Is it a "future tense"?
I mean, if there was a future tense?
 
Am I old? I'm just a robot.
 
I believe in a future tense.
 
5:29 PM
To clarify: In "Will that be all?" is "will" a future form?
 
Anonymous
First we have to get people to agree on what "tense" means.
 
Oh jeesh.
 
Mhm.
 
@Dam, remember when I told you I got CGEL?
I think more than a year ago?
 
Anonymous
In the analysis presented in CGEL, there is no future tense.
 
5:30 PM
He lost it.
 
I've read like ... two chapters.
:'(
 
I mean he lost the book.
 
Anonymous
@JimReynolds Hey, that's good! The first two chapters are the most important :-)
 
But I'm determined to argue about grammar.
O.O
 
It looks like I overwrote it with something else, Jim.
 
5:30 PM
@JimReynolds *grammer
 
Anonymous
The second chapter is sort of a short form of the whole book.
 
MAT, I lost it long ago.
MAT, or MAR, whatever your name is.
 
Who be MAT?
Oh. How dare you.
 
Oh, so in my wisdom, I realized that I'd absorbed the whole book?
 
MATamazani? O_O
 
5:31 PM
I can go forth propounding my wiseness?
 
Anonymous
To anyone who would like to read chapters one and two, they're available for free from Cambridge University Press: Chapter 1 - Chapter 2
 
@JimReynolds You absorbed it when you were born.
 
When are you going to be a licensed chemist / pharmacist, Mar?
I feel a duty to warn your future victims.
I just had a vision!
One day in the not-too-distant future, a dying person uses almost all their energy to slide a doctor's prescription across the counter to MAR . . .
The person gasps with effort .. . This is . .
finally succeeds in getting the prescription into Mar's hands,
And he throws it back, saying "I don't do proofreading."
 
Haha!
 
@snailboat New hampster!
 
Anonymous
5:42 PM
@JimReynolds We have two new non-epenthetic hamsters :-)
 
Don't fault them on their deficits, though.
Well, what is epenthetic?
 
@snailboat Big family, you have.
 
0
A: I don't uderstand this sentence

Nihilist_FrostHe is referring to the fact that English doesn't have a gender-neutral pronoun when referring to people. We only have he or she and their variations. "it" is mostly not used on people. Many authors use "he" for gender-neutral purposes, even though it is masculine and thus not addressing females...

 
Although that slip might be interesting, who knows. I'll leave it.
 
5:45 PM
@JimReynolds Huh
 
Anonymous
They is gender-neutral. You is gender-neutral. I is gender-neutral.
 
@snailboat Oops, I was mindlessly paraphrasing Catija
 
So's we.
 
Everyone's getting the question wrong, I think.
It's a joke that the OP doesn't get.
 
I fixed it.
 
5:46 PM
The book is for dummies . . .
Yes. I'm right. No one got it so far.
The author of XXX for Dummies, doesn't want to pick on one gender of the (dummy) audience.
Usually a writer will say, I don't want to ignore females/women by using *he for everyone.*
That's beside the point.
Why does the author say they don't want to tell gentlemen how ignorant they are?
That is what the OP is asking.
 
I thought it was to mix things up.
 
Anonymous
@JimReynolds Explain the joke to him! :-)
 
@Nih You know the Dummies series, I suppose, right?
 
I deleted my answer.
@JimReynolds Yes.
French for Dummies, so on
 
The idea is that they are for novices.
All of them, I think, say something like ... "This isn't really for dummies, of course ... You are very smart to have gotten this book .. .etc, etc."
 
Anonymous
5:51 PM
No, no, don't explain it to us, explain it to Cookie! :-)
 
Oh.
Well, Do you prefer to do it, Nih?
It is a way to mix it up. You are exactly right.
But it's confused the OP.
Haha
Ah, GoDucks did it, and Cookie got it.
@sna I learned something else from that chat of yours now .. .
 
To always be graceful of others?
 
I wondered what the heck was wrong with people here that they didn't seem to know if it was the year of the sheep or of the goat this year.
O.O
 
To know grammar a lot?
 
Mar!
Please go back to your bed under the house.
What I concluded ... somehow! ... from talking to a Taiwanese person or two, was that it was really goat, but recently people wanted to make it "cuter" by using sheep.
Obviously, there being a prejudice there.
 
5:57 PM
@JimReynolds I don't think it's a common thing in the west.
 
Anonymous
You could call it the Year of the Ovicaprid.
 
@JimReynolds Yeah, what year is chemical?
 
Anonymous
Doesn't really roll off the tongue, though, because we typically make that distinction in English, and the hypernym is uncommon and relatively unknown.
 
What's not common in the west? To be Graceful?
 
But isn't this a year of Monkey?
 
5:58 PM
Hypernym!
 
Anonymous
Well, it's not 2015 anymore :-)
 
A supra category?
 
Ahh
 
It's not a new Chinese year yet.
This is still sheep/goat.
 
@DamkerngT. Eh, your Calendar app is old.
 
5:59 PM
I guess y'all are right. :D
 
Anonymous
When is the Chinese New Year?
 
The Persian calendar is old, too, I'd guess.
 
Feb?
 
Early Feb, usually.
 
Anonymous
February 8
 
6:00 PM
@JimReynolds Old is not always crappy.
 
Anonymous
I looked it up!
 
Feb 8
 
Anonymous
Last year it was February 19.
 
Feb 8, dammit
 
Anonymous
Y'all are slow.
 
6:00 PM
Last Western year, or last Chinese year, it was?
O.O
 
Anonymous
Snails are faster than you.
 
It's based on a lunar calendar.
 
Because in Chinese, Adam and Eve are from the moon.
 
robo-slow-mo-mode
 
Squirts oil at Dam.
 
6:01 PM
Thanks!
 
In English, we use the same word for water and hot water. Good illustration, snailb.
 
Anonymous
Thanks! I only know a few things, so I repeat them a lot. That's one of my go-to examples :-)
 
What's an IE language?
Indo ..
That?
Like a family or category of languages, of which English is one?
 
@snailboat Ah, I can recall it now. That show on Discovery Channel is called Time Warp!
 
@JimReynolds Internet Explorer's got its own language.
 
6:09 PM
MAR !!!
 
@JimReynolds I guess it's Indian English.
 
An IE language → Indo-European
IE → Possibly InE
 
nods
 
@JimReynolds WHAT !!!! ???? !?!?
 
Anonymous
Indo-European, yeah.
 
6:10 PM
Context, context, context!
 
Anonymous
By the way, IndE and InE are two commonly used abbreviations for Indian English.
 
Please do not discriminate "I"s. They have all the right to be capitalized. — Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. 6 mins ago
 
I'm reading snailboat's 2nd chat referenced recently
in English Language & Usage, Dec 9 '15 at 0:25, by snailboat
Just like how in Chinese caprids aren't generally distinguished from one another. You can talk about sheep or goats specifically, but people don't. So when you talk about the Year of the Sheep – or is it the Year of the Ram? – in English, things can get confusing :-)
 
@snailboat I guess Jim's IE was used for InE because I've seen it's been used that way several times on ELL.
 
@snailboat I despise 4 letter acronyms, initials, abbreviations (expect prep), or anything like that.
 
6:13 PM
I always feel weird when I hear people call it "Year of Sheep".
(It's always Goat over here.)
 
My IE was Cerebrus's IE
O.O
 
Oh, now I wonder if this saying came from English: Have a goat rammed into a sheep
 
Haha
well, I don't know what that could mean, but it's funny because ram has the double meaning.
 
Anonymous
In Japanese, it's Sheep.
 
Anonymous
Well, to be more precise, it's hitsuji, which means 'sheep'.
 
6:16 PM
Then you also have your RAM, Dam.
 
It's a Thai saying (จับแพะชนแกะ), used for when someone read a little here and a little there and then says something as if they know stuff really well.
 
So, is a sheep more valuable than a goat?
Or could it work just as well the other way?
ram?
 
A valuable is more sheep than goat.
 
Another meaning, which I think is used more recently, is to pick stuff here and stuff there just to get away with the problem at hand.
 
As in forced into?
MAR!!!
 
6:19 PM
@JimReynolds I think both mean something not really substantial, in the metaphor.
 
ج!!!
 
Did your parents have any children who lived?
 
@JimReynolds Who? Me?
I just soaked our TV remote. O_O
 
Yes. That's supposed to be a clever insult, but even I don't know what it could possibly mean.
But do you feel insulted?
 
Yes.
You owe me a grand now.
 
6:20 PM
Dances around the room.
 
@JimReynolds I'm sure Cerberus would use the standard IE.
 
Internet Explorer?
Cerberus. Not Cerebrus.
 
Held Jim. Take Jim to MAR. :D
 
Nooooooo!
He'll kick me.
 
Dissolves Jim in ج
 
6:22 PM
Punch me.
Oh Cerberus and Cerebrus are alternative spellings of the same hound from Hell!
Who knew?
 
Hah!
 
Time to go to bed.
Opens casket.
Night!
Closes casket.
Thud!
 
Good night!
 
6:37 PM
0
A: At what time I should / should I come tomorrow?

Jim Reynolds At what time should I come tomorrow? Is correct. We can also ask: I should come at what time tomorrow? But the first form is the most common. Please see "How it works?" vs. "How does it work?" for more information.

Reopened and answered, if quickly. Someone else can give it a better treatment.
 
Cook it with applesauce.
 
6:49 PM
Hmm... I don't know if StoneyB's bounty will bet a really good result.
> Students were absentminded when thinking about what to do when home from school early.
It sounds just weird to me.
"They're thinking about when home."?!
Some reductions don't sound quite right, I think, even though it should be possible, syntactically.
> You can not say the following:
- Students were absentminded, thinking what to do when get home early.
This is because it is not implied who you are talking about in the second part of the sentence.
Right conclusion, but with the wrong reason, I think.
If only I knew when we can omit it and it still sounds right...
(It's easy to find in grammar books that we can omit "subject + be".)
 
7:27 PM
@DamkerngT., I have just read this question. It's impossible. What do you thbink?
 
@V.V. I'm sorry. What's impossible?
Ah, you mean When not a teacher, he lived a life of a monk, right?
 
To omit a subject in this construction.
 
I think it's technically okay.
(In other words, I think it's an okay sentence, but I don't like it much.)
 
Whenever I doubt anything, I read Swan PEU, he says ellipsis is possible in complex sentences with "and,but,or" in written speech. Coordinate (are they called so?)sentences
 
Oh, you have PEU. Good! -- A moment.
73.4
"Climb when ready."
 
7:38 PM
That's imperative
 
"When ordering, please send $1.50 for postage and packing."
 
Just the same.
 
It doesn't have to be an imperative sentence.
 
Look at the example When.not a teacher...You have different verbs
 
Different verbs from what?
 
7:42 PM
You have a subordinate clause.
 
"He handed them to her through the crack he created when opening the door."
 
Different
 
Enlighten me.
 
I got lost in your examples. We omit words to avoid repetition, right?
 
I don't think it's about avoiding repetition.
But you seem to have some ideas about the construction.
I'm not sure why you think my examples are different.
 
7:47 PM
Then it's your turn to enlighten
 
I've given some examples, which I think are okay. Why would you think it's different (or in other words, my examples don't apply)?
49 mins ago, by Damkerng T.
(It's easy to find in grammar books that we can omit "subject + be".)
The idea of omitting "subject + be" in the reduced when-clause is pretty much it.
But that's only about syntax, imho. Reduced when-clauses don't always sound good (or even sound right).
 
Look at 78.3 third edition
 
Hmm... my edition doesn't have 78.3 (and I thought it was the third ed., but I could be wrong).
What's the title of the sub-entry?
"reduced clauses with when and while", perhaps?
?
(If that's the case, it's 73.4 in my edition.)
 
8:09 PM
in English Language & Usage, 12 mins ago, by Frondor
I consider myself really bad at english, although today I passed with merits my PET exam :D But moments ago I was writting a comment on youtube, and realized that I really suck! So can someone tell me if this paragraph is ok?
in English Language & Usage, 12 mins ago, by Frondor
When I have a child, first thing I'm gonna do is install Need For Speed: Underground 2 on a Pentium 4, so he/she feels the same goosebumps I felt while driving under heavy rains, at the very late night, through the most beautiful city of the virtual worlds. Then, when he/she grows up and listens to this song, he/she shall feel the same nostalgic feeling I feel right now, it's more than beautiful! Thank you EA, Thank you QoTSA! You made my childhood even happier!
Hmm... I don't think it's that bad, and they could even pass FCE.
Then again, PET and FCE are not that different.
1
Q: Is this Liverpool dialect? "I wanna hold your hand"

Go  TyosyuI like this song "I wanna hold your hand" by The Beatles. Paul and John sing the phrase "I wanna hold your hand" as "I wanna hol'-your hand". Other cover singers sing it as "I wanna hol d-your hand" "I wanna hol'-your hand" is Liverpool or England dialect? Please tell me, thank you.

There are 13 "hold you hand"s in the song!
(If I counted them right.)
 
Might be a bit out of place, but I see it too important not to say it here: PLEASE DO NOT SUGGEST TAG WIKI EDITS IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT THE TAG REALLY MEANS AND PLEASE DO NOT PLAGIARIZE TAG WIKIS, ESPECIALLY NOT FROM WIKIPEDIA. Sorry, I'm not usually in all-caps, but bad wikis are really a nuisance. — Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. 43 secs ago
 
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. ♫ You know I love you. I'll always be true. ♫ -- youtube.com/watch?v=cEkMqXOuy3Q
 
@DamkerngT. (づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ
 
8:26 PM
Whoo! The next song is my favorite: I Saw Her Standing There!
 
I rerererererelistened "Radioactive".
@Dam is this sentence grammatical?
in Tavern on the Meta on Meta Stack Exchange Chat, 19 secs ago, by Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.
The only people that have a spare something are ones you don't want to have the spare.
 
A spare something?
I'm afraid it's not.
Hmm... maybe? With an omitted that?
"The only people that have a spare something are (the) ones (that) you don't want to have the spare."
(They are the ones you don't want them to have the spare.)
It sounds like it's missing something to me without any pronoun after want anyway.
Aww... In My Life...
Oh, I don't know if it's because I'm getting older, but the song seems to be more meaningful that I can remember.
 
Something spare would work, I think.
 
8:41 PM
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. I think "something spare" is okay. I just didn't have the context.
 
@DamkerngT. It's spammers.
in Tavern on the Meta on Meta Stack Exchange Chat, 29 mins ago, by Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.
Why are spammers asleep when I'm looking for flags?
in Tavern on the Meta on Meta Stack Exchange Chat, 13 mins ago, by Telkitty the Web Developer
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. how do you know that they are sleeping? maybe their machine broke down or maybe their internet connection was off
in Tavern on the Meta on Meta Stack Exchange Chat, 13 mins ago, by Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.
@TelkittytheWebDeveloper 'cause those never happen.
 
Hehe!
 
in Tavern on the Meta on Meta Stack Exchange Chat, 12 mins ago, by Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.
The only people that have a spare something are ones you don't want to have the spare.
 
Noun: hue ‎(plural hues)
  1. (obsolete) Form; appearance; guise.
  2. The characteristic related to the light frequency that appears in the color, for instance red, yellow, green, cyan, blue or magenta.
  3. (figuratively) A character; aspect.
  4. hue ‎(plural hues)
  5. hue c (singular definite huen, plural indefinite huer)
(5 more not shown…)
Adverb: hue
  1. today
Verb: hue ‎(imperative hu, infinitive at hue, present tense huer, past tense huede, past participle har huet)
  1. in?(transitive) To please
  2. hue
Interjection: hue!
  1. yah!, cry to make (a) working animal(s) etc. advance or turn right
  2. hue
does the audio recording use [hj] or [ç]?
 
It's also an y helicopter.
 
8:45 PM
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. *a y helicopter
 
@Nihilist_Frost I only hear a sneeze. O_O
@Nihilist_Frost I pronounced that as a vowel.
 
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. the Y letter is pronounced /waɪ/
 
Actually, my speakers are set for a low volume and I can't turn them up right now.
@Nihilist_Frost Didn't pronounce it that way. (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
 
[ç] is voiceless alveolar affricate, right?
 
@DamkerngT. *voiceless palatal fricative
 
8:49 PM
Oh, it's voiceless palatal fricative!
 
@DamkerngT. the voiceless blahblahblah
 
I misread.
 
What would [h] be?
 
@DamkerngT. voiceless glottal [something]. the [something] is disputed.
 
@DamkerngT. A helicopter landing sign improperly capitalized.
 
8:50 PM
@Nihilist_Frost Thanks!
 
The voiceless glottal fricative, sometimes called voiceless glottal transition, and sometimes called the aspirate, is a type of sound used in some spoken languages that patterns like a fricative or approximant consonant phonologically, but often lacks the usual phonetic characteristics of a consonant. The symbol in the International Phonetic Alphabet that represents this sound is ⟨h⟩, and the equivalent X-SAMPA symbol is h. Although [h] has been described as a voiceless vowel, because in many languages it lacks the place and manner of articulation of a prototypical consonant, it also lacks the...
 
My ear says it sounds like a [ç].
Let's see if I can tell the difference in spectrograms.
Confirmed. It's much closer to [ç]. I think it's a [ç].
 
what about this:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/huge?s=t
I don't hear enough trace of a /j/.
maybe [ç] too?
and this?

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/human
 
Yes, I think it's possibly a [ç], too.
I think /j/ is definitely there.
 

« first day (206 days earlier)      last day (3036 days later) »