Doesn't seem like that fits very well with DSO's advantages
DSO and TIB are cool because they require very little server load to run, and they're fast since you don't have all the overhead of network stuff, sandboxing, etc.
@AShelly Nice to see some of the early users returning! I'd suggest that, instead of requiring ['G', 'O', 'B'], you just allow [0, 1, 2] or something, as integers generally result in simpler bots. Is the KOTH only Python, or language agnostic?
@taRadvylfsriksushilani Ngl, I knew I had some very inefficient answers, but it wasn't until I saw your nomination for Off the Charts that I realised how many:P
@cairdcoinheringaahing I can certainly change the return type. I'm not expecting people to golf the answers, so I figured it didn't matter much, and made the score string correspond to Green Orange Black. Which brings me to one of my meta questions: How closely can I reference Wordle without running into IP issues?
The challenge should be language agnostic, the framework runs a user provided script. Although maybe I'd specify that it's an easilly installable language.
@AShelly Game mechanics are not copyrightable (in the US, anyway), though it's possible they could be patented. The name Wordle is probably trademarked, and I'm not sure about the legality of using it without permission (regardless of whether other challenges have done the same).
IANAL, but I'd say the safest option is to keep the mechanics, avoid referencing Wordle by name, and say your question is "based on a certain very popular word game."
@mathcat From skimming that article, it looks like "Because a court decided in 1800-something that a bookkeeping technique wasn't copyrightable, and the same principle was generalized and codified as law in 1973."
@mathcat From skimming the article: if you can prove that your stuff is sufficiently next-level (read: new ideas not thought of by anyone else before), you can apply for a patent on it and have patent protection for 20 years if successful.
so I was working on PXLCODE and encountered a problem, and successfully came up with and implemented a very clever solution. Immidiately afterwards I realised that there was a much simpler way to do it and that's what I should've done. This is why Intelligence and Wisdom are two seperate stats in DND.
Yep, they had 10s of thousands of rep, but now they mostly post things as CW answers to protest how easy it is to get rep with FGITW/clickbait and stuff
@thejonymyster basically, ais dislikes the fact that, as you get more rep, SE pushes you to do more on the site/in the community (e.g. moderation, reviewing etc.). He deleted his account a few years back, but still has a couple of sock accounts to post impressive answers or to chat
@thejonymyster Depends on how your interpreter works, but generally you're going to make it so that the main Code box is contained in a multiline string, and that string is what gets passed to the interpreter. For example (see the last link)