@pxeger yeah... I mean, people who know about the Sandbox and know to go there first probably bothered to familiarize themselves with our site scope a bit and understand what's on-topic; only people who don't really read any of the help text we try to shove in people's face would skip sandbox and post off-topic stuff / unspecified challenges to main directly :P
it's unfortunate but we can only shove so much stuff in new users' faces, we just have to hope they read it
idea: add something to our site's CSS that completely breaks it unless you install the SE Software Abuse Userscript™ which will unbreak the CSS and, at the same time, fix all the deficiencies in the help center and stuff that cause users to post inappropriately
Person A: Good morning. Person B: Good morning. Person C: Good morning. Person D: You all sound like robots, try spicing it up a bit. Person E: MORNING MOTHERF*****S
Redwolf: Good morning.
Lyxal: Good morning.
Razetime: Good morning.
caird: You all sound like robots, try spicing it up a bit.
user: MORNING MOTHERF*****S
There have been some major changes to the close reason UI since this request was created - as such, I'd love it if y'all would take a look at this guide on MSE and revamp the close reason more completely to take advantage of the new fields. Once that's done, re-tag this as status-review and I'll edit it for y'all :) cc @hyper-neutrino — Catija ♦49 mins ago
I like this
Might even be worth having an entirely new meta discussion about revamping the close reasons
I forgot to untag that myself actually :P I went over that request with Catija the other day and she pointed me to that as well as a private post on formatting close reason requests (since there are five fields to edit per close reason which can get confusing for us).
Hey there @Rainbolt! Your old meta post is once again getting attention :D
I wish I had time to golf these days but I just work all the time now
I did send some high school students this way. Not sure if they got involved. They compete in programming challenges for school, so this would be a good fit for them.
Are those programming challenges like ICPC / USACO (if you're in the US) -style competitive programming or like for-fun challenges like the ones we have?
Is it a valid Parker Square
5 Years ago, this happend, and then it became sort of a meme.
Challenge
The Challenge today is, to check if a "magic square" is a valid parker square.
What is a valid parker square?
It must be a \$3\times3\$ "magic square"
There must be numbers that appear twice in th...
I used to do that style of competitive programming a bit in high school but I was never really good at it. Got into the national competition kind of out of luck TBH and did absolutely garbage there xD
@user Yes I would. Specifically, when faced with a medium sized problem and I have to decide how much time do I spend Googling the solution versus just programming it myself, I feel like I have more options available to me because I spent a lot of time solving medium sized problems.
@Rainbolt Thanks, that's helpful. Someone told me those sorts of problems don't come up in real life, so I was wondering whether to continue participating in ACSL and stuff
UTF-8 is nice, because it uses single bytes so you don't have to worry about endianness and ASCII is nice and compact. UTF-32 is nice because everything is the same length. UTF-16 is like AES-192...it's just pointless.
@hyper-neutrino I think you mean 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
UTF-1 is a method of transforming ISO 10646/Unicode into a stream of bytes. Its design does not provide self-synchronization, which makes searching for substrings and error recovery difficult. It reuses the ASCII printing characters for multi-byte encodings, making it unsuited for some uses (for instance Unix filenames cannot contain the byte value used for forward slash). UTF-1 is also slow to encode or decode due to its use of division and multiplication by a number which is not a power of 2. Due to these issues, it did not gain acceptance and was quickly replaced by UTF-8.
== Design ==
Similar...
Print this matrix without embedding its values directly in the program:
1 8 9 16
2 7 10 15
3 6 11 14
4 5 12 13
Exact format does not matter as long as there is 4 lines and a separator between values.
Print this matrix:
1 8 9 16
2 7 10 15
3 6 11 14
4 5 12 13
Exact format does not matter as long as each row is printed on a separate line and there is a separator between values.
I have a question about the binary ordering to ternary ordering question - given that the symbols are 0, 1, and 2, surely mapping a binary int to a ternary int is good?
I started one code golf challenge recently and it seems like the winner is GolfScript (surprise, surprise!). What's interesting is that there was another very strong competitor that had all chances to win over GolfScript. Its name is APL. I see a lot of answers written in APL here. It seems like ...
Also, the entire FAQ could do with some cleaning up tbh. I'm updating the main index page atm, but faq posts should 1) be CW and 2) have [Return to FAQ index](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1280) at the bottom of each
watched / ignored tags breaking is really annoying for me :/ i watch all the bug/FR and status-review/planned/deferred tags and ignore the status-everything else tags to help me only see what's relevant and now everything's just the same :c
Unrelated, but here's another bad pickup line I found: Hey, are you my appendix? I don't know what you do or how you work but I feel like I should take you out.
@user It's that language I made. Remember that one? Where you can just mash together a bunch of tokens and it's valid syntax, and also the one which we argued over whether it's Turing-complete
the main point in allowing typically banned input methods is because we don't want to restrict languages from participating. input methods like these are usually banned to prevent exploiting certain mechanisms around it, which a language that can't even take input is highly unlikely to really be able to do
@Bubbler Can you attach a debugger to an interpreter running server-side, and then use that to only execute one thing at a time?
Using jdb or something for the JVM would allow people to run a bunch of languages with JVM backends, even if performance would take a hit because of the debugger