« first day (3751 days earlier)      last day (1078 days later) » 

8:00 PM
Decimary sounds kinda nice
I like Decimal more though
 
For what its worth if etymology dictates pronunciation (it doesn't) decimal should be pronounced with a hard c.
 
Deck 'im, Earl
 
(and the i should be pronounced as /i/)
 
Base 7 wouldn't actually be totally unusable, interestingly
 
@WheatWizard Sorry, I don't speak IPA. Is that "eye" or "ee"?
 
8:02 PM
IMO base 7 would be a good choice since divisibility by 7 rules would become much easier.
 
0.11111... is 1 / 6, so 0.33333... should be 1 / 2 I think
 
@user "ee"
 
@WheatWizard But then we wouldn't have those nice repeating fractions
Day Keem Earl
 
They're extra nice in base 6
.0505050505...
 
Day Key Mull
 
8:04 PM
Probably wouldn't be day-key-mull, that's two syllables with stressed vowels
It'd probably become either day-kih-mull or deh-key-mull
 
in base 3600, we can just represent things as 2 base 60 digits
[0-9a-yA-Y] should work
 
Oh your <e> is probably not right either it should be /ɛ/, like the ea in head.
 
@StackMeter If only there was a counting system that did that automatically :p
 
@RedwolfPrograms I was mostly just going for a funny way to pronounce it
 
/dɛkimal/
 
8:05 PM
so 1/2 is 0. t0
 
Decky-mull?
 
1/3 is 0. j0
1/5 is 0. b0
 
@StackMeter Bases higher than 60 are useless for humans
 
@user mall more than mull.
 
Base 6 has all of the same advantages as 3600 and more
 
8:06 PM
Also idk if the l is velarized, or not.
 
@RedwolfPrograms 1/5 would like to: know your location
 
There are some open questions as to exactly when /l/ is velarized in Latin.
 
@StackMeter .111... is perfectly acceptable, and base 30 or 60 is fine otherwise
 
@WheatWizard I believe there is a millennium prize for solving this one.
 
Plus your system with two characters is the exact same as base 60 I think
Bases higher than 60 are unreasonable, and higher than 128 are ridiculous IMO
 
8:08 PM
base 64: am I a joke to you
 
Not really for everyday human use though :p
For computers higher bases can make sense, and efficient has a totally different meaning
 
right but at least a couple of people in this discussion seem to be either partially or entirely robot, isn't that right mr. json reader?
:P
 
@hyper-neutrino For a second there I was afraid you'd caught on to me. Phew!
 
I actually kinda like base 60 in 6 bits, with the other four being ignored. Sorta like BCD.
It'd be good for floating point.
Much more efficient than actual BCD, too
 
8:11 PM
Base 100 is easy for humans to use.
 
@RedwolfPrograms 1/4? 1/10? 1/15? 1/12?
 
@WheatWizard Only if you relied on prior knowledge of base 10
 
Yeah, but it's a counter example to bases over 60 being impractical.
Since base 100 is super easy to use.
 
@StackMeter 1/4 and 1/12 are easy, 1/10 and 1/15 are two repeating digits
 
you're completely forgetting the fact that 3 is a prime factor, and thus, many more common fractions have a non-repeating representation
 
8:13 PM
base 10^n should be fairly easy to use overall
 
@StackMeter No I'm not
That's one of the main advantages of base 6
 
To convert a number to base 100 just count the number of digits. If it's odd add a zero to the front. 105 -> 0105, 2345 -> 2345.
 
rip - I meant 2, 3 and 5
 
5 isn't that important, we just made it important
I'd rather have non-repeating thirds than fifths
 
5 is the smallest prime number not divisible by 3.
 
8:14 PM
?
 
uh
am I missing something, or is that not 2
 
2s not a number.
 
Plus isn't there only one prime number divisible by 3
 
2 and 1 may be prime but they are not numbers so they are not prime numbers.
 
8:15 PM
wdym
2 exists
5 exists
in fact 5 % 3 == 2
 
I can't tell if WW has gone mad, or is talking about some complicated math
 
2 exists, but its not a number.
 
Could entirely be either :P
 
@WheatWizard ok you're gonna have to elaborate
 
8:16 PM
Both I think
 
i cannot tell if you are joking or are just 3 parallel universes ahead of all of us
 
If you have 2 of something that is just a pair. You have to have 3 before you can count them.
5
 
It's the first one
 
t h a t ' s n o t m a t h
 
@hyper-neutrino Ww'S nOt JoKiNg, ThEy'Re Ww
 
8:17 PM
oh haven't you heard? all three mods elected last september merged into a hivemind, so in fact, we are joking /s
 
@WheatWizard lol
 
You can't do math without first laying the philosophical grounds for it.
 
@hyper-neutrino Ah, a challenger to the Redwolf hivemind, good :P
 
give me a sec gotta find this video
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing It's just a sect of the Unified Hivemind
 
8:18 PM
@WheatWizard This currently has 2 stars. Does that mean it has a pair of stars?
 
Of course.
 
Because that's a very odd way of thinking about it :P
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing hilarious and original
 
I mean just try to count 2 things. You can say negative one, zero, one, two, but you are just saying things, you already know how much there are since you can see.
 
8:19 PM
I can't
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing are you serious
 
You need at least 3 of it before you can need to count it.
 
Well now there's 3 stars
 
i hate that this is slowly making more and more sense. can't believe I am being convinced that 2 is not a number
5
 
The frick's a 2
You mean a pair?
It goes 1 to 3
 
8:20 PM
no
 
no i don't mean a pear, i mean an APL
 
2 = 1 + 1
 
I think you mean 1 + 1 = a pair
 
math is defined on such
 
2 is just that weird symbol below @
You sometimes use it in numbers like 12
 
8:22 PM
That's a dozen
 
below @
you mean below F2
 
Below the Fpair key, but on the same key it's under @
At least on my keyboard
 
for me 3# is directly below F2
 
what's an Fpair
 
To break from the joke for a second, this is based on the fact that the ancient Greeks didn't consider 1 a prime number because they didn't consider 1 to be a number at all.
 
8:24 PM
we do F2 here
 
what's dozen x dozen again, a gross?
 
yes
144
 
new challenge idea from this
 
I have one too lol
 
8:25 PM
CMC: Given an integer input, return True/False if it's a number or not
 
VTC as unclear, what is a number
 
? Isn't that just _ => true?
 
haskell 5 bytes: (==3).
 
No, as 2 isn't a number
 
wait
what's 4 then
@cairdcoinheringaahing is 12 a number, and is 144 a number?
 
8:26 PM
An oumber
 
@hyper-neutrino 3 is a triple, so it's not a number either
 
and are there any other non-numbers
 
5 is a pumber, 6 is a qumber
 
@hyper-neutrino Only if WW says they are :P
 
7, 8, and 9 are rumber, sumber, and tumber
 
8:27 PM
@hyper-neutrino 4 is a pair of pairs, so that isn't a number
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing print(type(int(a)) = int)
 
lambda x:stack_exchange.get_user("Wheat Wizard").ask(f"Is {x} a number?")=="yes"
import stack_exchange
 
does this mean 4 is prime?
 
no
4 = 2 * 2
 
8:28 PM
@StackMeter but 2 doesn't count
 
yes it does
 
2 is a letter I guess
 
hey, just because it's not a number doesn't mean it isn't a factor
 
@hyper-neutrino ^
 
@hyper-neutrino You can golf the question to f"{x}isnum?" :P
 
8:29 PM
@user I'm not familiar with the Wheat Wizard API
 
The Redwolf API is just var RedwolfPrograms = (d)=>`${d} is bad, but at least it's better than SQL`
Golfable to RedwolfPrograms=d=>d+" is bad, but at least it's better than SQL"
 
@hyper-neutrino The newest site in the network: WheatWizard.SE, where you can ask anything and get an answer from the one and only WW :P
 
> SQL is bad, but at least it's better than SQL
 
And, questions are on topic there as well
 
which is true
 
8:31 PM
I hope someone else asks a question sometime.
 
> Redwolf is bad, but at least it's better than SQL
 
> SQL is bad, but at least it's better than SQL
 
VTC as dupe :p
 
No SQL is SQL, SQL isn't bad
 
@WheatWizard It's something I've been looking at doing, but I'm not familiar with axiomatic proofs enough to make one that's actually challenging
 
8:32 PM
@WheatWizard logical contradiction, VTC, flagged
 
bad is bad, better than SQL is better than SQL, get it right
 
Currently, that area of math/logic is just a general interest of mine, but I hope to expand it more at uni
 
i'm not familiar with axiom based proofs really, all of the proofs i've done so far have had a lot more theorems involved in the proofs rather than just being based on a few fundamental axioms
 
> Arbitrarily rating things in comparison to things that aren't at all similar is bad, but at least it's better than SQL
 
CMQ: do you prefer SQL or PREQL
 
8:34 PM
The trick is to find a fun little logic system.
 
wait preql actually exists
not too surprising but bruh
 
@hyper-neutrino I prefer OTQL
 
Disney ruined SQL IMO
 
The dialogue in PREQL is so clunky, and the writing in SQL is just awful :P
 
Even the literal intepretation of that is true
 
8:35 PM
"Somehow, INNER JOIN returned" is just bad writing :P
 
Hm, would a lambda calculus based proof be potentially interesting? like given the two (three?) of application and abstraction (and what else), prove that one expression is equivalent to another
sounds like it has potential but i suck at lambda calculus despite having to use it in a uni course
 
I'm not sure.
 
@hyper-neutrino What was that challenge idea you had? I got one too from that conversation and I don't want to post a dupe
 
in any case, proof-golf looks cool, but i'd leave that to someone who actually knows what they're doing, lol
 
The thing about LC is that there are only two rules so the best path is usually pretty straight forward.
 
8:37 PM
@RedwolfPrograms given two symbols representing conventional "numbers" and an operator, write the expression out but fix any bad references to numbers
2 * 6 => a pair of 6s = a dozen
3 + 12 => 3 and a dozen = 15
 
Okay good, mine's mostly unrelated
 
prove the collatz conjecture (+100 rep for doing it)
 
This one was SKI combinator calculus in disguise:
38
Q: (A → B) → (¬B → ¬A)

Wheat WizardWell I think it is about time we have another proof-golf question. This time we are going to prove the well known logical truth \$(A \rightarrow B) \rightarrow (\neg B \rightarrow \neg A)\$ To do this we will use Łukasiewicz's third Axiom Schema, an incredibly elegant set of three axioms that ...

 
oh I remember reading something about SKI being isomorphic to some logic system on the wiki page
when i was trying to learn how to use flurry so i could answer hello world since bubbler mentioned a lack of a flurry answer :P
 
Yeah SKI can be thought of as an intuitionistic logic.
 
8:40 PM
though i suppose (~a => ~b) => (b => a) isn't exactly I
is it?
 
Part of my laptop charger looks like a crewmate and now I've caught amogus.
 
No it's not representable as a normal combinator.
 
i can see how S is definitely a=>(b=>c) => (a=>b)=>(a=>c) and K is definitely a=>(b=>a)
ah okay
 
SK is intuitionistic meaning that it can't prove ~~b => b, which is what our third law allows.
 
Ah. alright, I see (i'll probably need to go read some more about intuitionistic logic sometime)
 
8:43 PM
@rak1507 make it 10000
 
nah
 
the person who does deserves it
 
They also deserve (and get) $1m :P
 
100 rep > $1m
 
@rak1507 wanna trade?
 
8:50 PM
what, I give you 100 rep and you give me $1m? sure :P
 
no I don't want to disadvantage you
 
the problem with being faster than light is that you live in darkness; that is to say, with New Posts and being able to see and delete posts so fast, they don't get sent to the review queue so I don't get the task completion
 
I could bribe people to give me 1k rep with like, a tenth of the money
 
I think I know what answer you mean :P
 
just promise them it back in upvotes
 
8:52 PM
It means I got another helpful flag tho, so that's fun :D
 
@rak1507 I want 20k rep for £1M
 
i still only have 46 helpful flags total even with my auto-validating flags, lol.
 
ngn
it's rumoured that SE rep is produced out of thin air, not backed by anything, and is controlled by a cabal of websites
 
what if we used SE rep as a new cryptocurrency
 
8:54 PM
SE rep is actually the newest cryptocurrency; asking and answering questions is just a form of mining crypto
._.
 
hah
 
Did...did I just...outgolf like 20 people in JS with recursion?
 
*i n J S *
 
Can't even post it rn because school ends in 3 minutes :|
 
wait why can't you post it then lol
 
8:56 PM
Have to change the output format first but I need to go to the bus
 
ah. F
in the meantime i will ninja you. even though i don't know what challenge you're referring to. also i don't know js.
 
I'm winning by 7 bytes rn, but the new format will probably add 3 or 4
 
@hyper-neutrino why tho
 
Input and output formats ruin good answers so often :(
I had to add 4 bytes, and ruin a nice dyadic chaining answer here, because the programs had to handle both uppercase and lowercase :/
 
9:01 PM
@StackMeter funny
 
@hyper-neutrino That'd actually be pretty nice
I could maybe buy myself some chocolate
 
1
Q: Tag Proposal: [asymmetric]

BeefsterI've cooked up a few king-of-the-hill challenges, mostly in the sandbox, and a few of them are asymmetric in nature. They're not really cops-and-robbers because it's not really about cracking a code, nor is it a meta-challenge that you might expect from the more common idea of Cops and Robbers (n...

 
if rep on SE became worth any material value i suspect voting irregularities would become a much larger problem and sites like SO would get like double the mod work
just got caird's 30m old answer in the new posts. lmao
it frequently does some interesting things. overall really nice tho so still +1
 
Which is why every question on MM saying "Can we allow people to buy reputation?" or "Can we spend reputation to buy things at the SE store?" are heavily downvoted
 
wait there are actual questions for that? lol.
 
9:14 PM
-87
Q: Is there a way to buy SO reputation?

vikas devdeIs there a feature by which we can buy reputation on SO (e.g 100 rep for $1)?, or a bot by which we can hack and increase our reputation?

 
buying rep is a totally nonsense idea. spending rep for IRL things would probably not totally break all of SE but if you could buy rep for money then uh
 
It's tagged with lol :P
 
I believe there was one where someone suggested offering people money for answering questions
@cairdcoinheringaahing Why is that even a tag?
 
Yeah, that happens from time to time
 
imagine if bots could spend a small amount of money to buy, say, 14 reputation, to get to 15 reputation, which is the reputation requirement for flagging posts
you know how spammers can post spam and that's about all they do?
imagine spammers but with the ability to redflag posts
 
9:15 PM
Spammers with access to site analytics (with enough money)
 
Time to create a spambot which just flags its own posts :P
@user Or VTDs
 
no but like buying 10k rep for VTDing would probably be quite expensive but just imagine
with 6 spam accounts and a bit of money to buy 84 reputation across them
 
@hyper-neutrino You just need to buy it once, then sell the information to other people
 
you can now instantly nuke any post you want
@user ?
oh
 
If it was 1rep = $1, then you could spend $60k and run the site
 
9:16 PM
you mean view deleted posts not voting
but the thing is now these 6 accounts can go around and instantly delete 10 posts per day
 
lol I spent an hour figuring out why my logs weren't showing up, then realized I never actually called the method to log them
 
3 20k+ users with aligned intensions are basically only stoppable by mods
 
or if you buy enough rep to get assoc, 10 per site per day (i think that's how it works?)
sure, mods can undo all of this
 
Nah, make it so you can buy a mod diamond :P
 
but it would be a massive hassle and a lot of users would lose reputation or get autoblocked which would be a total pain for mods
@cairdcoinheringaahing so if you have enough money you can just do whatever you want and abuse power? what is this, real-life politics?
 
9:19 PM
Or, have each mod election have a "raffle" diamond up for grabs. 1 ticket = $1 :P
 
Time to make a reality show about this /s
 
If sandbox.stackexchange.com was a site, I'd support this happening there :P
 
i'm going to have nightmares about this tonight
 
Let's turn Codidact Meta into such a site!
I'm sure they'd be very pleased if we replaced rep with money there
 
Speaking of Codidact, new(ish) challenge of mine :P
 
9:26 PM
is there a %2 builtin in jelly?
yes, there is Ḃ
 
So, suppose I have a friend with a hypothetical finger with which I could press a hypothetical mouse with which I could click a hypothetical upvote button and make a hypothetical person happy, would you be willing to utilize my friend's hypothetical finger in exchange for some hypothetical green sheets of cotton?
 
Personally, I prefer orange and purple sheets of plastic, but yes :P
 
(these hypothetical green sheets should have a hypothetical picture of a hypothetical person hypothetically named Ben Franklin)
Along with a number that is a power of 10
 
hypothetically, I suppose?
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing Great! If you hypothetically send me the money, I'll hypothetically tell my friend to do the thing
@hyper-neutrino Of course, of course (psst! You want in on this?)
 
9:30 PM
now, hypothetically, for the sake of argument, if you hypothetically traded these hypothetical upvotes for hypothetical sheets of cotton, suppose I hypothetically had a button that hypothetically disables a hypothetical user account for a year, hypothetically (/s)
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing did I have the same sol as you?
 
@hyper-neutrino Ah, but this hypothetical stuff would hypothetically be on another site, hypothetically
@cairdcoinheringaahing Is this a reference I should get?
 
@user Maybe, if you've ever been to the UK :P
 
plastic money is cool
 
I have been to the UK and I don't get it
 
9:33 PM
Our money is plastic and green, orange and purple (depending on the denomination)
 
oh
 
thing that's annoying is when people fold it
because it's hard to fold but if someone really tries now you can't unfold it that well
also if you drop it it goes flying like 100 miles away magically
 
@cairdcoinheringaahing Oh
 
But you can leave it in your pockets when you wash your trousers and then still have money afterwards :P
 
You can do that here too, as long as you insure your money :P
 
9:36 PM
@cairdcoinheringaahing wash your trousers with money -> problem solved
 
0
A: Sandbox for Proposed Challenges

BeefsterAre You My Mother? (very WIP) king-of-the-hill (coincidentally, thought up around mother's day) Oh no! All the newly-hatched ducklings have been mixed together, and they all look the same! The ducklings want to reunite with their own mother. But the mothers are also selfish and want as many duck...

 
@cairdcoinheringaahing what was your jelly solution
 
@rak1507 For what?
 
your codidact challenge
 
Exactly the same as your posted one
 
9:46 PM
:D
I wish Ƭ was µƬ, it seems like that would be a much more common use
 
Cotton money is water resistant too
I've washed dollar bills several times
 
I just thought of a half decent idea for a code-trolling question.
 
only several years too late
@user103648 do you not have a hobby or something?
 
lol
Don't respond to them, though, it'll probably just encourage them
 
Act really grateful and appreciative :p
@user103648 Thanks, I'm testing the sockets and needed some help!
Well, I've tried all the options I have access to. Looks like my last resort is, checks menu, "add as room owner"
 
9:53 PM
volunteers
 
@RedwolfPrograms And say what? "@user103648, love that profile picture! Rocking that haircut!"
@Wezl Get in line, buddy
Can you ROs make me a room owner if I get my account suspended?
 
any reason you're asking that now?
"can you put this on my grave"
 
10:06 PM
Just wrote two prime related answers, one of which is sexy
That is a sentence that you will only see on code golf
 
Not necessarily. You can write it on a poster and stand outside telling everyone about it :P
 
@user I can, but I don't know about ROs.
just tested in the Sandbox
 
ngn
10:31 PM
is the field GF(p)[i] algebraically closed?
i.e. complex ints mod p (like gaussian integers but using modular arithmetic)
"algebraically closed" means every polynomial with coefficients from that field has roots in that field
 
I'm going to have to doubt that one.
It's too late for me to think. I'll want to think about this in the morning though.
 
ngn
there's no rush
it's just a cunning idea for solving some PE problems more efficiently. who knows if it will work..
 
@user Hypothetically, if I clicked an upvote button on a hypothetical user's answer, what are the hypothetical odds that that user would hypothetically do the same on one of my answers? :P
Just hypothetical of course :P
 
10:57 PM
@ngn a smart person says 'No. For example, you don't have n-th root of unity for big n.'
 
ngn
that's a pity
 
@ngn Definitely not. The algebraic closure of GF(p) is infinite, for instance, while GF(p)[i] is finite. For some primes (p=5, for example), GF(p)[i]=GF(p), since there already is a square root of -1 mod p.
 
ngn
and here it says that the algebraic closure of GF(p) is the infinite union of all GF(p^n)
 
SE is asking whether I'm a bot. Google has been too...
 
maybe you've been infected by the hivemind
have you been pasting answers from TIO/your editor and submitting them too fast? or is this something else
 
11:06 PM
um, I did reload and repaste into the editor because preview wasn't working
 
hi
 
hello there
 
@lyxal you took less than two seconds to type that message, you must be a bot
 
general kenobi
 
ninjad
 
11:12 PM
According to my reputation page, I have "earned at least 200 reputation on 39 days". However, my progress tracker for Epic (earn 200 reputation on 50 days) is at 48/50 :P
 
0
A: Sandbox for Proposed Challenges

WezlReveal by Quarters (in need of a better name) array-manipulation code-golf Inspired by this: http://nolandc.com/smalljs/mouse_reveal/ (source). A valid answer: Takes a number \$w\$ and a coordinate pair \$(x, y)\$. Outputs a two-dimensional integer array with a width and height of \$2^w\$. This ...

 
11:52 PM
@cairdcoinheringaahing Hypothetically, that hypothetical user would hypothetically go and upvote all of your posts
This is a limited time offer, hypothetically
:P
 
okay ben shapiro
 

« first day (3751 days earlier)      last day (1078 days later) »