« first day (2269 days earlier)      last day (2869 days later) » 

00:06
@Downgoat Looks good
@Downgoat Why is the font of the stories monospace in the 'discover stories' section but serif in the full page?
@TuxCopter oh, sorry typo broke HTML try now
it's not truncating the text properly rn still though
@Downgoat I would prefer to not use that font
I strongly dislike it
Serif fonts are bad on screen
Try using Roboto, I know it's unconventional but it looks good
00:19
@Downgoat Yeah, the font you use looks too 'thin' too
@Mendeleev 0/10 you guys need to get hidpi displays
but isn't hidpi only on apple devices and v
@Downgoat yeah sure, just give me $1800 to replace my three screens with 5K monitors
@TuxCopter no.
you can get windows laptops and desktop compute rmonitors with high dpi
I'm planning on getting an XPS 15
can you guys try again and see if it looks right
no
looks wrong
00:24
Still looks weird
pls send screenshots
Oh my
> to make an executable research paper
10/10
Argh, does LLVM IR really have no line continuation character?
How am I supposed to emit pretty assembly???
@TuxCopter @Mendeleev does it look better now?
00:53
YES
:D ok that is good
Actually, all of them are short enough. The limit's 30000 or so IIRC (it maybe be closer to 65000)
user165474
Well I mean, it wouldn't be appreciated. :P
Most answers are short enough, but they contain unprintables.
They just don't want to use all that much space :P
user165474
Yes :P I feel like it would take a lot of scrolling :P
01:07
The JS one would be quite a bit shorter if it used unprintables, I'm sure
I could include a hexdump of my better answer, but then the permalink wouldn't fit.
user165474
I might try making a shorter answer but I feel like it will still turn out longer than all of the other ones :P
user165474
@Dennis Wait actually...>_> wow
user165474
You could just make a Gist and link to a TIO?
@Dennis is your bubblegum answer just compressed version of string?
01:13
All Bubblegum answers are.
@Dennis well, not all
Someone give me 3 sets of two random tags so I can practice the challenge contest thingy. I'll give myself 2 hours.
(or I may give up in a few minutes)
@Mendeleev Fair enough. :P
Anonymous
01:23
ok, one more set, someone else
printable-ascii grid
kolmogorov-complexity fibonacci
fractal audio
I made a Ruby script to generate them
Anonymous
Random.org is your friend :)
Oh I didn't realize he meant literally random
My bad
combinatorics stack
code-generation date (?)
sorting interpreter (?)
Right, I realized after I asked I could have randomized these myself but oh well
01:24
Here's a set of 250:
geometry game
compression graphical-output or image-processing
polyglot chess
graph-theory stack
internet compression
audio decision-problem
regular-expression random
balanced-string chess
fibonacci probability-theory
base-conversion geometry
geometry ascii-art
interpreter (?) binary
cryptography (?) palindrome
matrix graph-theory
string parsing (?)
combinatorics restricted-source
geometry polyglot
code-generation binary
fibonacci file-system
date (?) binary
path-finding (?) game
decision-problem restricted-source
uhh
thats ok
@Dennis can't you just submit a DEFLATE stream or whatever now that non-programming languages are allowed to be used?
I'll choose from busy-beaver/sequence, graph-theory/restricted-source, printable-ascii/grid
@Downgoat That's a Bubblegum program!
01:25
I know, but there is no need for "bubblegum wrapper" anymore
@Downgoat lol @ "bubblegum wrapper"
There's a list of tags to choose from, you know :P
@Downgoat Bubblegum is a normal language when the hash is a certain value
01:26
>_< pun not intended
@HelkaHomba Mine was not random
@HelkaHomba well yeah, so it would be a valid programming language but that doesn't need to be the case anymore
@quartata oh, and busy-beaver is not even on the list
but meh
01:34
I'm trying to write a JSFiddle to do this, but for some reason the HTML section is not recognizing a function from the JS section
@Downgoat since when?
8
Q: Do submissions have to be answered with a programming language?

Nathan MerrillWe've got various answers strewn across meta that tell different stories: On the standard loopholes, we disallow answers that aren't programming languages. This appears to be the most definitive answer of the lot. It has a vote count of 16/-8. However, on a question that asks "Should answers ...

@Downgoat oic
Imo it's pretty bad idea but GIF answers amirte?
Anonymous
01:40
It's a terrible idea
Anonymous
And Nathan's answer has so many strawman arguments you'd think it was a cornfield
> Disallowing non-programming languages is like disallowing arbitrary classes of languages.
what how
if they are not a language, excluding them is not excluding a language
Anonymous
Exactly
Anonymous
I gave up on arguing about that answer long ago, because Nathan and I were constantly talking crossways and making no progress
> As long as they produce the right output with given input, they are fine.
That's basically how I see it
01:43
I would totally tell someone writing HTML they are not programming.
Anonymous
@ETHproductions If you reduce it down to that rule, MetaGolfScript is allowed.
Anonymous
@feersum That, and I'd ask why they're not using a designer.
@Mego That's a separate loophole...
Anonymous
You wouldn't say that a person making brushstrokes on a canvas is programming
Each MetaGolfScript is still technically a programming language anyway
Anonymous
01:46
@ETHproductions You can't both have that loophole and say "As long as they produce the right output with given input, they are fine." They're incompatible statements. Either there must be more rules to prevent MetaGolfScript, or MetaGolfScript is acceptable.
Anonymous
Same with "Programming Language Created To Solve This Challenge" (PLCTSTC for short)
I'm sorry, I had assumed loopholes override other consensus-es (consensi?). If that's not the case then "If it's actually a valid programming language and it can answer, then it's allowed to answer" also allows MetaGolfScript.
Anonymous
@ETHproductions Well "no non-programming languages" is a loophole.
That's why we need the list Martin talked about on meta. As far as I'm concerned, we have Peter's only these programming languages are allowed at +63, so as long as Nathan's use whatever you want doesn't come anywhere near that, the former takes precedence.
@Mego Oh, OK. If I combine them into one loophole ("If the answer creates the right output with the given input, and doesn't contain data in the name of the language, it can answer.") does that fix it?
Anonymous
01:52
@Dennis That's my reasoning also.
@Dennis Hmm, where's Peter's answer on this subject?
63
A: What are programming languages?

Peter TaylorMy previous answer was criticised for not drawing a line in a sand, so following some discussion on chat I propose a line. Executive Summary A purported programming language should be accepted as such if and only if it is capable of addition of natural numbers and primality testing of natural n...

Anonymous
And even if the community consensus is that non-programming languages are allowed by default, I'll disallow them in every challenge I write.
Anonymous
@ETHproductions No, because not only is that unclear, it also doesn't come close to solving the problems at hand.
Yes, it would take a full-blown answer to make it perfectly clear...
Anonymous
01:55
We don't have a well-defined method for overriding previous consensuses, which is proving to be a problem
Yep
I do see the logic in preferring Peter's answer though, without an overriding system set up
Anonymous
But trying to deal with the intricacies of politics makes this site very unfun. It would be a lot nicer if people would just follow the spirit of the site without needing lines drawn in the sand.
I'm betting PPCG rules boil down to Godel's incompleteness theorem. Deep down we'll never know if they're consistent :P
Anonymous
@HelkaHomba But then we'd have to prove it... :P
@Dennis I would say they're different. Peters is the consensus for what a programming lang is. Nathan's is watery you need to answer in one
01:58
@HelkaHomba I'm betting our rules are complete, i.e. contradictory
@Downgoat watery?
Anonymous
Knowing us, we'd manage to be both incomplete and inconsistent
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but if this comes down to "if it's in the spirit of PPCG" then Bubblegum almost certainly falls on the same side of the line as "non-programming languages".
@Downgoat The question begins with Often, answers to questions asking for "programs" or talking about "programming languages".
Wow the first 6 messages on the star board all have 3 stars
Anonymous
02:00
@ETHproductions Yeah I'm not a big fan of Bubblegum. I choose to believe that Bubblegum was an example of how we'll always have languages that skirt the line of acceptability, and people took off with it and started using it seriously. I prefer that version of events to whatever the actual history is :P
@ETHproductions I'd agree with that. Simple answer is to not upvote or even downvote them
No matter how we lay the rules there will always be things that are technically legal, but not in the spirit of PPCG
@Mego Bubblegum was meant as a critique to both our definition of programming languages and KC challenges that cannot be efficiently solved by a clever method.
Note that it almost never wins, but it provides some sort of measuring stick for different approaches.
Anonymous
Yeah, I'm also not a fan of those KC challenges. I'm glad we have the consensus that they should be closed as dupes. I'm extra glad that I have a hammer to make that happen.
@HelkaHomba That's similar to what I was just thinking. We could stress less about the technicalities and just downvote things that aren't in the spirit of PPCG
02:04
0
Q: Make a string from a string!

haykamInstructions Your goal is to write code that makes a "string" from a string in the least amount of bytes possible, as per the rules of code-golf. Standard loophole rules apply. To make a string, you have to assume the string contains only alphabetical characters and basic punctuation such as th...

@Mego Ok, I had the seed of an idea going with these involving the 4-color theorem and 4 character classes (lowercase, upper, symbol, digit) for rectangular programs but now I'm getting distracted and hungry so I give up.
Anonymous
@HelkaHomba That would be a neat idea
Anonymous
And you've also made me hungry
@NewMainPosts I swear there was a Calvin's Hobbies challenge almost exactly like this one
Anonymous
I don't get to hammer it because I added the code golf tag :(
02:10
I could hammer it, but it's not an exact dupe for sure
You comment-ninja'd me there though
Anonymous
Mine was auto-generated
Anonymous
The only real difference is the lines, which isn't enough for me to not consider it a dupe
And the fact that you have to ignore non-letters, and ignore case
Anonymous
Ignoring case is as simple as converting everything to upper- or lowercase
Anonymous
And stripping non-letters is also simple
02:30
@Mego 'make your program an eulerian cycle'
For the Grapher, you can now return a matrix of either x,y or x,y,z for an input of a and ab respectively.
lol
StackExchange eats the * symbol from links.
Anonymous
Why aren't you escaping * in links?
02:33
Javascript's encodeURI function doesn't implicitly do it.
Because it's perfectly valid to have a * in a link.
Anonymous
Well, I found your problem
And StackExchange will try to onebox a link containing a *.
Then it eats it.
@ATaco How to a-ta.co/graph/y=x^2 ?
f(x)=x^2
y=x isn't supported.
a-ta.co/graph/f(x)=x%5E2 -> "Could not load function: /f(x)=x^2"
02:40
Just use the grapher.
It makes building the graphs easier.
Question: does left or right look better?
If you go in one do you come out the other?
But left
Anonymous
There's even cake
Left
@Mego what about the odd cake
02:44
this was a triumph
have I got a little story for you
Anonymous
proper story's supposed to start at the beginning
@Mego now you've lost me
@HelkaHomba ^
Anonymous
It's a different game
02:51
I hope someone got my pj reference
Anonymous
Of course :)
@Downgoat depends on the other
@Riker the other?
@Mego that game was hte best game ever
@Downgoat sorry, qwertial aphasia
*background
@HelkaHomba from bastion iirc
Anonymous
Yep, Bastion was fantastic
02:53
@Riker How does one go from "other" to "background"
@Downgoat update chatexchange source python
@Downgoat qwertial = keyboard, aphasia = loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage.
@quartata can I like give you ssh access to tf2 server folder and you can ssh
Why?
02:58
@Downgoat ^
Just clone the repo and copy chatexchange/ to tf/addons/source-python/Python3 @Downgoat
@Mendeleev nsfw much?
@Mego I kinda like transistor better
ok made minor changes, does still look alright on your display?
user165474
@Mendeleev NSFW, don't say stuff like that again.
03:13
sorry
for(let i=0; i<users.length; i++){
users[i].reputation += 10e5;
user165474
@Dobby Remove backticks
Ah no
I couldn't add the closing brace
And you typed!
Again :-
user165474
HEHE >:-)
03:21
The entire thing can be one line for all it matters.
No wait! Please
Again :-
It's too late, you're not getting this back.
hey no
Just a minute
user165474
for(let i=0;i<users.length;i++)users[i].reputation+=10e5;
user165474
@Dobby 0/10 ungolfed code
03:23
What's even the point of said code?
user165474
for (let i = 0; i < users.length; i++) {
    users[i].reputation += 10e5;
}
user165474
@Pavel Adds one hundred thousand to each user's reputation
for(let i=0; i<stackexchange.rooms[240].users.length; i++) stackexchange.rooms[240].users[i].reputation += 10e5
Ah, finished
What are you trying to achieve? There's no context, it's just a splat of code that doesn't actually do anything interesting.
user165474
For one thing, what language is this even meant to be?
03:26
I think it's JS?
It certainly is
user165474
let k;for(let i=0;i<(k=stackexchange.rooms[240].users).length;i++)k[i].reputation+=10e5
user165474
0/10 ungolfed code
user165474
Does let exist in JS?
Mate. let k,i;for(i=0 ...
03:27
It does in es6
Actually IDK if ^^ works in JS
And it's lexically scoped
user165474
let k=stackexchange.rooms[240].users,i=k.length;while(--i)k[i].reputation+=10e5
@Pavel I think it will work since assignment returns the assigned value.
But I am not sure
Nor willing to try
user165474
Let works tested in chrome
user165474
03:29
Though you could just use var since we know that works >_>
var looks ugly, though
user165474
:P
anybody here used maya?
@DobbyTheFree-Elf @HyperNeutrino damnit you guys look exactly the same to me
@Pavel isn't helped but he's actually distinguishable
let k,i=(k=stackexchange.rooms[240].users).length;while(--i)k[i].reputation+=10e5
@Downgoat hmm
a more yellow background might look nice
03:32
That is not shorter, darn.
to kinda evoke that old aged book feel
@Riker instead of blue/orange?
it's blue now isn't it?
@Riker Autodesk Maya?
the white background is lightly blue tinted
@DobbyTheFree-Elf yea
03:33
@Riker I have no idea what that's saying.
user165474
@Riker Well too bad :P Our names look different though
your avatar is very similar to dobby's and hyper's
@HyperNeutrino that assumes I can read those
@Riker I haven't
hm, okay
03:33
@Pavel your avatar is similar to their two, but it's a bit yellower
@Downgoat the background right now is white
Nah. It's close, but it's clearly distinct at a glance.
it would look nicer if it's a slightly warmer white, maybe a vanilla
@Riker oh, of the book
I see will try
not that no
@Downgoat the page background
left side of image >_> it's pure white atm, I'm saying tint it yellow
and maybe use the orange icon at the top instead of the blue one then
oooohhhh
@Riker even backgronud behind text?
03:36
yea
uh-huh
John Doe owns a store?
@Downgoat "stories" implies "books" to me
what it looks like right now is more evocative of scifi futuristic clean white holoboards or something like that (idk what I just said but you get hte picture)
Perhaps he rents his name to programmers for testing
their programs
@DobbyTheFree-Elf vihan.org/p/stories/story.html#3 is what I'm referring to btw
@Riker how does this look?
03:39
great
testing the orange icon locally 1 sec
why do windows keep telling me that my Outlook account settings are out of date?
I never used Outlook
it's all MS's mind tricks to try to get you to use outlook
Ah nice
Story
@TuxCopter email app on my phone does the same thing
I only use the gmail app, never stock email :p
user165474
@Riker lol wait can you read them?
03:42
not without glasses
I had to click on your profiles to figure out hte diff
user165474
@Downgoat yeah, I like the yellow background with the orange book a lot
user165474
@Riker Oh. i see.
10/10 font and spacing though
user165474
@HyperNeutrino When you have the CaretReply userscript and you type 20 carets >_>
03:43
@HyperNeutrino puts on glasses oh I thought you were dobby >_> I'm not even joking
Yay, My Userscripts!
kek
Also ^*20
user165474
@ATaco I was too lazy to count so I kept typing carets and looking at the chat preview until it was the right message. but yes i remember the shortcut
user165474
OOH IDEA
user165474
03:44
^*0 Will this work?
user165474
lol
user165474
@HyperNeutrino *-1 I am sad
Nice.
user165474
@Riker I can hardly distinguish you and Taco without my glasses >_> I can't read any messages either
How to enter spioiler here?
03:45
lol
@HyperNeutrino I can read messages not easily, but it's definitely not that hard
@DobbyTheFree-Elf you can't in chat :/
> Solution: don't do that.
@ATaco nope, doesn't work
03:46
@DobbyTheFree-Elf you can't put spoilers in chat messages
on main, it's >! spoiler text here
but in chat it's not possible
>! this is what happens
@Riker I did some tweaks to the color, does it look better or should I revert?
what'd you change?
font looks a bit greyer but that might be my eyes
looks great atm though, I think it's perfect
@Riker is that bad? I added a transparency so the font will have a slight brown tinge
oh, that's what that was
no, I thinkit's great
03:48
really evokes "old aged book" to me
:D
Also super easy on eyes because orange tinge :D
<div>Dobby's Spoiler goes here</div><style>div{opacity:0;transition:opacity 1s linear}div:hover{opacity:1}</style>
That does not work too
Not that I expected it to
Anonymous
@Riker I liked them both about equally. Both had very good stories, gameplay, and music.
yea
the music was like the best part
@Downgoat yes

« first day (2269 days earlier)      last day (2869 days later) »