I typically delete only a few messages at a time. There is a mod-tool for deleting a batch of messages, which Alex used. I would've moved them instead to avoid the big ol' eyesore.
Theoretical question: If instead of doing OEIS queries, the language had a giant database of sequences built in...? That doesn't sound that much different than having, say, a fib() function.
Still shady to me, but it's getting harder to argue against it.
And now, for quartata's pessimistic thought of the day.
You know, something I worry about is that eventually if we run out of easy and interesting challenge ideas we'll discourage new users from participating and the site will go stagnant.
We get a lot of new users from easy code golfs and hard code challenges/pop cons, but I don't see much participation from new users in hard code golfs.
And while I feel like this is true for a lot of SE sites (it's kinda already happened to SO), I worry that it might happen faster to us.
Geobits' optimistic thought of the day: I'm pretty sure people have been thinking this since the start of the site, and we haven't run out of challenges yet that bring people in. In fact, it's likely we gain more new users/day than a few years ago.
I decided to go back and actually do a full test of the map I published yesterday (I tested all of the jumps individually, as well as the first third or so straight through, but this is the first time I decided to test the whole thing in one go).
@AlexA. Yeah me too. Code golf just doesn't have the appeal to me that some other challenges do. I think I just like challenges that are more substantial (i.e. the work is in actually figuring out how to do the thing, not golfing the thing down)
This site may have been built primarily on code-golf challenges and puzzles that have no winning criteria, but we have evolved away from that. Our name is outdated, and we should rebrand ourselves.
Because the folks in the chat cannot seem to agree on a name, I'm going to post multiple answers a...
@Geobits I was 12, but through some shenanigans with my parents creating my account on my behalf and supervising it or whatever, it didn't violate COPPA
@Calvin'sHobbies Any string at all can be a variable name in SAS if you turn on extended names. But in that case you have to reference the names like N"What ever 434%$#".
That is definitely not appropriate for an edit. The rejection reason "This edit was intended to address the author of the post and makes no sense as an edit. It should have been written as a comment or an answer." is exactly right here.
Say there's a challenge with two inputs. Can we submit a function signature like this?
a=>b=>...
Instead of
(a,b)=>...
The function then becomes callable as f(a)(b) instead of f(a,b), if we provide example usage. Is this considered acceptable, or should it be added to "standard loopholes"?
@Dennis Granted, there's no actual consensus on whether they are or not. As long as there's an objective winning criterion, they wouldn't (or at least shouldn't) be closed as off topic.
But a better example of what I mean is, say you had the program - that takes the difference between two inputs. With current rules it technically encodes two programs, a-b if the argument order is a,b and b-a if the argument order is b,a (or in addition, in e.g. Jelly, 0 if there's only a single argument)
So in a way you have 3 programs in the space of one by changing how input is given
So I add a print-debug line to find out why, and it doesn't print. Oh, ok, it must not be flushing stdout. googles... Ok, so now it should flush. Nope! Still not printing!
print(bucket_id, flush=True)
for _ in xrange(self.batch_size):
encoder_input, decoder_input = random.choice(data[bucket_id])