« first day (1661 days earlier)      last day (3478 days later) » 
00:00 - 09:0009:00 - 23:0023:00 - 00:00

ETHproductions
ETHproductions
23:01
I wouldn't be surprised if this challenge doesn't fall below 300 hotness points, or second on the PPCG active question list, for at least another 24 hours. xD
Alex A.
Alex A.
Yeah, people have posted other stuff but I don't think anyone's paying attention.
ETHproductions
ETHproductions
Since I'm pretty much useless with this challenge, I think I'll go back to working on my language.
Martin Büttner
Martin Büttner
@Sp3000 implement a primality tester?
Sp3000
Sp3000
Do I have to? :P
ETHproductions
ETHproductions
Oh darn, just now it fell to 285 points. Guess I was wrong.
Martin Büttner
Martin Büttner
23:04
let me check the language again
ETHproductions
ETHproductions
I bet it'll stay on top, though.
Martin Büttner
Martin Büttner
@Sp3000 it looks TC to me
Sp3000
Sp3000
I think so too, but I guess I might as well try to be sure
Dennis
Dennis
The suspense isn't killing me at all.
Martin Büttner
Martin Büttner
@Sp3000 I feel like "[].""()c"er would be a valid BF-without-input to X conversion
Sp3000
Sp3000
23:08
My problem is whether or not this is your intended language - if it isn't, then I'd rather not mention it :P
You'd have to replace + and - with +1 and -1 too
Martin Büttner
Martin Büttner
if it is, Dennis should be able to tell from my last message
@Sp3000 ah yes, of course
Dennis
Dennis
For your own, personal reasons, that are entirely unrelated to the fact that you want to use or have used it yourself?
Martin Büttner
Martin Büttner
rather because it's gonna replace GolfScript as the "most used unintentional crack" once it's out there :P
Sp3000
Sp3000
^^ that
Dennis
Dennis
@MartinBüttner Doesn't ring a bell. But to be fair, I don't even know which of my answers you're talking about.
Martin Büttner
Martin Büttner
23:13
@Sp3000 if it's still uncracked on day 7, I'd probably use it
Dennis
Dennis
@Sp3000 Then it's not what I had in mind. None of the languages I chose should be usable for unintentional cracks.
To be clear, you're talking about the 21 byte answer?
trichoplax
trichoplax
But might an unintentional crack language also happen to crack yours unintentionally?
Sp3000
Sp3000
Yeah the 21 byte
Dennis
Dennis
What if somebody guesses a language I cannot verify? Somebody just guessed SPSS on my answer, and I think it could be valid.
Not sure if there's a freely available SPSS interpreter though.
Alex A.
Alex A.
PSPP
It's a GNU implementation of SPSS, unsure whether it's fully featured compared to SPSS
Basics should probably work fine.
Martin Büttner
Martin Büttner
23:20
I have clicked through all the BF-derivates and BF-equivalents on esolangs now... I still have no clue what SuperJedi224's answer is...
Dennis
Dennis
@AlexA. Oh, that's only 6.4 MiB. Nice.
Alex A.
Alex A.
Ugh, god help me, I'm using vim.
Doorknob
Doorknob
Don't you mean "it feels so amazing to use this wonderful editor"?
Alex A.
Alex A.
Uh... nope.
Doorknob
Doorknob
:(
Alex A.
Alex A.
23:29
It's not bad. It feels neutral.
It feels so neutral to use this neutral editor.
Dennis
Dennis
@MartinBüttner You won't have to. Seems like it's valid SPSS.
Sp3000
Sp3000
I almost have this primality tester working :P (it's a lot easier to use than BF)
Alex A.
Alex A.
Hooray, I finally came up with one.
@Dennis What was your non-SPSS answer supposed to be if not SPSS?
Martin Büttner
Martin Büttner
@AlexA. ugh that looks so familiar, but I've seen so many languages today that I don't remember where I saw something like that
Dennis
Dennis
It does look familiar.
Alex A.
Alex A.
23:36
Just forget about it... for like 7 days. No big deal. :P
Dennis
Dennis
@AlexA. I might reuse it so I don't want to tell right now.
Martin Büttner
Martin Büttner
The [...]$ also reminds me of Peter's answer.
Alex A.
Alex A.
@Dennis Okay :)
00:00 - 09:0009:00 - 23:0023:00 - 00:00

« first day (1661 days earlier)      last day (3478 days later) »