I wouldn't be surprised if this challenge doesn't fall below 300 hotness points, or second on the PPCG active question list, for at least another 24 hours. xD

Yeah, people have posted other stuff but I don't think anyone's paying attention.

Since I'm pretty much useless with this challenge, I think I'll go back to working on my language.

@Sp3000 implement a primality tester?

Do I have to? :P

Oh darn, just now it fell to 285 points. Guess I was wrong.

let me check the language again

I bet it'll stay on top, though.

@Sp3000 it looks TC to me

I think so too, but I guess I might as well try to be sure

The suspense isn't killing me at all.

@Sp3000 I feel like "[].""()c"er would be a valid BF-without-input to X conversion

My problem is whether or not this is your intended language - if it isn't, then I'd rather not mention it :P

You'd have to replace + and - with +1 and -1 too

if it is, Dennis should be able to tell from my last message

@Sp3000 ah yes, of course

For your own, personal reasons, that are entirely unrelated to the fact that you want to use or have used it yourself?

rather because it's gonna replace GolfScript as the "most used unintentional crack" once it's out there :P

^^ that

@MartinBüttner Doesn't ring a bell. But to be fair, I don't even know which of my answers you're talking about.

@Sp3000 if it's still uncracked on day 7, I'd probably use it

@Sp3000 Then it's not what I had in mind. None of the languages I chose should be usable for unintentional cracks.

To be clear, you're talking about the 21 byte answer?

But might an unintentional crack language also happen to crack yours unintentionally?

Yeah the 21 byte

What if somebody guesses a language I cannot verify? Somebody just guessed SPSS on my answer, and I think it could be valid.

Not sure if there's a freely available SPSS interpreter though.

PSPP

It's a GNU implementation of SPSS, unsure whether it's fully featured compared to SPSS

Basics should probably work fine.

I have clicked through all the BF-derivates and BF-equivalents on esolangs now... I still have no clue what SuperJedi224's answer is...

@AlexA. Oh, that's only 6.4 MiB. Nice.

Ugh, god help me, I'm using vim.

Don't you mean "it feels so amazing to use this wonderful editor"?

Uh... nope.

:(

It's not bad. It feels neutral.

It feels so neutral to use this neutral editor.

@MartinBüttner You won't have to. Seems like it's valid SPSS.

I almost have this primality tester working :P (it's a lot easier to use than BF)

Hooray, I finally came up with one.

@Dennis What was your non-SPSS answer supposed to be if not SPSS?

@AlexA. ugh that looks so familiar, but I've seen so many languages today that I don't remember where I saw something like that

It does look familiar.

Just forget about it... for like 7 days. No big deal. :P

@AlexA. I might reuse it so I don't want to tell right now.

The [...]$ also reminds me of Peter's answer.

@Dennis Okay :)