Changing your username to fit a username-dependent challenge
Changing your username or registering a new one to make your score better in username-dependent challenges.
Changing your username to fit a username dependent challenge
Changing your username or registering a new one to make your score better in username or userID dependent challenges.
No, quines are not played-out
I believe there will always be new ways of formulating good challenges, and some of those yet to be made good challenges will involve quines. Saying "we've asked every quine problem there could ever be" is like saying we've thought of every math problem there could ...
The problem is the lack of reflexion behind questions. Those type of challenge aren't hard to write, but people underestimate how hard it is to write a good and original one.
and they often are interesting, just new users don't have the context to know that many others found them interesting in the past and posted lots of similar things
also, the "X without Y" thing often fails with esoteric languages that a user who thinks in terms of c/python/java wouldn't anticipate
in that esoteric languages would not have used Y anyway
or it doesn't make sense to define Y for that language
Unrelated, but sometimes I wish the Unscramble the Code challenge was still going. It'd be interesting to give puzzles which test how well you know the syntax of a language...
Write a program that takes one integer input n and one format letter and outputs n autograms in the format This sentence contains ? "A"s, ? "B"s ... and ? "Z"s.
Each question mark ? represents the number of times the the following letter appears in the text
The integer (let's call it n) is used...
I promise, this will be my last challenge about diamong tilings (for a while, anyway). On the bright side, this challenge doesn't have anything to do with ASCII art, and is not a code golf either, so this is actually completely different.
So just as a reminder, every hexagon can be titled with t...
hm, test cases for Boggle Board Compression ... what do people think about just having N-2 strings from length 3 to N, and the test cases are then just all prefixes of that (i.e. just the first string, just the first two strings, just the first three strings, etc. up to all N-2 strings).
Given an mxm chess board, find a minimum number of pieces of the given kind and place them on a chess board in such a way that all squares are either occupied or attacked by at least one piece.
Input
The input consists of two parameters: m, the number of squares on each side; and a letter which...
Sure, but that depends on finding sequences that are a) interesting b) conceptually simple and c) haven't been studied thoroughly yet. I think the diamond tilings was a really lucky find. I don't expect to find more of these easily.
So basically, you dirige 6 cells, which can : Clone,Move,attack,explode. Each of them can have 1 (special case of 2) capacity between : Eat,Fire,Thunder,Merge,Heal. It's about guiding and expending/merging your cells to fight your opponent
Each cells have stats that are set by the player at start, and change with merging/eat
@trichoplax I agree with that point, that's why i'm scared it's a lot more to complicated
@Katenkyo I think so too. It also means that early answers can focus on a specific capacity and give it to all their cells, which allows simple strategies early on
@Katenkyo Good point. If you want it to be clear that a strategy doesn't need to use everything mentioned in the question, you can include a simple example answer that only uses one or two features, then people can work to beat that
@PhiNotPi does it maybe need some definition of how input/output can be encoded for the proof of Turing completeness, since actual I/O should not be considered?
For example, instead of writing a program that takes a number as input and outputs whether or not it is prime, like $input=<>; primeTestHere you could simply write a new program for each number you wanted to test, like $input=2; primeTestHere then $input=3; primeTestHere then $input=4; primeTestHere etc.
@Katenkyo Am I right in thinking that if you start with 4 cells, each will have a certain capacity which cannot be changed, and all the descendents of a given cell will have the same capacity as it?
but "When proving Turing-completeness, you may assume that input is hardcoded into the program, and output can be read off the program's internal state." might be sufficient
@trichoplax A bot means an answers. A bot will control all of its cells each turn (there's an extra parameter for each cell that you can use like you want, it could be easier to remind the role of each cells, and act accordingly)
That sounds good. So the example answers could each focus on just one capacity, and then people who add later answers can start to combine different capacities that support each other and build up more complex strategies