I started it off, although it's really easy to crack I thinl

If you crack an answer, you get a few upvotes and $10000 prize money for solving the problem :P

How did you...

Shitty wifi

Didn't even notice it double posted :/

hacker

Trivia: If you can crack Baillie-PSW, you're cracking Maple, Mathematica, PARI/GP, SageMath, Maxima, Magma, Java, Perl, and Sympy all at once :P

And Vyxal I think

checks code

Time to use # in Jelly and Wilson's theorem to crack it :P

> What do you have to say to kill someone with a single word in D&D?

Yep

sympy.ntheory.isprime(n)

Insert meme of Dicaprio pointing to something

(I added that and promptly broke Vyxal's isprime)

nice job tidying up tho

@NewPosts We've talked about how difficult Jelly is to get started with, so I've added an explanation to my cop answer to help robbers :)

> Given how difficult Jelly can be to understand, I've provided an explanation to help the Robbers

this smells of trickery

My explanation actually is valid

@totallyhuman You know enough Jelly to know that the explanation is 100% legit :P

2-years-ago-me maybe :P

ok so this explanation looks valid but like

thonk

thonk indeed

is a string of length 1 considered truthy, falsy, or undefined?

You got cracked

welp

that was quick

doesn't this fail on every odd-length string that is valid if you remove the last character?

not even my intended crack :P

your intended crack is probably something silly involving string delimiters

behold: 3 answers all cracking mine :P

lol

fails on ““

i'm not even gonna bother posting :p

@cairdcoinheringaahing Please fix it, so I can post an intended crack (presumably) :P

the uneval-pop-dequeue thing was just too cursed

actually should i post my solution too? different than all the others

ohh i hate how many challenges i need to have open for this

No, once cracked, there's nothing to crack

just waiting for arnauld to post some super cursed weird js behavior that literally nobody will be able to figure out

@totallyhuman ^^

I feel like mine's so obvious, and I'm very surprised no one's cracked it yet.

just now looking at the c&r and i want to say i've probably got a good few of my own old answers i could leverage but i feel like i'm maybe a bit too on top of explaining why certain things won't work

i wasn't considering attempting it but now that there's an explanation i'll give it a shot

@Ausername your solution doesn't even look remotely valid

It uses some tricks

and it is valid for all but one input.

are you sure? ^v makes it fail

00:20:55, 00:21:17 and 00:22:15 for the Jelly cracks :P

@hyper-neutrino Shouldn't that be 0

no

Hold on checkign

if you upvote and then downvote a post, it ends up downvoted

> ^v -> -1

Oops

I thought they cancelled out

@NewPosts ಠ_ಠ I'm trying to think of all the cursed Jelly behaviour I;ve found over the years

Unfortunately, I've shared too much of that behaviour with hyper and unrelated :/

@Ausername your program should at least pass the test cases in the question itself ಠ_ಠ

don't worry we forgot probably

I can't even remember how half of the intended behavior works

@hyper-neutrino My intended crack was empty string

ok the robbers' thread is officially a mess lol

lol

calling it now

wait no never mind ignore me

ok but poor jonathan allan tho, getting ninja'd on both of caird's posts

f

it's gonna take some time for a good cop i think

anything submitted rn will be trivial

I'm trying to find a weird bug in Jelly that also fits with an existing challenge :/

vyxal flags are weird

are these essentially just stuff that's already in the operators?

Not necessarily

That one means "take input as strings"

vyxal's flags largely fall into four categories IMO

1. I/O formatting ones that just extract the "last link -> Y" footer that jelly has, either to bypass unnecessary strict I/O or whatever, like j

2. things that modify the entire behavior to essentially be a vyxal fork that behaves a bit differently, like r

3. things that are just postprocessing that really should be operators in the code, like s (or S, I forget which is the sum flag)

4. whatever the fuck H is /s

100 on the stack

used for cheesing fizzbuzz

and not much else

except I never use H for my fizzbuzz

Then its a complete waste

i know what H does

the only times I've used H is for printing a 10x10 grid and printing the numbers 1 to 100 in a restricted source challenge

and i also know that lyxal didn't even use it during fizzbuzz, and before you mention it again, yes, i know vyxal beats jelly for fizzbuzz flagless, but it's still a weird flag lmao

I’ve used H flag in at least 3 programs completely unrelated to fizzbuzz or restricted source

uh huh

interesting

but there's constants for fizz and buzz

if that's the only reason it beats jelly then it's kinda lame imo

(nvm i see the comments now)

17 bytes

₁ƛ₍₃₅`₴ḟ₴ḣ`½*∑∴;⁋

no built in fizz and buzz

no flags

Sandbox posts last active a week ago: Transdeletion, Will the hydra finally die? Part II

still beats jelly

how useful are %3==0 and %5==0 in general?

quite

they also have overloads for strings that are a bit more useful

vyxal's compression is better for a lot of things and FizzBuzz is one example

vyxal has `₴ḟ₴ḣ` and jelly has “¤alE°»

like the string overload for ₅ is based on a common pattern in the 05AB1E corpus

ah

yeah i've always felt that vyxal is significantly strong than jelly on string challenges but weaker on array-manipulation math challenges

IASN (Ash's prototype improved string compression) was turing complete

lol what

I'm slightly improving it for use in a new golfing language, not sure whether to waste a bit or two to make it TC just for the lols

do it and then just golf in (whatever language) string decompressor :P

sort of like how i think you can write in C/C++ preprocessor

I was actually thinking about that, yeah

just publish it as an independent language

then you have "evaluate as iasn" literals in the other language

Maybe instead of a language where you use " to start a string, it's a language where everything's the string except what's in " :p

@cairdcoinheringaahing chances are I probably would

Posted another Jelly cop for y'all :P

... is this supposed to be easy :p

that taxi cop is safe for free lol

anyway i'll leave this for someone else

@hyper-neutrino Are you sure it's that easy? :P

pretty sure

again, your program should pass the test cases in the question itself :p

CMQ: Four to eight most useful string operators?

(Specifically, those that take at least one string as input and return a string)

@hyper-neutrino it does

... am i dumb? the last case literally fails

that nilad isn't 127

@hyper-neutrino but it has the ⁷ :P

@RedwolfPrograms yuno’s “square a string” thingamajig :p

see i cannot tell if you are being sarcastic or not (well until the last message :p)

That's a 100% genuine ;# interpreter

yuno's ""square a string" thingamajig :P": Try it online!

That is a very specific operator :p

i couldn't think of a better string overload :p

Vyxal

's ² op

erator

and before after anyone mentions vyxal's convert string into a square built-in, i am planning on implementing that for lists

on strings

@hyper-neutrino Too late

@RedwolfPrograms Try it Online!

Posted a JS cop

The challenge says 'no input' tho

Doesn't matter anyway, it just got cracked with an edge case I wasn't aware of

Edge case?

An unintended crack due to an oversight by me, I mean

oh

Can I edit in my intended solution in spoiler tags, since it's cracked?

I think that's a normal thing to do if you don't intend to post a "redo" cop

Found a bug in spoiler tags! >:|

Any of these?

mornin

'night :P

nooo don't go