« first day (1906 days earlier)      last day (2929 days later) » 

5:04 PM
is the leaper challenge too far removed from chess to use the chess tag?
 
@MartinBüttner I thought we already had a challenge about leapers?
 
just, "given a leaper, print an ASCII art representation of where it can go"
 
(-‸ლ) ... user can't understand why email address orders@ can't be used exclusively for their 12-person branch office (out of a 4500-user company)
 
@quartata That's... odd logic. Don't we hundreds of questions about numbers? :P
 
Well I don't know what this precise challenge is but I remember this:
12
Q: Fairy chess "leaper" movement patterns

PhiNotPiA leaper is a category of fairy chess piece which moves by "jumping." A normal knight is a (1,2)-leaper, meaning each move involves moving a distance of 1 square in an orthogonal direction and 2 squares in the perpendicular direction. .o.o. o...o ..N.. o...o .o.o. There are many different lea...

Whoa, lots of close votes in the review queue.
Ah, it's an underhanded purge
 
5:06 PM
3
A: Sandbox for Proposed Challenges

Martin BüttnerSeeking Leapers code-golfgridgraphs I recently got a really weird irregular chess board. It's squares are all over the place and not even all connected. At least they're still laid out on a regular grid. I want to adapt the chess rules to be able to play on the board, but to start with, I need ...

 
@quartata The purge is underhanded, or is being purged?
 
@TimmyD The latter :P
 
@Sp3000 Cool! I started making a regex lang a while ago, then I saw retina and gave up :P
I'm thinking of rebooting it
 
@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ knowing you it'll probably be based on JS's regex flavour? if so, don't bother :P
(disclaimer: I hate the ECMAScript regex flavour)
 
Ah. Why?
And only loosely :P
 
5:08 PM
it's extremely limited
 
The only thing ECMAScript has going for it is (?R), really
 
uh, what?
since when is that?
 
... that's PCRE isn't it
 
I get the two mixed up :/
nvm nothing going for it!
 
5:09 PM
lel
R`<()>_`
E
That's balanced parens
 
that looks a bit like Lua's flavour, and I think that kind of balancing syntax is fairly limited
 
@MartinBüttner Interesting
Did you actually get a chess board like that? :P
 
the only thing the ES flavour has going for it is [] and [^] (where the former is only useful in golfing and the latter is only necessary because it doesn't even have a bloody s modifier)
@quartata plot twist: I didn't
the challenge was inspired by this mathematica post: mathematica.stackexchange.com/q/112745/2305
(which I didn't link to because it would be a bit misleading for this challenge)
 
brb restarting cpu
 
@MartinBüttner Ooh, I see.
 
5:11 PM
quartata now hates me Q_Q_____
This means the entire community has made up a plan against me ಥ_ಥ
 
so chess tag or not :D
 
Might as well, for searching
 
I mean, if I were to write a leaper challenge and wanted to know what existed already...
(Of course, a fairy-chess tag would be better, but that's probably going too far)
 
Would everything tagged chess also be tagged board-game and game?
 
5:13 PM
nope
this is not a game
 
^
if it's about actual chess rules or something related directly to the game, I'd use the tag even if it wasn't about playing the game
 
alright, I can die happy now that I've been caret'd by a mod :D
 
@MartinBüttner Yeah, definitely chess tag.
 
but this is really just taking a single concept from chess out of context
 
I know, but it's thematically related. I think that warrants it.
 
5:14 PM
you know, if I were to redesign webscripting, I'd totally make it so that webpages had their own "assembly" language that you could compile to
 
yeah it doesnt really have to do with chess other than the idea of pieces moving on a board
 
@NathanMerrill asm.js
 
that doesn't count. the base language is still js
everything just compiles to JS
 
the world is js -- accept it
 
which is much too high level language
 
5:16 PM
JS is written in C# right?
Or some C deriv
"C(.*)"
 
@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ ummm
 
depends on who's implementing JS
 
@MartinBüttner ?
oh
meh
 
Unless your browser runs on .NET, that seems unlikely (and even then...)
 
5:18 PM
@poi830 We have a tag IIRC, and most of the challenges are just about the relating equations
 
1
Q: Seeking Leapers

Martin BüttnerI recently got a really weird irregular chess board. It's squares are all over the place and not even all connected. At least they're still laid out on a regular grid. I want to adapt the chess rules to be able to play on the board, but to start with, I need a piece that can actually go anywhere ...

 
I don't think that we should be "minimalist" with tags on challenges
 
neither should we be maximalists :)
 
use ALL the tags!
 
I have no idea how to tag things, I only ever retag basic stuff because I'm too likely to make a mistake with anything fancier than or :P
 
5:20 PM
heh
 
but if 1 tag is a strict subset of another tag, then I'd argue it is a synonym
 
@NathanMerrill let's make everything a synonym of then ;)
 
:P
 
they aren't tag subsets
 
5:21 PM
surely things like "number", "arithmetic", "number-theory", "graphs", "primes" etc are
 
sure, they're conceptual subsets, but not tag subsets
 
they could be... I'd usually apply as many reasonably applicable tags as possible prioritising the more specific ones when I run out of slots
so if a challenge is about maths and there aren't a lot of good tags for it, then is fine, although I'd omit it when all of [number], [sequence], [number-theory] and [primes] are applicable (even though [math] would still apply)
 
but if you don't have a fourth tag (like, no others apply), should one keep it on?
 
so simply says "there's math in this problem"?
isn't that a bit too broad for a tag?
 
possibly
 
5:24 PM
CAUTION! THIS PROBLEM HAS MATH! BEWARE!
 
it's just an example though, there will always be some hierarchical tags
 
I guess technically, is a child of , but since we disallow both tags, there isn't a problem
the challenge has nothing to do with math (in the specification)
 
yeah that could do with better tags
 
It should probably be tagged string, at least...
 
I was gonna say ascii-art
hm, we don't have a topology tag
 
5:27 PM
aren't ascii-art challenges about generating ascii-art?
 
I also use them for if the input is an ASCII art representation
 
hmmm, I'll edit the tag then
 
My challenge is a good example of math unrelated to most other tags.
 
[geometry] might be a good idea for that as well, as long as we don't have [topology]
 
because it says: This challenge involves creating pictures using text characters as the paint
 
5:28 PM
@MartinBüttner Really?
 
@NathanMerrill then maybe that should be fixed :P
 
I said I'd edit it :)
its in the queue
 
oh I overlooked that message
@NathanMerrill approved
 
oooh, this is a good subset question
isn't every kolmogorov-complexity question an ascii-art question?
 
I wouldn't say Fizz Buzz is ASCII-art...
 
5:31 PM
Plenty are just about text, like the Rickroll one.
 
oooh, you're right
I forgot about the "art" part
oh, the tag is super broad too
 
definitely
 
I think it has its place when dealing with stuff like constants
aka, generate pi
 
I'd say it often makes sense with generating something from a set of numbers (like primes), too, but I'm never sure with stuff like that :P
 
I'd argue for in that case
 
5:35 PM
What if the result is a number?
 
I use [number][sequence] to find OEIS-style challenges all the time
but maybe introducing [integer] or even [integer-sequence] for that would be better
 
finding a particular element of a sequence is still a challenge IMO
 
But what if they aren't necessarily most logically a sequence? Sure, numbers can always be ordered in some way, but IMO sequence makes more sense for something like Fibonacci numbers rather than, say, palindromic numbers, which aren't constructively related to each other.
 
@NathanMerrill yeah but I think [sequence] is also used for some challenges about dealing with sequences as input, which might be a misuse of the tag and could do with [array-manipulation] instead
 
Also I guess "check if a number has property X" style questions is more what I mean.
 
5:38 PM
@FryAmTheEggman then yeah, that'd be a challenge
 
I've also got a few more retagging projects on my list
I guess now that I'm done with [balanced-string] I could start on the next one
 
@MartinBüttner Which projects?
 
so, going back, what if we removed , and for each of them, either pick the particular field its in, and for problems related to equations, add a tag?
 
@NathanMerrill or [algebra]?
 
do we have a differentiation tag?
 
5:42 PM
I got a great idea! ;P
2
 
@NathanMerrill do we have [calculus]?
 
If we did, would be better
 
yep
only 13 challenges
 
@zyabin101 a few ones I want to add ([color(s)], [polyomino], [compiler]/[transpiler], [interactive]) ... a few I want to reorganise, e.g. I'd like to split [subsequence] into [substring] and [subsequence]. go through music/audio and make sure they're used correctly, maybe introduce specific tags for input or output like we have for graphics. also get rid of some obsolete tags.
 
so, then
well, I'm going to go on a tagging spree with , unless you think I should meta post it
 
5:44 PM
you definitely should
it's our most-used non-challenge type tag
also, when you say "tagging spree" I hope you mean "3 at a time and then wait for 12 hours"
it might be easier to ask SE to burninate the tag and then go through untagged challenges
 
@MartinBüttner no, faster than that, but asking what to do on less-obvious scenarios
 
is a very question-heavy tag. One does not simply want to burninate it.
I think.
 
@NathanMerrill faster than that would just flood the entire front page
 
@MartinBüttner we'd miss some that way (if it has other tags, but not the actual field of math it belongs to)
oh, I didn't think about the front page
 
@zyabin101 one != SE
 
5:49 PM
should I make the post along the lines of "lets burninate the tag with these steps", or have the answers give the steps?
 
maybe make the question something like "that [math] tag is way too broad, should we get rid of it, and if so how can we tag some of the [math] challenges more appropriately?" then put your own opinion and suggested course of action in an answer
 
You know, I hate to say this, but if it ain't broke don't fix it. I really don't see anything wrong with the tag system as is
seems fine to me.
 
it just seems like a fairly useless tag
 
ooooh, we've got an .
 
If we're gonna burninate anything it should be
 
5:54 PM
^
HEY DEES CHALENJ HAZ NUMAHS
 
WARNING: NUMBERS
 
I do think number has a place, but it's current wording is rather bad, I agree. I think if your challenge has to do with properties of numbers it makes sense, and I don't know what other tag to use (except math... :P )
 
@MartinBüttner For a simple test case for the leaper challenge, add some two-square boards on which there is only one solution.
 
@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ I've got two of those, but I can add more if you want.
 
Oh, I didn't see those :P
Ah, under misc.
Higher-leaper boards would be nice
 
5:57 PM
I feel like we already have three general tags to cover most instances of : , and
 
15
Q: The Ideal Question

Cᴏɴᴏʀ O'BʀɪᴇɴWhat makes the ideal question? Perhaps it is merely the abstraction of a profound thought and the initialization of a dream, a hope, a thought, a (… 5,024.2 characters omitted). Therefore, I propose that we find such a factor to quantify questions. I propose also that this factor be called QF, or...

----------------------------^
what would this be?
 
unless we rename that to
 
oh god.. did Science fund Pokemon XY? Ash says the line "Science is so amazing" 3-4 times an episode.
 
^^^ This is probably gonna end up in my Fantastic Epic Songs playlist. :P
 
quartata hates me right now.
 
@El'endiaStarman I have to listen to it now :D
@zyabin101 D: why?
 
6:02 PM
@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ Because he wanted to make something I didn't want D:
 
@zyabin101 I wouldn't quite qualify that as "hate" :P
 
@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ He currently fully ignores me, and I did say sorry but he didn't forgive.
 
oh
:( @quartata
 
What?
 
are you ignoring zyabin?
 
6:04 PM
Isn't that his business?
 
Yes, because I didn't want to keep getting pings from the Unipants room.
 
Oh, I see.
@HelkaHomba Yeah, sorry. It just makes me sad to see others sad. sighs
 
@NathanMerrill I think [arithmetic] and [algebra] are a bit different. to me the former implies that you're just doing a basic calculation of an expression (using basic arithmetic) whereas the latter involves solving equations.
 
^
 
I concur. (not in the mood for ^s today :P)
 
6:06 PM
Hello!
 
Hi!
I'm glad you made your way here ^_^
 
Thanks ^_^
 
Are there any 2x2 magic squares where each number is a square number and all numbers are distinct?
 
I was wishing one day that this place had a chat, before I found out it did. XD
 
6:11 PM
@Xanderhall You're in luck! This is one of the most active chatrooms on the network!
 
@Xanderhall I hope you saw the slogan of this room!
 
@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ Awesome!
 
Oh no, I forgot it is a new one.
 
@flawr I did indeed! XD
 
@El'endiaStarman From what I know about magic squares you can't have a 2x2 one with all distinct values, without any other restrictions? (Haven't watched video)
 
6:12 PM
@Xanderhall The old one was Abandon all work, ye who enter here (almost Dante)
 
@FryAmTheEggman Hmm, is that right? I'll go look that up.
Ah, sure enough. Drat.
 
@flawr Both equally awesome :P
 
@El'endiaStarman I mean, it seems pretty clear: x+y != x+z unless y=z :P
 
3x3 is an unsolved problem, and I had been hoping to base a challenge on it... :P
 
@FryAmTheEggman You don't know javascript.
 
6:14 PM
@MartinBüttner afaik, we've got 1 "solve the algebraic equation"
(technically, 2, but the second is poorly defined and heavily downvoted)
 
Oh lemme fix that for JS: x+y !================ x+z unless y=========z
2
 
@FryAmTheEggman True true, curse my laziness... :P
 
@FryAmTheEggman ouch
 
1
Q: Lets remove [tag:math]!

Nathan MerrillThe math tag is incredibly broad. Its description says: The challenge involves mathematics. Also consider using more specific tags: [number] [number-theory] [arithmetic] [combinatorics] [graphs] [geometry] [field-theory]. After going over the tag, there seem to be three distinct types of ques...

 
0
Q: Why am I getting this error when trying to run code?

LiamI keep getting the error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/liamdocherty/Documents/stage4.py", line 24, in <module> File=open(FileName,'r') FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'Class2_results.csv' in python editor when trying to run my program, why is this? ...

 
6:19 PM
@NewMainPosts 19-second close :)
 
What would ==== do in JS if it was added? Hmm..
 
@El'endiaStarman #parkersquare
 
Check for exact identity.
 
@quartata Probaly deep equal
 
6:20 PM
@Doorknob ROASTE
D
 
^^ For anyone who likes nerf and/or TF2. :P
 
@El'endiaStarman I got scared for a second XD
 
@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ Number of equal sign tells how deep the comparision should go.
 
It would check if the == operators were implemented in the same way for both arguments.
 
"No, no more nerfs!"
 
6:21 PM
Haven’t been here in a while, looks like things have changed? :-p
 
@FryAmTheEggman I think that's basically ===
 
@Sherlock9 "I don't want to name it a Parker square!" ... *gets named Parker square*
 
Jan 14 at 23:50, by feersum
To do an N-level-deep comparison in Javascript, one must use N+3 equals signs.
SAMURAID
 
@El'endiaStarman I want that Parker Square shirt
@quartata double the fun of == operators, checking if types are equal only if they can group the types together. Floats and ints. Lists and tuples. Strings and bytes. That sort of thing
 
I have a quick newbie question for those present. I've tried researching around the site, but I can't quite get the answer I'm looking for. If I have an answer in the same language as someone else that's shorter, should I still post it? Or is it generally considered better form to comment and help improve someone else's answer?
 
6:22 PM
Well what about the ≡≡≡ operator?
 
@flawr I see a new esolang coming up already
 
That's what === does in essence. @Sherlock9
 
@Xanderhall If it's significantly shorter and/or uses a different algorithm, post it. Otherwise, it's more generally accepted to comment with your improvement.
 
@Xanderhall If your answer is close to another answer, I'd comment, but if you use a totally new approach (well I'd probably still comment it) I would say it is acceptable to post as a new answer!
 
Just to note: People like puns in titles of tag-related requests, like countless of SE's burninate requests.
 
6:24 PM
Comparison Operators: ==, ≡≡, ≣≣, ≈≈, ...
 
Hmm...
 
@zyabin101 Here, let me golf that for you: "People like puns".
 
@Timwi Or any combination of them.
I didn't know there was a four-bars sign.
 
Me neither.
 
@quartata Ah, darn. Javascript out thought what I thought would be a horrific mishmash into a slightly sane horrific mishmash
@Xanderhall I do that all the time :D Though I try to help first and if I can think of too many improvements, or a few improvements that would be quite significant, I figure they might warrant a separate answer
 
6:25 PM
@El'endiaStarman ^ Is this correct english? I'm always wondering, as I am very tempted to say this but after a few moments I always resort to neither do I?
 
Me neither is fine.
 
=≡≣≣彡≈~≈
2
Dubstep.
 
Me either is wrong though, as my GF is fond of reminding me.
 
Both me neither and neither do I are fine
 
6:27 PM
@flawr Yes. Hmm. Neither do I is correct, but doesn't flow as well. It may be one of those things that doesn't fit into the usual rules of English. Lemme look it up.
 
@flawr It should be me either. Neither is exclusively used when saying "neither ... nor ..." unless I was taught English wrong :P
 
@Xanderhall Your algorithm doesn't need to be completely new. I've written answers that with only one part that is new (different way to calculate binomial coefficients) and it counted
 
@FryAmTheEggman You also use neither when affirming a negative, so to speak.
I could've also said Nor I.
 
18
A: What is the difference between "me neither" and "me either"?

LaureIn colloquial spoken language some people use me neither in place of neither do I. A- I don't like getting up in the morning. B- Neither do I. /Me neither. In the US some people will also use me either in that case: A- I don't like getting up in the morning. B- Me either. But this...

Me either is wrong.
 
Yes, I'm not only interested in the theoretical rules but also what is deemed acceptable by native englihs speakers=)
 
6:28 PM
Neither do I, and, nor I, is colloquial English from an older time
 
19
Q: Neither do I / Nor do I / Me neither / Me either

SuchiIn this circumstance, which would be the most correct / natural answer? Person 1: I don't eat meat Person 2: Neither do I / Nor do I / Me neither / Me either This says both neither do I and Me neither are often used. But I have also heard / read "me either" and "nor do I" in multiple scenarios....

 
I still use Neither do I
 
@Sherlock9 I have an answer I want to post that essentially takes a current answer formatted as a loop, and compresses it to one operation. Much of the answer is using the same functions, but it's also a little shorter (69-65 bytes)
 
@El'endiaStarman @MorganThrapp @quartata Thank you for answering/links e.t.c.
 
@Sherlock9 Which is why I wanted to ask. It's different, but I don't know if it's different enough.
 
6:31 PM
@flawr No problem. :)
I like those questions, actually, because they make me think about the rules of English that are basically innate for me.
 
@El'endiaStarman They may be innate, but don't let them be inert :D
@Xanderhall What challenge are you planning to post this answer on?
 
32
Q: Choose The Powerball Numbers!

Helka HombaPowerball is an American lottery that has recently gained attention because the current jackpot (as of January 11, 2016) is the largest lotto prize in history, at about $1.5 billion (USD). Powerball players choose 5 distinct numbers from 69 numbered white balls, and 1 one "Powerball" number from...

 
@Xanderhall I think compressing it would work. I usually credit the answer that inspired my solutions
 
@Sherlock9 Alright, thanks for the help. Still trying to figure everything out around here.
 
Good luck and good golfing
 
6:39 PM
user image
3
lol
 
Magnificent :D
 
@orlp Did anyone calculate combinations of 11 characters yet? And what code did you use to calculate combinations of nine characters?
And with that, I shall go. Class in six hours. Goodnight!
 
6:51 PM
in The Upper Room, 1 min ago, by Flimzy
(I love how in English, we repeat a word, with that emphasis, to indicate something is more true. I wonder if other languages do the same thing.)
 
@Sherlock9 night
 
The context was talking about "work work", which is the work that you do that you get paid for, distinct from work that you do for fun or out of personal conviction.
 
@El'endiaStarman My pastor once went to (India?) where something similar happened. He used double negatives for emphasis of the positive, where there it meant the emphasis of the negative, producing interesting results.
 
@El'endiaStarman Like a book book (e.g. to emphasize it is not an e-book)?
 
I know there are a lot of foreign language speakers in here (like, everyone), so I figured I could get answers here.
@flawr Yeah, that'd be another example.
 
6:53 PM
Like, a girlfriend girlfriend
 
long long weDoItInProgrammingToo; :P
 
@Doorknob bool bool?
 
@El'endiaStarman Finnish has that, but it may be just borrowed from English.
 
@flawr Invalid type.
 
@flawr A bool bool is true or false. Just a bool is true, false, or FileNotFound :P
 
6:53 PM
(But good joke.)
 
@Zgarb I think in german it is getting used more and more too, but also just borrowed from english.
 
create Stop as Constructor { ret "thing"; }; Stop It { }
 
@Zgarb I'm actually uncertain how much this is a language-specific feature. Though, given what flawr said, maybe it is.
 
@El'endiaStarman VSauce had a video about this not too long ago. Seems like we use it to distinguish words when the original has become generic. Like, a book book, as opposed to an eBook.
 
^ that's a good way to state it
 
6:55 PM
@TimmyD Right, let us find that!
 
@TimmyD Vsauce? Did I miss that video? I don't particularly remember that.
 
@MartinBüttner Where does codegolf.stackexchange.com/q/78024/26997 fit into the number tag debate?
 
0
Q: A Numpad's Knight Numbers

Helka HombaFor the non-zero digits on a standard numpad 789 456 123 consider placing a chess knight at any digit and moving it around with any number of normal L-shaped jumps, tracing out a positive decimal integer. What positive integers can be expressed in such a way? One of them is 38, since the knig...

 
^ fastest NMP ever
 
6:58 PM
@El'endiaStarman Before I go, I think mentioned that Bahasa Indonesia uses republication for plurals, right?
 
@HelkaHomba Looks fine to me.
 
@Sherlock9 I do remember the Tahu-tahu example, but I don't think I remember you saying that specifically.
@QPaysTaxes You don't make any sense.
 
Interesting challenge
 
Was someone against the number tag? I can't even remember. Meh.
 
6:59 PM
@HelkaHomba it's quite similar to my challenge actually :P
 

« first day (1906 days earlier)      last day (2929 days later) »