@darijgrinberg Can you show me an example? Now, when I click the "flag" button on an answer (for instance this), I only see "spam" / "rude or abusive" / "not an answer" / "in need of mod intervention". I know that long time ago there was also "very low quality", but it seems to have disappeared.

Aha I found it; a 7-day-from-post/edit limit was implemented in 2016.

Which is silly really. A very low quality post (no matter one's definition of "quality") does not magically stop being low quality after 7 days...

@BillDubuque @XanderHenderson @RRL @JoséCarlosSantos: What do you think of this post? I think it is so severely misleading as to be terrible...

@user21820 Yes, it is terrible. I have downvoted it.

D1, D2, D3.

D4, D5, D6.

D7, D8, D9.

D10, D11, D12.

D13, D14, D15.

C1, C2, C3.

C4, C5, C6.

C7, C8, C9.

C10, C11, C12.

C13, C14, C15.

@user21820 now needs a couple delete votes

DA - DD, DG - DL, DO need some votes

not sure anymore @user21820 , but i see one in my own flag list

that was math.stackexchange.com/questions/3430283/…

though it now says "deleted by owner"

same for this math.stackexchange.com/questions/11150/… which has since been undeleted??

@BillDubuque I guess order relations multiply with less negating more ;)

This means there will be far more newbies that will fight the activities of this rooim (and others who try to organize the site)

@samerivertwice I tried to fix that but the time window expired (yet another poor design decision). This chat software if by far the worst I've ever had to suffer.

@BillDubuque if the world was perfect there would be nothing to do

Maybe that's what we're here for

@samerivertwice But on this platform you can't even try to fix it if the masses organize against you. And now the masses will have much more global power.

@BillDubuque what idiot thought democray was a good idea?

@samerivertwice The idiot that never dreamed how a "smart" phone could empower "idiots"

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-latin answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (50): solution on the time domain becomes "periodic" after the inverse fourier transform by user724947 on math.SE

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-latin answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (50): Error bound for a PDE with a perturbation term by user724947 on math.SE

@Jack I'm sure some probably do, although they're reluctant so far to explain how, sadly. My policy is never to downvote without an explanatory comment. But I udnerstand how people needing to cover a lot of ground don't have time to comment everywhere. More to the point, I think the question would reveal significantly more merit than is apparent on a cursory look, to anyone thinking about it in a little more depth.

@Jack I have convergence, I can define the open sets but I can't define a metric that achieves the same. I can see that my proposed metric fails symmetry although I can fix that by adding a $\min\{ d(x,y),d(y,x)\}$ or a $\max\{ d(x,y),d(y,x)\}$ but that seems like a cheat somehow. I'm just not experienced enough to confidently know what's a good approach.

@MartinR did you come to see who's calling who an idiot :)