« first day (1852 days earlier)      last day (1530 days later) » 

11:49 AM
On 26 January, I flagged a question to draw moderator attention to a user on an editing spree. On 4 February, I flagged two questions to note two other users on editing sprees. All three flags are still pending. Do I deduce from this that moderators are not bothered by users editing dozens of old questions in a matter of a few minutes, pushing new questions off the front page, and would rather I stop flagging such events?
 
 
4 hours later…
3:41 PM
@GerryMyerson Martin Sleziak said that moderator quid said that s\he might be less available in the next few days. Of course there are other 8 moderators but maybe the one in charge to address that specific flags was quid, idk:)
btw, on 8th February I flagged a comment on meta and still pending.
 
4:36 PM
@GerryMyerson As I mentioned previously, these days have been somewhat unusual for the team. (See here.) If more transparency would help, I am moving for another country for about a year in 18/02 and received my visa only two days ago after a lot of back and forth, and I've had a health issue discovered in my family. (I'd appreciate if more transparency is not needed regarding this.)
As a result, I've been handling mostly simple and straightforward flags (such as too many comments, or simple merges, too many edits, rude comments etc). As I mentioned, I'd say that by the end of the month (when I'd expect to be settled down) I'll be able to help clearing the pending flags.
The others in the team also don't seem to be very available. So I'd ask for a little patience in the following days, but please keep flagging.
 
5:02 PM
@AloizioMacedo Oops, I think I just missed you (you just left!). I flagged a post written by a fifth grader, concerned about the "age requirement" for participation on SE, flagged the post for mod attention, but also recommended the student check out AoPS, as an alternative. But I don't know if in the past year, the SE network has become "lax" about ages of users. But I believe there this exists a "legal issue" about a users capacity to "consent" to terms of use.
Anyway, you can check out my flag when convenient for you.
Also, any other mod (@quid, e.g.) can weigh in too.
 
5:39 PM
If there is a moderator, or an informed user who frequents the review queues, I've noticed a recent(?) change in that the count-keeper in each review--queue does not update unless I refresh the queue. In the past, Upon a reveiw, I'd immediately see an uptick in the total-reviews-counter for the particular queue. Not a huge deal, but I lose track of my votes/actions unless I regularly refresh each queue after acting on it.
@JoséCarlosSantos, please see my comment immediately above. Have you noticed any change in the behavior of action-counts in each review queue?
 
5:59 PM
@amWhy Yes, I noticed it. But it also happens with other StackExchange sites, not just this one. Also, read this post.
 
@JoséCarlosSantos Thanks for the info!, @JoséCarlosSantos! It's always good to know "it's not just me" and/or "it's not just math.se!"
 
 
3 hours later…
9:16 PM
Aloizio, thanks. I'll keep flagging (as needed).
 

« first day (1852 days earlier)      last day (1530 days later) »