@McNets Not trying to say anything, just would like to point out that the other person originally submitted their post a few days before you (2014-04-30 vs 2014-05-04). It might be tricky to prove your ownership because of that
@TomV-TeamMonica Yes, that's what I thought too. Jmagnet's post is from May 4, 2014, ilemberg's is said to be from 2014-05-23 but first published 2014-04-30
Could be related to the fact the link in McNets's post is broken. Maybe something happened and some part of the content was lost, and when they tried restoring references they didn't manage restore everything correctly. They might even be aware of that and ready to accept ownership claims. Pure speculation, of course, but it's possible.
Not dumb. Overthought, maybe. Very straightforward and clear, though (to me anyway). The kind where taking a fresh look at it helps you to see quickly what can be improved without thinking too long what it's about in the first place.