A one instruction set computer (OISC), sometimes called an ultimate reduced instruction set computer (URISC), is an abstract machine that uses only one instruction – obviating the need for a machine language opcode. With a judicious choice for the single instruction and given infinite resources, an OISC is capable of being a universal computer in the same manner as traditional computers that have multiple instructions. OISCs have been recommended as aids in teaching computer architecture and have been used as computational models in structural computing research.
== Machine architecture ==
In a...
I have this scenario, it looks like MySQL is taking the largest decimal value and tries to cast the other values to that.
The problem is that this query is generated by an external library, so I don't have control over this code, at this level at least.
Do you have some idea how to fix this?
...
You must be reading something else or I don't understand. The quoted paragraph refers only to the behaviour of distinct (UNION vs UNION DISTINCT vs UNION ALL) and has nothing to do with data types or casting. — ypercubeᵀᴹ37 secs ago
@EvanCarroll yeah, using "types" is confusing. They just say (in a very weird way) that in SELECT .. UNION ALL ... UNION ALL ...UNION (DISTINCT) SELECT ..;, all UNIONs are treated as UNION DISTINCT.
@McNets To me it looks like when you have a fairly large integer and a decimal following it, the resulting decimal(x,y) type is chosen in such a way that x is the length of the largest integer literal and y is the scale of the decimal literal that follows. But the type should actually be decimal(x+y,y).
@PaulWhite Yep, I had the same issue. It's either a server audit or an unaknowledged bug. We decided to roll back the CU as we didn't have a server audit running
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it should have been posted on serverfault.com: Server Fault is a question and answer site for managing information technology systems in a business environment. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about server, networking, or related infrastructure administration. — hot2useyesterday
The question is already reposted on ServerFault a few days later:)
I acquired a Cisco c240 M4 with twenty-four (24) 800 GB SATA SSD. I requested the engineers configure the disks in two separate RAID 10 arrays (18 + 4), plus with a hot spare for each. The LSI MegaRAID Storage Manager was installed and I used it to review the settings, and came across the followi...
@Vatev yes maybe, but that's you being lazy creating unnecessary work for moderators. Ask your question on one site, if it doesn't get answers delete and repost elsewhere. Migrating and merging is a pain. Have you considered accounts that don't exist on both sites for example? — Tom V15 secs ago
@MaxVernon Not a dumb question at all. Thanks for the edit on the logs, I didn't know those existed. I'll see if they have anything in them later today =)
I don't think "you know that", and I mean it respectfully. "It" isn't prioritizing anything, it isn't choosing that "Email" is a better match than "Address"....you asked for a string that contains the string "Address" anywhere", and that's exactly what you got, nothing to do with the string "Email" — Lamak45 secs ago
> I was looking for %Address% but it brought back Email_Address ,that means it thought that I was looking for %Email% not %Address% , why did it make that decision ?
,I was looking for %Address% but it brought back Email_Address ,that means it thought that I was looking for %Email% not %Address% , why did it make that decision ?What was the mechanism behind it ?I want to know so next time I can search for Address and not get back Email_address ,because an address and an Email_address are different things — Lucy26 mins ago
@MaxVernon Just considering it since somebody gave the idea ,I still want to stick with like and your answer which was deleted earlier on where you had something like this select * from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS IC where ic.COLUMN_NAME like '%Address%' AND NOT (ic.COLUMN_NAME LIKE 'Email%') — Lucy8 mins ago
Based off of como evitar que pgadmin III se desconecte de postgresql cada 15 minutos aproximadamente?
Would you vote to close? Ask to be translated? Let it stay?