@AndyD273 In my opinion, even more interesting than possible life extensions of LEO satellites (which are pretty near-term possibilities), if you can manage to get an air-breathing thruster with an exhaust velocity higher than about 7.8 km/s (LEO orbital velocity), you can actually configure your satellite to gain air, and store it as fuel for other missions. It's basically ISRU right in LEO.
@Gryphon Definite possibility. I guess the problems there would be the excess drag from gathering air, and the hurdles to get it compressed and into tanks. Maybe can use the thruster mechanism to get a high enough pressure for a compressor to be able to function.
@AndyD273 The idea would be to make all the drag from gathering air (e.g., all air producing drag is gathered), probably by using some kind of scoop to cover the entire prograde side of the satellite. At the point where you're gaining air, you actually want to increase drag produced by the scoop, because more drag = a higher rate of fuel collection. I will agree that compression and storage may be a little tricky at such low pressures.
@Gryphon Maybe have the scoop be like a flower, so that it can open and close. Then you can have it be aerodynamic when you want, and have the maximum amount of collection area when you want that.
@AndyD273 That would be an option, and the scoop would have to be foldable to get it in a rocket to launch it anyway, but I don't see a major reason to make it aerodynamic, other than possibly to reduce wear-and-tear on the thruster mechanism and other components.
@Gryphon Well, if you don't want to be thrusting continuously, and are able to get the tanks full, then you can maximize the boost by reducing drag when not collecting/thrusting. Either way, being able to widen and narrow the collection aperture would be one way to throttle thrust.
@AndyD273 That's true. I suppose there's no reason to continue thrusting after the tanks are full (besides the occasional boost to maintain orbit), so it'd be a good idea to be able to minimize thruster wear-and-tear. Especially since Oxygen, which is a fair proportion of the atmosphere, is really nasty on thrusters.
TBH, if something in here is starred, you can fairly safely assume it's either a joke or unintentionally funny (or possibly a post of something from outside the room).
@Hosch250 You never know. The joke I heard was that a spoiler adds 50hp, and a racing stripe adds 20hp, or something like that. Maybe their car is just cosplaying?
@Gryphon I'm torn between "Satellites don't die. They simply burn away..." and "You'd be lucky to smack into the ground. Either way, you're going to be going pretty fast right up to the last second."
Some people might immediately think this is a duplicate of A Promotion for the Community Promotion Ads, but i assure you it is not. That question was simply a promotion; my question is about making a promotion, which requires vastly different information.
The point is, I have an ad idea for enco...
In other words, there are two ways of killing heretics? One is by tying them up so they can't run when you burn them. The other is letting them try to escape and chasing them until they run so hard they spontaneously combust.
After I reached the net worth of Steve Jobs in collateral damage, during my most recent battle, the rest of the world decided to suppress me for obvious reasons. My only request was a small land, the size of the Pentagon, where I'd spend the rest of eternity slurping tea with Glarnak. Yeah, I was...
@Mephistopheles It's actually a Portal reference. The Aperture Science Enrichment Facility is a giant building/space where the rooms are created, reconfigured, and taken apart on the fly as needed.
@AndyD273 Yeah, that, but with less space and somewhere out in Siberia. Essentially a hybrid between a labor camp and the playground of an autistic god.
Huh, and that kind of makes me picture the facility from Cabin in the Woods, with thousands of modules that can be moved around, except instead of cages they could be whole rooms, reconfigured at will.
Well, to me, if it was a work of fiction, it's still as valid a source of inspiration as other fiction books. And if it's not a work of fiction, it's an even better source of inspiration.
But yeah, if you want quotes for war games, it has some really good ones.
FWIW, that's not that much rape compared to other books of old-testament times. I can think of 3 cases off-hand (Dinah, Bathsheba, and Tamar). And inbreeding is the rule of the day for small tribes.
Because there's nobody else to breed with.
I mean, inbreeding is a (sometimes serious) problem in small US towns too.
When I drove through farm country ND last June, there'd be a town of maybe 20 people. Then 10-20 miles farther, another town of maybe 20 people. Or maybe 5. Not more than 50, and probably not more than 25. It was like that for over 200 miles.
There weren't any facilities. No restaurants, no gas stations, no hotels.
@StephenG One, two, Freddie's coming for you. Three, four, better lock the door. Five, six, grab your crucifix. Seven, eight, gonna stay up late. Nine, ten, never sleep again. — VLAZ6 mins ago
@Mephistopheles Did not read any of them. I assume "none of them are really applicable for a dragon." Typically for trying to research real life to apply to non-real things you have to consume multiple sources and multiple takes to expand your knowledge to make an educated guess.
If you're building a fictional bronze age military, it's not enough, normally, to research a single bronze age military from a single source. I find a few bronze age militaries, and find a few sources on each (a couple websites, a documentary, something else) and consume all of that and then think on what I read/watched/listened to.
@Mephistopheles Largest known (long since extinct) flying animal was the Quetzalcoatlus. To quote Wikipedia:
"Weight estimates for giant azhdarchids are extremely problematic because no existing species share a similar size or body plan, and in consequence, published results vary widely.[4] Generalized weight, based on some studies that have historically found extremely low weight estimates for Quetzalcoatlus, was as low as 70 kg (150 lb) for a 10 m (32 ft 10 in) individual. A majority of estimates published since the 2000s have been substantially higher, around 200–250 kg (440–550 lb)."
@Hosch250 Welcome to quantum physics. We hope you enjoy your stay until you suddenly teleport somewhere else. You can forget about normal physics concepts like laws of motion for now, you won't be needing them here.
You left out the next word, which is a compound word that answers the question:
ויהי בימי אחש-וראש
And it will be in the days that I get a headache
(the ב רפה got mixed up for a ו, as the עיטור (quoted in בית יוסף אבן העזר לד) explains can happen sometimes)
So, when the author of the...