1:17 PM
@MonicaCellio The following was composed outside of chat; it is a bit long.
@MonicaCellio The paragraph you added at the start of the "Content" section makes clear one problem that I am not entirely certain how to address: the proper combination of flowing text with list points. I like the content, and having a brief introductory paragraph for each of the three "aspect" sections may be appropriate; but, as it stands, the move to list format is excessively jarring.
The completeness statement added to the "relevant quotes" point is good, but since such is a more general point, it should probably be the primary bullet point (perhaps ideally with "relevant quotes" being one of several subpoints). Such would require a rewording of that sentence ("should" to "do") and of the "relevant quotes" sentence.
Including the "recommending books" subpoint in its parent point's text is appropriate as long as further subpoints are not found (a list of one entry is not a list).
The merging of the "additional resources" point into the "sufficient" point is good, but I plan to edit that last sentence moving "such complex questions" to the beginning.
The moving of the editing portion--and substantial expansion of the content--seem good. The appropriate tone of the subject (more counsel/encouragement than commands--not that the bullet points are absolute commands or exclude advice on application) fits the format. However, it revisits the issue of how flowing text and lists should work together for artistic excellence.
It might be appropriate for counsel (flowing text) and commands (lists) to be separated at the top level rather than at the section level. This would involve fewer (jarring) transitions. Placing the counsel at the end would have the advantage of first giving the "Law" and then giving the "Commentary" (and avoids the need to substantially rephrase the introduction).
However, as the length of the text portion grows, section headers might be needed for it as well, making the list sections less distinct. (Using a h1 header over the entire "Commentary" portion might properly separate the two parts of the answer and allow subsection headers to be used without disorientation.) OTOH, there is an attraction to having a summary/commentary at the end of each section.
As an initial guess, based on your text additions, it seems most appropriate to have a very short text piece at the start of each section and an extensive text at the end of each section. I am not entirely comfortable with this organization since the text content seems likely to have overlap and non-obvious assignment. A unified text could avoid repetition and would be more friendly to a less structured organization than lists.
Concerning additional content, a "provide examples" bullet point seems appropriate, but I am not certain whether such belongs under "Content" (it is adding content) or "Style" (it is a method of explanation). There should probably also be a point about not using a signature (I suspect there is also an answer-equivalent to the "Thanks in advance" of questions which should be avoided).
Since all SE sites could benefit from "What makes a good answer?" advice and a large portion of that advice is about writing, it would be right and proper for the answer for the Writers SE to be a worthy resource for other SE sites. The joy of excellence in your (plural) calling awaits.