« first day (5209 days earlier)      last day (21 days later) » 

00:32
So... I recently got a clamp meter and found it odd that it did not have a user-replaceable cartridge fuse... turns out it uses two Polyfuses instead. That's the first DMM I've had that uses PPTCs rather than fuses for input protection.
(alongside a couple of MOVs)
Mind you, this is not a no-name product. It's a Klein Tools CL390, and it has an Intertek ETL Listed mark (which I've confirmed to be valid).
The meter is rated at CAT III 600V.
So why the Polyfuses?
00:56
The green round parts near the input terminals are the Polyfuses.
And from looking at the PCB traces... they're in series. I don't get why one would put two Polyfuses in series.
01:18
@bwDraco can you post a part number for said Polyfuses?
on a different note, should I expect AVRs to be around for the long haul? (i.e. the next few decades vs. going away with a big "poof" sound in the near future)
got a concept for a microcontroller-involving project, and the lead candidates for the uC are an AVR part and a LPC800 Cortex-M0+
01:38
@Shalvenay The markings are really hard to read. Give me a few moments...
01:48
...okay, it's WMZ12A-75HV.
That is a PTC thermistor, not a Polyfuse.
🤔
02:22
@Shalvenay lol @ "big 'poof' sound"
@bwDraco well, Polyfuses are a kind of PTC thermistor :P
Yeah. But I still find the choice of part odd.
@bwDraco that said, I figured out why there's no fuse. it's because it's a clampmeter and thus doesn't have a current shunt for a fuse to protect to begin with
(i.e. there's no current input jack feeding a shunt, all the current ranges work off the clamp save for perhaps a uA/low mA range)\
It does has a microamp range.
But even then, I'm used to seeing a small low-current cartridge fuse rather than a PTC as input protection on a DMM.
(and possibly a separate high-current fuse if there's a high-amperage range)
Also, why two PTCs in series?
 
1 hour later…
03:55
@bwDraco voltage rating maybe? that's all I can think of
 
4 hours later…
07:41
@Shalvenay AVR is already very old and outdated, from the 1990s. It's already been around for those decades and is long overdue for it's "poof". There's not really a single argument why you would ever use it professionally in 2025. There was no reasons to ever use it back in 2015 either. In 2005 it would have been considered.
 
4 hours later…
11:58
I wouldn't automatically dismiss AVR as obsolete. 8-bit MCUs tend to be more tolerant of extreme temperatures and can operate at wider voltage ranges.
 
3 hours later…
14:49
One way fuses have no advantage over polyfuses with similar voltage rating imo
(hot take possibly ;))
 
1 hour later…
16:09
@tobalt One-way fuses can open faster than polyfuses. There are also different flavors of one-way fuses: fast- and slow-blow.
One way fuses [particularly in DMMs] have the secondary function as "You screwed up!" indicators.
 
3 hours later…
19:22
@Shalvenay I wrote this blurb about MCU family selection. That was 12 years ago, and things have changed (mainly for the better). I still think that a lot of that holds.
I can ask you the proverbial "20 questions" about your project, which might help decide between AVR and LPC.
19:35
Are you already familiar with the firmware development environment for AVR or for LPC? Or are you equally new to both?
Is your project going to become a commercial product? Or a serious one-off instrument (for 3rd party use, not just for your own use)? Or is it a hobby project?
If product, then what quantities [approx] are you planning to produce? How long are you planning to manufacture it?
For example, consumer items are usually manufactured for a couple of years, medical electronics – 10 years.
How many people will be on the project? Are you the one who's going to maintain it long term [if there's long term]?

« first day (5209 days earlier)      last day (21 days later) »