I have an 18650 dead battery with 0.9V i revived that battery with small amount of current 50mA and now the battery is normal. I've done full charge/discharge test and the capacity is 2300mAh. Does that mean the battery is now safe to use ?
I periodically checked the battery to see if it's hot but it seems normal. It holded a charge for about a week now. Currently i'm charging it with 0.5A and it seems normal
does it mean that it fully revived ? it has a good capacity for a dead battery 2300mAh ?
but if it's too dangerous i will throw it away because it will not worth the trouble
At Fig. 26 from this page,
what can I use instead of a thyratron?
I have looked at thyristors and SCR's but the rest of the circuit will have 20kV in it.
I will find out values of capacitors and inductors if there is something to replace this with.
@Jon I had a system that could do exactly that, about 3mm accuracy for about 4 feet. I used three ultrasonic transmitters and one receiver. I can send you the schematics if you want, it's a bit overcomplicated but you might be able to implement it on an arduino with a custom board. IR might be the way to go if you want a simple solution.
@pjc50 With newbies you mean someone who keeps asking severly limited questions about the same goal without taking any of the hints given in previous posts and just generally letting question quality and content to deteriorate rather than learn till the point comes you need to edit a whole rant out of the question before you can link it as an argument to your statement?
Don't get me wrong, some people here - who don't come into this chat - are much to direct and strict when it comes to new people.
Nah, it's just for getting some running better quickly, I started shopping for some WiFi micro modules to put out for some measurements, given the time, I aim for having proper Christmas outdoor solar lighting next year
@PlasmaHH To be totally honest, if I wasn't often here and didn't know the atmosphere, I'd interpret "the request to use their goddamn mind" to be bloody hostile.
I wonder in what year we have to recategorize idiocracy as a documentary
anyways...
without a 1kW/m² light source, whats the next best way to figure out the nominal voltage of a given solar panel? would like to replace that one with a proper one that won't risk to kill the micro...
And then there are even PLC simulation programs with 3d models of the whole system (where I worked 15 years ago they had something like that and simulated the luggage distribution system of some big chinese airport)
the a380 segment thing had like almost 20 3-axis robotic arms, euqal amount of load sensors and hundreds of other sensors and simple actuators... all using S7 stuff to control and talk to them
I don't know, the spanish guys were involved in the setup, I only had to interface it. We wrote the software that did the measurements with laser trackers and generated the information how the machines would have to move the arms (as nc files)
the gui was done in wincc (and talked to our system via tcp/ip, a concept that was entirely new to the siemens guys back then, they opened one tcp connection in each direction instead of using one bidirectionally)
they basically bought our xml rpc module for wincc and developed it as their network protocol
anyways, with c++ and boost.units you have zero runtime overhead (exactly the same assembly generated) and can just configure your types by multiplying SI base unit exponents together
@JohanLarsson at our university, those people that were comfortable with functional programming and for which it felt intuitive was teeny tiny, compared to those that found object oriented and/or imperative/structured programming the way they can best work with
@pingOfDoom Does it matter if the output impedance of whatever feeding your amp is high or low? does it matter if the input impedance of whatever yoru amplifier feeds is high or low?
@JohanLarsson it has some advantages, but unless you are really good in that way of thinking you often run into problems that you can only solve by completely redesigning
not to talk about that doing I/O is a hell of a hack in most languages
I went through asteroids in haskell, I could not even understand it after a full bottle of whiskey
@PlasmaHH There are Lisps that compile to as efficient of machine code as GCC. Not that Lisp is a strictly functional language or that GCC is the ultimate in compiler efficiency.
But better than you'll get from an interpreted or byte-coded language