9:18 AM
You're citing the Roosevelt Corollary, which post-dates the Monroe Doctrine by eight decades and is firmly not part of 19th century history. Secondly, that does not address my point at all. Roosevelt was claiming for the US policing powers over American nations, not advocating for America to go to war against European powers in the Americas.
Why did not anybody answer "hey, take a look at MD itself". It would be enough to cite "... that the American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers (...) With the existing colonies or dependencies of any European power we have not interfered and shall not interfere."
The discussion demonstrated that perpetual bonds can achieve profitability for the state under certain conditions
9:38 AM
What was unclear in this question history.stackexchange.com/q/21475/2395 that required 8 comments to explain what I mean?
9:48 AM
I wrote it in the comment: how did the visits look like? "This is His Majesty Louis the XIV, King of France, and this is His Majesty, Charles II, also a King of France". This was a problem for the French if republican diplomats demanded to stop it. So why wasn't it a problem for Louis XIV and it was for Robespierre?
9:58 AM
I'm sorry - English is not my first language and I need to say some things using more words than necessary, as I sometimes feel I don't have a word. So, from the beginning, in my opinion the question is clear: did anybody demand from England to abandon the title King of France?. Then there was a comment that it was ceremonial, and I can't believe (i said why).
...because if I do not discuss the matter, there will be someone who says "what was your effort?" These questions are connected to one another, the main question is in its title, these are only hmmm... hints what I do expect in an answer, that when I ask "was Hitler the best chancellor of Germany?" I know that he was a chancellor, that he was a chancellor in Germany, and I know that he started ww2.
The same is here. I want to show that I made some research. I know that English used the title "king of France" and I know that it is ceremonial because he was not real king of France. I showed that: yes, I found: some French had problems with it.
The sub-questions are to give advice, what I do not understand. I was thinking about my problem and these questions arose. But all of them are related. I say "had France problems with England?", I explain why I think it can have problems, I show I found that they had a problem but they stated it after 300 years.
But maybe the research was not complete, and I'm wrong: France had problems and demanded it from England, but something happened that England did not agree?
Or again I am wrong and when the English said "this is king of England and France" the French only laughed?
« first day (1351 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (3244 days later) »