« first day (1910 days earlier)      last day (3268 days later) » 

22:00
The only real annoyance I've had in practice with that is having to copy data byte-by-byte when I could have just cast a pointer
@MickLH my desires are unconventional
@AviD NO.
we do not speak of that
@Ohnana he started
"ah, his methods - supernatural."
better?
@MickLH as long as it' not a null pointer :P
and the circle is complete :)
your circle is complete.
22:06
3 hours ago, by CodesInChaos
Including the famous billion-dollar-mistake.
@MickLH not with all algorithms and all sets of functions, you can't. All primitive recursive functions are total, but that doesn't describe the set of all computational algorithms modelled by (say) a Turing machine.
Following that train of thought far enough leads to the Halting problem.
@diagprov I have no need for the set of all algorithms
not to mention everything happening outside of your code - okay you're not using a higher level language / compiler / framework / libraries, but you still have the OS to deal with.
@diagprov and only AV companies can solve that.
@AviD by ensuring that your programs will never halt because the AV hogs all the resources?
3
@Gilles I suppose that's one way.
22:09
@AviD If the application doesn't need an OS, I avoid using one. I haven't had to use an RTOS yet but if that's what it takes then I would.
What are you donuts on about?
@Simon cocky devs
@Simon Donuts. Glazed donuts.
with filling.
@TildalWave Someone's being a cocky dev here or cocky devs in general?
@MickLH My favorite thing to do is this: create code without writing comments at all. Make sure everything is named appropriately. After that, go back and write comments and justify what you're doing... more often than not, you might find a mistake in your approach, or a bug... and you can fix it easier. It also helps justify what you're trying to do. Sometimes, you may even find that your design approach is incorrect... if you're programming without designing first, that is. I'm weird.
22:11
@MarkBuffalo started it!
@Simon read up
@TildalWave Meh.
I like my stuff being maintainable by others
in case I get hit by a bus
@AviD and some random guy on the stackexchange podcast talking about LLVM IR ages ago.
BTW if any of you aren't following (cc @Simon):
In theoretical computer science, correctness of an algorithm is asserted when it is said that the algorithm is correct with respect to a specification. Functional correctness refers to the input-output behaviour of the algorithm (i.e., for each input it produces the expected output). A distinction is made between total correctness, which additionally requires that the algorithm terminates, and partial correctness, which simply requires that if an answer is returned it will be correct. Since there is no general solution to the halting problem, a total correctness assertion may lie much deeper. A...
not the best page but it has links to better ones and it gives a broad overview
22:30
I literally can't read anything longer than 10 words right now.
What did I just type? Too long to be read.
@Simon s/right now//
s/avid/assholejerkanus
lol
@Simon You've just discovered self-referential sentences, am I allowed to talk about Godel?
@diagprov I already know everything about Godel, he's an American dude that I used to play RuneScape with.
He was into anime.
22:34
@Simon Oh good ok you know him already. Coolio.
Yeah son.
@Simon hello....ey
allo
@diagprov well aren't you a maths geek :) you're missing an umlaut tho... or, even better a $\ddot$
@TildalWave I know :( my keyboard is configured to Swiss French and I can't work out how to make it do an umlaut with the e :)
22:48
anyway, I'm not sure that provable logic works on infinite-state donuts
I will do a Simon... Godül
@diagprov Compose " e
on my layout I do Alt Gr + - + e
or s/e/[a|o|u]
ö thanks @Gilles !
Had to turn on my compose key though
BTW you need ö anyway :)
22:52
:(
and for Erdős it's Compose = o in the default X11 compose map
Meateor™ 1 Meateor™
Large 13.5"
BBQ Stuffed Crust
Chick 'n' Mix Box 1 Chick 'n' Mix Box
7 Chicken Kickers™ 1 7 Chicken Kickers™
Twisted Dough Balls™ - Pepperoni 1 Twisted Dough Balls™ - Pepperoni
Create Your Own 1 Create Your Own
bow before me mortals
meh I had beer brats for dinner, not jelly at all
-1
Q: ANOMALY NETWORK TRAFFIC DETECTION

ENASI NEED A HELP I WANT TO Design intrusion detection system FOR PROTECT NETWORK I USED SNORT WITH IDS AND FIREWALL TO DETECTS ATTACKS BUT I NEED INTELLIGENT ALGORITHMS TO USED IN SNORT PLEAS ANYONE CAN HELP ME ?? :(

unclear what you're shouting?
why is he shouting this question
23:06
so it reverberates even in a vacuum
VTC'd as unclear for shouting
@TildalWave I'd love to understand how these people go about asking questions and why the random case change in there
was it to much of an edit?
I mean, if you're going to use all upper case, why not just do it for everything?
23:09
it looks like he typed it and held shift to type the things he wanted in capitols
while caplocks was on
It's basically too broad
I tried to help :( but obviously i cannot just assume what he wants to know so kept it with the same meaning but wrote it a tiny bit better
yeah, too broad, unclear ... similar beasts, both close reasons should do
half of these questions are trolling me for information. that's what my tinfoil says
(I'm not serious)
one says "add detail", another "narrow it down", both boil to "please expand"
23:13
@TildalWave What it boils down to, is usually what I ask my enemies to do... until they burst.
oh @MarkBuffalo you're so steampunk :)
@RоryMcCune I was also a bit confused by this... MS-SQL Server you say?, On Linux you say?
:]
@diagprov it's awesome, though
It'll probably be a lot faster too... I say this because I'm a Linux fanboy and hate microsoft by default, and am incapable of non-group-think.
and the VS/Eclipse thing.
lol
Wait, what? VS/Eclipse? Where???
I remember hearing about this, but wasn't sure if it was completed
man where is my pizza
this manatee hungry fool
@MarkBuffalo they should have announced the SQL server thing on April 1st.
@diagprov genius.... no one would know what to think

« first day (1910 days earlier)      last day (3268 days later) »